Royals Extend Salvador Perez Into 2027

Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images

Just think how wrong it would’ve felt. Two years from now, watching Salvador Perez, who signed with the Royals as a 16-year-old in 2006, squatting behind the plate in Miami blue. Salvador Perez, who put the “everyday” in “Kansas City Royals everyday catcher” starting in 2012, launching dingers through the thin mountain air in Rockies purple. It’s enough to make you cry, but luckily, this dystopian future has been avoided. According to Anne Rogers of MLB.com, the 35-year-old backstop has signed an two-year extension that will keep in him in Royals Blue through the 2027 season. It’s better this way. The deal is for $25 million, with some deferrals and a $7 million signing bonus.

To be clear, Perez wasn’t at risk of leaving anytime soon. His previous four-year, $82 million deal that started in 2022 had a $13.5 million option for 2026, and general manager J.J. Picollo told reporters in September that the catcher would be returning one way or another. Anthony Franco of MLB Trade Rumors explained the reasons for the deal: “While the specific salary structure and deferrals have yet to be reported, it stands to reason [the Royals will] negotiate a lower ’26 salary than the option value while giving Perez the security of the second guaranteed year.” So it’s the classic extension trade-off. The Royals get a discount and Perez gets an extra year of job security. It also allows him to avoid free agency amid whatever shenanigans occur when the collective bargaining agreement expires after the 2026 season.

That extra year is a big one in terms of increasing the likelihood that Perez retires as a lifelong Royal. One day in the not-too-distant future, we’ll endure a knock-down-drag-out battle about Perez’s worthiness for enshrinement in the Hall of Fame, and we’ll be lucky to live through it. In the meantime, he’s improved his shot at wading into the fray wielding single-team bona fides. As for why the Royals would feel the need to get out in front of things and lock down the age-37 season of a catcher who has exceeded 0.8 WAR just once in the past four years, well, it makes more sense than you think.

Let’s start with the reasons to be skeptical and then we’ll end with the reasons the move makes sense. In terms of pure power, Perez is one of the greatest catchers of all time. His 303 career home runs rank eighth on the all-time catchers list right now, and he looks likely to vault into fifth place in 2026. He needs just 22 homers to do so, and the last time he didn’t hit at least 20 home runs in a season was 2014 (aside from 2020, when his 11 translated to 26 over a full season). He launched 30 in 2025, his highest total since 2021, when he set the now-broken single-season catcher record with 48. Could he blast another 30 home runs? Of course he could. He hits the ball as hard as ever. In fact, he just hit the hardest ball of his entire career this May and ran his highest 90th-percentile exit velocity since 2021. But his overall offensive profile is a different story.

Thanks to one of the highest chase rates the game has ever seen, Perez has offset nearly all of that power with disastrously low walk rates and on-base percentages. Among the 717 players in our database with at least 6,000 career PAs, his 3.9% walk rate ranks 711th and his on-base percentage ranks 694th. As a result, he owns a career 103 wRC+. The 2025 season provided a great example of his combination of strengths and weaknesses. He put up the lowest BABIP of his career and his third-highest xwOBA since Statcast started measuring the stat in 2015, which balanced out to a 95 wRC+. Perez has run a DRC+ of at least 100 in every season but one stretching back to 2017, but as one of the slowest and least patient players in the game, he’s always going to be susceptible to the BABIP bug. Steamer sees him posting a 100 wRC+ next year, which presumably means it sees him a bit below that the following year. He could easily put up anything from the 87 wRC+ he ran in 2023 to the 117 he had in 2024. Then again, if the aging curve drops his contact rate even further, watch out. Things could get really ugly really fast.

Perez led baseball in games caught three times and exceeded 100 games in six different seasons, but that was a different time. He has caught just over 90 games in each of the past three seasons, splitting the rest of his time between first base and designated hitter. His defense has graded out poorly at catcher and average at first. It goes without saying that any competitive team should want more than a league-average bat from both first base and DH, especially when much of that value is frittered away because of some of the worst baserunning value in the game. So that’s all the bad stuff.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Now we end on the high note. Why should the Royals want Perez around for the 2027 season? There’s all of the legacy-burnishing stuff that we mentioned earlier. There’s the fact that regardless of the defensive woes, it’s hard to turn up your nose at a guy who’s got a good chance at blasting 30 homers out of Kauffman Stadium, especially when you’ve got an iffy DH situation. Lastly, we’ve got the fact that Perez is a leader, a fan favorite, and a Robert Clemente Award winner, possessing the kind of intangibles that have caused the Royals to overlook mediocre WAR totals for years now. All those skills are relevant because it’s starting to look like Perez could be the bridge to the next era of Kansas City catching.

The Royals traded backup catcher Freddy Fermin to San Diego at the deadline, and they did so at least in part because Carter Jensen started to make him look superfluous. Jensen was the team’s third-round pick in 2021, a local kid out of Park Hill Senior High School in Kansas City. He ran a 130 wRC+ between High-A and Double-A in 2024, then followed it up with a 136 between Double-A and Triple-A in 2025. The Royals called him up in September, and over 18 games, he had a 159 wRC+ thanks to monster exit velocity numbers that didn’t look all that different from the ones he posted in a larger sample at Triple-A.

It seems safe to assume that Jensen isn’t going to keep putting up Cal Raleigh numbers next year. Steamer projects him for a 104 wRC+. Moreover, when Eric Longenhagen ranked Jensen second in the organization behind Jac Caglianone back in May, he wrote that the 22-year-old still had a lot to figure out, both at the plate and behind it: “The physical tools are the reason to stay on Jensen even as he trudges the long development path of a high school catcher.” But given his early success and the Fermin trade, it certainly looks like the Royals are ready to push Jensen along the path at a faster pace. It’s hard to imagine a better guide over the next two years than Perez. He’s Kansas City’s last link to the 2015 championship team and one of the most venerated veterans in the game. His spot in franchise history is already secure, and there’s no way of knowing how long he plans on catching, but helping to groom the next franchise catcher could be a cherry on top of an already remarkable career.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SenorGato
8 months ago

As a fan all I see is age, extension, and non-min salary. Man does that piss me off for its inefficiency. Younger, cheaper, younger, cheaper…Is it so hard? So complicated?

As for Perez…speaks to his weak character and unending greed that he would accept this money. He and aging employees who refuse to die are the oppressors

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
8 months ago
Reply to  SenorGato

I encourage you to expand your field of vision and include the context Davy mentions in the article. And let’s not jump to a false conclusion that signing Perez means KC can’t afford to sign FAs that would make a difference in a very winnable AL Central…

MoMember since 2024
8 months ago
Reply to  SenorGato

I’m sorry, you’re feeling oppressed because the royals signed a franchise legend to a 2-year extension? Seems a little dramatic to me.

Kevbot034
8 months ago
Reply to  SenorGato

Wow, this might be the biggest cringe ever posted on this site. Nice.

joehieronymus
8 months ago
Reply to  SenorGato

The 2024 Roberto Clemente Award winner has “weak character‘? Okay.

Shirtless George Brett
8 months ago
Reply to  SenorGato

This is one of the most obvious troll attempts I have ever seen lol.

cashgod27Member since 2024
8 months ago

I think it’s always going to be worthwhile for small-market teams to do whatever they can to ensure players like this – excellent careers, but never superstars – stay with them their whole careers. Salvy is going to be one of the most famous and beloved Royals of all time, and that’s wonderful.

Also, I really do think Jensen could put up close to Cal Raleigh numbers (not 60 homers, but still). Guy’s going to be a special hitter.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 months ago

I can’t be too critical of this because he’s a local hero and the Royals’ offense is so bad almost anything helps. And I also have been literally wrong about this twice before (around 2018 and 2023). But he looks like he is done. Maybe he catches fire again, but this is a tough way for a team with limited resources to spend.

MoMember since 2024
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He ran a .365 xwOBA this year and .360 last year. Walk and K rates are similar. I think there’s a lot to optimistic about.

Shirtless George Brett
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean, the Royals aren’t the Dodgers by any means but no team in baseball has such limited resources that a 2 year $25 million deal is going to be a big problem.

Last edited 8 months ago by Shirtless George Brett
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 months ago

If there are teams where it would make a difference, the Royals are one of them.

Partly because they play in a small market, and partly because they have *so many holes* to fill.

cashgod27Member since 2024
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t think they have a lot of holes? I think the RosterResource projection is off – Jensen will be the everyday DH, which slides India to 2B and Massey to the bench.

At that point, all they need is a LF and a few bullpen arms. Their rotation and most of their lineup is set

Shirtless George Brett
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Strongly disagree that they have so many holes. They need a CF and a LF (2B wasn’t great but you could say that about like half the teams in MLB and India has a better track record). The rest of the roster is pretty much set. If you dont believe in Cags you could argue a RF as well but the Royals are going to play him regardless, as they should, so its a moot point for now.

But more to the point, $12 million a year is nothing to even the Royals. Their 40 man right now is $180 million. There is no scenario where Salvy’s extension stops the Royals from making any moves.

Last edited 8 months ago by Shirtless George Brett
opifijiklMember since 2024
8 months ago

Waiting to see if Laurila interviews Piccolo again – want to hear his perspective and plan!

opifijiklMember since 2024
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s not a ton of money and they aren’t a super limited team, resource-wise. $171 million payroll in 2025 with $105 million for 2026 on RR now (may change). What’s a little money to keep around a fan favorite? Just like with Jaren Duran midseason, sometimes better to keep team “identities” or intangibles than just look at the dollars and wins.

There’s probably a balance between increasing market size through a better on-field product and keeping fan engagement through not being too robotic. I’m guessing a decent amount of fans just think “yay, we kept Perez, as it should be” and don’t even discuss the money.

dangledangleMember since 2024
8 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They are paying him by the size of his crew neck

NATS FanMember since 2018
8 months ago

Perez was worth .5 WAR last year. That’s a half of one War. I guess Royals fans are going to see every single drop of Perez before he is through. He is not the worst idea for a Dh, but I wouldn’t catch him very often anymore.

eph1970Member since 2025
8 months ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

But that’s the plan: a little FB, a little C, and some DH.

I live in KC, and Salvy’s smile lights up the metro. Salvy was driving to the stadium and saw some boys playing whiffle ball. Naturally he parked and joined the game.

SenorGato
8 months ago
Reply to  eph1970

Tbf there is no Value in joining that game and certainly doesn’t shrink a massive $/WAR. Gotta use your brain, think like a magnate who has to manipulate with violence 300 million illiterates into worship

tigerfannky
8 months ago

Really? A knockdown drag out for the HOF? Lance Parrish was twice the catcher this guy was!

I mean he seems like a good guy and he was a good player who could help a team get where they needed to go, but nothing more than that to the baseball world outside of KC.

Darrell Porter was better and I don’t hear his name brought up as someone who was short changed by HOF voters.

Shirtless George Brett
8 months ago
Reply to  tigerfannky

Parrish had a career 106 OPS+ and 39 bWAR. Perez has a 105 OPS+ and 35.5 bWAR.

SenorGato
8 months ago

Now do $/WAR

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
8 months ago
Reply to  tigerfannky

And so it begins