Salvador Perez Deserves a Break

Salvador Perez, to me, is one of the more overrated players in baseball.

Defining “overrated” is a largely subjective endeavor, but, to me, he has received praise and exposure in a volume not commensurate with his abilities. Yes, he was part of a world-championship club, and he was of course heavily involved as its catcher. Still, his production is not that of an All-Star.

He’s posted three straight seasons of sub-.290 on-base percentages, wRC+ numbers of 91 or less. He’s a below-average hitter, and he doesn’t stand out at the game’s most challenged offensive position outside of pitcher. MLB catchers combined for a .310 on-base mark last season and an 87 wRC+. Perez posted an 88 wRC+.

In an age when pitch-framing has been quantified and now prized, Perez was rated as the worst framer in baseball last season, according to StatsCorner. Perez, like Matt Wieters, might have a framing problem in part because, at 6-foot-5, he’s unusually tall for a catcher. According to BWARP, which includes framing value, Perez has been worth an average of 0.5 WAR per season since 2014. Half a win! This is a player who has been invited to participate in four straight All-Star games. There’s a disconnect here.

What he does do well is stay on the field and throw out baserunners.

While Perez isn’t highly regarded as a receiver, he does lead all catchers in Defensive Runs Saved (39) since 2013, which accounts for catcher defense without considering framing. Perez led the AL last season by throwing out 48% of attempted stolen-base runners. His 35% rate over the course of his career is well above the league average of 28% over that six-year span.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

While health is in part a skill, and while he has a strong arm, the overall profile is not one of an All-Star, let alone a quality regular. Unless, I’m missing something. And I think I might have been missing something. I wasn’t aware how dramatic Perez’s first-half and second-half splits were until watching MLB Network’s top-10 catcher show via DVR the other night.

Salvador Perez, Career Splits
AVG OBP SLG ISO wRC+
1st half 0.282 0.312 0.456 0.174 107
2nd half 0.263 0.293 0.410 0.146 87

And this is interesting because, since 2013, no catcher has logged more innings behind the plate. Since 2013, Perez has logged 17% more innings at catcher than the No. 5-ranking catcher, Buster Posey, and 13.7% more inning than the third-ranking catcher, Jonathan Lucroy.

Innings Played at Catcher, 2013-16
Name Innings
Salvador Perez 4662.0
Yadier Molina 4415.0
Jonathan Lucroy 4064.2
Russell Martin 4055.1
Buster Posey 3931.2
Kurt Suzuki 3658.2
Wilson Ramos 3617.1
Jason Castro 3590.1
Derek Norris 3557.0
Miguel Montero 3542.0
Welington Castillo 3534.0
Brian McCann 3494.2
Tyler Flowers 3304.0
Chris Iannetta 3252.0
Yan Gomes 3174.1
A.J. Pierzynski 3167.2
Nick Hundley 2980.2
Carlos Ruiz 2914.0
Mike Zunino 2914.0

Perez’s problem might be that he is simply playing too much. Way too much. And it’s not as if the position as a whole exhibits this sort of split. Consider: MLB catchers as a whole last season posted a 85 wRC+ in the first half and a 89 wRC+ in the second half. OK, so Gary Sanchez arrived in August. But in the pre-Sanchez era of 2015, catchers were again just as productive in the first half (84 wRC+) as the second half (85 wRC+).

Perez, meanwhile, is almost always significantly worse in the second half. Last season, he posted a 114 wRC+ in the first half and a 55 wRC+ in the second. In 2015, it was 92/78 split. In 2014, it was 114/59. He’s also one of only four catchers to log more than 4,000 innings behind the plate since 2013. Perez ranked third in inning caught last season and first in 2015.

Perez sure seems like a player who would benefit from more time off. And in this age of enlightenment when teams are supposedly more interested in improving player efficiency through more rest and off days, the Royals keep leaning on Perez. The Royals have vowed to relax his innings in the past, as Craig Edwards noted back in the spring of 2015, but have been unable to quit the habit. Now, perhaps this is in part because their back-up catchers have not warranted much playing time. Drew Butera is a career .198 hitter and below-average framer for his career. Perhaps for that reason, no team should have been interested in adding a quality reserve catcher this winter. (Wieters is still available.) And while Perez’s desire to play seems like an admirable quality, and is cited as such, is it really if it explains his second-half production?

If Perez could sustain his first-half production into the second, or simply remain closer to league average in the second halves of the season, there’s no doubt he would be a valuable player. He’d be an above-average hitter with a plus arm. Even when accounting for the receiving skills (perhaps no catcher would benefit more from robot umps), that’s a quality regular. But in order to be that guy, he must log fewer innings and the Royals more often must give Perez a break.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

Beware the Ides of July

http://i.imgur.com/22832zP.png

Baltar
9 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Amazing chart! Thanks.

Johnston
9 years ago

So he’s a great catcher, just so long as you don’t play him at catcher.

CATCHER-22!

DDMember since 2020
9 years ago

This would also explain the all star game appearances (besides the unusually high vote totals coming from KC). A strong first half is all you need.

Bjoe
9 years ago

Perez is vastly overrated.
Above Average: Stolen base prevention
Below Average: Pitch framing, plate discipline, power, speed

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  Bjoe

Average AL ISO is .166. Salvador Perez had .191 last year, is .160 for his career. and projected for .180 next year.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  Bjoe

I believe he is also an above average pitch-blocker, FWIW.

andrewaohara
9 years ago

A couple of comments:

1) In addition to his league leading # of innings, he also caught about 280 innings in the post-season, by the far the most of any catcher in that 4 year span (though given his 1st half splits, he seems to recover in the offseason)

2) With the responsibility to call games, catching is the still the position with probably the most ability to add value in a way that hasn’t been quantified yet. Just because it hasn’t been quantified and incorporated into a WAR calculation doesn’t mean that it isn’t real value.

Lee TrocinskiMember since 2016
9 years ago

Within the last month, I decided to look at Ripken’s monthly splits for basically the same reason. August was easily his 2nd-worst month and September was easily his worst month. One has to wonder what kind of numbers Cal would have put up if he wasn’t dragging the last 2 months of basically every season.

Dee P. Gordon
9 years ago

Catchers need a backup almost as much as pitchers do.

JimMember since 2016
9 years ago

Nobody’s mentioned this yet, but Salvadore is a GREAT GUY.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
9 years ago

He was noticeably, clearly, and absolutely worn down in September in both 2015 and 2016. I’m going to guess (because I’m lazy, and just a fan) that his wRC+ for those months was in the single digits.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2020
9 years ago

My memory is hazy. It was only last year that he faded in September. 36 wRC+. In 2015 it was in July that he hit for crap.

John Autin
9 years ago

I’m not disputing you, but Perez did post an .845 OPS in the 2015 postseason, copping the WS MVP.

John Autin
9 years ago

Perez probably would hit better with more rest. But it’s not clear that KC would win more games that way, unless they find a better backup than what they’ve had lately.

On a tangent … While Perez’s workload is extreme for the most recent era, it’s not among the heaviest of all time. Over the last 4 years (age 23-26), he’s caught in 550 games, starting 534 of those. Here’s a partial list of catchers who bore at least that workload in a 4-year span (listing each guy in just his heaviest period):

Randy Hundley, caught in 612 games, started 592 of those (age 24-27)
Jim Sundberg, 592, 566 (24-27)
Gary Carter, 585, 571 (23-26)
Jason Kendall, 582, 576 (28-31)
Ted Simmons, 582, 574 (22-25)
Johnny Bench, 582, 550 (20-23)
Tony Pena, 580, 558 (26-29)
Jody Davis, 579, 551 (26-29)
Ivan Rodriguez, 570, 560 (24-27)
Terry Kennedy, 569, 551 (26-29)
Yogi Berra, 567, 551 (27-30)*
Mike Piazza, 565, 559 (27-30)
Cy Perkins, 564, 556 (24-27)*
Earl Battey, 561, 543 (25-28)
Butch Wynegar, 561, 531 (21-24)
Bill Freehan, 549, 533 (22-25)
Russell Martin, 548, 532 (23-26)
Jim Hegan, 556, 527 (26-29)*
Ray Schalk, 548, 545 (26-29)*
Jorge Posada, 548, 530 (28-31)
Yadier Molina, 547, 531 (26-29)
Thurman Munson, 541, 541 (25-28)

* 154-game schedule

Some burned out from the load; some didn’t. I’m just saying, the Perez workload so far wasn’t *inherently* abusive. But now that we see he wears down, an adjustment is warranted.

abailey
9 years ago

I hadn’t really considered Wieters as a player on the Royals’ radar, but man, that makes sense.

At this point it’s almost a sure thing he’s not getting the five years he wants and may only get a year. Can the Royals buy him for two years? One year and a player option?

It should be clear by now to the team that Perez completely falls apart as soon as the calendar flips to July. Drew Butera played in 56 games last year and is awful. Seems like a decent investment to bring in a fairly competent catcher, bump Butera’s 56 to 70-75 games, maybe, and be much less likely to face a two or three month stretch where your catcher is at best a warm body.

DougMember since 2019
9 years ago

It’s probably worth noting that for a catcher, the ability to play that much is also a skill with value. As you note, every day Perez is out there is one more day the Royals don’t have to play Drew Butera.