Starting Pitcher Disabled List Analysis (1 of 3)

This is the first in what will be a series on the disabled list. Here’s a link to the data.

I recently posted a projection formula (here and here) that estimated the chance of a starting pitcher spending time on the disabled list. To say the least, it generated several questions.

So I’m going to take a step back and show historic DL numbers for starting pitchers. For the purpose of this post, I’m only looking at pitchers with 20-plus starts and more than 120 innings from the previous season.

Going back to 2001, there were 947 pitchers who didn’t retire and met the criteria for starts and innings. In addition to basic DL information (trips to the disabled list, days on the list), I collected data on other non-game-related statistics, including height, weight, college, high school and even country of origin. It was an exhaustive compilation.

The primary drawback with DL data is pretty obvious: there aren’t many seasons of it. Nine, to be exact – from 2002 to 2010. For my research, I want at least three years of disabled-list data on each player but since I only have nine seasons of that information that means I can only look at six years of samples. (I won’t have sufficient DL statistics for pitchers from 2002 to 2004.)

Height and weight numbers were collected to get an idea of the pitcher’s frame. Teams most-certainly bias those values to make players appear bigger and stronger, and they don’t account for changes over a career. But even with this bias, they give a good, rough estimate of the player’s frame. With this in mind, I calculated each pitcher’s body mass index. This gave me a general idea about how their individual weight is distributed across their bodies.

As part of this experiment, I’m introducing what I call “Average Disabled List Expectancy.” ADLE is the number of expected DL days for a pitcher. It’s a simple calculation that takes the percent chance of a player going on the disabled list and multiplying that by the average number of days for each DL trip.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Here’s what I discovered:

The key numbers here is that 39% of all starting pitchers will end up on the DL the following season after being a starter in the league the year before. Those injuries will result in an average of 66.3 days lost per trip, which calculates to an ADLE of 25.9.

Three other values stick on from this list. Younger pitchers average fewer days on the DL, which shouldn’t be surprising. Perhaps the most obvious part of this research is that the older a player gets, the higher the chance of a that player getting hurt. Also, players who weigh more than 210 lbs (BMI greater than 26.5 for the average height of 74.8”) are more likely to find themselves on the DL.

To get an understanding of how the days lost on the DL are distributed, here’s a chart grouping the days lost into 15-day intervals.

That is all for today. Tomorrow I will look at each attribute separately.





Jeff, one of the authors of the fantasy baseball guide,The Process, writes for RotoGraphs, The Hardball Times, Rotowire, Baseball America, and BaseballHQ. He has been nominated for two SABR Analytics Research Award for Contemporary Analysis and won it in 2013 in tandem with Bill Petti. He has won four FSWA Awards including on for his Mining the News series. He's won Tout Wars three times, LABR twice, and got his first NFBC Main Event win in 2021. Follow him on Twitter @jeffwzimmerman.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
S.X.M.
15 years ago

The DL average days doesn’t seem very instructive. There’s obviously a lot of long term injuries like Tommy John surgery or shoulder injuries like Brandon Webb. The better solution than a simple average would be to break it down by injury and expected loss. Most of what you’re saying here was said at BPro here: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=1799

Wally
15 years ago

To me, the obvious first place to start is trying to ask the question of: Do DL trips in the past predict DL trips in the future?

You could subdivide this basic question a lot of ways, like setting up cut offs for 50+ day DL trips predicting 50+ day DL trips, various other young vs. old comparisons, and like SXM said, if certain types of initial injuries predict more injuries of the same kind or even different ones, in the future.

Lots to be done here. And building a good data base from which you can launch all these different types of questions is often greatly under-appreciated.

shthar
15 years ago

the only sure indicator of future injuries, is past injuries.

Nathaniel Dawson
15 years ago
Reply to  shthar

Huh?

B N
15 years ago

While I’m not convinced this is a very good way to predict factors that underlie DL trips, I do think that this gives a decent idea of things that DON’T affect DL trips actually. Looking at these things, height and weight at least don’t seem to be particularly important- which is something I’ve seen claimed before.