Szymborski’s 2021 Breakout Candidates: Pitchers
On Wednesday, I tackled my picks for 2021’s breakout hitters, so now it’s time to look at the pitchers who feel like good bets to reach a new level of performance this season. Pitchers are inherently volatile creatures, so while there’s the potential for looking smart, there’s ample opportunity to end up sitting in the analytical dunce corner with that pointy hat that I’m not sure was actually ever a real thing. Let’s get straight into the names!
Jordan Montgomery, New York Yankees
The Yankees were cautious with Montgomery in 2020, a smart thing to do for a pitcher who was returning from Tommy John surgery in a season in which every good team made the playoffs. The 5.11 ERA in his 10 starts wasn’t impressive, but many of the underlying numbers were. A .320 BABIP meant that his FIP was a much sunnier 3.87, but the good stuff doesn’t end there. Compared to his promising rookie season of 2017, Montgomery walked fewer batters, struck out more, and induced more soft contact. A lot of soft contact, actually; Monty’s average exit velocity of 84.6 mph was the third-lowest in baseball, behind Ryan Yarbrough and Max Fried. Not bad for a pitcher coming off two lost seasons! I don’t think it would be the nuttiest thing in the world if Montgomery ends up playing Andy Pettitte to Gerrit Cole’s Roger Clemens in 2021.
Joe Musgrove, San Diego Padres
Musgrove was the last person cut from my 2020 list, something I greatly regret given that I put Mitch Keller there in his place. He already had a mini-breakout in his eight starts in 2020, with his strikeout rate shooting up by an absurd 50% over his career mark up until that point. The strikeouts weren’t a flukey thing, either, as his contact rate dropped by a massive amount across the board. Like Montgomery, Musgrove doesn’t bring any real amount of heat; if a healthy Jordan Hicks is a Trinidad Moruga scorpion chili pepper, Musgrove is more a poblano. His version of chiles rellenos is his curve, which he leaned on more heavily in 2020 with extremely sexy results, only allowing a single hit on the pitch all season. This is the year Musgrove completes the full breakout and ends up appearing in the All-Star game.
Zach Eflin, Philadelphia Phillies
Eflin’s high BABIP hid just how much he improved in 2020, an improvement I think is real and will make him one of the best No. 3 starters in the majors this season. Like Musgrove, he relied on his curveball a lot more in 2020 than in the past, and he finished as one of the top ten curveball pitchers in terms of results (ninth in wRC among all pitchers). The biggest difference was the willingness to use the curve as a two-strike weapon. In 2019, Eflin only threw the curve on two-strike counts 3% of the time. In 2020, that went up to 19% against lefties and 24% of the time against righties. The result? Twenty punchouts via the curve compared to 28 in 2019 in about triple the number of batters faced. I’m definitely at odds with ZiPS’ grumpiness here (4.59 ERA, 1.9 WAR in 151 projected innings), and my ample gut feeling is that Eflin beats the projection of the most optimistic of the systems — THE BAT at a 4.09 ERA — by a half-run.
John Means, Baltimore Orioles
Sure, Means has already been an All-Star, but there was a distinct feeling of a Jeff Ballard 1989-style fluke in that performance. In 2020, the velocity really started to kick up thanks to, of all things, a mattress.
Orioles All-Star left-hander John Means credits the tantalizing increase in velocity he displayed in his 2020 debut Thursday to throwing into a mattress in his garage throughout the lengthy quarantine the coronavirus pandemic required.
“I had a lot of time to myself,” Means said. “Sometimes, it’s better off with that sort of catch play because you’re not really worried about where it’s going but really just focusing in on your motion and how your body feels.”
Means said he used the quarantine-mattress sessions to work on keeping his front side closed more, allowing him to better stay on plane toward home plate. In Thursday’s start against the New York Yankees, Means’ fastball averaged 95.2 mph, a large spike from 2019′s 91.7 mph, per Statcast. His average changeup velocity was also higher, at 84.1 mph compared to 80.9 mph last year.
It took Means a while to figure out just how to use his new-found velocity, but it was something he found as the season went on, and in his last four games, he struck out 30 batters in 23 2/3 innings and put up a 15.7% swinging-strike rate. Three of those four teams (Yankees, Rays, Blue Jays) made the playoffs, so it’s not like he was feasting on the Rangers or Tigers. I think Means establishes himself as a real No. 2 starter and a long-term piece for Baltimore this season.

Ryan Tepera, Chicago Cubs
How can he break out; he’s already had an MVP vote! Tepera still has occasional lapses in control, but I’ll always put my money on a reliever who can miss bats, something that’s not easy to teach. Tepera’s cutter became one of baseball’s best secret weapons, and hitters swung through it 62% of the time, a huge jump from the 35–45% rates he had previously in Chicago and Toronto. As a result, he had the third-best contact rate for all pitchers with 20 innings in 2020, behind only Devin Williams and Edwin Diaz, neither of whom were cheaply available in free agency this offseason. Compared to a pitcher like Kenley Jansen, who uses his cutter high in the zone at the edge and dares hitters to hit it, Tepera almost uses his cutter like a slider, a chase pitch that results in hitters making some regrettable swing decisions.
I think the Cubs got the deal of a century in bringing back Tepera on a one-year, $800,000 contract.
Julio Urías, Los Angeles Dodgers
ZiPS likes Urías the most out of the projection systems, and in this case, I tend to agree. ZiPS uses playoff performance; after all, why wouldn’t the most-important games pitched against the best teams in the league matter when gauging a player’s ability to play baseball? Even more importantly, postseason stats being included slightly improves the accuracy of the projection itself, so it’s more than just good-sounding theory. Urías bedeviled four solid teams in the playoffs in 2020, and I think his 29 strikeouts in 23 innings against four walks and three runs allowed represent his coming-out party to an extent. The Dodgers have been extremely careful with him, but I hope we get to see a career-high for innings out of him in 2021. Every pitcher deserves a chance to find his ceiling, and I think Urías’ is very high.
Dylan Cease, Chicago White Sox
Cease had a respectable 4.01 ERA in 2020, but he also had a 6.36 FIP thanks to an ultra-low strikeout rate and far too many walks. While I’m not optimistic about him becoming an All-Star like I am with the top pitchers on this list, I think we’ll see a big improvement in the strikeout department in 2019. His contact rate wasn’t amazing at right around league-average, but combine that with his high-90s velocity, and I’m far from convinced that he should struggle over the long haul to punch out batters.
ZiPS agrees in this respect, seeing Cease as the pitcher with the second-largest underperformance based on velocity, movement, and plate discipline stats in 2020. In other words, he needs to figure out that final key to making hitters cease-and-desist.
| Pitcher | Actual K Rate | zSO Rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Yarbrough | 18.8% | 25.6% | 6.8% |
| Dylan Cease | 17.3% | 23.8% | 6.5% |
| Tyler Anderson | 15.8% | 22.1% | 6.4% |
| Julio Urias | 20.1% | 24.8% | 4.7% |
| Alex Cobb | 16.8% | 21.4% | 4.6% |
| Alex Young | 19.1% | 23.0% | 3.9% |
| David Peterson | 19.5% | 23.4% | 3.9% |
| Germán Márquez | 21.2% | 24.9% | 3.6% |
| Aníbal Sánchez | 17.6% | 21.1% | 3.5% |
| Tanner Roark | 18.6% | 21.9% | 3.3% |
| Zack Wheeler | 18.4% | 21.6% | 3.2% |
| Jesús Luzardo | 23.8% | 27.0% | 3.2% |
| Brett Anderson | 15.8% | 19.0% | 3.2% |
| Antonio Senzatela | 13.5% | 16.5% | 3.0% |
| Randy Dobnak | 13.5% | 16.5% | 3.0% |
In some ways, I’m more confident about a Cease breakout than for Michael Kopech — a more common pick among analysts — who was always the more volatile prospect and hasn’t been healthy since 2018. Cease doesn’t have Kopech’s ceiling, but I think he’s more likely to be a league-average pitcher in 2021, something that shouldn’t be undervalued for a contending team.
Jeffrey Springs, Tampa Bay Rays
Well, the Rays acquired him, so he must be good!
Okay, not really, but they do have a knack for finding interesting relievers out of nowhere. And when I see a pitcher with a crazy-high BABIP well beyond the level of hitters being used as pitchers (the .330 range), I get really interested. Springs was occasionally hit really hard — naturally a bad sign for any pitcher — but I keep coming back to his changeup; only Devin Williams threw one that was harder to connect with in 2020. The Trop is a great place to be to contain mistakes, and I’m getting a real Doug Jones vibe from him.
Jones was successful for one inning, but when he returned to the mound for a second inning, he was exhausted. “I knew I had to take something off the ball,” he says, “so I decided to throw a changeup I’d been experimenting with.”
He had learned the pitch by watching former teammate Willie Mueller, who went on to pitch against the fictional Indians in the movie Major League. Jones retired the next six batters. After that, he pared down his six-pitch repertoire to a fastball and changeup. “The hardest part is accepting that you only have two pitches,” says Jones, who went on to baffle opposing hitters for the remainder of his minor league career.
In terms of breakouts, I’ll take a pitcher with glaring weaknesses but one great weapon over someone who is middling across-the-board.
So, who do you agree on? Who am I dead-wrong about? Who do you think I missed? Let us know in the comments!
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Are you concerned about the Padres purported “slow rolling” of starters, possibly even using a 6-man rotation, affecting Musgrove’s value?
It might affect his value, but it might help his quality!
I like most of these picks–Musgrove, Urias, and Montgomery in particular all seem really underrated by observers, and I had thought similar thoughts about Means and Eflin. Montgomery is probably the Yankees’ second best pitcher unless Kluber still has some of the old magic, and the main concerns with Musgrove and Urias are health. They both pitch very well!
Jeffrey Springs seems like a bit of a cop-out, since just regressing to the mean will make him look like breaking out–he’ll look like a competent reliever instead of a guy who you only bring for garbage innings (I’d put Michael Wacha in the same boat). I think you could make a similar argument to Cease and Tepera as with Springs–simply regressing to the mean would make them look like he’s breaking out. But I’m even a bit more skeptical on those two because the strike-throwing is definitely an issue, and Cease has also has “bad spin”. Even if they have an uptick this season, I don’t really see it being that much different than what they did in 2020.
For relievers, I’ll pick Jonathan Hernandez, who seems to have gotten awfully unlucky last year, and who seems to finally be hitting the strike zone enough. For starters, I’ll pick Trevor Rogers, who as long as he uses the changeup enough could turn into a mid-rotation guy. As a bonus, I’ll buy Tyler Mahle, who I’ve liked for a long time but has been stuck behind some other very good guys in Cincy, looked great last year in a very small sample, and should finally get consistent innings.
Hernandez was unlucky by what measure?
Normally when a guy is getting 87.5 MPH exit velos he’s doing something right, and the strikeout/walk numbers look good and sustainable. Let me just check on his wOBA vs xwOBA, just to be sure.
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/jonathan-hernandez-642546?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb
Wow, he hit the 6th percentile in xwOBA! Yeah, I definitely feel good about that pick now.
And he’s got two plus pitches, and so I don’t think it’s fluky.
The rangers relief core is sneaky interesting, can see them getting some decent prospects back for them at the deadline
If Leclerc is on, he’s nearly unhittable and the Rangers would be very wise to deal him. If Joely Rodriguez replicates last season’s performance I could see other teams stepping up with big offers, and since he’s 29 that makes sense. But I bet they keep Hernandez unless someone blows them away. I’m more in the always-be-trading-relievers school but when your guy is 24 and isn’t a free agent for another 5 years it’s a lot easier to justify keeping him.
I like the Monty, Musgrove, and Urias picks, not too concerned. Means and Eflin maybe. Springs feels like a sleeper. TEPERA WILL WIN MVP.
For breakout relievers my pick is Gregory Soto. His slider is absolutely nasty
I also think Daniel Ponce De Leon can have a big year in a hybrid/bulk role
Umm… I really like Trevor Rogers?
Me too. He looks like the real deal.
Let’s say Musgrove breaks out and wins the Cy Young (or gets very close to winning). How much jeering would the Pirates get for trading Cole for a Musgrove the Great, but trading Musgrove before he was “the Great “.
Josh Lindblom is my pick for breakout starter
Disagree a little with your take on cease vs kopech– they’re quite similar prospects, but Kopech’s elbow unfortunately blew out upon reaching the majors, while Cease had his TJS upon getting drafted. Other than that timing they’re pretty similar, southern HS draftees with high-octane, high-spin fastballs, a power breaking ball, and command & changeup questions. As such, their ceilings are approximately the same– and very high.
Also worth mentioning that these two have a new pitching coach– apparent wunderkind Ethan Katz, who was Giolito, Flaherty, and Fried’s high school coach, was largely responsible for Giolito’s transformation from worst-starter-in-baseball to young ace, and likely had a significant hand in the breakouts of Smyly and Gausman in his first and only year as SF’s assistant pitching coach last year. Katz’s rise has been nothing short of astronomical; he went directly from pitching in the minors to coaching the loaded Harvard-Westlake in 2009 at age 26, and he’s a major league pitching coach at 37!
I think you’re right about Cease’s and Kopech’s ceilings being similar, but as for a 2021 breakout I think Cease is more likely. Kopech hasn’t pitched a competitive inning since 2018 and probably will need some time to really get in gear again.
Also, that Katz story is awesome, I hadn’t heard that before.
Yeah, at the very least Cease is likely to get a lot more innings as Kopech is going tobstart in the bullpen and is probably on an IP limit after not pitching in 2 years. In fact, Kopech may not get a many starts at all unless a starter or two gets injured or implodes. Although he might be first in line for an opportunity if things go well for him early.
ME AND JULIO DOWN BY CHAVEZ RAVINE
Dan must have felt weird writing a positive blurb about one of his Orioles. As a guy with lot of means shares in dynasty format I’m excited
My pick is Kendall Graveman, who looked absolutely filthy in September. He’s relief-only at this point but showed late-inning stuff out of nowhere after returning from injury.
Three years ago, Graveman was the Opening Day starter for a team that would go on to win 97 games. This seems nuts.
“He needs to figure out that final key to making hitters cease-and-desist.” Dan you are terrible, and I love it.
Forgotten all about Jeff Ballard and that weird season. Career done by age 30, only season with ERA+ over 100, followed it up with 2 seasons with a combined BWAR of -2.7.
I just looked up Ballard’s 1989 and he must have done it with magic. 10.0 hits/9 along with a ghastly 2.9K/9 look more like the 8-23 he put up the next two seasons with equally bad peripherals.
I still have the Jeff Ballard Starting Lineup figure!
A/k/a “retirement fund”!
All my favorite analysts think Means will break out in 2021!
Eric doesn’t think he’s more than a backend type; I really don’t understand his process leading to that thought. I think some of the same people who (understandably) thought his 2019 seemed fluky, pointed to 2020 as the proof. But his year end 2020 numbers looked fluky in the other direction.
The only thing that got Means up the ladder in the minors was pinpoint command and a good changeup.
Now he has top five lefty starter velo, the same or better changeup, at least a 50 curve and the same pinpoint command. If you go back and watch his last two starts against the Rays/Jays they looked completely overmatched against him.
I think he grades out something like
60 Fb; 60 CH; 50 CB; 45 SL; 60 Control; 60 Comm.
That’s a number 2 in my book
Good chance Cease has gained vertical movement on his four-seam too! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLZgyQJ3gp8&ab_channel=LanceBrozdowski
Cristian Javier is a big breakout candidate this year. I always look at average against when grading a prospect’s future potential. The ability to prevent hits is overlooked in the era of spin-rates and pitch break.
Javier’s worst season in this category was a .204 AVGa back in 2016. He’s just flat out hard to square up for a legit hit. Sure, his fastball velocity is a tick below league average, but you can’t argue with positive results and that’s all he’s produced since debuting.
With slight gains in command and velocity, we could be looking at a true breakout star here.
A big breakout? That’s difficult to predict for him since he finished third the RoY voting and had a 129 ERA+ his rookie season. Some of his peripherals actually point toward regression. I like him as a pitcher, but a “big” breakout coming off a fine rookie season seems unlikely.
Musgrove has been touted as a break-out the last 3-4 years. Strong competitor, average pitcher. Maybe you guys can put him on the list again next year.
Came here to say this
Hey, if you add him enough you’ll eventually be right!
(Maybe…)
Not much of a surprise, mind you, but Pablo Lopez (Mia) is a favorite of mine to go from good to excellent. Advanced stats say the guy is destined to be very, very good. Last year he posted 3.09 FIP, 32% hard hit rate, nearly 2-1 ground ball vs. fly ball, 85 mph exit velocity, deals at 94 mph, plus change, swinging strike rate of 12.1%, and he is now adding curve ball to his mix.