Strasburg’s Human Inning Against Houston
Stephen Strasburg did his job Monday night against the Astros, notching the win and a quality start. He threw six innings and held Houston to two runs on six hits and one walk while striking out five. It was a solid outing and any pitcher across the league would take it, but this was Stephen Strasburg pitching at home against one of the league’s lesser squads. The no-hitter watch was started as soon as Jordan Schafer stepped up to lead it off for the Astros. Given the circumstances, Strasburg’s performance looks surprisingly human.
Through five innings, Strasburg was absolutely cruising. The Astros were scoreless with just three baserunners against the Nationals’ phenom, and Strasburg needed just 61 pitches to dispatch the first 15 outs. Strasburg didn’t fall behind a single batter in the third, fourth or fifth innings and looked to be on track for an easy seven inning start.
But then things got dicey in the sixth inning, as the Astros mustered two runs on three hits and a walk with the top of their order. Specifically, Strasburg struggled to get ahead of hitters and was forced to serve up fastballs in the zone as the inning progressed. As good as his fastball is, Major League hitters will hit any straight offering if it is presented enough, and that’s what happened in the sixth inning. Strasburg threw 13 pitches from behind in the count after throwing just 11 in the first five innings.
Strasburg opened the sixth inning by falling behind both Jordan Schafer and Jed Lowrie. He then threw fastballs in the zone, and with each hitter able to sit fastball without concerns of falling behind should Strasburg spot a breaking pitch for a strike, they pulled both for singles:
Could each of these pitches been hit had Strasburg been ahead in the count? Of course — both caught plenty of plate. But 95+ MPH fastballs are difficult to hit no matter where they’re spotted if hitters have to be aware of other pitches as well. Ahead in the count, Schafer was quick enough to be ahead of an outer-half fastball from Strasburg and Lowrie was able to pull a ball past Adam LaRoche at first base. Hitters generally don’t get out in front of his fastball in a pitchers count, and we saw that in the at-bat that eventually plated both Astros runs of the inning.
Strasburg did not fall behind Chris Johnson, the Astros’ sixth hitter of the inning, batting with the bases loaded and two outs. Instead, he was quickly up 1-2 on the Astros’ third baseman, a career .276/.309/.416 hitter. Strasburg pounded the over matched Johnson with fastballs. Early in the count, Johnson had managed contact with the curveball, with a relatively hard foul ball to the pull side. When Strasburg threw the fastball, he was well behind it. And so he threw Johnson the fastball three straight times with a 1-2 count:
Click to embiggen
Indeed, Johnson remained behind on the first two offerings, but he managed to square up on the third for a line drive single to right-center field, plating Schafer and Lowrie and tying the game at two. F.P. Santangelo suggested the following just before the at-bat’s final pitch:
The more fastballs you see as a hitter, the longer you stand in there, the better shot you have of timing one up.
It was a prophetic statement from the former utility man, a .245/.364/.351 hitter who was likely overmatched in many situation as Johnson was here. Perhaps Strasburg didn’t trust his ability to locate his offspeed stuff — eight of his 13 changeups and curveballs were balls in the sixth inning.
Strasburg’s brief loss of his usually sharp control in the sixth shows how even somebody with his fastball can be touched up by any quality of major league hitter when his ability to locate departs him. Still, part of what makes Strasburg such an effective pitcher is that his margin of error is much larger than the typical starter. Even though he was forced to pound the zone with fastballs, Houston’s hitters made good contact but didn’t manage much power. Not a single one of the Astros’ hits made it beyond the Nationals’ outfielders.
As such, even in what was a slightly disappointing outing for the Nationals’ present and future ace, he gave his team more than enough to win the game. He still enjoys an utterly absurd 2.35 ERA and 1.86 FIP in his first 111 innings and is just 23 years old. Stephen Strasburg’s beatable is still better than what much of the league has to offer on the normal day, and he remains one of the best and brightest young arms in the game.
Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.


Where are those ~30% of readers who said they prefer Ackley to Stras last year?
I was pretty shocked at that poll. Yet, it’s still very early in both their careers. I believe the the injury factor was the only factor in Ackley’s favor, or against Strasburg, if you will. His talent and upside is obviously tremendous. I chalked it up to homers.
I prefer him still. Pitchers get injured more often.
strasburg is arguably the best pitcher in baseball to build a team around right now. i do not understand your choice unless you would prefer ackley to any pitcher in baseball.
Dun understand either… Ackley upside is a poor-man Dustin Pedroia. Not to say that is bad, but Stras upside is a poor-man Pedro Martinez.
Strasburg isn’t a poor man’s version of anybody. I might describe him as a young giant version of pedro martinez though.
Strasburg’s upside is a rich man’s Pedro Martinez. Good chance he doesn’t reach it, but that’s who he conceivably becomes if everything goes well.
I’ve been concerned on occasion this year (spring and reg. season) about his slightly declined command compared to pre-surgery Strasburg. He throws a lot of balls – not nibbling, simply missing spots. Thing is, though, this is still Stephen Strasburg, which means he can throw too many pitches without allowing very many walks or runs scored at all. In other words, he’s this amazing even when his game isn’t at its best.
What I’m learning from innings like this one against Houston is that, if the common wisdom is true about Tommy John guys needing extra time to fully recover their command, Strasburg will be getting more efficient and better with time. Kid’s certainly got the brains to do it.
Some day we might look back and find it especially fitting that this article appeared right after a breakdown of a Roy Halladay inning.
Eerily similar scenario in last night’s Braves/Mets game. Hanson threw 5 straight curves to Ike Davis with two men on. McCann called for a 6th, which Hanson hung and Davis crushed into the left field stands.
During that sequence, Ron Darling said something along the lines of:
“The more curveballs you through in a row, the greater chance you have of hanging one.”
Sure enough… Who gets the blame though? McCann for calling 6 straight curves or Hanson for not shaking him off?
That seems like a bizarre sequence. Why would anybody throw nothing but junk pitch after pitch to a struggling hitter? Should THE Tommy Hanson have been able to rear back and finish off Davis?
Hanson’s curve is his best pitch ad was so last night. Gary Cohen also noted that Davis had been struggling with Hanson’s curve for what it’s worth.
Davis has been struggling because people have been throwing him breaking stuff about 41% of the time this season.
Strasburg also said that he thought he might have been tipping his pitches in the 6th inning.
http://www.masnsports.com/nationals_pastime/2012/04/strasburg-talks-improved-curveball-tipping-pitches-after-nats-win.html
Click to “embiggen”???
It’s a perfectly cromulent word
Not that I am by any means ready to believe it, but I can’t help but wonder if Strasburg isn’t already a top 3-5 MLB pitcher. In 20 starts and 111 innings the guy has 4.4 WAR. He is tied for Roy Halladay for 3rd if fWAR this season for the entire MLB. His ERA/FIP look like they come from a video game character. I know, its still way too soon for anyone to make the claim. But personally, given the Stuff and what he has already done, I can’t keep the speculation out of my head.
Right now Strasburg is on track for around 200 innings and about 7.5ish WAR. If he keeps up anything near this pace, I will join the Nationals fans in rioting when they enforce the 160 inning cap.
I don’t know, it could be Verlander, Halladay, Strasburg already – except for the innings cap.
It will be interesting to see how well he holds up over steadily increasing innings limits. As of right now he’s inarguably top 3-5 in terms of per-inning production (the only possible argument against that is that he still has sample size issues over his entire career, and it’s not a particularly convincing one to me).
The big question is whether he will eventually (once the Nationals loosen the reins a bit) be able to pitch 230 innings year after year like Verlander, Halladay, Felix, etc. while keeping up those numbers. I wonder if his numbers will decline a bit once he is expected to work 7-8 innings into every start like the aforementioned workhorses and therefore has to conserve his energy a bit more. Will his stuff still dominate at 91 in the early innings the way Verlander’s does?
Worth pointing out here that he’s already intentionally chosen to drop his velocity from 98-99 to 94-95. I don’t see the drop to 91 as highly likely – but if it is, he’s following the Verlander playbook for sure.
Yeah I agree with Englishman in that he may be getting better (as scary as that thought is). In addition to the fact that his command may not be all the way back, his velocity may not be either. Post injury he’s been 94-97 and was easily 97-99 before it (I think the PitchFX numbers bear this out as well). Though he may be throwing with less effort now, maybe to sharpen his command or reduce the stress on his arm, which would might also explain the velocity drop.
The velocity drop is indeed intentional. He and the team say that he was overthrowing before the injury. He’s cited Verlander’s year last year as a model for throwing with 100% effort only in a few situations when he really needs to and working at somewhat less the rest of the time.
I love this type of article, please keep this trend going.
This guy is nuts.