Ryan Braun’s Complicated Legacy
The announcement was inevitable, with only its timing in question. On Tuesday, Ryan Braun formalized what had been presumed since last winter, namely his decision to retire from baseball. The 37-year-old slugger made his announcement via the Twitter feed of the Brewers, the team that drafted him out of the University of Miami with the fifth pick in 2005, and the one with whom he spent his entire 14-year major league career.
Today, more than 14 years after I first took the field as a Milwaukee Brewer, I’ve decided to retire. While it’s impossible to summarize my emotions, what I feel most is one, simple thing – gratitude.
I just wanted to take a moment to say ‘thank you’.
– Ryan Braun pic.twitter.com/pQxuW9qk1z
— Milwaukee Brewers (@Brewers) September 14, 2021
Braun hit just .233/.281/.488 for a career-low 99 wRC+ last season, as back and right index finger injuries limited his playing time to 39 games and 141 plate appearances. In late October, the Brewers declined their end of a $15 million mutual option, choosing instead to pay him a $4 million buyout. It was the first time he’d ever reached free agency, as he spent all but his 2007 rookie season playing under two long-term extensions, first an eight-year, $45 million deal that covered 2008-15, and then a five-year, $105 million deal that covered 2016-20.
Braun and the Brewers remained in touch through the winter, and he went so far as to visit the Brewers during spring training. Even so, he told MLB.com’s Adam McCalvy in February that he was enjoying his time with his family and business interests and didn’t foresee resuming his career, saying, “I’m continuing to work out and stay in shape, but I’m not currently interested in playing.” Braun reiterated that stance in May, when Team USA reached out to ask whether he was interested in pursuing a spot on the US Olympic squad, which ultimately won a silver medal with the similarly unsigned likes of Ian Kinsler and Scott Kazmir taking on pivotal roles. Team Israel had expressed interested as well, given Braun’s Jewish heritage.
By the numbers, Braun put together an impressive career, even given the injuries that limited him to an average of 130 games a year from 2014-19, with never more than 144 in a season over that stretch. He hit .296/.358/.532 with 352 home runs, 216 stolen bases, a 135 wRC+, and 43.9 fWAR (47.1 bWAR). After rocky beginnings as a third baseman — his -32 Defensive Runs Saved in 2007 is a record low for the position — he became a defensively solid left fielder. He made six All-Star teams, won the NL Rookie of the Year and MVP awards, and finished second and third in the voting for the latter award as well within his career-opening six-season run of receiving MVP support. He hit 30 or more homers six times, leading the NL once in that category and twice in slugging percentage. A swift and smart baserunner, he reached the twin plateaus of 30 homers and 30 steals in the same season in both 2011 and ’12.
What’s more, Braun defined an era of baseball renaissance in Milwaukee. Including its one-off season as the Seattle Pilots, the franchise made the playoffs just twice in its first 38 campaigns, back in 1981 and ’82. With Braun bopping 34 homers in just 113 games en route to Rookie of the Year honors in 2007, the Brewers finished above .500 for the first time in 15 years. The next year, they made the playoffs as the NL Wild Card; it was the first of five times the team reached October with Braun. In 2011 and ’18 they won NL Central titles and advanced as far as the NLCS, only to fall just short of trips to the World Series.
For all of that, Braun’s career is tainted, not only by his connection to performance-enhancing drugs, which resulted in a 65-game suspension in 2013, but to his actions when he was previously caught — only to become the first player to have such a suspension overturned. In December 2011, less than a month after Braun beat out Matt Kemp for the NL MVP award, Major League Baseball suspended him for 50 games for testing positive for elevated levels of testosterone, later discovered to be synthetic; the sample was taken after the Brewers’ first postseason game in October. With a spokesman citing “highly unusual circumstances,” “Ryan’s complete innocence,” “impeccable character and no previous history” of violations, Braun challenged the suspension. In February 2012, an arbitration panel overturned it due a technicality involving the delay between when he submitted his sample and when the collector submitted it to the lab.
“Today is for everybody who has ever been wrongly accused,” Braun proclaimed at a press conference after the result was announced. “The simple truth is that I’m innocent. The truth is always relevant and the truth prevailed.”
“I would bet my life this substance never entered my body,” he added.
After reporting to the Brewers’ spring training facility, Braun continued to lay it on thick, going so far as to publicly smear the sample collector, a man named Dino Laurenzi, Jr., by telling reporters, “There were a lot of things that we learned about the collector, about the collection process, about the way that the entire thing worked, that made us very concerned and very suspicious about what could have actually happened.”
More than a year later, after Braun accepted a 65-game suspension for receiving PEDs through the Biogenesis Clinic, Yahoo Sports’ Jeff Passan reported that in attempting to rally support for his cause among his peers, Braun “told players around baseball before spring training 2012 that the man who collected his urine that tested positive for synthetic testosterone was anti-Semitic and a Chicago Cubs fan in an effort to gather support throughout the game.” ESPN’s Buster Olney reported the allegations of anti-Semitism as well.
Such chutzpah! Of all the ballplayers caught using PEDs either via investigations or tests over the past two decades, Braun is the only one I can recall who impugned the workers involved in the testing process. What’s more, he used his religion as a shield, invoking anti-Semitism as a motive for what the arbitration panel ruled was an improperly handled (but untampered) sample. Even without the knowledge of what came next — the underlying evidence of Braun’s PED regimen, and his admission that he was using a testosterone cream and lozenges to deal with “nagging injuries,” meaning that he was in fact doping at the time of the mishandled sample — it was an incredibly disappointing display.
Braun was 29 years old when he was suspended. To that point, he offered durability to go with a package of power, speed, and patience; from 2008-12, he averaged 154 games, 34 homers, 22 steals and 5.4 WAR while hitting for a 148 wRC+. Post-suspension, he slipped to averages of 130 games, 22 homers, 14 steals and 2.1 WAR per year. That’s not to say that he was simply a product of whatever he was putting into his body; it’s a pretty typical aging pattern. So typical, in fact, that the ZiPS projection Dan Szymborski created for Braun from 2014 onward is uncanny:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | .297 | .363 | .500 | 582 | 90 | 173 | 32 | 4 | 26 | 97 | 55 | 22 | 138 | 1 | 3.6 |
| 2015 | .294 | .358 | .502 | 554 | 85 | 163 | 32 | 4 | 25 | 93 | 51 | 17 | 132 | 0 | 3.2 |
| 2016 | .289 | .353 | .487 | 532 | 79 | 154 | 30 | 3 | 23 | 86 | 48 | 17 | 120 | 0 | 2.7 |
| 2017 | .285 | .348 | .469 | 508 | 72 | 145 | 27 | 3 | 20 | 78 | 44 | 14 | 110 | -1 | 2.1 |
| 2018 | .282 | .341 | .449 | 483 | 65 | 136 | 24 | 3 | 17 | 70 | 39 | 12 | 110 | -2 | 1.4 |
| 2019 | .277 | .332 | .429 | 452 | 57 | 125 | 21 | 3 | 14 | 61 | 34 | 10 | 96 | -2 | 0.8 |
| 2020 | .269 | .320 | .401 | 349 | 42 | 94 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 43 | 23 | 7 | 93 | -3 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | .258 | .306 | .364 | 283 | 31 | 73 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 32 | 17 | 5 | 76 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Total | .284 | .344 | .460 | 3743 | 521 | 1063 | 191 | 23 | 140 | 560 | 311 | 104 | 113 | -10 | 13.3 |
| Actual | .276 | .338 | .492 | 2920 | 436 | 807 | 171 | 18 | 141 | 473 | 254 | 86 | 119 | -2 | 12.7 |
That 2021 line — a season that Braun didn’t even play — distorts things a little bit; without it, the projection is for 13.8 WAR and a 116 OPS+, albeit in about 18% more plate appearances than he actually took during that span. Prorated, for the 2014-20 period Braun was forecast to produce 2.4 WAR for every 650 PA; his actual production prorated to 2.6 WAR.
Was Braun on a Hall of Fame path? Color me skeptical, though assuming he had never been caught with PEDs, such an outcome wasn’t out of the question. Braun was certainly among the game’s top players in 2011-12, with only Miguel Cabrera surpassing his 165 wRC+ and 13.8 WAR, but he had gotten a comparatively late start to his career, debuting at 23 years and six months. His 202 homers through his age-28 season ranked 59th, his 29.8 fWAR 178th, his 33.1 bWAR 131st, and 33rd among left fielders.
I asked Dan to go back and project Braun from 2013 onward, replacing his suspension-shortened season with a full one and bolstering the remainder of his projections going forward:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | H | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | .304 | .373 | .534 | 596 | 181 | 32 | 102 | 59 | 26 | 144 | 4.5 |
| 2014 | .306 | .373 | .548 | 566 | 173 | 32 | 100 | 55 | 21 | 152 | 4.4 |
| 2015 | .300 | .367 | .528 | 547 | 164 | 29 | 94 | 52 | 20 | 142 | 3.8 |
| 2016 | .295 | .362 | .518 | 525 | 155 | 27 | 87 | 49 | 17 | 130 | 3.3 |
| 2017 | .293 | .356 | .492 | 502 | 147 | 23 | 79 | 44 | 15 | 118 | 2.6 |
| 2018 | .285 | .348 | .465 | 473 | 135 | 19 | 69 | 40 | 12 | 116 | 1.7 |
| 2019 | .280 | .337 | .445 | 443 | 124 | 16 | 60 | 34 | 10 | 101 | 1.1 |
| 2020 | .270 | .324 | .409 | 374 | 101 | 11 | 46 | 26 | 7 | 95 | 0.2 |
| 2021 | .261 | .310 | .382 | 314 | 82 | 8 | 35 | 19 | 6 | 82 | -0.4 |
| 2022 | .254 | .303 | .365 | 181 | 46 | 4 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 76 | -0.5 |
| Ages 29-38 | .289 | .352 | .485 | 4521 | 1308 | 201 | 690 | 388 | 137 | 122 | 20.7 |
| Thru Age 28 | .313 | .374 | .568 | 3477 | 1089 | 202 | 643 | 305 | 126 | 147 | 33.1 |
| Total | .300 | .356 | .521 | 7998 | 2397 | 403 | 1333 | 693 | 263 | 134 | 53.8 |
Just the impact that a full 2013 season has on the rest-of-career projection is striking; Braun’s 2014-20 forecast improves from 13.8 WAR to 17.1. But even if he had produced some bigger seasons with the bat from 2013-15, his projected slide to replacement level at age 36 leaves him well short of both 2,500 hits and 500 homers. With a projection of 53.8 career WAR, accompanied by a 40.0 WAR seven-year peak, that’s a 46.9 JAWS, which would tie with Hall of Famer Joe Medwick for 17th on the list of left fielders but fall 6.8 points shy of the standard.
Our projected Braun would be just three rungs ahead of Lance Berkman (52.0/39.2/45.6) and ahead of just six of the 20 enshrined left fielders, including Ralph Kiner (48.1/.42.7/45.4), Jim Rice (47.7/36.4/42.1), and Lou Brock (45.3/32.0/38.7) among those elected by the BBWAA. Given the writers’ recent treatment of Berkman (1.2% in 2019), I don’t think this version of Braun would have gotten much traction from the voters, though to be fair, Berkman retired at age 37, falling short of both 2,000 hits and 400 homers, milestones that this version of Braun would have surpassed. Of course, whether Braun could have done all of this without later running afoul of the game’s drug policy after flouting it so brazenly is another question entirely, and we’ll never know that answer.
The record shows that after receiving his suspension Braun did issue a statement apologizing for “some serious mistakes, both in the information I failed to share during my arbitration hearing and the comments I made to the press afterwards… For a long time, I was in denial and convinced myself that I had not done anything wrong.” He also publicly apologized to Laurenzi, and met with him privately as well, over dinner at the collectors home. Braun said in November 2013, “We’ve made amends and I think we’re both excited to be able to move forward and put this behind us.”
Thereafter, Braun did his best to rehabilitate his image and demonstrate solid citizenship, continuing his previous involvement with charitable organizations such as the Make-A-Wish Foundation, Habitat for Humanity, the AIDS Resource Center of Wisconsin, and Sharp Literacy. He was the Brewers’ nominee for the Roberto Clemente Award in both 2014 and ’16. During the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic, he joined Christian Yelich in a partnership with several local companies to provide meals for front-line health care workers at four Wisconsin hospitals. In the team’s statement announcing his retirement, Brewers principal owner Mark Attanasio praised Braun for “his commitment of countless service hours and more than $1 million to community causes over the years.”
The Brewers and their fans viewed Braun as someone special and treated his retirement announcement accordingly, announcing a celebration of his career at American Family Field on September 26. I remain less reverential. As someone who defended Braun on the grounds of due process and breaches of confidentiality — foundational necessities for a fair and functional drug testing program — both at Baseball Prospectus, after his 2011 suspension was announced, and again in 2013, when MLB’s leaks during the Biogenesis investigation painted a picture of a league overzealously pursuing individual stars without having demonstrated their guilt, I’m one of those people described in Braun’s confessional statement, one of “[t]hose who put their necks out for me [who] have been embarrassed by my behavior.”
I suppose that merely puts me in the same boat as a previous generation of reporters who felt betrayed by the likes of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and other stars after their PED misdeeds were revealed. I chide them in my annual Hall of Fame coverage, where I differentiate between PED allegations that date to the “Wild West” era before the game’s testing-and-suspension regimen was introduced, and those that came after the point at which MLB and the union began cracking down, but I get it. What’s more, it’s fair to point out that the other allegations around some of those players, such as those against Bonds for domestic abuse, have no parallel in Braun’s litany of misdeeds.
Yet the other matter that still sticks in my craw is Braun’s reported invocation of anti-Semitism. The list of Jewish ballplayers isn’t a long one in the grand scheme, but the annals are full of stories of Jewish fans celebrating the likes of Hank Greenberg and Sandy Koufax as they publicly acknowledged their heritage. Pride in the feats of Team Israel in the World Baseball Classic and the most recent Olympics is an extension of that. Braun, whose father was an Israeli-born descendent of Holocaust survivors, told reporters early in his career that he didn’t have a bar mitzvah or celebrate the holidays, which isn’t uncommon within the aforementioned list, and doesn’t preclude someone from tapping into that goodwill. Braun did so, proclaiming, “I’m extremely proud to be a role model for young Jewish kids,” and accepting the “Hebrew Hammer” nickname.
Braun is hardly the first role model to fall short, but to the eyes of this Jewish scribe (and descendent of a family similarly decimated by the Holocaust), crying wolf as he did still feels like a particularly acute betrayal of the legacy he invoked. Greenberg hit home runs, won championships, served his country (not content to limit himself to working as a physical education instructor and playing ball for military teams in the manner of peers such as Joe DiMaggio, he worked with B-29 Superfortress bombers as part of Operation Matterhorn in the China-Burma-India Theater), and projected an image of great strength at a time when Hitler was murdering Jews. Braun, whose surpassing of Greenberg’s 331 career home runs in 2019 was noted throughout the Jewish press, was proclaimed in a headline as “the all-time Jewish home run hitter” on the occasion of Tuesday’s announcement, but demonstrating himself as a mensch on par with Greenberg is another matter.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Hmm, complicated indeed. The headline to Schoenfield’s ESPN article is “Ryan Braun Leaves Behind a Complicated Baseball Legacy”.
His smear campaign against the collector, an innocent working man, is disqualifying in my book. He’d rather ruin an innocent person’s life rather than face the music.
He’s showed himself to be a moral coward and isn’t worthy of our respect
As mentioned in the piece, this is his only known public misdeed, and at least his was still baseball-related, i.e. not domestic violence. If his charitable amends are real, and if said “innocent working man” is willing to publicly forgive him, maybe the court of public opinion can too.
This sums up my sentiments. Doping is one thing but going after a totally innocent guy who was just doing his job because you got caught is reprehensible. Braun can go to the same hell as Lance Armstrong.
I agree. I actually think it’s a big problem that the chain of custody was violated so blatantly, though I definitely don’t ascribe it to any malice on the part of the collector (just incompetence and/or not wanting to get in trouble for being late).
That said, both things can be true: Braun was right that the sample wasn’t treated correctly AND he’s an asshole for tarnishing the collector (even if he actually had been innocent, which we now know he wasn’t).
For me, his legacy isn’t complicated at all. He was a good and sometimes great player, who probably falls short of the Hall on statistical standards, and who sits alone among the Top Steroid Villains for having the chutzpah to completely tarnish individual, repeatedly, while falsely invoking anti-Semticism to make others sympathetic to his story.
To me, there’s nothing complicated about that.
I don’t know anything about Ryan Braun as a person. I’m not going to call him a jerk. But he was a good ballplayer, who made some horrible choices to try to preserve his career, and an example that I give to my own ball-playing son about one of life’s most important lessons: Don’t lie, because the lies come back to hurt you worse than the original truth.
If he falls short on Hall of Fame statistical standards, how did Harold Baines get in?
Because all his friends were on the Veterans Committee.
Interesting that my comment was downvoted when I’m saying the same thing you are
People on FG have thin skin….just ignore it
It’s downvoted because it’s entirely irrelevant.
It also gets downvoted because you’re worried about that.
Good player and sometimes great, indeed, but to me it’s hard to know how much the PEDs played in either
I’m actually not so sure they did hurt him all that much. Who knows how much extra money he made by taking PEDs? Would he have signed two big extensions, and made almost $150 million? Do you think he or his kids are crying in their champagne over people badmouthing him online? I somehow doubt it.
The fact is, until and unless contracts can be invalidated for PED violations, the risk is always going to outweigh the reward.
Robinson Cano is maybe the one exception, who already had made a ton of money and was probably on a Hall of Fame path without the suspensions.
I am not a fan of what Braun did, at all. This article is a great summary of why I dislike Braun.
I am fan of Jay Jaffe, and this article is a good example of why I think highly of Jaffe.
I don’t think I’ve read any article about a player’s legacy and agreed so thoroughly with it, ever. Everything Jay said here is 100% spot on. He’s always going to be special to Brewers fans for all the reasons mentioned here, and you can’t take that away from them. But he’s definitely a villain in the bigger picture of MLB.
He wasn’t anywhere on the same level as, say, Lance Armstrong, who is a uniquely despicable villain in the doping wars, ruining multiple people’s lives in a scorched earth campaign for about…ten years? But there are some eerie parallels.
Brewer fan here. He’s not special to me, at all. He was a good ballplayer and a less-than-stellar person.
Reading the comments here, it’s pretty obvious that he’s just not a good enough player to overcome his moral issues. Other players clearly are. Let’s be real: it’s a sliding scale.
Agreed. Prince Fielder was the heart, soul and smile of those 2007-2011 Crew teams. Sad day when he left via FA, but never once felt bitter about it. He earned his money. Braun’s personality was far less approachable and his path to beloved status rested largely on him agreeing to stick around and become a lifelong Brewer. He could have sat comfortably at the midway point between Yount and Gantner (okay, a little closer to Yount).
After Biogenesis, Braun fell rapidly from fan favorite to meh familiar veteran. Sure, the feelings of betrayal dissipated as compared to non-Brewers fan, and on the whole I’d say the fan base forgave and forgot … but, significantly, our love for the player was forgotten along with his misdeeds.
Braun provided a bevy of clutch hits and a few of the most indelible homers in team history, yet personally I can’t help but view his best moments through bittersweet eyes knowing in the back of my head what was required to make them happen.
Of all the PED guys, this one pissed me off the most. Lots of guys tried to avoid accountability (“someone snuck it into my vitamins” and other nonsense). Braun was the only one who successfully did so by waging an aggressive PR campaign against a random sample handler, and then tried to gaslight the public with claims of vindication.
On the claim of antisemitism, I do find it odd that claims of antisemitism appear to be the one set of claims of bigotry that it’s socially acceptable to dismiss or treat with skepticism. It added another layer of despicable to Braun’s legacy, because it was clearly absurd, but if he had been a POC, in the same situation, and claimed racism, would anyone be comfortable calling him out? Just making a comment on the double standard we apply when evaluating claims of antisemitism vs. similar claims from nearly any other group.
Seems like you’re just making up a guy to get mad at here…the Black or Latino player who did something like this and then wasn’t called out. Hypocrisy claims are always a bit of a weak substantive criticism, but this is hypothetical hypocrisy, which is even sillier.
It’s not hypothetical hypocrisy, it’s very observable in society, though I will admit it’s off topic so I will probably leave it at this. I am just commenting on what I find to be this odd cognitive dissonance in our society about how we are for some reason much more comfortable dismissing claims of anti-Semitism than we are for any other protected minority. The rule of “actual intent and context are secondary to how an action/statement is received/perceived” is not universally applied, which I find weird and problematic.
I think we all know why the claims are easily dismissed.
Yeah, it is off-topic. I’ll say one phenomenon is that people sometimes try to conflate criticism of Israel’s apartheid policies with anti-Semitism, which provokes lots of pushback, including from Jews who don’t support apartheid. So if that’s what you’re thinking of, then I would say different things are different.
I cannot think of a worse place to discuss antisemitism than the comments section of an article, even on a site with such level-headed commenters as Fangraphs.
I keep wanting to add more, and then I re-read this sentence and decide better of it.
Haha, agreed, and I probably should’ve restrained myself!
Over & Out
This is probably one of my favorite sadtrombone comments ever, which is actually saying a lot!
the LGBT community certainly seems to have their claims of bigotry dismissed on a regular basis, especially in popular music circles these days
Not the same thing but there are very few Jussie Smollett apologists left.
And at least in his case, there wasn’t a specific person wrongly accused of bigotry.
If you knowingly lie about others being discriminatory, you are really no better than the people who actually discriminate.
There are no apologists, there are just people who refuse to speak about it now that the facts have come out.
The worst part of the smear campaign against the handler was that said handler did absolutely nothing wrong! He followed procedure perfectly, while Braun only got off due to the arbitrator ruling that the procedure itself was inadequate (which was then corrected).
I was rather wondering the opposite – if we were going to put together a lineup of all players who have tested positive for PEDs dating back to, I don’t know, Manny Alexander, and then ask you to guess which one was the only one to have the penalty overturned, wouldn’t Braun be one of the most likely guesses?
To me, supporting Braun is like supporting Curt Schilling. Both are complete scumbags in specific (but different) ways. Braun might be worse from a baseball perspective, since he was also a confirmed cheater.
This guy makes the Hall, I condemn it as a hopeless enterprise.
Totally different, because the case against Schilling is purely a character one, while the case against Braun involves in-game cheating.
You get the upthumbz for the same content as mine which getz teh downthumbz.
2021 on the Internet, embody.
The guy who cuts me off is a scumbag, too, but presumably, he’s not using his millions of dollars and fame to support bigotry and oppression.
With his numbers, Braun’s not making the Hall even if he had saved babies falling out of an airplane while making a diving catch in Game 7, so I dunno where that concern comes from. And I have no love for him (Jaffe said it well, as always)…but if we can’t differentiate between “Guy cheated at baseball, lied about it, has consequences” and “Guy uses his vast fame and fortune to bring misery and despair to women/minorities and even in a small way, further deepen a national crisis,” then truly, we are lost.
I guess you didn’t read the article.
I don’t think you realize to whom this comment was in response
I will plainly and unequivocally state that I think Braun was clearly in the wrong in his treatment of the specimen-taker and doubly so once he filtered it through the lens of antisemitism. This is an unmistakable blemish on his career and his person.
I will also say that I don’t think Braun, or anyone, should be solely defined or judged by their worst moments, or their best. It’s reductive and simplistic, and we all have our fair share of both. (Certainly that entire episode falls within his “worst.”) People are complicated, fallible, inconsistent.
As detailed later in the article, he did apologize in person and attempted to make amends with the person he had denigrated; plenty of damage was already done but it does show some capacity for admitting fault (in person, not over email/twitter/even a phone call). That alone is more than some people are capable of.
Too, he has done many things for organizations within the community: Make-A-Wish Foundation, Habitat for Humanity, the AIDS Resource Center of Wisconsin, and Sharp Literacy. He has been blessed with many talents and resources and appears to have made some effort to share those resources to better his community.
I don’t think these things in the “good” column can totally offset whatever mistakes he’s made; again, we shouldn’t be judged solely by our best moments, nor by our worst. But they do help to show him as a more complete person with the capacity for both terrible behavior and considerable generosity.
I have worst moments but I have never blamed an innocent person for any of them and I would hope nearly everyone else has not either.
OK, but this wasn’t a mistake. This was pure evil.
It’s not a moment, though. It wasn’t some issue that happened in the spur of the moment. He, and his PR team/lawyer orchestrated a multi-day/week campaign against this guy. This is a character flaw far worse than just having a bad moment.
Ug, I find this sort of coverage of Braun’s career rather distasteful. Readers of this website are well aware that (most and/or all) athletes use both legal and/or illegal drugs and/or supplements. When “caught”, ~all have (initially) claimed innocence. Braun’s representatives found a loop-hole in his positive test, which they exploited to get him off the hook, something (all/most) athletes would do. Braun only accepted the suspension after a season ending wrist injury. Without that wrist injury (which affected his power numbers in the 2nd-half of his career), Braun probably doesn’t admit guilt. Again, our legal system is built around guilty people pleading “not guilty” and something 99+% of athletes don’t admit guilt. So, give these facts, why is Braun’s legacy complicated and other athletes don’t have this complicated legacy (Brett Favre, Dave Parker, Paul Molitor, Keith Hernandez, Derek Jeter, Kellen Winslow II, Carl Lewis, Shawne Merriman, Manny Machado, etc etc)?
Ummm… there’s a world of difference between “pleading not guilty” and “lying and claiming that the testing agent was an anti-Semite who tainted your sample solely for being Jewish.” This is not just about getting caught and trying to pass it off. That happens every day. This is about trying to pass it off by slandering the character of an innocent man whose job was to transmit the sample to the lab.
yeah i kinda agree with you, but I think a big part of it is him showing off his acting chops. If he hadn’t done such an extreme doubling down I don’t think people would care. I mean, just look at nelson cruz and starling marte. No one really cares (and I don’t really think they should). I think everyone can relate to not like people being so self righteous and smarmy, which is why braun gets such a bad wrap. not a guy id want to get a beer with.
I think most of us would say that a lot of those guys have extremely complicated legacies, some of them outright bad.
also whats up with the jeter and manny machado comps at the end? have there ever been substantial claims about them using? I know one that got way swept under the radar was the whole peyton manning / ryan zimmerman thing. That was weird, and how tenuous the connection between the two was, it seemed more believable for some reason.
No one here is putting him on criminal trial or advocating for taking away his money or possessions. But if you don’t think your decisions should affect your legacy, then, friend, what is the point of having one (or caring) at all?
It’s beyond the lying part really, it’s lying and then claiming the person who tested you was motivated by hateful intentions without reason
He was an extremely good, often great player who did a really bad thing. National coverage of him pretty much went to zero after 2013 (other than the occasional fantasy writer noting his late career resurgence/fantasy relevance), so I’m glad to hear he tried to redeem himself with good deeds.
From a stats point of view, what Braun (and Berkman) show is just how hard it is to hit the big round numbers. Both of those guys crushed, for a lot of years, and yet didn’t even reach the 400/2000 signposts that put you in contention.
Likewise here. Thank you, Jay, for including the part about making up with Laurenzi. If Laurenzi is willing to bury that hatchet, I am.
Having said that (coughcough): “We’ve made amends and I think we’re both excited to be able to move forward and put this behind us.” Dude, YOU! had to make amends. YOU! had to move forward.
I also note a) the likely social power disparity between Braun and Laurenzi, and b) that Braun’s word cannot be trusted in any way.
Still think Matt Kemp should have won the 2011 MVP outright (and definitely after Braun got pinched). I won’t begrudge fans who adore him, but he literally stole an award that altered careers.
Kemp’s 2011 was completely out of line with the rest of his career, so I have no idea how not winning the MVP in a flukey year somehow altered his career.
Great work, Jay. I’m a brewers fan attending the game on Sunday (for the talking Bob Uecker bobblehead, not for the Braun celebration!) and I’m still not quite sure how I’ll react.
Jay summed up perfectly how conflicted I feel. The steroids itself was disappointing, but the adamant denials and smearing of a urine collector (and using his religion and the very real issue of antisemitism) for his own selfish gain is a much bigger issue in my mind. All that said, I think Braun has largely paid the price and from appearances at least, has made amends to the people he’s wronged as much as possible.
Braun made $145M in salaries alone throughout his career, a substantial portion of which he might not have earned without cheating.
Then he gave back “more than $1M” to the community.
Good for him, I guess.
Isn’t that the point of charity for a lot of rich people? Tax-deductible good-will purchases?
Good point
Do let him know when he’s given enough to satisfy you, by all means
What was the steroid that he tested positive for? While I’d be nearly positive he did take it, there is a certain steroid, Turinabol that seems to have some controversy surrounding the tests.
He tested positive for testosterone. Basically had a testosterone level that was far higher than anything that had ever been seen before.
Ah, makes sense
It wasn’t just insanely elevated testosterone either, it was also identified as synthetic testosterone as well IIRC.
Yeah.
But he still had more 15 homer/10 stolen base seasons for a single team than any other player in MLB history, so #RyanBraunForever
As a Brewers fan, Brauny will always be a special player to me, but I understand the feelings around the league towards him. Braun played a big role in my formative years as a Brewers fan and provided a lot of great memories. I’m sad I didn’t get to see him play in person one last time due to the fan-less pandemic year. In my opinion, most Brewers fans will remember him fondly.
I’d have been mostly indifferent to the PED usage if Braun hadn’t thrown some poor guy under the bus to try to save himself. A famous millionaire celebrity and he cost some guy making less than 1% of his own income his job in a desperate attempt to shift blame.
For that he deserves to be remembered as a bad guy.
FTR the guy never lost his job. Also, the only reason anyone knows his name is because MLB was pissed (pun not intended) they lost the case and went public with everything.
I’m curious about the accusation made by the BioGenisis principals that Braun was outed by the A-Rod camp in an attempt to spread the heat when that story was breaking.
When it comes to throwing people under the bus and lying and denying one’s PED guilt, A-Rod dwarfs all others. Braun included.
Mr. Jaffe is spot on.
Interesting that you no longer believe that “due process and breaches of confidentiality — foundational necessities for a fair and functional drug testing program” or that “MLB’s leaks during the Biogenesis investigation painted a picture of a league overzealously pursuing individual stars without having demonstrated their guilt” after MLB violated due process, breached confidentiality and overzealously pursued an individual star without demonstrating his guilt. That would make me more upset with MLB, but that is just me I guess. As long as Braun got what he deserved, who cares about due process or confidentiality…
“without demonstrating his guilt”
Are you his lawyer? Because this is gaslighting nonsense.
Crazy to think 2012 was his last definite all-star-worthy season (+4.0 WAR)….hard to believe it’s been that long since he was great. Still had a real good career overall.
eh, as far as Hall candidacy goes its not complicated at all. his numbers weren’t good enough, full stop. the other stuff just confirms he’s human and just as awful as 90% of the people you’ll meet in life
Hebrew Hammer… S tier nickname wasted on this guy
He’s more “Scammer” than “Hammer”
Tell it real Jeff! Well done
By the look of the comments here (I didn’t read all of them), I’m going to play a bit of Devil’s advocate here. Yes, what Braun did in regards to the sample collector was awful. At the end of the day and by al accounts he reached out and made amends with him – and then continued to dedicate himself to doing better for everyone while admitting what he did was wrong. That entire part is more than most players do after they’re caught. Admitting mistakes, and then doing everything you can afterwards to be a good human is enough in my books to make up for previous issues. You can’t take back the past mistakes, all you can do is try and do better in the future.
All that said, he’s just not a HOF player anyway.
This take is exactly how I feel and I am a HUGE Brewers and Braun fan. No need to play devil’s advocate. The acts that you mention above are correct and shouldn’t we use Braun as an example of how a person can rehabilitate his image and rewrite his story among the people that he cares about.
I find the entire story to be a great turnaround story. He is not and would likely have never been a HOF player. #RyanBraunForever