Snell Trades $15,500 for $50 Million

The Tampa Bay Rays announced this afternoon that they’ve come to terms on a long-term contract extension with the team’s ace, Blake Snell. At five years and $50 million, Snell’s new deal buys out all of his arbitration years and nets the Rays, or the team he’s eventually traded to, an extra year until he hits free agency. There are no team-friendly option years tacked into the end, a common feature in pre-arbitration long-term deals such as this. The deal will take Snell through his age-30 season.

Yes, it’s less than Snell would make if he were a free agent today, but in the big picture, it’s the MLBPA’s job to negotiate a fair system of compensation with major league teams. Snell has to do what’s best for himself under the system that’s currently in place. And as these contracts go, it’s hardly a poor one for the 2018 American League Cy Young winner. The contract goes into effect immediately, crushing the $15,500 raise that Snell was assigned by the team, a situation that was primed to leave lingering bad feelings between player and team. (See Gerrit Cole and the Pirates for a situation in which fighting over a few thousand dollars led to long-term bad feelings.) Per Jeff Passan, it’s the largest deal ever given to a player with just two years of service time, surpassing those signed by Gio Gonzalez as a Super 2 (five years, $42 million) and Corey Kluber (five years, $38.5 million); both of those deals contained option years.

ZiPS Projections – Blake Snell
Year W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2019 15 9 3.08 31 31 166.7 135 57 15 66 189 135 4.2
2020 14 8 3.14 30 30 160.7 131 56 14 65 181 132 3.9
2021 14 8 3.12 29 29 156.0 127 54 14 63 177 133 3.8
2022 13 7 3.10 27 27 145.3 118 50 13 58 165 134 3.6
2023 12 7 3.12 25 25 138.3 111 48 12 55 159 133 3.4

The ZiPS projections don’t usually get too excited about single seasons, but Snell’s emergence was stunning one. No, he’s not really the pitcher that the 1.89 ERA suggests, but then, nobody really is so it’s not part of anybody’s realistic expectations. With the downside risks in both performance and injury factored in ZiPS, the projections still see him averaging just under four WAR a year over the terms of the contract. That’s enough to rank him comfortably in the top projected starting pitchers over the next five seasons.

Top 15 Pitchers by Five-Year ZiPS WAR
Rank Player 5 Year
1 Chris Sale 25.9
2 German Marquez 21.8
3 Luis Severino 21.3
4 Corey Kluber 21.2
5 Jacob deGrom 20.8
6 Aaron Nola 20.5
7 Max Scherzer 19.5
8 Gerrit Cole 19.2
9 Blake Snell 19.1
10 Shane Bieber 19.0
11 Trevor Bauer 18.8
12 Justin Verlander 18.5
13 Carlos Carrasco 17.0
14 Clayton Kershaw 16.9
15 Noah Syndergaard 16.4

(Remember, I told you that ZiPS loves Shane Bieber more than anything you or I will ever love.)

As a free agent, ZiPS projects that Snell would receive and eight-year, $243 million contract. $50 million is obviously quite a lot less than that, but again, it’s the system we have at this moment and the system in which Snell has to make his decisions. When projecting year-by-year, future arbitration awards, and a year of free agency, ZiPS projects Snell to make $73 million over the next five years in a world in which the extension was not signed.

That’s a significant loss for Snell, but it reflects the amount of leverage that teams have over pre-arbitration stars and thus, it’s baked into the system. Snell received a decent signing bonus of $684,000, far more than most draft picks get, but that was also back in 2011, with taxes taking half of it from the moment he signed. Two years, and 40% of another, of minimums gets him over a million, but again, that’s not “live on for the rest of your life” money. Until Snell got his first big arbitration award, the Rays had the upper hand, and pitchers being the way they are, there’s always another fresh cautionary tale to point to about the risks they face (just this week, it was Michael Fulmer).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The fact that it only costs Snell a single year of free agency is a big one. Based on the projections at this minute, if Snell became a free agent in four years, ZiPS suggests he’d get a six-year, $171 million deal. ZiPS estimates a six-year, $162 million contract for that “next contract” after adding a year to the start date. Of course, given the state of the free agent market now, it is reasonable to wonder just how many suitors a 30-year-old pitcher will attract, even one so talented as Snell. Further complicating that assessment is the fact that that hot stove season will be conducted under a new CBA.

Beyond the statistic-based projections, one reason I’m optimistic about Snell’s continued dominance is just how deep his repertoire is. Snell’s success isn’t a gimmick pitch or deception or contingent on leveraging a single pitch in his arsenal to the fullest. Literally everything he throws is frightening; Snell wasn’t the hardest starting pitcher to make contact against (66.6%, 1st of 57 qualifiers) in 2018 by accident.

Pitches by League Rank – Blake Snell
Pitch Rank
Fastball 16th
Slider 12th
Curve 3rd
Changeup 7th

It’s a strange thought, but his 95-98 mph fastball, a pitch against which batters hit .221 and slugged .358, was arguably his least effective pitch in 2019. From a strategy standpoint, the biggest change in Snell from 2018 was his confidence in his curveball, which he threw twice as often as he did in 2017. But it wasn’t just the quantity. It was the situations in which he used it; Snell used the curve as his out pitch as often as his slider against lefties and it practically replaced his slider against righties. Having that additional weapon against righties erased 2017’s large platoon splits and the strikeout rate against those hitters improved by nearly 50%, from 21% to 31%.

The Rays would not have stayed Wild Card relevant as long as they did in 2018 without Blake Snell. He’s the most important employee of the Rays, be it player or executive or owner, so it’s nice to see him get paid in a way that reflects that importance to the franchise.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cardinal SinMember since 2016
7 years ago

This rash of arb extensions makes me wonder whether the owners know something about significant changes to the current pre-FA system coming down the pipe. My guess is there’s a decrease in team control in the next couple years (minus 1 arb year, perhaps, or a brand new system?)

Mahoney
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

I have a theory about this. With analytic folks now in basically every front office, we’ve probably gotten market consensus that spending on free agents is the least efficient use of payroll. Spending a moderate amount above the expected arbitration cost to extend your control years on your best young talent is,much more efficient.

Exhibit A: the Yankees extending Severino and Hicks. It’s not just for low budget teams any more.

Cardinal SinMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Sure, I agree with that wholeheartedly, but the timing is somewhat suspicious all in a chunk like this – the analytic folks have been in place and against FA for a couple years now based on the last 2 offseasons. The timing makes me think that it’s some combination of: (a) the players are now terrified of FA (duh), and have some level of union blessing to sign these deals, (b) the owners recently realized that the arbitrators are less stingy/old-school than they were in the past, resulting in higher pre-FA salaries, and/or (c) the owners have sensed the public tide is turning against them and are planning to concede some pre-FA changes to placate the players, which will result in less control over their current pre-FA players.

The fact that MLB recently met with the union 2 years before the end of the CBA is another sign, methinks. If they got a sense of what FA changes the players were pushing for, I could see the owners deciding what compromises they expect to reasonably propose and then acting quickly to lock down talent while they can. But who knows? I feel like a conspiracy theorist…

baubo
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

I’d say the players now willing to accept extensions is the biggest change. After all, just last year you had Greg Holland rejecting something like 3yr/$52 and Boras entering FA asking for $200mil for Arrieta.

CL1NTMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

(c) is most likely, IMO. I mean let’s not overthink this… teams know there’s a change coming. And even if the players know that preARB will soon be better also… which party has the financial ability to go with their gut on such a farsighted “gut feeling”??

Obviously the teams.. so they just concede a little now, and maybe save a few ten million bucks.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

I think (a) is definitely happening, (b) is probably happening, and (c) might be happening.

antone
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

Is the narrative still that the owners are collusive, or have we moved to something else now with all these extensions and record signings? I can’t keep up.

CL1NTMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  antone

Exactly!

This narrative you speak of… is a very very tired and overused excuse. Surely it’s over with

CL1NTMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

Well yeah.. with the current dramatic narrative that major league players are being shafted so horribly by salaries, teams know that it’s only a matter of time before things change and they’ll have to pony up more money.

IDK who has the most pull right now (in terms of forcing a change), the players, Manfred, the fans… but there has to be a ‘REACTION’.. there always is.

We shall see…

martyvan90Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Cardinal Sin

CS, I suspect you are correct. It seems the owners are recognizing the market realities and are taking advantage of a market inefficiency in advance of a new deal being struck. Hopefully both sides will prioritize and align around their prioritized needs- owners large market/small market needs and MLBPA around pre-arb, arb and post arb needs (and hopefully putting a little meat on the bone for MiLB players). My fear is either or both won’t have a well thought out plan that is prioritized. That could result in significant stoppage.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

This is the third “staff ace”/borderline “league ace” that has signed a deal like this–Nola, Severino, Severino. Considering that teams should probably let these guys walk in their age-30 season anyway instead of paying them until they’re 35 or whatever they will get in FA, it’s another point in favor of extending your stars early.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The choice isn’t really between extending or paying them through 35 or later, though. It’s between extending them through 30 or letting them walk at 29, or something like that.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Another way to think about it is to say that the team gets an extra year or two of team control for the same price they would have expected to pay in arbitration, but they can’t just cut they guy if he gets hurt or totally forgets how to play baseball. That’s probably a smart move.

KevinMember since 2017
7 years ago

Zips love shane bieber but not as much as it loves german marquez…. ahead of degrom, severino, and nola? wow

AnonMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

To reinforce your point – in the entire history of the Rox, no pitcher has accumulated 21.8 WAR over any period of years whether 5 or more. Ubaldo is the career leader at 18.7 WAR.

MikeMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  Anon

This is lazy analysis. Just because it hasn’t been done before doesn’t mean it can’t be done.

Pepper Martin
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike

There’s over a quarter century of data for Rockies pitchers. It’s not like there’s some small-sample-size issues. Since the Rockies came into being, here are each team’s fWAR leaders for pitchers:

Braves: Greg Maddux, 72.9
Dodgers: Clayton Kershaw, 61.6
Tigers: Justin Verlander, 57.9
Yankees: Andy Pettitte, 57.0
Diamondbacks: Randy Johnson, 54.7
Mariners: Felix Hernandez, 54.4
Red Sox: Pedro Martinez, 51.9
Blue Jays: Roy Halladay, 48.7
Astros: Roy Oswalt, 46.3
White Sox: Mark Buehrle, 43.0
Phillies: Cole Hamels, 40.4
Orioles: Mike Mussina, 39.6
Twins: Brad Radke, 38.7
Cardinals: Adam Wainwright, 38.1
Indians: Corey Kluber, 34.1
Brewers: Ben Sheets, 31.9
Angels: Jered Weaver, 31.2
Nationals: Stephen Strasburg, 30.6
Cubs: Carlos Zambrano, 30.1
Royals: Kevin Appier, 29.4
Padres: Jake Peavy, 29.0
Giants: Tim Lincecum, 28.1
Athletics: Tim Hudson, 27.6
Mets: Jacob deGrom, 24.4
Rays: James Shields, 23.9
Rangers: Kenny Rogers, 23.1
Reds: Aaron Harang, 22.4
Marlins: Josh Johnson, 21.6
Rockies: Ubaldo Jiminez, 18.9
Pirates: Gerrit Cole, 15.2

The Pirates have been absolutely atrocious for most of the last 25 years, but have been particularly churned through pitchers like nobody else — only one pitcher has thrown 1,000 innings for them since 1993, Paul Maholm. But there’s something about the Rockies (hint: it’s Coors Field) that just prevents pitchers from being able to accumulate value.

AnonMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Mike

I actually agree with you. I mean nobody had stolen 100 bases and then somebody did and then another guy and then another guy. But in the 120+ years that they’ve been playing baseball, only 3 guys have stolen 100 bases.

The fact that nobody has done it before for the Rockies in 26 years is a pretty strong indicator that it is unlikely that Marquez is going to do it. Nobody has yet quite figured out how to conquer pitching at altitude. Chacin and de la Rosa have come the closest.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago

Cool. Looking forward to the rays trading him 3 years from now for a bunch of 2 WAR players on minimum salaries, per Rays protocol.

Kirby
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

You’re right, they should have tossed $200M at David Price and not flipped him for Willy Adames.

dl80Member since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Kirby

Considering that Price has so far been worth 19 wins more than Adames since the trade, the jury is still out. $200 million was too much, but maybe not by a ton.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Well, Price was worth something like 9.5 wins in that year-and-a-half since they would have controlled him, while what they’ve gotten out of Adames, Nick Franklin, Drew Smyly, and Mallex Smith is about 7 wins, plus some future value from Adames and Mike Zunino. Looks like the deal is roughly even if Adames establishes himself, because while the Rays are going to get more “overall value” from this it’s way more valuable to have a league ace than a bunch of spare parts.

(as long as you don’t factor in the fact the Rays will have had to do waaaaay more work to get that value with all those trade).

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Also, time value of WAR is a real thing. Being a good team now is worth more than being a good team 5 years from now.

calebwMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

And being one good team now is worth more than being one good team spread across 3 years.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Kirby

No. 1, there’s not much evidence Willy Adames is going to be an above average major leaguer, so maybe not the best example there.

No. 2, Price was not one of the extend then trade guys I’m referencing. The Rays never extended him. Moore and Longoria are more like it.

No. 3, the point is not that the Rays have lost any individual trade, it’s that they are perpetually treading water by acquiring cheap, average-ish players with lots of team control. It’s a good way to be sort of relevant but never actually win anything.

I find it modestly amusing how much people want to congratulate the Rays for winning a little marginal value in these trades. Like, ok Matt Duffy has been approximately as good as Evan Longoria for much less money…wtf did you do with all those savings? Nothing. And then you got steamrolled by the yanks and Sox. Congrats, guys

bobr
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

What history are you looking at? It is true that for 4 of the past 5 years the Rays have been mediocre, but last year they were quite good, and ordinarily would have been in the playoffs with 90 wins.

But more to the point, if you extend a bit further back, for 6 years from 2008-2013, with basically the same front office, they won more games than any team except the Yankees, won 90 or more games 5 times and were in the playoffs 4 times and the World Series once.

The Rays do not simply tread water. They demonstrate an intelligent approach to building a contender that can sustain that status for more than one or two years. The marginal advantages in their deals that you mention may very well have put them in the position of repeating their 6 run period of excellence, perhaps even extending it further.

And incidentally, the two examples you give-Moore and Longoria-were apparently traded just as they were about to crater. So that was hardly an example of trading significant value for minimal upgrades. The money they saved on both may very well have been used to build a top flight farm system, pay Morton and extend Snell-and perhaps B. Lowe.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  bobr

I’m not saying they lose the trades they make. In fact, it appears they did quite well in the Moore and Longoria trades. Early returns look good on the Archer deal, as well. I’m criticizing them for not investing their savings in their team.

They have a lot of players who are cheap and basically average, like Duffy, Wendle, Daniel Robertson, Glasnow, adames, etc. Maybe if they used some of the money they’re saving by having a base of solid players making nothing to acquire an above-average player or three, they would have a better shot. They deserve plenty of praise for building a good, cheap club, but I also think they deserve criticism for not being more aggressive when they have a good club.

Kirby
7 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

How can you honestly comment and say that they aren’t using the savings to invest in their team when you’re literally replying to a story about them signing their ace for five years. Also, they locked up a prospect the other day for six years.

There may be more to come. Also, if you realize why Sternberg is cautious about dumping a bunch of money he may or may not have because of an iron clad, awful lease the previous owner had signed for the dumpster fire of a stadium they’re currently in, maybe you’d understand more the motives.

CC AFCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Kirby

Instead of signing snell and Lowe, which does literally nothing to improve the current team since they already had them anyway, they could have used the money to sign a free agent or trade prospects for a more expensive veteran. Then they’d have snell, Lowe and someone else. Ideally, do all of those things.

AnonMember since 2020
7 years ago

I know this about Snell, but damn, the Indians have 4 pitchers on that list. They even have significant control over all of them at way below market deals – Kluber has 3 years left, Carrasco 5, Bauer 2, and Bieber 6 (heck he doesn’t even hit arb for another 3 years). Both Kluber and Carrasco’s last years are team options too so they limit any downside risk. For fun, Clevinger (who I’m guessing isn’t terribly far off this list) has 4 more years and all of them pre-arb or arb years so bargain deals.

Throw in that they have Lindor for 3 more years and Jose Ramirez for 5, both at below market deals, and the Tribe should win the Central for basically the foreseeable future. I mean, they didn’t do much this offseason but they didn’t have to given the rest of the division. If some other team in the division starts showing some improvement the next couple years, the Indians absolutely have the room to go out and splurge and add 2 or maybe even 3 $20M/yr guys.

MichaelMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Anon

Yeah, except maybe they should sets their sights higher than AL Central Champs, just sayin.

calebwMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Michael

What happens in MLB playoffs is such a crapshoot, winning your division is as good a position as any. It’s not the NBA we’re talking about here.

Mahoney
7 years ago
Reply to  Anon

If I were an Indians fan, I’d be hoping they drum up the dough to sign Lindor to an extension.

Max Power
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Maybe a 300M+ extension announced right before the ASG in Cleveland?

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
7 years ago

this “extend everyone pre arb until they are 30” is my strategy when I play GM mode on MLB: The Show. good to see my video game strategy validated in the real world.

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago

How in the hell is Marquez projected for the 2nd most WAR of all pitchers in baseball over the next 5 years? That seems very aggressive and a bit ridiculous.

CL1NTMember since 2025
7 years ago

Jeff Sullivan is the most important employee in the Rays ORG!!

rosen380
7 years ago

$50M contract, “ZiPS projects Snell to make $73 million over the next five years… That’s a significant loss for Snell, but it reflects the amount of leverage that teams have over pre-arbitration stars and thus, it’s baked into the system. ”

Is it “leverage baked into the system” or the player trading risk for $$$$?

johansantana17Member since 2026
7 years ago
Reply to  rosen380

It’s both. The risk to the player (i.e. the fact that a player could conceivably win the Cy Young in all three of his pre-arb years and still have career after-tax earnings of less than $1 million) is baked into the system, which provides the motivation for the player to trade that risk for $$$$.

DeanAnna
7 years ago

Im loving this new extension trend. I think its very healthy for the game as a whole.