Samuel Basallo Is Going To Be an Oriole for a While

The Baltimore Orioles came into this year with a few goals. Foremost among them: reach the playoffs, find reliable pitching, and sign some of their young core to contract extensions. Goal one is out of the question. Goal two is up in the air. But goal three? Goal three is going strong after the Orioles and Samuel Basallo agreed to an eight-year, $67 million contract extension, with a team option and escalators that could push the total value to $88.5 million. Andy Kostka of The Baltimore Banner first reported the deal.
Basallo, currently the third overall prospect in baseball, debuted in the majors last week after a whirlwind tour of the minor leagues. He overpowered A-ball at 18 in 2023, mastered Double-A in 2024, and was hitting .270/.377/.589, good for a 150 wRC+, in Triple-A before the O’s called him up. He’s been far younger than his opposition at every level, and it just hasn’t mattered; his colossal raw power has papered over any weaknesses or growing pains again and again.
Throughout his ascension through the prospect ranks, the biggest question about Basallo has been whether he’ll stick behind home plate or have to move to a less demanding defensive position, likely first base. While Basallo’s offensive performance has been consistently excellent, his defense hasn’t been quite so exciting. A stress fracture in his elbow has slowed him, costing him valuable reps at catcher. He played DH about as frequently as he caught in Triple-A this year, and the same was true in 2024.
ZiPS generally concurs with the scouting assessment of Basallo. It sees him as a plus hitter who can stick behind the dish, albeit as a below-average defender (-7 runs a year relative to the positional average, which isn’t displayed below). Put it all together, and the computer forecasts him as an above-average contributor as he hits his stride. Accounting for three years of pre-arbitration salaries and the arb process, ZiPS would have been willing to offer Basallo as much as $101 million for these eight years:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .241 | .305 | .413 | 453 | 60 | 109 | 19 | 1 | 19 | 67 | 41 | 121 | 4 | 105 | 1.7 |
| 2027 | .246 | .312 | .425 | 475 | 65 | 117 | 20 | 1 | 21 | 73 | 44 | 121 | 4 | 110 | 2.2 |
| 2028 | .248 | .316 | .434 | 495 | 70 | 123 | 21 | 1 | 23 | 78 | 48 | 122 | 4 | 114 | 2.6 |
| 2029 | .251 | .320 | .443 | 494 | 71 | 124 | 21 | 1 | 24 | 80 | 49 | 118 | 3 | 117 | 2.9 |
| 2030 | .252 | .324 | .445 | 492 | 72 | 124 | 21 | 1 | 24 | 81 | 51 | 115 | 3 | 119 | 3.0 |
| 2031 | .255 | .327 | .454 | 491 | 73 | 125 | 21 | 1 | 25 | 81 | 52 | 113 | 3 | 122 | 3.3 |
| 2032 | .257 | .329 | .456 | 491 | 73 | 126 | 21 | 1 | 25 | 81 | 52 | 113 | 3 | 123 | 3.4 |
| 2033 | .257 | .329 | .456 | 491 | 73 | 126 | 21 | 1 | 25 | 81 | 52 | 114 | 3 | 123 | 3.3 |
| 2034 | .255 | .327 | .448 | 491 | 72 | 125 | 21 | 1 | 24 | 81 | 52 | 115 | 2 | 121 | 3.0 |
A -7 catcher is barely above the lowest acceptable bar for long-term major leaguers. Given that we’re talking about a median projection here, ZiPS sees plenty of outcomes where Basallo’s defense ends up as fringe playable there. Thus, we also have a projection for him at first base:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | WAR | $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | .239 | .304 | .409 | 457 | 60 | 109 | 19 | 1 | 19 | 68 | 42 | 123 | 4 | 103 | 1.0 | 5.7 |
| 2027 | .245 | .313 | .423 | 477 | 66 | 117 | 20 | 1 | 21 | 73 | 46 | 123 | 4 | 110 | 1.5 | 11.6 |
| 2028 | .252 | .320 | .441 | 488 | 70 | 123 | 21 | 1 | 23 | 77 | 48 | 121 | 4 | 117 | 2.1 | 18.2 |
| 2029 | .256 | .327 | .450 | 493 | 72 | 126 | 22 | 1 | 24 | 81 | 51 | 118 | 3 | 121 | 2.5 | 23.8 |
| 2030 | .257 | .330 | .456 | 498 | 74 | 128 | 22 | 1 | 25 | 83 | 53 | 116 | 3 | 124 | 2.7 | 26.8 |
| 2031 | .260 | .335 | .460 | 500 | 75 | 130 | 23 | 1 | 25 | 83 | 55 | 114 | 3 | 126 | 2.9 | 30.0 |
| 2032 | .260 | .335 | .460 | 500 | 75 | 130 | 23 | 1 | 25 | 84 | 55 | 114 | 3 | 126 | 2.9 | 30.9 |
| 2033 | .263 | .338 | .465 | 495 | 75 | 130 | 23 | 1 | 25 | 83 | 55 | 114 | 3 | 128 | 3.0 | 33.4 |
Note that ZiPS forecasts a better offensive outcome at first base. Dan Szymborski noted to me that it’s also a less volatile outcome; it’s a lot harder to develop offensive skills when you’re spending your days crouching and getting baseballs thrown at you at upwards of 100 miles an hour, so the model likes Basallo’s offensive potential much more if he changes positions. Note, though, that the aggregate value equation still doesn’t come out quite as well, thanks to the positional value of playing catcher. ZiPS would offer Basallo $87 million as a first base only option, slightly less than it would give him as a catcher despite the improved offense.
In his first game in Baltimore, Basallo DH’ed. With Adley Rutschman hitting the IL, he’s since caught three of the four games he’s started, which answers the question of whether the O’s would be willing to give Basallo major league catching time this year with a resounding yes. Out of necessity? Perhaps. But the best sign that a player can handle catcher is a major league team giving him playing time there.
Even when Rutschman returns, I expect the two to split time behind the plate. Both of them are good enough hitters that getting both guys extra playing time elsewhere in the lineup while they alternate days wearing body armor is a no-brainer. Heck, Basallo has been catching only about half of the time in the minors this year. Catchers are often slow-walked to the majors because the defensive side of the position is so demanding. Learning behind Rutschman, an excellent fundamental defender, is a nice upside for Basallo.
Meanwhile, the O’s should have space to play both at DH intermittently (or first for Basallo if they’re so inclined) with Ryan O’Hearn and Ryan Mountcastle out of the picture (O’Hearn was traded to the Padres at the deadline, while Mountcastle is headed to free agency). In fact, Rutschman has already been DH’ing frequently to get his bat in the lineup more often, and the team could use a bit more offensive juice. Extending that plan to Basallo feels like a good option to me, even if it means carrying a third catcher; the cost of that extra roster spot is offset by the fact that you’re getting a starting DH in aggregate between Rutschman and Basallo’s non-catcher playing time.
It might feel a bit strange for the Orioles to agree to an extension with their prospective star of the future instead of one of their current stars. Gunnar Henderson, Rutschman, Jackson Holliday, and even Jordan Westburg are much closer to free agency than Basallo, and bigger contributors to the current-day team. Even if the O’s didn’t agree to a deal with Basallo, they’d have him under team control for the next six seasons.
Here’s the counterpoint: That doesn’t matter. It’s not an either/or situation. The right number of young stars to attempt to sign to long-term extensions is “all of them.” The $67 million Basallo is making over the next eight years won’t break the bank; this deal doesn’t stop the O’s from pursuing extensions with the rest of their core. Owner David Rubenstein said as much over the weekend. “We have a lot of other talented people on the team who we hope will ultimately want to spend their entire career here… We’re committed to doing more of these as soon as we can,” he told reporter Steve Melewski. That’s absolutely the right way to think about this from Baltimore’s perspective.
That’s the throughline of this extension for me. There are a lot of small downsides on the periphery of my considerations. Basallo plays the same position as another star. He’s a tweener defensively, and now that the O’s have signed this deal, he’ll be doing his development at the major league level. There are other guys they could give extensions to as well. That’s all true, but each of those are marginal problems at best. The upside of the deal – guaranteeing nine years (assuming the option is exercised) of a potentially spectacular hitter at a reasonable price – outstrips all of those drawbacks combined, and it outstrips them by a good margin.
So is it weird that the first O’s contract extension didn’t go to Rutschman or Henderson? Sure, a little bit, but it would be weirder if they refused to offer any other extensions until one of those stars signed one. This is a great sign for those future extensions, though. Until at least one young Oriole signed a contract extension, there was some probability that the O’s just weren’t in the right ballpark in their negotiations. Now that we know that they’re making offers that get accepted, I feel better about them finding deals with at least one or two of their other extension candidates. None of the others are quite as far from free agency as Basallo, which gave the team extra leverage in its negotiation with him, so maybe the others will just take longer to come to an agreement on.
That’s not to say that more deals are automatic, of course. It takes two interested parties to sign a deal, and there are myriad reasons why any given player might prefer to test free agency instead of signing an extension, particularly if they’re already closer to reaching that milestone. Henderson’s agent, Scott Boras, notably guides his clients towards free agency. Money isn’t the only factor, either. “I want to be in a winning culture. That’s the number one thing for me… Losing doesn’t sit well with me,” Henderson told The Baltimore Sun over the weekend when he was asked about a potential extension of his own. A Basallo extension doesn’t make future deals inevitable, particularly if the team doesn’t make other moves to bolster the roster come the offseason, but it definitely makes them more likely.
That’s Baltimore’s side of the deal; Basallo’s is much more straightforward to me. Last week, he was a minor league catcher who got a $1.3 million signing bonus in 2021 and had been earning minor league salaries ever since. Even if he continued to develop rapidly and made the major leagues for good next year, he wouldn’t crest $1 million in salary until 2029. His profile has some high highs and some low lows; you can imagine a world where his bat won’t play at first, but his glove won’t play at catcher, even if that isn’t the median outcome. Who wouldn’t want to lock up life-changing money given that backdrop? Even better, he’s so young that even if the O’s pick up the $18 million team option, he’ll hit free agency at 30. The deal has escalators worth up to $20 million, too, so he’s not taking much of a discount to the ZiPS estimates. This is the kind of contract that, were I a young baseball phenom, I’d be excited to sign.
It’s been a bummer year in Baltimore, no doubt, but if you asked me what the best thing the O’s could do this season would be, I’d say “lock up the young core.” It’s incredibly hard to develop standout major leaguers. The Orioles basically gave up on competing at the big league level for half a decade in their pursuit of it. Now that they’ve done that very tough job, it’s incumbent upon them to keep their window open for as long as possible, and the best way to do that is to keep their good players for as long as they can. This is the first step in that process, much better late than never.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
I really like these sorts of deals for players and for teams. But I especially like them for players who don’t have to be put on the 40-man for a while, are clearly not developed, but are too talented to learn in the minor leagues. Basallo is like that, and so was Chourio. It feels like Sebastian Walcott is like this too. These guys clearly need a lot of work on things and they don’t have to learn them in the minors because they’re just better than everyone.
The incentive is just to keep them down until they figure things out against inferior competition because they won’t be contributing that much at the big league level immediately and you want to preserve your team control for the time when they’re better. But it’s much more interesting to challenge them and probably better for them if you throw them up against players who are just as talented as they are and they have to adjust. And it’s better for everyone because then you don’t have all these weird battles over service time manipulation.
Speaking of that, assuming Basallo doesn’t exhaust his rookie eligibility this year then he would still be a prospect next year and the O’s could still get a comp pick for having him on the opening day roster if he fulfills the other aspect of that rule, right? The contract doesn’t change that, does it?
ETA: Basallo was called up just after there would be 45 days left in the Orioles season. He has 23 at bats so far (it remains beyond stupid that the threshold is AB instead of PA). So he’d need to average 3.375 AB per game the rest of the way to exceed rookie threshold. Would the O’s consider throttling him just a touch for the chance at a draft pick?
Colt Keith and Chourio lost eligibility when they signed extensions prior to their debuts, so it seems that Basallo still qualifies.
Kinda ironic that the PPI rules just mean teams manipulate service time in different ways. Now there’s no reason to call up a top 100 prospect unless it’s the first two weeks or last 50 days of the season.
I think the only contract-related extension is that an IFA who signs a contract not eligible for the bonus pool (like Yamamoto) is not eligible for the PPI (MLB FAQ). So Basallo would be eligible as long as he retains rookie status.
(Unless he hits the IL in such a way as to retain rookie status but get too much service time; apparently Jacob Wilson is ineligible for that reason. I was going to make an argument that if an ineligible IFA beats an eligible player for RoY, then the eligible player should get a pick, but I have no argument that that shouldn’t apply to eligible Jackson Merrill coming second to ineligible Paul Skenes. Really I think that IFAs who aren’t restricted to the bonus pool probably shouldn’t be eligible for RoY.)
Of course they would and will. There’s a reason they called him and Beavers up immediately after there were 45 days left. There’s like a 95% chance both will maintain rookie eligibility next year.
This applies much more to offensive shortcomings than defensive ones. Holliday and Mayo feasted on AAA pitching because AAA pitching is the worst it has ever been and won’t challenge them in the way that Major League pitching does. But keeping a catcher in the minors to work on their defense makes complete sense, as it’s a lower pressure environment and playing the position every day makes them more likely to accomplish that development. I think the biggest reason Elias promoted Basallo anyway is that he wanted him to get some time with the pitchers now in preparation for next season.
This is true, but didn’t Eric say he has some scary chase numbers? That’s very much the kind of thing that can be hard for an elite hitting talent like Basallo to fix in AAA because he can get away with it.
Maybe I am thinking of someone else, but I was pretty sure it was Basallo. (I am not worried about it, I think he’s going to be great, especially if seeing MLB pitching makes him reevaluate what to swing at)
Small note that technically Mounty has 1 arb year left, though likely to be traded or non-tendered at this rate
The O’s are replete with 1B/cOF/DH types who have put up mediocre batting lines. Mountcastle may be the most expensive of the easily disposed of, but it isn’t like Mayo or Kjerstad has done a whole lot to force a decision on his contract.
Neither has O’Neal, TBH, who is doing his customary job of being good when healthy but not good at being healthy thing. He requires redundancy. Beavers, so far so good, but it’s too soon to say for sure.
The young ones all have options left also, so could be stashed in AAA to work on stuff.
Which is all to say that I think the O’s would very happy for someone to step up and make Mountcastle truly expendable, but until that happens they don’t actually have to move him.
I can’t imagine they would tender him for $7M or whatever it would take to keep him around if he went through the arbitration process.
He’s making I think $6.8M this year, and I believe that if you tender someone a contract you have to pay them at least 80% of the previous year’s amount. So that would be something like $5.5M.
They might keep him at that rate, or they might not.
But it seems like he would have to agree to a negotiation because I’m pretty sure arbitrators almost always (if not always) award an increase to the previous year’s salary. If the Orioles submitted at 5.5 and Mountcastle submitted at 7, I’m pretty sure I know which way it would go.
I think if they keep him it’s because they worked out a deal beforehand. They’re not going to tender him, they’ll say “we have $5M in our budget for you, do you want it?” And then Mountcastle either says yes or no.
For me, Mountcastle may not be “worth” whatever he would get in arbitration, but whatever the team replaces him with internally (or off their beloved waiver wire scrap heap) is going to be worse than the slightly above league average production Mountcastle usually gives you. So, from an owner that claims to be interested in giving out extensions (which for the players involved would be hundreds of millions), overpaying a little bit to get production from first base shouldn’t be a big deal.
Mountcastle isn’t league average, much less above, but otherwise I agree with your assessment. Whatever the Orioles could get for ~$7 million probably wouldn’t be significantly better than Mountcastle, and depth is important for a 162 game season. Obviously, he could be traded but I doubt that any team would offer much for him right now.
Mountcastle’s R/R 1B profile is tough to fit on a roster. Mayo has options, so if continues to struggle, he can be stashed at AAA. Unfortunately I think you are right that Mountcastle gets non-tendered.
And I think this is the right call because I don’t even know how you would value the Orioles’ young players at this point. Henderson, Rutschman, Westburg, and Cowser were all so much better in the year before this (for Adley it was two years before). Henderson is going to look to get paid like a 7-win player, Rutschman like a 4+ wins player, and Westburg and Cowser at 3+ wins. I actually think the most reasonable player for a long-term extension is Bradish, who is coming off a serious injury and who probably could use some security. And the second is probably Dylan Beavers
Westburg had a 123 wRC+ with a .23 BB/K last year.
He has a 122 wRC+ with a .23 BB/K this year.
He’s just been hurt a couple times.
I think we need to start asking about the health thing though. I agree, he’s great when he plays, but he has missed a lot of time.
Yep – I doubt the missed time will get any better as he gets closer to 30, either.
Hitters like Westburg tend to drop off a cliff to unplayable once their athleticism starts to decline, with his age I couldn’t really blame them for taking it year to year in arbitration rather than guarantee an 8-figure yearly salary to a corner infielder with a <5% walk rate
Tis true.
To me the bigger concern is he’s going to be 27 before next season starts & is not a FA until AFTER 2030 & he’ll be 32 before he plays after becoming a FA.
With his profile, I’m not sure I wouldn’t prefer to just keep him thru his arb years & not get caught buying the post-peak years.
Not sure how you sign/value Rutschman. Rutschman has already made $15M & has been in an 1 1/2 year hitting funk. Likely going to be tough to come to an agreement, IMO.
To me, you could maybe buy low on Cowser & sign a contract that doesn’t cost too much & he may bite now that he’s seen the downside & would take $50-60M.
To me, Henderson should get the Bobby Witt/Julio type deal, but, not sure Baltimore has the stones to do it..but, they should.
I do not think Henderson would take it.
But it seems fair to me.
I think the time has probably past..probably needed to do it after 2023/early 2024 when he still had some $550K seasons to play through.
The price per year keeps rising because they didn’t buy out the really cheap years. He has little incentive to give a deal on arb/FA years now.
Gunnar, Westburg, and Holliday are all Boras clients, and you can look up the record on them signing pre-arb extensions.
Adley already has quite a bit of money and probably wants to get paid like he’s still putting up five win seasons.
I would’ve signed Grayson to an extension at the start of 2024, and that would, evidently, have been a terrible decision.
You could extend Bradish if he looks healthy, but iirc he’s already controlled through his age 31 or 32 seasons.
That leaves some relatively unproven guys (bad or inconsistent) like Mayo or Cowser or guys who aren’t good enough to warrant it, like Mountcastle or Kremer.
The person they should actually try to extend is Trevor Rogers. If he plays to his peripherals (mid-3s) that’s definitely worth buying out a couple FA seasons.
Baltimore media said that Elias discussed one extensively with Rutschman’s agent Dan Vertlieb. Reportedly, he wanted ten years with at least $25 million per season. I understand why they would ask for that much given the excellence of his first two seasons, yet after continuing his decline on both offense and defense, I hope that he will be more realistic this winter. I would still like to see him be the primary catcher while Basallo catches ~40 games.
Henderson, Westburg, and Holliday are all Boras clients, which means that extensions with them aren’t even possible yet. Boras steadfastly refuses to do pre-arbitration extensions, as the first and only one he ever did was Carlos Gonzalez in January of 2011. Jose Altuve wanted Boras to do one in 2013 and Boras refused, so Altuve fired Boras and went back to Octagon, who negotiated the extension two months later. Keibert Ruiz wanted Boras to do one in 2023 and Boras refused, so Ruiz fired Boras and went to Octagon, who negotiated the extension two weeks later.
Boras has mentioned in interviews that he views pre-arbitration extensions as “snuff contracts” which greatly favor the organization and depress the career earnings of the player. Unless one of those Orioles leaves his agency, they won’t be signing extensions any time soon.
I can’t imagine that. Basallo just produced a 150 wRC+ as a 20 year old in AAA and Eric had him as the fifth best prospect in baseball coming into the season. His bat will unquestionably play at first or DH, he’s just more valuable if he is at least a passable catcher.
I do not fault the orioles for the relative lack of extensions. As noted, the ones that make the most sense are boras clients. also, yeah, I think its a less than say 10% chance Barsallo’s bat does not play at first. so i guess i can imagine it, but very unlikely.
I know most people struggle w 95+ mph, but saw a stat where he basically can’t hit a good fastball at all. Was something like a 120/180/120 slash vs 95+ in minors career. Just something to keep an eye on
I think you’re referring to an Eric Longenhagen chat from June.
I don’t have Synergy (pending the lottery), but I did pull a similar query on Baseball Savant. I think it’s clear his numbers improved since then, at least under the hood, not by contact rate but peep the exits and expected data.
I was. Glad to hear it’s changed then!
There are always questions with young players. There’s always questions with every player. Players forget how to hit overnight.
Sometimes people take these projections as written in stone without thinking about the randomness of outcomes inherent in baseball and life at large.
Randomness of outcomes is inherent in projecting a player in A ball. The range of realistic outcomes is much smaller for a player with the highest barrel percentage in AAA, the second highest average exit velocity, the fourth highest hard hit rate, the eight highest 90th percentile exit velocity, and a respectable contact rate. There are no serious questions about Basallo’s bat, and I say that as someone who told people when Jackson Holliday was in AAA that he had major red flags and shouldn’t have been considered the best prospect in the minor leagues.
Are we sure that Adley is a good enough hitter to DH? Been more than a year of being horrible
It’s a valid question, but Rutschman is actually hitting the ball harder than ever this season while also running the best contact rate of his career. He’s had horrendously bad luck on balls in play.