Snell Trades $15,500 for $50 Million
The Tampa Bay Rays announced this afternoon that they’ve come to terms on a long-term contract extension with the team’s ace, Blake Snell. At five years and $50 million, Snell’s new deal buys out all of his arbitration years and nets the Rays, or the team he’s eventually traded to, an extra year until he hits free agency. There are no team-friendly option years tacked into the end, a common feature in pre-arbitration long-term deals such as this. The deal will take Snell through his age-30 season.
Yes, it’s less than Snell would make if he were a free agent today, but in the big picture, it’s the MLBPA’s job to negotiate a fair system of compensation with major league teams. Snell has to do what’s best for himself under the system that’s currently in place. And as these contracts go, it’s hardly a poor one for the 2018 American League Cy Young winner. The contract goes into effect immediately, crushing the $15,500 raise that Snell was assigned by the team, a situation that was primed to leave lingering bad feelings between player and team. (See Gerrit Cole and the Pirates for a situation in which fighting over a few thousand dollars led to long-term bad feelings.) Per Jeff Passan, it’s the largest deal ever given to a player with just two years of service time, surpassing those signed by Gio Gonzalez as a Super 2 (five years, $42 million) and Corey Kluber (five years, $38.5 million); both of those deals contained option years.
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15 | 9 | 3.08 | 31 | 31 | 166.7 | 135 | 57 | 15 | 66 | 189 | 135 | 4.2 |
| 2020 | 14 | 8 | 3.14 | 30 | 30 | 160.7 | 131 | 56 | 14 | 65 | 181 | 132 | 3.9 |
| 2021 | 14 | 8 | 3.12 | 29 | 29 | 156.0 | 127 | 54 | 14 | 63 | 177 | 133 | 3.8 |
| 2022 | 13 | 7 | 3.10 | 27 | 27 | 145.3 | 118 | 50 | 13 | 58 | 165 | 134 | 3.6 |
| 2023 | 12 | 7 | 3.12 | 25 | 25 | 138.3 | 111 | 48 | 12 | 55 | 159 | 133 | 3.4 |
The ZiPS projections don’t usually get too excited about single seasons, but Snell’s emergence was stunning one. No, he’s not really the pitcher that the 1.89 ERA suggests, but then, nobody really is so it’s not part of anybody’s realistic expectations. With the downside risks in both performance and injury factored in ZiPS, the projections still see him averaging just under four WAR a year over the terms of the contract. That’s enough to rank him comfortably in the top projected starting pitchers over the next five seasons.
| Rank | Player | 5 Year |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chris Sale | 25.9 |
| 2 | German Marquez | 21.8 |
| 3 | Luis Severino | 21.3 |
| 4 | Corey Kluber | 21.2 |
| 5 | Jacob deGrom | 20.8 |
| 6 | Aaron Nola | 20.5 |
| 7 | Max Scherzer | 19.5 |
| 8 | Gerrit Cole | 19.2 |
| 9 | Blake Snell | 19.1 |
| 10 | Shane Bieber | 19.0 |
| 11 | Trevor Bauer | 18.8 |
| 12 | Justin Verlander | 18.5 |
| 13 | Carlos Carrasco | 17.0 |
| 14 | Clayton Kershaw | 16.9 |
| 15 | Noah Syndergaard | 16.4 |
(Remember, I told you that ZiPS loves Shane Bieber more than anything you or I will ever love.)
As a free agent, ZiPS projects that Snell would receive and eight-year, $243 million contract. $50 million is obviously quite a lot less than that, but again, it’s the system we have at this moment and the system in which Snell has to make his decisions. When projecting year-by-year, future arbitration awards, and a year of free agency, ZiPS projects Snell to make $73 million over the next five years in a world in which the extension was not signed.
That’s a significant loss for Snell, but it reflects the amount of leverage that teams have over pre-arbitration stars and thus, it’s baked into the system. Snell received a decent signing bonus of $684,000, far more than most draft picks get, but that was also back in 2011, with taxes taking half of it from the moment he signed. Two years, and 40% of another, of minimums gets him over a million, but again, that’s not “live on for the rest of your life” money. Until Snell got his first big arbitration award, the Rays had the upper hand, and pitchers being the way they are, there’s always another fresh cautionary tale to point to about the risks they face (just this week, it was Michael Fulmer).
The fact that it only costs Snell a single year of free agency is a big one. Based on the projections at this minute, if Snell became a free agent in four years, ZiPS suggests he’d get a six-year, $171 million deal. ZiPS estimates a six-year, $162 million contract for that “next contract” after adding a year to the start date. Of course, given the state of the free agent market now, it is reasonable to wonder just how many suitors a 30-year-old pitcher will attract, even one so talented as Snell. Further complicating that assessment is the fact that that hot stove season will be conducted under a new CBA.
Beyond the statistic-based projections, one reason I’m optimistic about Snell’s continued dominance is just how deep his repertoire is. Snell’s success isn’t a gimmick pitch or deception or contingent on leveraging a single pitch in his arsenal to the fullest. Literally everything he throws is frightening; Snell wasn’t the hardest starting pitcher to make contact against (66.6%, 1st of 57 qualifiers) in 2018 by accident.
| Pitch | Rank |
|---|---|
| Fastball | 16th |
| Slider | 12th |
| Curve | 3rd |
| Changeup | 7th |
It’s a strange thought, but his 95-98 mph fastball, a pitch against which batters hit .221 and slugged .358, was arguably his least effective pitch in 2019. From a strategy standpoint, the biggest change in Snell from 2018 was his confidence in his curveball, which he threw twice as often as he did in 2017. But it wasn’t just the quantity. It was the situations in which he used it; Snell used the curve as his out pitch as often as his slider against lefties and it practically replaced his slider against righties. Having that additional weapon against righties erased 2017’s large platoon splits and the strikeout rate against those hitters improved by nearly 50%, from 21% to 31%.
The Rays would not have stayed Wild Card relevant as long as they did in 2018 without Blake Snell. He’s the most important employee of the Rays, be it player or executive or owner, so it’s nice to see him get paid in a way that reflects that importance to the franchise.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
This rash of arb extensions makes me wonder whether the owners know something about significant changes to the current pre-FA system coming down the pipe. My guess is there’s a decrease in team control in the next couple years (minus 1 arb year, perhaps, or a brand new system?)
I have a theory about this. With analytic folks now in basically every front office, we’ve probably gotten market consensus that spending on free agents is the least efficient use of payroll. Spending a moderate amount above the expected arbitration cost to extend your control years on your best young talent is,much more efficient.
Exhibit A: the Yankees extending Severino and Hicks. It’s not just for low budget teams any more.
Sure, I agree with that wholeheartedly, but the timing is somewhat suspicious all in a chunk like this – the analytic folks have been in place and against FA for a couple years now based on the last 2 offseasons. The timing makes me think that it’s some combination of: (a) the players are now terrified of FA (duh), and have some level of union blessing to sign these deals, (b) the owners recently realized that the arbitrators are less stingy/old-school than they were in the past, resulting in higher pre-FA salaries, and/or (c) the owners have sensed the public tide is turning against them and are planning to concede some pre-FA changes to placate the players, which will result in less control over their current pre-FA players.
The fact that MLB recently met with the union 2 years before the end of the CBA is another sign, methinks. If they got a sense of what FA changes the players were pushing for, I could see the owners deciding what compromises they expect to reasonably propose and then acting quickly to lock down talent while they can. But who knows? I feel like a conspiracy theorist…
I’d say the players now willing to accept extensions is the biggest change. After all, just last year you had Greg Holland rejecting something like 3yr/$52 and Boras entering FA asking for $200mil for Arrieta.
(c) is most likely, IMO. I mean let’s not overthink this… teams know there’s a change coming. And even if the players know that preARB will soon be better also… which party has the financial ability to go with their gut on such a farsighted “gut feeling”??
Obviously the teams.. so they just concede a little now, and maybe save a few ten million bucks.
I think (a) is definitely happening, (b) is probably happening, and (c) might be happening.
Is the narrative still that the owners are collusive, or have we moved to something else now with all these extensions and record signings? I can’t keep up.
Exactly!
This narrative you speak of… is a very very tired and overused excuse. Surely it’s over with
Well yeah.. with the current dramatic narrative that major league players are being shafted so horribly by salaries, teams know that it’s only a matter of time before things change and they’ll have to pony up more money.
IDK who has the most pull right now (in terms of forcing a change), the players, Manfred, the fans… but there has to be a ‘REACTION’.. there always is.
We shall see…
CS, I suspect you are correct. It seems the owners are recognizing the market realities and are taking advantage of a market inefficiency in advance of a new deal being struck. Hopefully both sides will prioritize and align around their prioritized needs- owners large market/small market needs and MLBPA around pre-arb, arb and post arb needs (and hopefully putting a little meat on the bone for MiLB players). My fear is either or both won’t have a well thought out plan that is prioritized. That could result in significant stoppage.
This is the third “staff ace”/borderline “league ace” that has signed a deal like this–Nola, Severino, Severino. Considering that teams should probably let these guys walk in their age-30 season anyway instead of paying them until they’re 35 or whatever they will get in FA, it’s another point in favor of extending your stars early.
The choice isn’t really between extending or paying them through 35 or later, though. It’s between extending them through 30 or letting them walk at 29, or something like that.
Another way to think about it is to say that the team gets an extra year or two of team control for the same price they would have expected to pay in arbitration, but they can’t just cut they guy if he gets hurt or totally forgets how to play baseball. That’s probably a smart move.
Zips love shane bieber but not as much as it loves german marquez…. ahead of degrom, severino, and nola? wow
To reinforce your point – in the entire history of the Rox, no pitcher has accumulated 21.8 WAR over any period of years whether 5 or more. Ubaldo is the career leader at 18.7 WAR.
This is lazy analysis. Just because it hasn’t been done before doesn’t mean it can’t be done.
There’s over a quarter century of data for Rockies pitchers. It’s not like there’s some small-sample-size issues. Since the Rockies came into being, here are each team’s fWAR leaders for pitchers:
Braves: Greg Maddux, 72.9
Dodgers: Clayton Kershaw, 61.6
Tigers: Justin Verlander, 57.9
Yankees: Andy Pettitte, 57.0
Diamondbacks: Randy Johnson, 54.7
Mariners: Felix Hernandez, 54.4
Red Sox: Pedro Martinez, 51.9
Blue Jays: Roy Halladay, 48.7
Astros: Roy Oswalt, 46.3
White Sox: Mark Buehrle, 43.0
Phillies: Cole Hamels, 40.4
Orioles: Mike Mussina, 39.6
Twins: Brad Radke, 38.7
Cardinals: Adam Wainwright, 38.1
Indians: Corey Kluber, 34.1
Brewers: Ben Sheets, 31.9
Angels: Jered Weaver, 31.2
Nationals: Stephen Strasburg, 30.6
Cubs: Carlos Zambrano, 30.1
Royals: Kevin Appier, 29.4
Padres: Jake Peavy, 29.0
Giants: Tim Lincecum, 28.1
Athletics: Tim Hudson, 27.6
Mets: Jacob deGrom, 24.4
Rays: James Shields, 23.9
Rangers: Kenny Rogers, 23.1
Reds: Aaron Harang, 22.4
Marlins: Josh Johnson, 21.6
Rockies: Ubaldo Jiminez, 18.9
Pirates: Gerrit Cole, 15.2
The Pirates have been absolutely atrocious for most of the last 25 years, but have been particularly churned through pitchers like nobody else — only one pitcher has thrown 1,000 innings for them since 1993, Paul Maholm. But there’s something about the Rockies (hint: it’s Coors Field) that just prevents pitchers from being able to accumulate value.
I actually agree with you. I mean nobody had stolen 100 bases and then somebody did and then another guy and then another guy. But in the 120+ years that they’ve been playing baseball, only 3 guys have stolen 100 bases.
The fact that nobody has done it before for the Rockies in 26 years is a pretty strong indicator that it is unlikely that Marquez is going to do it. Nobody has yet quite figured out how to conquer pitching at altitude. Chacin and de la Rosa have come the closest.
Cool. Looking forward to the rays trading him 3 years from now for a bunch of 2 WAR players on minimum salaries, per Rays protocol.
You’re right, they should have tossed $200M at David Price and not flipped him for Willy Adames.
Considering that Price has so far been worth 19 wins more than Adames since the trade, the jury is still out. $200 million was too much, but maybe not by a ton.
Well, Price was worth something like 9.5 wins in that year-and-a-half since they would have controlled him, while what they’ve gotten out of Adames, Nick Franklin, Drew Smyly, and Mallex Smith is about 7 wins, plus some future value from Adames and Mike Zunino. Looks like the deal is roughly even if Adames establishes himself, because while the Rays are going to get more “overall value” from this it’s way more valuable to have a league ace than a bunch of spare parts.
(as long as you don’t factor in the fact the Rays will have had to do waaaaay more work to get that value with all those trade).
Also, time value of WAR is a real thing. Being a good team now is worth more than being a good team 5 years from now.
And being one good team now is worth more than being one good team spread across 3 years.
No. 1, there’s not much evidence Willy Adames is going to be an above average major leaguer, so maybe not the best example there.
No. 2, Price was not one of the extend then trade guys I’m referencing. The Rays never extended him. Moore and Longoria are more like it.
No. 3, the point is not that the Rays have lost any individual trade, it’s that they are perpetually treading water by acquiring cheap, average-ish players with lots of team control. It’s a good way to be sort of relevant but never actually win anything.
I find it modestly amusing how much people want to congratulate the Rays for winning a little marginal value in these trades. Like, ok Matt Duffy has been approximately as good as Evan Longoria for much less money…wtf did you do with all those savings? Nothing. And then you got steamrolled by the yanks and Sox. Congrats, guys
What history are you looking at? It is true that for 4 of the past 5 years the Rays have been mediocre, but last year they were quite good, and ordinarily would have been in the playoffs with 90 wins.
But more to the point, if you extend a bit further back, for 6 years from 2008-2013, with basically the same front office, they won more games than any team except the Yankees, won 90 or more games 5 times and were in the playoffs 4 times and the World Series once.
The Rays do not simply tread water. They demonstrate an intelligent approach to building a contender that can sustain that status for more than one or two years. The marginal advantages in their deals that you mention may very well have put them in the position of repeating their 6 run period of excellence, perhaps even extending it further.
And incidentally, the two examples you give-Moore and Longoria-were apparently traded just as they were about to crater. So that was hardly an example of trading significant value for minimal upgrades. The money they saved on both may very well have been used to build a top flight farm system, pay Morton and extend Snell-and perhaps B. Lowe.
I’m not saying they lose the trades they make. In fact, it appears they did quite well in the Moore and Longoria trades. Early returns look good on the Archer deal, as well. I’m criticizing them for not investing their savings in their team.
They have a lot of players who are cheap and basically average, like Duffy, Wendle, Daniel Robertson, Glasnow, adames, etc. Maybe if they used some of the money they’re saving by having a base of solid players making nothing to acquire an above-average player or three, they would have a better shot. They deserve plenty of praise for building a good, cheap club, but I also think they deserve criticism for not being more aggressive when they have a good club.
How can you honestly comment and say that they aren’t using the savings to invest in their team when you’re literally replying to a story about them signing their ace for five years. Also, they locked up a prospect the other day for six years.
There may be more to come. Also, if you realize why Sternberg is cautious about dumping a bunch of money he may or may not have because of an iron clad, awful lease the previous owner had signed for the dumpster fire of a stadium they’re currently in, maybe you’d understand more the motives.
Instead of signing snell and Lowe, which does literally nothing to improve the current team since they already had them anyway, they could have used the money to sign a free agent or trade prospects for a more expensive veteran. Then they’d have snell, Lowe and someone else. Ideally, do all of those things.
I know this about Snell, but damn, the Indians have 4 pitchers on that list. They even have significant control over all of them at way below market deals – Kluber has 3 years left, Carrasco 5, Bauer 2, and Bieber 6 (heck he doesn’t even hit arb for another 3 years). Both Kluber and Carrasco’s last years are team options too so they limit any downside risk. For fun, Clevinger (who I’m guessing isn’t terribly far off this list) has 4 more years and all of them pre-arb or arb years so bargain deals.
Throw in that they have Lindor for 3 more years and Jose Ramirez for 5, both at below market deals, and the Tribe should win the Central for basically the foreseeable future. I mean, they didn’t do much this offseason but they didn’t have to given the rest of the division. If some other team in the division starts showing some improvement the next couple years, the Indians absolutely have the room to go out and splurge and add 2 or maybe even 3 $20M/yr guys.
Yeah, except maybe they should sets their sights higher than AL Central Champs, just sayin.
What happens in MLB playoffs is such a crapshoot, winning your division is as good a position as any. It’s not the NBA we’re talking about here.
If I were an Indians fan, I’d be hoping they drum up the dough to sign Lindor to an extension.
Maybe a 300M+ extension announced right before the ASG in Cleveland?
this “extend everyone pre arb until they are 30” is my strategy when I play GM mode on MLB: The Show. good to see my video game strategy validated in the real world.
How in the hell is Marquez projected for the 2nd most WAR of all pitchers in baseball over the next 5 years? That seems very aggressive and a bit ridiculous.
Jeff Sullivan is the most important employee in the Rays ORG!!
$50M contract, “ZiPS projects Snell to make $73 million over the next five years… That’s a significant loss for Snell, but it reflects the amount of leverage that teams have over pre-arbitration stars and thus, it’s baked into the system. ”
Is it “leverage baked into the system” or the player trading risk for $$$$?
It’s both. The risk to the player (i.e. the fact that a player could conceivably win the Cy Young in all three of his pre-arb years and still have career after-tax earnings of less than $1 million) is baked into the system, which provides the motivation for the player to trade that risk for $$$$.
Im loving this new extension trend. I think its very healthy for the game as a whole.