Spencer Strider Is Comically Overpowering

Darren Yamashita-USA TODAY Sports

I don’t think you understand. You probably think you understand, but you don’t understand. Oh, you know that Spencer Strider is a bolt of lightning, a strikeout pitcher so overpowering that he might as well have been created in a lab. You know that he’s having a good season, surely; he’s locked in a tight race for NL Cy Young with Zac Gallen and Blake Snell. You know that he’s the logical continuation of the high-strikeout ace lineage, Bob Feller or Sandy Koufax or Roger Clemens for a new age. But I doubt you grasp how much of an outlier Strider’s 2023 season is, because I didn’t either until I took a closer look.

We have pitch-by-pitch data for every major league game on our leaderboards starting in 2002. That means we can calculate swinging strike rate, the percentage of pitches that result in a swing and a miss, for all of those years. I’ll tell you right off the bat that the single-season leader in this category is Jacob deGrom in 2020. In fact, four of the top five seasons on the list are from 2020; they’re outliers that were likely aided by the inherent randomness of a shortened schedule, in other words. For a rate statistic, that makes sense; the fewer innings you can throw to qualify, the easier it is to put up a wild number.

Notice how I said four out of five, though? Strider’s 2023 season is the other one in the group. Batters have come up empty on 19.7% of the pitches Strider has thrown this year. I can’t stress enough how outrageous that is. One way of thinking about it? Here’s a complete list of every non-2020 season where a pitcher recorded a swinging strike rate within three percentage points of Strider’s mark:

Pitchers Within 3% of Strider’s Swinging Strike Rate
Pitcher Year SwStr%
Gerrit Cole 2019 16.8%

That’s it! Gerrit Cole finished the 2019 season 2.9 percentage points shy of Strider’s current pace. By way of comparison, here’s a list of all the seasons within three percentage points of Cole, who was the previous record holder for this particular leaderboard (again excluding 2020):

Pitchers Within 3% of Cole’s Swinging Strike Rate
Pitcher Year SwStr%
Corbin Burnes 2021 16.6%
Max Scherzer 2019 16.4%
Randy Johnson 2002 16.3%
Max Scherzer 2018 16.1%
Justin Verlander 2019 16.1%
Luis Castillo 2019 15.9%
Clayton Kershaw 2015 15.9%
Max Scherzer 2021 15.9%
Johan Santana 2004 15.8%
Patrick Corbin 2018 15.6%
Corey Kluber 2017 15.6%
Robbie Ray 2021 15.5%
Max Scherzer 2017 15.5%
Kevin Gausman 2022 15.5%
Shane McClanahan 2022 15.5%
Jacob deGrom 2019 15.4%
Max Scherzer 2016 15.3%
Carlos Carrasco 2018 15.3%
Kevin Gausman 2021 15.3%
Max Scherzer 2015 15.3%
Lucas Giolito 2021 15.3%
Kerry Wood 2003 15.2%
Blake Snell 2018 15.1%
Jacob deGrom 2018 15.1%
Masahiro Tanaka 2017 15.1%
Corbin Burnes 2022 15.1%
Lucas Giolito 2019 15.0%
Luis Castillo 2023 15.0%
Dylan Cease 2022 15.0%
Blake Snell 2023 15.0%
Shohei Ohtani 2022 14.9%
Chris Sale 2017 14.9%
Randy Johnson 2004 14.8%
Dylan Cease 2021 14.8%
Chris Sale 2015 14.6%
Curt Schilling 2002 14.6%
Freddy Peralta 2023 14.5%
Pablo López 2023 14.5%
Gerrit Cole 2021 14.5%
Justin Verlander 2018 14.5%
Gerrit Cole 2022 14.3%
Francisco Liriano 2015 14.3%
Patrick Corbin 2019 14.3%
Pedro Martinez 2002 14.3%
Clayton Kershaw 2014 14.2%
Robbie Ray 2017 14.2%
Noah Syndergaard 2016 14.2%
Matt Clement 2002 14.2%
José Fernández 2016 14.1%
Pedro Martinez 2003 14.1%
Clayton Kershaw 2017 14.1%
Michael Pineda 2016 14.1%
Carlos Rodón 2022 14.1%
Jesus Luzardo 2023 14.1%
Gerrit Cole 2018 14.1%
Johan Santana 2007 14.1%
Matthew Boyd 2019 14.0%
Shane Bieber 2019 14.0%
CC Sabathia 2008 14.0%
Carlos Carrasco 2015 14.0%
Jason Schmidt 2004 13.9%
Curt Schilling 2003 13.9%
Johan Santana 2005 13.9%
Matt Clement 2004 13.9%
Shane Bieber 2022 13.8%
Oliver Pérez 2004 13.8%
John Smoltz 2007 13.8%

What a fun trip down memory lane, as well as a reminder that I probably underestimated Matt Clement at the time. But the point is, that list is 67 pitcher-seasons long. The race towards missing more bats was contested, a slow upward climb with tons of contenders for the top spot. Then came Strider, and well, I don’t think we’re going to see a lot of people jostling with him atop the record books any time soon.

I find this hard to fathom. After all, we’ve seen seasons like Strider’s when it comes to strikeout rate. Shane Bieber and deGrom exceeded Strider’s current 38.1% mark in 2020. Cole exceeded it in that superlative 2019 season. Heck, Randy Johnson put up a 37.4% season in 2001. That’s impressive company, no doubt, but Strider isn’t lapping the field like he is in swinging strike rate.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

In fact, he stands out in the opposite way here: you might expect him to get more strikeouts given how frequently batters are coming up empty. Here’s a scatterplot of every qualifying season since we have pitch-by-pitch data, excluding 2020:

Strider is that dot out on the far right. It’s not actually that far off of a simple regression line, which would predict a 40.2% strikeout rate instead of his 38.1% number. Cole, meanwhile, is the highest dot; his “predicted” strikeout rate is a mere 34.3%. A one-factor linear regression is obviously far too simplistic – command artists get more called strikes, and so on – but it’s pretty clear that these two skills go together. And it’s just as clear that Strider is great at both.

One underrated aspect of Strider’s season: He’s remarkably consistent. It might feel like he’s a boom or bust type; the Pirates tagged him for six runs in 2.2 innings earlier this month, for example, and he had a handful of other poor performances earlier in the year. But his poor performances aren’t about him failing to miss bats; they’re about everything else going wrong.

The highest swinging strike rate in a single game this year? It’s not Strider; it’s Shane McClanahan, with a whopping 35.2% mark (31 of 88 pitches) against the White Sox in April. Freddy Peralta is second on the list; Trevor Richards is third. Emmett Sheehan and Lance Lynn both have top-10 efforts. One quick note here: I’m using the convention that we use on FanGraphs, which doesn’t count foul tips as swinging strikes. Baseball Savant defaults to counting them, so if you look at their leaderboards, things might be slightly different. But it’s not like Strider’s peak is on a different level than the rest of baseball, however you count.

His consistency, though, my goodness. Strider is fourth on the list – a 29.7% mark on April 24. He’s also sixth on the list – 29.1% on May 12. He’s eighth, 15th, 26th, and 28th, too. That’s six of the top 30 performances this year by swinging strike rate. Peralta has three, and no one else has more than two. Strider has nine of the top 100 games; Peralta and Snell each have four. There’s no one crazy performance driving Strider’s dominance; he’s just doing it nearly every time out.

Here’s another way of putting it: Strider’s worst start from a swinging strike perspective came on June 3. It was a perfectly serviceable start; he struck out seven Diamondbacks over six innings, walked four, and allowed two runs. He threw 99 pitches and garnered 13 swinging strikes, a 13.1% rate. That’s the 1,096th-best swinging strike start (minimum 50 pitches) on the year, out of 4,057 starts (last place: one swinging strike in 97 pitches from Noah Syndergaard on May 31).

That’s Strider at his worst – and it’s more swinging strikes than the major league average. Most pitchers have the occasional clunker in this category. McClanahan has a 6.6% game. Peralta has a 5.9% game. Snell has a 7.8% one. Some days you just don’t have it, or the other guys are seeing the ball well, or any number of other reasons things don’t break your way. There are just so many baseball games. But in every one he’s appeared in this year, Strider takes the mound and guys start swinging.

Is that enough to give him this year’s Cy Young? I have no idea. I’d vote for him right now, but I don’t think his case is overwhelming. But regardless of whether he wins it, what he’s doing is unprecedented. Strider’s 2022 season already felt like a strikeout cheat code – and he had nine different games with a lower swinging strike rate than his worst effort this year. It’s simply hard to wrap your head around how consistent he’s been.

So next time you have a chance — like say, tonight against the Dodgers — check out a Strider start. I can’t guarantee that he’ll shut the other team down, but I can pretty much say for certain that whatever he does, he’ll make a lot of hitters look foolish while doing it. That’s the closest thing you can get to a guarantee in the round-ball, round-bat sport.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago

As a life long Atlanta fan, I can say without a shred of hesitation, that Strider is one of the most exciting starting pitchers I have ever had the pleasure of watching. Right now, he’s the kind of pitcher, that could force teams to tweak their lineups. I believe one of the reasons that the 2022 Mets gave him such fits at times was due to the number of level swinging contact guys in the lineup. Strider’s fastball was designed to punish hitters with a swing that emphasizes launch angle. It could see teams looking for a couple of level swinging hitters for bench and platoon roles to give them a better chance against Strider.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

It’s hard for me to tell looking at the specific players and how they did against Strider. Based on the Rotowire list, the only players who I could tell who performed better against Strider than their overall 2022-2023 performance are Nimmo and Lindor, although Schwarber is pretty close. Everyone else does worse but Trea Turner, Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, Nick Castellanos, Rhys Hoskins, and JT Realmuto are particularly bad against him. I have zero idea why it seems like every non-Schwarber Phillies player is so bad against him.

That said, the Phillies aren’t outliers here. If we take a minimum of 40 team PAs against Strider, the teams that have done the best against him are the Mets and D-Backs–both teams have performed very well against him. The Phillies and Padres are similarly bad against him, and the Marlins and Giants are way worse. The Marlins have a tOPS+ of 10 against him; the Giants are at -9. Negative nine! They’ve struck out three times as often as they’ve reached base against Strider, and only scored one run in 48 PAs.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Fitting that Lindor is one of the hitters that can get to Strider. From Strider’s own comments, we know that Lindor is one of the Major League superstars that would still cause Strider to fanboy out during his Rookie season.

rustydudeMember since 2021
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Just from watching his starts, I recall one of his worst starts against a team I can’t remember (sorry, lol) that really concentrated on swinging at pitches in the zone. Didn’t matter if it was the first pitch or in an 0-1 count, they were swinging. You get at least 3 free swings in any plate appearance. Don’t waste them as called strikes against Strider. If you have him in a hitter’s count you absolutely need to be looking to swing on anything in the zone.

On fantastic outings by Strider I’ve seen dismal performances by teams where hitters are looking for a walk. They’ll get into hitters counts and then be passive as he comes back into the zone and gets easy called strikes.

This piece sort of confirms my thinking. If a hitter on average is going to miss completely on 20% of the times they swing v Strider, they better not waste pitches in the zone by not swinging.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  rustydude

I mean, that all plays back to the constant cat and mouse game between hitters and pitchers. Hitters need to pick the right time to be aggressive against a pitcher, particularly power pitchers as most hitters will need to sell out a little to catch up to 98+. The pitcher likewise needs to be able to judge the correct time to attack the zone, and when to try to get the hitter to expand. I think Maddux was the master of this game. I know its anecdotal, but I’ve heard so many stories of a hitter deciding he was taking a pitch against Mad Dog, and it would end up being a meatball down the heart of the plate for an easy called strike.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

I would also absolutely vote for him for Cy Young, because what he’s doing is ridiculous. He’s not really giving batters a chance. But I think they’re going to give it to Justin Steele or Blake Snell. IDK, maybe the voters will split between Steele and Snell and allow Strider to win it, especially with how good the Braves have been. Probably not.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago

I think the pitching WAR leaderboard is just evidence that the park factors are too heavy a weight, from the chat (with Clemens I think) the Phillies park is worth an extra ten k’s (which is a nice way of putting it)

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

I was the one who posed the question to Clemens. I believe he ended up clarifying that park factors weren’t creating the difference as much as Wheeler’s increased number of infield pop-ups, which don’t show up in FIP, but are calculated into fWAR.
But, even though he didn’t specifically address it, I believe that team defense is playing a role. Strider pitches with the Brave’s defense, which is on the lower side of average, while Wheeler gets to contend with the Phillies Defense, which is a Greek Tragedy.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Oh that’s interesting. Because doing that confounds your WAR measure. Teams have systematically different defense quality for different pitchers, and the Braves look different (better) behind strider than they do, say, Morton (am I crazy or was this an article on fangraphs?). It makes sense, if you’re behind strider you’re just going to field fewer balls and have fewer opportunities for mistakes.
If you’re penalizing a pitcher for playing in front of a good defense, you’re penalizing him for a good thing he might be causing (to an extent)- unless you only use the team defense measures when he’s not pitching.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Sorry, I may have mispoken. I was confusing bWAR and fWar for a moment. As fWAR uses FIP as one of its primary inputs, they don’t adjust for defense as much, where as bWAR likely is more impacted by a teams defense.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Can you explain this a little more? This might partly explain why bWAR seems to overcorrect too much for team defense in a lot of cases. Although the main problem is DRS, which is often wrong and can give you some very extreme values (see: The Blue Jays’ outfield). But I’m not sure.

I’m trying to figure out if this is an especially large problem for teams with a high DRS, pitchers who strike out a ton of batters, pitchers with huge strikeout rates on teams with a high DRS, or all of them. It does seem like Kevin Gausman (in particular) would get overpenalized because he strikes out a lot of batters and the Blue Jays’ DRS is enormous (and not credible, IMO).

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

My apologies, I didn’t mean to imply that I have any greater understanding of the calculation of bWAR than the average enthusiast the peruses their site and reads their content. From their own reference page they note the role the xRA_def plays into their final calculations.

JimmyMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I wrote a community article on here addressing that point: https://community.fangraphs.com/fixing-baseball-references-defensive-adjustment-for-pitcher-war/ Wheeler in particular was getting a huge boost in bWAR because while Philly’s defense was god-awful, it was not so bad when he was on the mound.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Basically, if you want to know a pitcher’s impact on DRS (or whatever metric), you look at the DRS for when he is pitching versus when he isn’t.

If there’s a meaningful difference, you can say it’s likely that the pitcher causes a change in DRS (it could be other things but just assume that for the sake of argument).

If you’re using DRS to “correct” pitcher WAR, you’re operating under the assumption that the pitcher doesn’t affect a teams DRS. If the pitcher causes a shift in DRS, that’s a wrong assumption. So if you’re penalizing a pitcher for a good DRS in this case, you’re penalizing them for something they control and more importantly makes them “good.”

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago

Btw, if it’s true that home runs aren’t correlated year to year, he could have an even more ridiculous season next year. The FIP xFIP gap is almost entirely driven by a slightly high home run rate. (He could also walk fewer guys, but that’s probably the pitcher he is going forward)

whatmonster
2 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

as a Braves fan, it certainly feels like the homeritis is his only weakness. I can’t think of a single “bad” Strider start this year that wasn’t due to a few homers appearing out of nowhere.

The walks hardly even bother me because he can usually K his way out of a jam. If anything the main benefit of cutting down on walks will be managing his pitch count, but I also think going late into games is never going to be Strider’s thing. Takes a lot of pitches to get those K’s!

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  whatmonster

It’s seems like the FIP xFIP flipped in the last couple of starts too, so the inference you’d draw is backward. I thought his xFIP was lower than his FIP.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Yeah, Strider’s current (and career) xFIP vs FIP gap actually implies that he tends to get lucky in regards to the number of fly ball that turn into homeruns. I certainly remember during his recent outing in San Francisco that he gave up a few fly ball outs that would have been Home runs in other stadiums.
Stider in various interviews has admitted that his approach emphasizes stuff over location. The pitching ninja even created a compilation of the number of times Strider grooved a 98+ mph fastball down the middle of the strikezone, and batters still were well below league average against it. So, if he gets outside of his mechanics, and his stuff starts to fall off, that tends to be when he is prone to the homerun ball.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Look at Cole too. Great pitchers with great FBs they use up in the zone and sometimes hitters are just plain good, lucky with the barrel, or the location is a little off and that contact results in homers more often than other pitches might.

JV19
2 years ago

How far back do swinging strike rates go? Would be curious to see the leaderboard normalized to a swstr%+

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  JV19

This made me curious about where his overall K%+ lands in comparison to others. He’s roughly tied for the 71st or so spot in that going back to 1951 if you split the seasons or so apart. So this is good, but it’s not quite as big an outlier for the era he plays in as some others. FWIW, Nolan Ryan has eleven (!!!) of the top 30 seasons on this metric, and Randy Johnson had seven of them.

MDLMember since 2021
2 years ago

Patrick Corbin?! His recent years must have clouded my memory of how good he was.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  MDL

I know. Seeing the current state of Patrick Corbin and Noah Syndergaard really makes me sad.

EstebanMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  MDL

He really had 2 excellent seasons and 2 other good seasons. His FA year being his best worked out but was also his best year for HR/9. Flags fly forever so I I guess the Nationals were ok with getting his other excellent year in 2019.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Esteban

Why does it seem like there is someone in the comment sections on this article who is just going through and downvoting every comment?

Anon21Member since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  carter

Yeah, this is strange behavior.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  MDL

There was a little bit of a Corey Kluber admiration society around him when he was on the Dbacks because he was really quite good even if he hadn’t put it all together, all the time

TimBrownUMember since 2020
2 years ago

My takeaway from the big table is how absurd Randy Johnson was (and Kerry Wood showing up twice). Putting up a swinging strike rate in the early 2000s that’s comparable to the best seasons from two decades later is nuts.

downbaddav
2 years ago

he’s had some pretty bad defense played behind him, especially in that pirates game

offthewall
2 years ago

“Strider to miss next start due to forearm tightness, MRI scheduled.”

PhilMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  offthewall

Really? I’ve google him and nothing has come up. That would be a major bummer.

Was going to say he’s pitching against his possible age 36 version today in Lance Lynn – lots of strikeouts, a few too many homers (though obviously Lynn is no where near as extreme with the number of strike outs, and Strider is no where near as extreme with the number of HRs)

Though Strider’s HR/FB% of 12.0% isn’t anything especially bad.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Phil

yeah, either offthewall has an inside source or he is trolling. We should know which by the end of today.

offthewall
2 years ago
Reply to  v2micca

Trolling. But it’s only a matter of time.

v2miccaMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  offthewall

Meh, I actually expect his shoulder to give out fist.

hughduffy
2 years ago
Reply to  offthewall

Strider had UCL reconstruction surgery back in 2019, and dude doesn’t want to have to go through that again. He revamped his mechanics after the surgery. The guy is very smart about his own biomechanics. He doesn’t want to have to go through that again.

The earliest I would start worrying about another TJ surgery would be 2026.

rustydudeMember since 2021
2 years ago

Scherzer shows up 5 times from 2015 to 2021 on that list. He has been so consistently good throughout his career. Doesn’t have Strider’s peak performance but man that guy has earned his future HOF induction.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
2 years ago

Some say its the stache. I say its the quads. Dude’s got Hulk thighs

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
2 years ago

Huge quads and crazy flexibility. Explosiveness all through the kinetic chain.

https://youtu.be/ZVyVGWfWocA?si=Eduz7RH3vxe31q_q

jvdlo
2 years ago

Has there ever been a more underwhelming Cy Young race? It’s September 1st, and a guy with a 4.8WAR and a 3.56 ERA is a leading contender.