Sonny Gray Is Leveling Up

Pitching is complicated. There are so many layers to it, including mechanics, sequencing, proprioception, supination/pronation… the list goes on and on. Depending on a player’s personality and knack for including analytical information in their learning and development process, digesting this information can be a battle. Over the years, we’ve seen Sonny Gray progress through this experience with multiple teams; now in Minnesota, it seems like he is hitting his peak. As David Laurila wrote, Sonny Gray is evolving as a pitcher.
That interview that David conducted with Gray is a must read. Having the player’s perspective on how they’ve thought through their own changes and development experience helps gives direction to an analyst, and it’s clear in that interview that Gray’s goal is to have a pitch that moves in almost any direction. As somebody who doesn’t have overwhelming fastball velocity (16th percentile), it’s crucial that he stays unpredictable and deceptive. That hasn’t been a problem for him in the past, but this year he has leveled up his diversification. Below is a plot of his pitch movement chart in 2023 (top) versus 2022 (bottom):


Last season, there were essentially two tiers of separation: fastballs in one area, breaking balls in another. For the most part, there isn’t much negative blending happening within either pitch group. The two-seamer has distinct horizontal separation from the four-seamer, and the curveball has vertical separation from the sweeper. The horizontal distribution of the sweeper is on the tail ends of the curveball; Gray manipulated the pitch to have more or less sweep than the curveball to ensure that separation. This year, he has taken his 2022 arsenal, improved upon it, and added two more effective pitches in the cutter and changeup.
In this interview with Rob Friedman, Gray goes into deep detail about the shape of each of his pitches and why he thought it would be valuable to include two new ones, particularly the cutter, in his repertoire, and about the value of his cutter serving as an in-between for the two fastballs and two breaking balls. From the hitter’s point of view, doing that complicates attacking or locking in on one zone or speed. If you’re a left-handed hitter sitting on a four-seam fastball on the inner third, a cutter could move in and jam your barrel or, if it has a little more vertical depth, slide right under. The same idea can be applied for expecting breaking balls; the cutter can stay up and freeze you instead of having the level of drop or sweep of a curveball or sweeper. In addition, the cutter velocity is just a few ticks faster than the two breaking balls and a few ticks slower than the two fastballs.
Gray has has done almost everything possible to assure he maintains deception. His release points are consistent. He has multiple layers of movement both vertically and horizontally. He can vary velocity and movement within a given pitch. If you were to build a pitcher who doesn’t have great velocity but can spin the heck out of the ball, this is a darn good blueprint.
It’s important to see exactly how Gray uses these pitches within the context of an at-bat. You can have all this movement and velocity diversity, but you still need to command each pitch and sequence correctly. I’ll start with an at-bat against a right-handed hitter.
Pitch 1 (0-0 count, four-seamer)
Pitch 2 (0-1 count, cutter)
Pitch 3 (0-2 count, curveball)
Pitch 4 (0-2 count, sweeper)
Pitch 5 (1-2 count, sweeper)
Gray has gotten his cutter usage up to 17.6% on the year; you should expect to see it only one or two times in an at-bat. But this at-bat against Yan Gomes is a perfect example of how the pitch allows him to progress with a four-seamer through to a sweeper. Gomes didn’t pull the trigger on the upper third four-seamer but did on a cutter that had enough separation to miss his barrel. Gray followed up with a curveball out of the same tunnel, and Gomes chopped it on the ground for a foul ball.
At this point, Gomes had failed to differentiate his swing enough to get his barrel to any of these pitches, and Gray still had the sweeper in his back pocket. The first he threw was backed up out of the zone, but the second was placed in the same tunnel as the other three pitches, and Gomes swung too early on it. Again, the cutter isn’t the main weapon here; it’s another layer to keep Gomes guessing.
Now, here is an example of how Gray used the pitch against a lefty:
Pitch 1 (0-0 count, curveball)
Pitch 2 (1-0 count, cutter)
Pitch 3 (1-1 count, curveball)
Pitch 4 (1-2 count, two-seamer)
This is one of my favorite sequences from any pitcher all year. After starting with a curveball out of the zone against Brandon Belt, Gray followed up with a cutter that stayed up. Belt was clearly prepared for a breaking ball of some sort based on his timing and swing path, but the cutter got above his barrel. Because Gray was able to keep the pitch in the zone, Belt’s eye level was changed, leading to him chasing the next curveball below the zone. With a 1–2 count and two bad swings from Belt, Gray could’ve gone in multiple directions but ultimately opted for a front-door running two-seamer at the knees. Why? Because Belt had showed Gray that his swing was geared for middle-of-the-zone loft; horizontal entry low was unhittable for that swing path if Gray could execute it, and that he did.
Gray’s -5 run value on his cutter is eighth in the league, right behind pitchers with established elite cutters like Kenley Jansen, David Robertson, Marcus Stroman, and Camilo Doval. To add such an effective pitch — a .231 batting average against, a .233 wOBA, and it doesn’t have bad splits, with a .153 wOBA and -2.4 run value versus lefties — into your arsenal this quickly is a career-changing development. All that, and I haven’t mentioned Gray’s changeup usage and effectiveness thus far (-1 run value). Having a sixth pitch with a .125 batting average against is a premium not many other pitchers in baseball have, even if you just occasionally flash it (and Gray has thrown it just 6.4% of the time).
Gray is on pace for the highest fWAR of his career and is a mere 0.4 wins behind the AL leader, Kevin Gausman. There may be some regression coming considering he has only given up one home run all season, but that is a skill he’s displayed his entire career anyways. If he can keep this up and stay healthy, he is in a for a career year.
Esteban is a contributing writer at FanGraphs. One of his main hobbies is taking dry hacks every time he sees a bat.
Would be nice if they let him pitch beyond 4 innings…
He’s only stopped at four innings twice this year, never gone below five otherwise. Averaging just shy of five and a half IP/G. And that’s while dealing with some minor injuries.
He has pitched 5 or more innings in 12 of 14 starts this year and he only has two 4-inning starts. But he has only gone 6 or more five times.
For as dominant as Gray has been this season, he really hasn’t gone deep. He is 17.2 innings behind Nathan Eovaldi in the same number of starts.
He hasn’t pitched over 150 innings in 4 years. Need to be careful with players who are prone to getting injured
THIS – if he has such an array of pitches to choose from you would think they would explore letting him average more than 5.5 innings an outing.
It really seems like the Twins are managing the 2022 version of Gray and not the version described above
He may have to hit too
I’m also really impressed by his changeup usage this season. Not only is it the highest rate since 2017, but he’s increased its separation in velocity and movement from his fastballs, and it’s working well.
I think a lot of his progress has to do with his slider usage being at a career high, being used more than either of his fastballs. That and the typical high usage of his curve has allowed his other stuff to play up and play off his best breaking stuff more effectively, especially the changeup which has mirrored spin to both breaking balls. His cutter fills the one gap in his revamped arsenal.
I think it’s interesting to contrast these things with his interview with Eno Sarris back in 2017. Sonny Gray is / was infamous for his pitches being more on a continuum rather than discrete, and found it hard to talk about what “pitches” he used as a result. But he seems much more able to discuss it now, even though adding multiple new pitches is functionally not all that different than his more “continuous” approach of earlier years even if it’s easier to wrap your brain around.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/sonny-gray-is-a-mystery/
Always been a big fan and thought he’s been underrated most of his career and thought it was bullshit when Cashman said Gray struggled because he couldn’t handle NY.
With the benefit of hindsight, I would say your assessment has been vindicated. He was a #3 in Oakland and was pitching more like a #2 when he was traded to the Yankees. Then when he left, he became a #2 for a year plus the 60 games of 2020. And while he’s gotten very lucky this year (take a look at the number of hard hits that have not left the park), even the most conservative interpretation of his batted ball numbers and results has him as a strong #3 pitcher, and the most aggressive interpretation has him as being on pace for more than 5 wins. It’s pretty clear the problem was whatever he was asked to do in New York.
I commented way back then about his splits. He was terrible at Yankee stadium. His road fip was in the 2.00s if I recall.
i’d love to see the pitch tunneling overlay on those ABs, almost every pitch looked like it started the same way then broke differently
watching Sonny play defense is one of the most underrated things in baseball. He’s sooo athletic
Getting that strong Javier Vazquez feeling again. Otherwise, good piece.
Former Oakland A’s seem to be good at baseball.
Wonder if they’d be a playoff team with Olson, Semien, Chapman, Murphy, Gray, Bassitt, and company
He’s so good. I’ll never forgive Larry Rothschild and the Yankees for ruining him and trading him away for basically nothing. He was an awkward fit in NY but I don’t think that was his problem. The problem was that the Yankees coaching staff couldn’t get the best out of him.
The massive pitch mix changes and the way they wanted him to rely more on his already bad 4-seam were really terrible decisions. Nowadays the pitch is better, but in 2018 it was one of the worst in the league iirc. He had a good thing going!
Every time I see that exaggerated ‘inverted W’ I instinctively think “that guy is going to ruin himself”.
No idea whether that’s been confirmed or debunked these days, but I do know that I’ve never had much faith in Dr. Mike Marshall.
Haha, me too! I read his post on that one stinkin time and have never been able to shake it. The power of images.