Six Takeaways From Our 2024 Playoff Odds Release

Hey there, FanGraphs reader. Great news! Our playoff odds just went up for the 2024 season. These odds, as always, are mostly enlightening, but also a tiny bit mystifying. The model itself remains simple: We take projections for each player, aggregate them up to the team level based on playing time projections, and then use that to create expected team run scoring and prevention numbers. From there, we simulate out the season 20,000 times and note what happened in each instance. The odds are just a summary of those simulations.
As simple as the process is, itās also inscrutable. How good are the projections? We think theyāre very good, as theyāre a combination of ZiPS and Steamer. But those projections inevitably differ from peopleās perceptions of both individual players and teams. So in whatās become an annual tradition, Iām going to give you a guided tour through the projections and point out the notable points in each division, then explain how our model got there and what I think of it.
The AL East Is a Buzzsaw
My goodness, this division is good. Our model simulates the actual schedule, but to do that, we first forecast team strengths in a vacuum, and the AL East has four of the top 10 teams in baseball, and four of the top six teams in the American League. If we played in a weird counterfactual world where instead of facing each other, every team played a hypothetical .500 team 162 times, our model projects that the AL East would outscore their opponents by a combined 218 runs. The second-best division in baseball is the NL East… at 44 runs.
The Yankees sitting in first place might surprise some people, but they finished above .500 last year despite some bad injury luck, and both the model and I absolutely love what theyāve done to the team since then. They backfilled the rotation with Marcus Stroman, who should provide bulk innings with reasonable quality, something the team sorely lacked last year. They acquired three different outfielders better than every Yankees outfielder aside from Aaron Judge, and one of those was Juan Freaking Soto. There are certainly still reasons to worry ā depth and aging being the top two ā but our odds agree with bookmakers and other similarly constructed models that theyāre the team to beat in the division. They might not win 95 games because the division is so tough, but this iteration of the Yankees looks legitimately great.
The Orioles and Rays are in a dead heat for second, which might surprise some ā the Oās just won a billion games, after all. But they outperformed their raw statistics meaningfully, and weāre projecting their competition to get tougher this year. Adding Corbin Burnes is obviously great, and we think theyāre now one of the best run prevention teams in baseball, so mission accomplished there. Still, this is the projection of a club just below the game’s elite tier, which contains four teams: the Braves, Dodgers, Astros, and Yankees. The system simply doesnāt care that the Oās won 100 games last year; it projects each player individually and goes from there.
The Rays have generally been underrated by our model because their depth does an incredible job covering for injuries. That may yet be the case this year, but theyāve also accumulated a gaudy assortment of above-average hitters and pitchers that mean they stack up well against the rest of the league when comparing starter to starter. Add in their usual depth, this time headlined by a bumper crop of prospects, and things look characteristically rosy in Tampa Bay. By BaseRuns, which strips out sequencing and context from the statistics each team puts up, they finished 11 wins ahead of the Oās last year (but two games behind in real life). Weāre projecting a healthy dose of regression for them, but theyāre just so good that itās hard to imagine them falling further than this.
Lastly, the Blue Jays and Red Sox are no slouches. We have the Jays as the seventh-best team in baseball, but think theyāll win the 12th-most games. We think the Red Sox are above average and yet will finish with a losing record. Either of those teams would stand a good chance of winning one of the two central divisions. What a wildly competitive group.
The Twins Stand Alone
Itās really hard to project as having a 50% chance of winning your division. Baseball is inherently volatile and teams are bunched up. Only four teams in the entire majors hit that mark, and three of them are the consensus best three teams in the sport: the Braves, the Dodgers, and the Astros. The fourth is the Twins, who we think would be the fifth-best team in the AL East if everyone played the same schedules.
Hereās the thing, though: the AL Central is awful this year. Dylan Cease and Luis Robert Jr. might still be on the roster, but the White Sox are fast approaching the point where they move past the ātrade everything thatās not nailed downā part of their teardown and start trading the nails. The Royals lost 106 games last year, and while we think theyāre going to be a lot better in 2024, theyāre still a bad team. The Tigers and Guardians are going to struggle to score runs, though both will do a fairly good job of preventing them.
The Twins arenāt exactly the second coming of the 2001 Mariners or the 1927 Yankees. We project them in the bottom half of baseball offensively, though we do love their pitching staff. But when you win your division by nine games and none of your opponents do much to improve their rosters over the winter, itās easy to come out on top again. At least, thatās what our odds think, and I tend to agree. For what itās worth, betting markets do too: In perfect agreement with our odds, the Twins are one of only four teams who are more likely than not to win their division.
Look at the Mariners and Rangers
Dunking on the Mariners for their payroll-reducing ways has become a fun offseason pastime. They sent Eugenio SuĆ”rez away for very little, then traded away Jarred Kelenic with a few bad (but still relatively minor) contracts for nothing in return. Even bringing Mitch Haniger back into the fold was as much about Robbie Rayās salary as it was reinforcing the outfield. Combine those moves with the team’s murky RSN picture and the goal is pretty clear: This winter was about long-term financial savings.
Itās definitely a bummer to take a team thatās right on the fringes of the playoffs and subtract pieces to balance the books. But Jerry Dipoto and co. have done a really good job of maximizing the teamās 2024 chances while doing so, and our odds show it. Sure, theyāre in a tough division ā the defending World Series champs arenāt even the favorites. Sure, they traded away some players who looked like important contributors. But they did a lot of adding around the edges, and even if I didnāt like the big picture thinking behind a lot of their trades, I think they did really well tactically in most of their deals. Their offense still isn’t going to light the world on fire, but their pitching remains elite. They barely missed the playoffs last year, and they might be a better team in 2024 than they were in 2023.
As for the Rangers, their challenge will be getting to the playoffs. Three of their top four pitchers will miss the first half of the year, which is impacting their full-season run prevention projection. Their bullpen remains sketchy at best. But if theyāre still in the thick of things when Jacob deGrom, Max Scherzer, and Tyler Mahle return, watch out: Our depth charts give that trio 17% of their starter innings, but that number might be above 50% by September. Our full-year forecast simply can’t account for that late-season change.
It’s Always Sunny in… Atlanta
Yeah, the Braves are ridiculous. We think theyāre the best team in baseball by a wide margin. Their offense is ludicrous, of course. They lit the majors on fire in 2023. But their pitching should be better this year with a full season of Max Fried and some valuable innings from Chris Sale. They even shored up their bullpen, which now ranks among the best in baseball. Last year was no fluke; this team is just stacked across the board.
No one else is realistically playing for first in the NL East. Thatās not because the Phillies are awful; we think theyāre more likely than not to make the playoffs thanks to a top 10 offense. But theyāre just not the equal of Atlanta, at least in the regular season. You can tell that the Braves agree; their offseason was built around addressing their lack of dominant postseason pitching. I also enjoy the Marlins/Mets face-off in the middle of the division; we think both teams will get to .500-ish records in extremely different ways.
The Brewers Might Have Miscalculated
The Brewers are trying to thread a delicate needle by trading Corbin Burnes while bringing up Jackson Chourio. Theyāre working on setting up their next five years while also keeping 2024 in play. That “next five years” part is looking pretty good ā they infused an already promising young core with more talent by trading Burnes ā but theyāre no longer the favorites in the NL Central after losing their ace.
That position falls to the Cardinals, who finished last in the division in 2023. But theyāre the Cardinals, and they focused their entire offseason on shoring up their biggest weakness: pitching. We still think theyāre not a very good pitching team; they have the 11th-worst run prevention projection in baseball despite playing in a pitcherās park. But they were much worse than that last year, and their offense is loaded.
The Cubs might end up being better than they look at the moment ā theyāre reportedly still considering adding a marquee free agent. The Reds have a Cardinals-esque pitching staff without the run-suppressing home stadium, so theyāre going to get in a lot of shootouts, but their hitters will win their fair share of them. In 2023, Milwaukee easily walked away with this division. In 2024, we think that itāll be a melee with the Brewers starting from a disadvantage. Theyāre not down and out by any means, but theyāre coming into the season in a weaker position than Wisconsinites are used to.
The Giants are Confusing
Okay, fine, the Dodgers are really great. We and pretty much everyone with a pulse agree that theyāre one of the best teams in baseball. I donāt think thatās an interesting takeaway from our odds, though. Itās just obvious on its face. Yeah, the team with Freddie Freeman, Mookie Betts, and Shohei Ohtani is good. Thatās all youāre going to get on them in this article.
The down-ballot portion of the division is considerably more intriguing to me. The Diamondbacks unquestionably overperformed expectations last year; they got outscored on the season and made the World Series anyway. This offseason, they doubled down on their success by shoring up weaknesses both in the field and on the mound, and theyāre coming back with a stronger core around Corbin Carroll, Ketel Marte, and Zac Gallen. We think theyāre more likely than not to make the playoffs.
My biggest āwhoa, what?ā of the entire odds run, though, is the position of the Giants and Padres. 2023 was supposed to be San Diegoās last stand. They lost a ton of contributors from that team via free agency and trade, and spent the offseason reducing payroll instead of reloading. The list of their offseason moves mostly reads like a minor league waiver wire. Weāre projecting their payroll to drop by $90 million this year, a huge tumble.
We still like them more than the Giants, who are spinning their wheels without accomplishing much of anything. They didnāt sign many free agents this year after talking a big game about rebounding from missing out on Aaron Judge by making a huge push for Shohei Ohtani. Theyāre also spending much less in 2024 than they did in 2023; theyāre down nearly $50 million in payroll. They have a below-average infield and a league average outfield, even with the addition of Jung Hoo Lee. Their pitching staff is thin ā itās Logan Webb and then a lot of question marks. Their bullpen is hardly an asset; itās been intermittently good in recent years thanks to swingmen bulking it up, but a lot of those guys left this winter. Robbie Rayās eventual return will help, but even then, I donāt like the construction of this team much at all.
Surely, this isnāt how the Giants planned it. Their 107-win 2021 campaign was clearly a high-water mark, but it wasnāt supposed to be the last time they contended. Right now, though, this team looks lost at sea. A sub-Padres projection is a fitting indictment ā even the team purposefully trading off its best players to shrink the budget looks better on paper. The farm systemās not great, either. The San Francisco doom loop narrative irks me to no end as a resident; I think the city is great and that reports of its decline are a ridiculous culture war talking point. But on the baseball field? Now there, I have to admit it looks pretty doom-y.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Twitter @_Ben_Clemens.
heard that one before. how’s that usually work out
Typically around 90+ wins and a playoff spot
sure about that? old, injury-prone, and no depth? that’s a bad trio right there. each kinda compounds upon the other two
Where exactly are they lacking in depth?
They’ve got 2 catchers who could make a case to be starters, plus another reasonable backup. (Trevino, Wells, Rortvedt)
Infield: Rizzo, Torres, Volpe, LeMahieu, Peraza
Outfield/DH: Stanton, Judge, Verdugo, Soto, Grisham + Pereira + some AAAA guys like Greg Allen, Luis Gonzalez, etc.
The rotation is set assuming everyone is healthy. A couple mediocre fill-ins (Weaver, Poteet), and a few prospects very close to the majors.
They’ve already got too many guys to put in the bullpen.
Really the infield is the only place where they could use a little more depth. Getting one of the OF some time at 1B would solve that problem, but not sure if they’d do that.
Heh heh. While I think it’s fine that a projection does not *assume* a spate of injuries — even if occurring with regularity of late — I do hope your skepticism is validated.
The sport is so much better when the Yankees are middling.
Yep, definitely better when the teams in the flyover states are better than the teams where everyone actually lives
Hear hear!
Damn that must mean baseball has sucked for you since the early ’90s… That makes sense given that you wish for players to be injured.
Hey I’m just wishing for middling. How they get there doesn’t matter.
Obviously I’m just poking fun at decades of national media stating as fact that League X is better when the Yankees, Red Sox, Lakers, Knicks, Giants, Cowboys, etc. are in contention. I’d just as well seeing the Marlins win 90.
Not the Marlins. The Marlins are depressing. But the Orioles, Mariners, Twins, and Padres…
For me the Mariners and Twins rank high in the underrated class. Orioles very good but slightly overrated. Padres ?? Who knows. Certainly not me.
No. It’s better when the Yankees are just good enough to miss the playoffs by a game or two and we can listen to them whine about it.
Iām genuinely confused why people think the Yankees are old. They were 15th youngest team last year and are younger this year. They have 3 older bats in DJ, Rizzo, Stanton. The rest of the lineup is very young. No starter over 33. Young pen outside of Kahnle.
Because almost none of the young guys are contributing anything at all. Obviously Soto and Torres will. The rest?
Volpe is projected at 3 wins isn’t he?
Surely based entirely on minor league performance that evaporated on arrival last season. He has no distinct offensive attribute to carry him, he’s just mediocre or moderately bad at all of it. He’d need to improve somewhere between 5% and 30% at like 20 different things to be an impactful player.
The offensive projections literally just expect him to hit his xwOBA from 2023, haha.
He put up 2 fWAR and 3 rWAR despite underperforming his batted ball data by 17 points of wOBA, last year.
Soto, Torres, Wells, and Volpe are projected for about 15 WAR. Plus a wildcard in Peraza (some systems project him for another win). Then 1-2 WAR for Dominguez depending on when he comes back? Oh, and then they have this guy Aaron Judge.
Jealousy against the Yankees is always high. The truth hurts. They are a very good team that if they added Snell would be American League favourites…..they almost are as is. Almost any projection system ranks them ahead of Baltimore. Anti Yankee fans abound because they are jealous.
Also if Soto and Torres were literally the only contributions they got from players who are “young” they’d be better off than most other teams in that department. As if it matters.
And a lot of the building up redundancies is to cover for the fact that you can’t expect all three of those to be healthy and good at the same time.
I am concerned about 1B depth and feel like they should do something to shore that up.
Yankees’ 1B depth should be Juan Soto.
I understand your point but if Rizzo can’t do the job they slide DJ over and put Peraza at 3B. Now if both Rizzo and DJ slump they have a problem.