Take Peralta: Brewers and Mets Trade Top Prospects for No. 1 Starter

This one may be a little too one the nose. On Wednesday evening, the Brewers and Mets agreed to a trade that sent Freddy Peralta and Tobias Myers to the Mets in exchange for two top 100 prospects, Jett Williams and Brandon Sproat. That’s right, the Brewers got cheaper and younger by selling their best pitcher for prospects, the Mets flexed their financial muscle, and president of baseball operations David Stearns acquired Freddy Peralta. Welcome to every single day.
Peralta may not be your idea of a surefire ace, but he was the unquestioned leader of the Brewers rotation, their Game 1 starter in the playoffs for each of the past two years. As salary dumps go, this one is particularly depressing. Peralta is due just $8 million in his walk year, a hair more than the Angels will be paying Anthony Rendon to clear out of Anaheim as soon as possible, if you please. For Myers and the wildly underpaid Peralta, the Mets surrendered the prospects who ranked 31st and 63rd overall in our Top 100 update back in July. The Brewers did what they do, avoiding expenditures of any kind, finding young players, and trusting that they can keep creating aces out of whole cloth. Meanwhile, the Mets have increased their CBT tax hit from preposterously large to ludicrously large in order to reinforce a rotation that still ranks just 15th on our Depth Charts.
Brendan Gawlowski wrote about Sproat and Williams in a separate article, so our focus here is on the major league side of things, and we’ll start with the headliner. In February 2020, right before the world started exploding, Peralta signed a five-year, $15.5 million extension with two club options that could push the total to $30 million. He was, at that point, a 23-year-old with a career 4.79 ERA and 3.96 FIP and more relief appearances than starts. “We are happy to announce that we have reached a multi-year extension with Freddy that can keep him in a Brewers uniform for the better part of this decade,” said Stearns, then Milwaukee’s president of baseball operations. That prediction came true by the slimmest of margins.
Peralta pitched in relief in 2020, running a 3.99 ERA and an encouraging 2.41 FIP. He broke out in 2021. Over the past five seasons, Peralta has put up 14.8 WAR and gone 54-34 with a 3.30 ERA and 3.65 FIP. Despite dealing with shoulder injuries earlier in his career, he’s pitched at least 165 innings in each of the last three seasons. He anchored the rotation in 2024 when Corbin Burnes got traded and Brandon Woodruff got hurt. By my count, the Brewers extracted roughly two-thirds of a win for each million they paid Peralta. At that rate for their entire roster, the Dodgers would expect to win 208 games this season.
Peralta’s $8 million salary was the fourth-highest on the Brewers, but it will now slot in as the 14th-highest on the Mets. The galling part isn’t just that the Brewers couldn’t swallow the $8 million this year. Trading him means there wasn’t even a thought that they might be able to extend him, or at least that they might be able use a really good pitcher in 2026 and then just deal with losing him in 2027. After all, this is a team that just finished with the best record in baseball and made it to the NLCS. No matter. Milwaukee is taking the cash and the prospects and betting that Woodruff will finally get healthy (and that his alarming drop in velocity isn’t a portent of bad things to come).
After this year (and just in time for a possible work stoppage), Peralta will be entering his age-31 season and finally have the chance to make what he is worth on the open market, unless the Mets lock him up to another extension. This certainly seems like the kind of trade that ends up that way, especially when you consider that Stearns must like Peralta an awful lot, given that he has now traded for him twice and extended him once. Peralta won’t turn 30 until early June, and he just put up the highest fastball velocity of his career. Sproat was our top-ranked prospect on Eric Longenhagen’s updated Mets list from last June, and Williams came in at sixth. In his piece on the Brewers’ return, Brendan wrote that both players “are near-ready, 50-FV contributors and slot into Milwaukee’s farm system as the club’s third- and fourth-best prospects, respectively. Sproat projects as a mid-rotation starter, while Williams is a middle-of-the-diamond player with an as-yet undetermined defensive home.” That’s a serious haul. Keeping Peralta for a while would certainly take some of the sting out of losing them.
Peralta throws a four-pitch mix: four-seamer, changeup, curveball, and slider. He leads with the four-seamer, throwing it just over half the time to both righties and lefties. As Lance Brozdowski noted in his write-up of the trade, it’s a weird pitch (complimentary). It comes from a low release point not because of a low arm angle, but because he’s only six feet tall and he has a huge stride that brings him a long way down the mound. That huge stride also means huge extension. So even though Peralta’s 94.8 mph velocity put him in just the 57th percentile (among pitchers who threw at least 100 four-seamers in 2025), his 95.2 mph perceived velocity put him in the 74th percentile. A flat fastball with above-average velocity is a great combination, but it’s worth noting that Peralta really needs every bit of his stuff.
He hit the strike zone just 45% of the time in 2025, the lowest rate among all qualified pitchers. He ran the third-lowest mark in 2024 and the 13th lowest in 2023. Over the past five years, among pitchers who have thrown at least 2,000 pitches, his 46% zone rate puts him in the ninth percentile. That’s great if you can get away with it, as pitches over the plate are the ones that get hit. Peralta gives up too many walks, but he runs average chase rates and superlative whiff rates, allowing him to offset all those walks with tons of strikeouts and lots of weak contact. It’s a cocktail that some advanced ERA estimators, like DRA, absolutely abhor, but he’s got a long track record of success with it.
If and when Peralta’s stuff stops fooling batters, though, this trick could fall apart in a hurry. If he can’t induce chases, he’ll have to come into the zone. Once he’s in the zone, he’s probably going to allow more hard contact, and if he’s not inducing chases, he’s probably not going to induce as many whiffs either. That’s not to say that he couldn’t learn a new approach, and the good news is that this potentially swift decline doesn’t seem imminent. As you know, his four-seamer averaged 94.8 mph in 2025 (and played even faster), but his fastball velocity has actually been trending up over the past few seasons. It performed well even in 2022, when it averaged just 92.9 mph. That’s a reassuringly large margin for error. On the other hand, the inefficiency of his approach means that he throws tons of pitches; 8,991 over the past three years, to be exact. That’s the fifth most in the game, and it’s fair to wonder whether he might one day, you know, get tired.
Peralta halved his slider usage in 2025, throwing it just under 10% of the time. He didn’t really throw it to lefties at all, and against righties, he threw all three of his non-fastballs roughly 16% of the time.

Brozdowski posited that Peralta lost feel for his slider, noting its inconsistent amount of horizontal break. It has shifted so much that in some years, some pitch classifications split it up into a slider and a sweeper. Regardless, Stuff+ and StuffPro both regard the pitch as Peralta’s best, and Brozdowski hypothesized that the Mets will try to help him figure it out and return it to its place of prominence. Even if he doesn’t find another gear, he still slides in as the top pitcher in a Mets rotation that completely fell apart in the second half in 2025, and projects as average in 2026. That’s not to say it’s without upside.
The Mets have several starters whose names any baseball fan will know. It starts with Nolan McLean and Jonah Tong, who made their debuts in 2025. McLean looks ready to contribute right away in 2026. Kodai Senga has a career 3.00 ERA and 3.82 FIP in MLB. After a shoulder capsule strain and a calf strain cost him nearly the entire 2024 season, his velocity dropped and his strikeout rate cratered last year, when he also dealt with a hamstring strain. As a result, the projections peg him for an ERA that’s dangerously close to 4.00. But if he finds his old form, he’s a star.
In his first season as a starter, Clay Holmes posted a solid 3.53 ERA, but his 4.11 FIP told a different tale, and the peripherals were scary. The velocity of his sinker, his most-used pitch, fell by 2.9 mph as he transitioned from high-leverage reliever to starter. His strikeout rate, which had averaged nearly 25% to that point in his career, dropped to 18%. Holmes is entering his age-33 season, and it’s hard to know how much improvement to expect from him with one year of starting experience under his belt.
Despite underperforming his peripherals in a major way in 2024, David Peterson seems solid as ever, and he’ll make $100,000 more than Peralta in his final year of arbitration. An oblique strain blew up Sean Manaea’s 2025 season, limiting him to 12 ugly starts, but he’s just one year removed from a 2024 season in which he earned a Cy Young vote. That’s six names and nearly as many question marks, but this rotation certainly isn’t devoid of talent. It’s not hard to envision this staff being good, and it’s not hard to envision it being quite bad. If nothing else, Peralta adds some much-needed stability.
Tobias Myers is 27, and across his two big league seasons, he has made 31 starts and 18 relief appearances, putting up a 3.55 ERA and 3.92 FIP. An early-season oblique strain cost Myers some time in 2025, and he got sent down after a rough start. However, he came back up in a relief role in July, and over the last three months of the season, he posted a 2.64 ERA and 3.49 FIP. With a 93.5 mph fastball, his stuff grades out as roughly average, and he doesn’t strike out many batters. He also had the odd distinction of tying for the splitter that had the most induced vertical rise in baseball at 10.5 inches.
Myers throws six pitches: a four-seamer, cutter, slider, splitter, changeup, and curveball. When you look at his extremely steep 61-degree arm angle and the huge rise on his four-seamer, you start to wonder why he doesn’t embrace this North-South profile and throw his curveball much more often. He was blocked in Milwaukee, and if all goes to plan, he’s likely to be blocked in New York too, and maybe he’s shown all that he has to offer. Still, though it might not be the smartest thing in the world to assume that some other team is going to do a better job of developing a pitcher than the Brewers, it’s fair to say that Myers doesn’t seem like a finished product.
The Mets spent the beginning of the offseason upgrading their bullpen and replacing Pete Alonso. Over the past several days, they’ve reminded everyone just how much of a juggernaut they really are. What’s $8 million (and the resultant $8.8 million luxury tax hit) to a team that just snatched Bo Bichette away from the Phillies for (in theory) three years and $126 million? It’s entirely possible that the Brewers will turn Sproat into their latest ace, and that in a year or two he’ll start a playoff game against the Mets, just like Peralta did in 2024. But the Mets are trying to win this season, and now that he’s not in Milwaukee, David Stearns has the luxury of leaving tomorrow’s problems for tomorrow.
Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.
No 1 starter? lol. Zips thinks he’s a 3/4 at best
This is the prototypical “good for both sides” trade, at least if the Mets are able to extend Peralta (which I’m not entirely sure will happen) where the Brewers obviously concluded they couldn’t. Williams is such a Brewers-y guy — the kind of high-floor, low-ceiling, controllable and predictable near major leaguer that just seems to grow out there.
Sproat is the most interesting piece here in terms of who ultimately “wins” the trade. I believe I saw some reporting that the Brewers preferred Tong but the Mets wouldn’t move him, which to me sounded very surprising. But Sproat is surely the more ready for the majors.
I find the conversation of MLB readiness to be an interesting one here. I keep seeing people say Sproat is “more MLB ready” than Tong but when looking at his development (or lack thereof) since his promotion to AAA in 2024, it feels more like we’re saying “Sproat is 3 years older and can’t be a prospect forever” rather than anything about his ability to pitch in the majors.
Yup and Tong was one of the best pitchers in the minors in 2025 and Sproat was decidedly not close.
Fair point, but also (a) I watched both these guys pitch in the majors with my eyeballs and one of the two seemed ready to do it while the other didn’t, and (b) with age comes a bit more certainty. Tong surely has more out-and-out bust risk.
Tong was rushed that’s why he struggled and it was 4-5 starts.
Is “rushed” not the opposite of “ready to pitch in the majors”?
So trade him over Sproat then? Sproat wasn’t gonna have a rotation spot to start this season unless guys got hurt. Every prospect writer as well as the Mets felt Tong was the better prospect.
I will be interested to see where the prospect writers land on Tong, but at least in the previous update they were both FV50s. I agree that Tong seems like a better prospect because a double-plus fastball makes up for a lot of faults, but if it’s not big enough to show up in the grades I don’t think it matters.
Surprising that they wouldn’t trade Tong? He’s younger and a far better prospect than Sproat.
But will he be a better major leaguer? Ahh, there’s the rub?
I think so I think Sproat is a back end guy.
An MLB ready backend starter is extremely valuable, perhaps more so than a higher ceiling guy that’s further away.
It’s fine if you prefer the higher upside, but prospect evaluation would be very different if it were only based on the most upside as opposed to the most probable outcomes
Tong is gonna be in AAA not like he’s in A ball.
These guys are like near sixty spots apart according to mlb pipelines new released rankings. I was originally responding to hotfoot’s strange post saying he was surprised that the Mets weren’t willing to trade Tong because he looked bad in a few mlb starts.
The Brewers did not trade Freddy Peralta because he’s owed $8m. They traded him because they can’t keep him after this year. They just tendered Andrew Vaughn for that much for gosh sakes. Don’t you think they would have non tendered him and kept Freddy if that money was that important?
Lazy writing I wouldn’t expect from Fangraphs. Thumbs down.
Got to have a Vaughn on the roster, Ricky, Greg or Andrew.
not Mo?
Or the mayor from JAWS
Not Hippo?
I’m sensing some serious Arky disrespect in this thread
Arky had an extra “a” in his name.
Yes my reaction as well. It’s a take that’s very out of character for Fangraphs.
To every lazy writer (or one on a deadline) a lede is a problem is search of a cliche.
The team that won the most games in the majors last year just traded away their ace that is making only $8 million. Truly gross, no matter the return.
The last time they traded their ace, they went from 92 wins to… 93.
They don’t do this because of salary constraints, they do it because it works.
That, and $25M – $30M a year for a pitcher in his 30s is too much risk for a team like the Brewers. I believe they can probably spend a decent chunk more than they do, but are still limited to a small number of contracts in that range even at their max spending ability. That, and Peralta’s WAR projection in 160 IP is 2.6, and if you split that between their (now) 5-6 starters (Gasser, Patrick), they are losing about a half a win. You have to take 6 years of 2 top 100 prospects for the likely fraction of a % change in WS winning probability losing Peralta this year has on their chances every time.
Peralta’s not exactly a slam dunk TOR guy either. I’m optimistic that a lot of his improvements from ‘25 stick, but it’s also someone that’s mostly been a 2ish win guy for his career
I’m not sure if the Brewers could spend more. They don’t even have a TV contract at this point.
Gross?
Kevin?
Greg?
Kip?
Poor Wayne. He was an all-star once
The resource disparity in MLB is pretty gross. There are a lot of teams that can spend double what the Brewers or Royals do in a year and make more money. It’s a huge problem and it’s not new.
I just don’t think that this is a great example of that issue. A better example is probably the inability to even seriously negotiate an extension with Willy Adames, who they lost after not trading him.
And the Brewers have spent significantly more in past years – $122 million on the active roster back in 2019 – than they track for this year.
I agree Adames is a better example of their financial constraints but this is clearly an example of trying to maximize their return on a guy they didn’t think they could keep beyond this year. What they do. And there may be an indication of possible unwillingness to spend, not only inability.
Brewers had multiyear TV deal back in 2019
To clarify, Tylor Megill will be waiting for 2027 with a cast around his right arm.
Focusing on the actual trade, I think it’s pretty dang good for the Mets. Peralta is probably a bit stretched as your undisputed #1 (as he was in Milwaukee the last two years, although McLean could have something to say about that soon), but he’s still a great pitcher and one the Mets desperately needed if they wanted to feel reasonably confident in October.
Williams didn’t have a clear path to playing time, and I’m not sure about Sproat; he didn’t really strike guys out in a pretty big sample at AAA (and didn’t in his MLB cup of coffee, either). The Stuff+ is great, and if any org can figure out how to translate stuff into strikeouts, it’s probably the Brewers, but he realistically would have spent most of this season in AAA if he stayed with the Mets. Myers is going to be very useful to them as well; it definitely says something that he was what got this deal done.
For the Brewers, it just strikes me as unneeded. I don’t think Sproat is that much better than their existing gaggle of AAA starters, and I don’t think Williams stands out from the rest of their young infielders. Would’ve rather gotten Peralta’s 2026 and the draft pick.
The Tylor Megill thing is pretty sloppy.
I disagree about this not being worth it for the Brewers but I agree with you on the Mets side. Both Williams and Sproat had fallen out of favor and were not likely to see playing time in the near future.
For whatever reason the Mets couldn’t figure out what to do with Jett Williams. They kept playing him at shortstop, which made no sense if they wanted to keep him. They had a huge hole in CF and a potential future hole at second base, and Francisco Lindor at shortstop. The only reason to keep him at shortstop was for other teams.
Sproat is a good prospect but McLean has clearly separated himself so far from the rest, Sproat’s struggles earlier this year I think pushed him clearly behind Tong, and they still have Manaea and Peterson and Senga and Holmes hanging around. Christian Scott is still around too, I think he spent all last year recovering from surgery. I think they had decided he was the odd man out.
This is often how the Brewers like to do things—they decide who is surplus and then trade them for the best guy they can get. It makes sense that Stearns operates the same way since he was the guy in charge when the Brewers started doing that.
I initially thought this seemed like an overpay by the Mets, but apparently I missed that the Mets are getting Myers as well. The Mets’ big league rotation may look overfull right now, but I think Myers is a sneaky good get for them given how hammered with injuries the Mets staff was last year. Never any harm in bringing in cheap, controllable arms with a history of providing adequate major league starts.
Wouldn’t surprise me if Myers ends up making ~20 starts this year for New York.
It seems like he was pretty good out of the bullpen last season, and at this point it seems like the Mets could use more help there.
Yeah he could be a swing man/spot starter or he can step into the rotation when guys get hurt.
It is quite a haul for one year of a #3 pitcher on a team with playoff aspirations. I don’t know that Tobias Myers is a particularly valuable player, but he was a competent starter for the Brewers back in 2024 and he has a minor league option.
He probably was the #8 starter for the Brewers and probably still would be with Sproat slotting well behind Peralta but clearly ahead of Myers, with Woodroff, Misiorowski, Priester, Patrick, Henderson, and Gasser being the other guys. What’s weird is that he’s probably also the #8 guy for the Mets. He would have way more value for a team like the Angels or Astros or Padres who are in deep trouble if anybody gets hurt. But also none of those teams have prospects to trade.
I think this is a better haul than the Brewers got for Burnes. I like Sproat a lot more than I liked DL Hall, and I like Williams a bit more than I liked Ortiz.
I think it’s better too. In the Burnes deal the comp pick they got is probably valued at FV45 (or lower), Hall was absolutely looking like a reliever at that point so he would also be at FV45 (or lower).
And Ortiz was a 50. I admit I didn’t like Ortiz at a 50 at the time of the trade but I think I was wrong about that. I was right about the lack of power but his defense is so good it works.
I will take two FV50s over that group for sure.
There are some talent evaluators that like Myers better than Sproat. There is legitimate risk that Sproat is a reliever and Jett ends a 2 WAR player.
Every pitching prospect has reliever risk, and Williams being a 2 WAR player is an extremely good outcome and probably on the higher end of his projections
Sproat has bad fastball shape and in the first half of the season in AAA he had one of the worst K-BB in the league.
Show me one talent evaluator that likes Myers better than Sproat.
Baseball prospectus said there’s not a big difference between the guys.
So no talent evaluators that prefer Myers better than Sproat?
I don’t comment often but come on you know the Brewers traded Freddy because he had 1 year left of control not because he is making 8 mil. Brewers are not in a place to properly pay Freddy 25+ million a year and commit long term to a starting pitcher, thats what slightly over 20% of their budget? That is a stupid proposition for a small market organization. Leave the Poverty franchise shtick somewhere else these aren’t the kind of takes I expect from fangraphs.
I think highly of Fangraphs, but I agree on this point.
The fact is the Brewers got 2 50 FV prospects for Peralta (& Myers, who’s not nothing) when a comp pick would be far less than that makes this a far better deal than that option.
Stearns will get all the praise but Matt Arnold did a good job on this. Williams and Sproat are a nice haul for what may be a one-year rental. The inclusion of Myers indicates that both GMs agreed that those two for Peralta alone would have been an overpayment.
also, MIL has at least 2-3 options for rotation ahead of Myers, so i barely count him as anything that MIL cares about losing – he had 10 IP last year because of the better options they had and there are just as many options this season if not a couple more that are ready to catch up and probably pass Myers on the org’s depth chart
I’m probably overrating Myers, but I really like that part of the deal. He’s at worst an innings-eater, and has the potential for further growth. I’d be curious to see how he’d play in a Ryan Yarborough-like role, maybe paired with Manaea.
And yes, the Brewers have other SP options, but depth can shrink quickly, and the 5 years of affordable team control is big for a team like that.
Myers is pretty dang good as a “throw-in” – he is probably comparable to Mike Burrows (similar tier of pitcher but 1 less year of team control), who cost the Astros a couple of decent prospects earlier this offseason. Greater than 0% chance here that Myers produces more pre-FA WAR for the Mets than Sproat does for the Brewers.
Myers regressed hard last year and always was a deception over stuff guy. He will be useful in case of injury but I will be surprised if Mets gonna use all the years of control. But who knows his whole career is like a roller-coaster.
he was hurt in spring training, could be why he regressed
Brewers went into last season with like 8 MLB ready starters and then had to trade for Priester in may because 6 of them were injured. You never have enough pitching now.
the article premise is either lazy or uninformed, or maybe it was put together hastily by AI, any of which are sad for fangraphs. MIL very routinely trades away players in their last year of control to get something for them instead of comp pick after the season. The money wasn’t the motivation here and any brief research or knowledge of the team you’re writing about would make that clear.
Agreed, and ofc the jab at the Mets and their preposterously high team salary. Didn’t see much of that on FG after LAD signed Tucker.
For the annual trade value column, I have felt Peralta should have been much higher on the list for a number of years. The 5 year / $15mm contract with 2 $8mm club options, and he managed 2 all star seasons seems super valuable.
I’ve never read a FanGraphs article with a tone that made it as clear the author absolutely did not want to write it as this one.
It oozes misery.
The obvious analogy here is to Tyler Glasnow. Former team executive now working for a rich team trading with his former team to get a #3-type starter with one year left?
The difference is that Glasnow was going to make $25M and Peralta was only going to make $8M. Everyone knew the Rays were going to trade Glasnow. The Brewers could have kept Peralta. They didn’t, but that’s because the Mets basically doubled the Rays’ offer. Which makes sense, there was about $17M less on Peralta’s deal.
The next logical step is for the Mets to extend Peralta, and it feels like the Glasnow deal is a good template. Peralta doesn’t dominate like Glasnow when he’s on but Peralta has been more valuable because Glasnow is hurt so much. Maybe he gets the total dollar amount with one fewer year so the AAV is higher.
It’s a fairly steep price for one year of a #3 starter on a team with playoff aspirations but the Mets have the ability to make the most of it.
It is possible to win on a lower payroll, Dodger’s recent evidence to the contrary, but these kinds of “big market/small market” trades have become really boring in their predictability.
Arnold has been winning on these deals for so long that I’m inclined to trust his judgment. At this point they’ve cycled through the whole pre-Covid generation of Brewers, so it should be a few minutes before this becomes a yearly ritual again.
Seems on paper at least they’ve threaded the needle yet again. This team should still have a fair shot at a playoff berth again, and the next five years are set up to be very promising with the talent on hand and the talent in waiting.
Also, I would submit that there has been insufficient observation about the fact that Tobias Myers’ degrees-of-separation is reaching Kevin Bacon territory.
I liked this article and don’t understand why some of you are being so grumpy about it.
Acquiring a player making $8M is flexing financial muscle?
Yeah that description fits the Robert trade not this one.
I don’t get calling it a salary dump. They got two good prospects for a pitcher who is going to be unrestricted free agent this off-season. These are the types of trades small market clubs have to make to stay competitive.
Really not sure why the financial part of this trade is a factor at all. Any other team could have made this trade for Peralta, the Mets won because they offered more prospects, not more $$. The brewers operate similarly to the rays, ensuring they get return on their pitchers before they depart for free agency (see Devin Williams, Corbin burnes, etc).
Feels like we are trying to add a narrative that doesn’t exist.
Ortiz was pretty bad in 2025. Williams could be an improvement.
Sproat has a decent chance to be a 2 WAR pitcher and Peralta only projects for 2.4 by ZiPS.
This is about as well as Milwaukee could have hoped to do. It probably is better than Fred 2026 plus pick
Projections aren’t gospel and I’m not sure Jett can stick at SS and even if he does Made should be taking over in a year, year in a half at worst.
Williams intrigues me bc of the OBP and sneaky pop
Hey, let’s give Davy a break. He writes bangers all of the time. Articles that you could never find anywhere else
It’s not just him though; it’s also on whoever edited this piece. Happened to a Baumann article last year too. Most of FanGraphs stuff is so bulletproof that it’s just really disappointing when they slip, particularly for a big move like this (for comparison, Clemens’ piece on the Gore trade rocked).
Davy Andrews’ crime here is that he wrote an article on a tight deadline that is indistinguishable from something Baumann would have written, and nobody can see that our reaction to it is actually evidence for how awesome Davy Andrews is.
Disagree purely for the lack of college baseball digressions
I too would have preferred something a bit more nuanced. This trade is fascinating from a sabermetric point of view – and isn’t that what FanGraphs is about?
In 2026, Peralta is worth about $25 Mn (+/-). So the Mets picked up $17Mn in surplus value (eg, $25Mn – $8Mn contract).
How do the other pieces fit together, taking into account the time value of money and the volatility of performance by each player? (Eg, barring injuries, Peralta appears to be worth 3 – 3.5WAR, Williams can be anything from 0 – 20 WAR during the period the Brewers control him ).
What are the expectation for the other players in this trade and how do you incorporate their relative volatility in performance?
THAT would be an interesting article! Are there any editors reading the comments??
This trade makes sense for the Brewers if they like Sproat or Williams to be a 2-3 WAR contributor for the next 6 years. Massive upside too. And if they are already high on guys like Gasser and Henderson, then all the more reason to swap SP for Jett.
Framing this as something of a salary dump is dishonest at best
The article seems to focus pretty heavily on the measly $8m Peralta is making this year. The Mets taking on $8m certainly isn’t a flex of their financial might. It also almost certainly isn’t why the Brewers traded him, rather it’s that they know they’re not going to be able to keep him in free agency.
We can debate if they should have kept him and gone all in on 2026, but teams in these markets never go all in on a particular season. The Sproat/Williams is significantly more than the comp picks they would have gotten for Peralta in a year