Tanaka-Fest: This Is Going To Be Insane
The month spanning Christmas Day to Jan. 24 is going to be something unlike we have seen in recent baseball history. We could call it “The Month of Tanaka,” but I prefer to look it at as a 13th sign of the zodiac, one that will showcase all of the good, the bad and the ugly in the baseball business. The ultra-predictable United States sports calendar—which can basically be programmed a year in advance—is about to be given quite a jolt. The posting and eventual signing of Masahiro Tanaka has the potential to become the ultimate month-long sports reality show. You don’t think so? Consider this:
— He’s good. Potentially really good. He was good enough to strike out 196 batters in 186 innings in 2007 in the Japanese major leagues. At 18 years old. When Yu Darvish was 18, in 2005, he struck out 52 batters and walked 48 in his first major-league season. Tanaka went 99-35, 2.30, with a 1,235/275 K/BB ratio in 1,315 innings in seven years in Japan. Darvish went 93-38, 1.99, with a 1,250/333 K/BB in 1,268 innings in his seven years in Japan. Pretty darned comparable. Darvish’s K rate spiked in his final two years in Japan, while Tanaka’s raw numbers had less spectacular spikes throughout his tenure.
This past season, however, was the year of the rabbit ball in Japan, as Wladimir Balentien bested the all-time single-season Japanese home-run record. Tanaka, meanwhile, celebrated this change by managing contact better than he ever had, posting a 24-0 record and a 1.27 ERA in a season where the Japanese Pacific League’s overall ERA rose from 3.03 to 3.57. Tanaka allowed all of six homers in 212 innings. Of course, we know ERA is a very limited statistic, but this guy clearly dominated Japan much like Darvish did—and at a younger age—albeit with less raw stuff.
About the stuff…. Like most Japanese pitchers who have come to the U.S., Tanaka has a diverse pitch arsenal. He throws a two-seam fastball, four-seam fastball, cutter, slow curve, slider, changeup and splitter. Interestingly, he seems to be one of those guys who doesn’t have an overwhelming “out” pitch; he’s instead more of a control pitcher — a “performer” type who outpitches his raw stuff. He’s the type of guy who analysts tend to like more than scouts. The only pitch consistently rated as a plus offering is his splitter. His fastballs flash plus velocity, but generally fall just short of that level. He throws his slider often, but it isn’t his most consistent pitch. His curve is more of a slow, looping change-of-pace pitch. The potential difference-maker — for better or for worse — just might be his ability to get outs up in the zone with his fastball. More on that, and how that helps him measure up with his potentially his most comparable major league counterpart, later.
— He’s in his prime. Unlike the vast majority of major league free agents, Japanese or not, Masahiro Tanaka is going to, at least in theory, be paid not for what he’s already done, but for what he is going to do. He is all of 25 years old. The vast majority of large free-agent contracts going back over many years have proven to be poor investments. You simply pay top-dollar-market-value per win in the free-agent market. You have to go back to the first Alex Rodriguez mega-contract to even come close to getting so many of a player’s prime years available on the market. Oh, and this isn’t the only way that A-Rod figures prominently in the Tanaka Sweepstakes. More on that later, as well.
— He’s the first true star-level Japanese free agent. Darvish wasn’t a free agent. Daisuke Matsuzaka wasn’t a free agent. Ichiro Suzuki wasn’t a free agent. They negotiated with one U.S. club after multiple clubs bid against one another in the previous posting system, in which the Japanese club earned the dollars generated by the free market. Now, for the first time, teams have to commit a relatively low $20 million entry fee that doesn’t have to be paid unless they are the prevailing club, as their ticket into the proceedings. Then the free market kicks in, and the player, not the Japanese club, is the benefactor of any speculative bidding that ensues. All 30 teams could — and probably should, in this case — negotiate with the player, instead of one.
— Baseball is swimming in money. All teams are in the process of receiving a huge national-television-revenue bump. Many individual clubs have either just renegotiated or are about to renegotiate their local cable TV contracts, and some have bought or have heavily invested in their own regional cable networks. This could prove to be a short-term speculative bubble, at least in some markets, but it will not burst before Tanaka receives his many millions.
— Teams have planned their entire offseasons around Tanaka. There was a significant pre-Winter Meetings flurry of player movement, and the free-agent position player market in general has been fairly well picked over, with a couple of exceptions. On the other hand, most of the top free-agent starting pitchers are still on the board, sitting there for weeks and waiting with the rest of us for the Tanaka decision. On top of all of this, baseball’s richest club, the New York Yankees, may or may not have more than $25 million in 2014 payroll dollars freed up by the pending A-Rod suspension appeal decision. (This thing really has been pending for awhile, hasn’t it?) Not too many people are in the business of feeling sorry for the Yankees, but, despite some big-ticket acquisitions, they’ve had their offseason hijacked by the extended decision-making process, and could be readying their ultimate revenge.
The decision has finally been made to post Tanaka, and general manager after general manager has been quoted saying something to the effect of: “We like our club, we’ll only make another significant move if it’s for a special player.” Which roughly translates to: “We’re done, unless Tanaka’s posted, in which case we’ll bid the GDP of a growing third-world country for him.” “Special” is a tricky word, which doesn’t necessarily mean “outstanding,” but Tanaka clearly qualifies as special on many levels, so these recently quoted GMs and many others are ready to rock-and-roll.
How might teams value Tanaka? Analytics are of limited help, as the data available for Japanese players — while growing, thanks to the existence of organizations like ScoutDragon — is nowhere near as comprehensive as it is for Major League Baseball. Therefore, traditional scouting is relied upon much more heavily when evaluating Japanese players. As mentioned earlier, Tanaka has some limitations with regard to raw stuff, compared to a guy like Darvish. There are some clear takeaways from a cursory analysis of Japanese statistics, however: The caliber of play is much higher in the United States, so great dominance must be seen in the Japanese raw numbers. Batting average translates quite well for high-end hitters, but power must be dialed way down. For pitchers, K and walk rates have to be brought down a bit, but authority on batted balls allowed has to be dialed way up, even after the 2013 rabbit-ball effect.
Before 2013, Tanaka didn’t fare particularly well in regards to authority of contact allowed. In fact, he allowed a higher batting average on balls put in play than that of fellow ERA qualifiers in each year from 2009 to 2012. In 2013, though, he made major BABIP improvements, and was much better than his starting-pitcher peers. At this point, we don’t have enough evidence to declare Tanaka’s improvements in this regard in 2013 were any more than a typical one-year outlier. Tanaka’s success to date has had much more to do with his superior K and BB rates than with the relative authority of contact he generates.
So what will he ultimately be? As stated earlier, the separator could be his ability — or inability — to get outs with his fastball up in the zone. This skill has been Jered Weaver’s separator throughout his career. Like Tanaka, Weaver’s raw stuff grades out just fine, but is a cut below that of other elite hurlers. Weaver has ridden high popup rates and very low walk rates to earn his place among the game’s best, though he has begun to slip from his perch a bit. The best-case scenario for Tanaka would appear to be a combination of better-than-league-average K and BB rates, a solid popup rate and a higher-than-average groundball rate, thanks to his splitter.
This is likely a less-than-1%-probability scenario, as it is exceedingly hard to pull off the popups and the groundballs. More than likely, one will have to be sacrificed for the other, and we are left either with a Jered Weaver-type, low-BB, high-popup guy with a tendency to allow homers, or a Hiroki Kuroda/Adam Wainwright-type groundball guy with a low walk rate. And that’s if all goes well.
This extremely highly compensated free agent is going to roll into spring training — and have his entire preparation process adjusted, in all likelihood. The workload for a Japanese starting pitcher isn’t necessarily heavier, but it certainly is different. Instead of working every fifth day over a 162-game season, they work every seventh day over a 144-game season. They also throw more innings and more pitches per start. It’s basically a very long U.S. college baseball season for a Japanese starting pitcher, with the total number of innings for top U.S. and Japanese starters actually being quite similar.
When Hisashi Iwakuma joined the Seattle Mariners in the spring of 2012, major training adjustments needed to be made to prepare him for the grind of a season in the United States. Iwakuma’s spring training was almost totally devoted to conditioning, and he worked out of the bullpen for most of the first half of the season to fine-tune his pitch precision. Tanaka is physically stronger and much younger than Iwakuma, but it is quite likely that Tanaka will have his own unique set of physical hurdles to encounter in his first major league season, and there are no guarantees the transition will be seamless.
— What’s going to happen? Well, it’s already happening. Has there ever been real baseball news on Christmas Day before? There was this year. Tanaka was posted. He has an agent, and in Casey Close, it’s one of the best. Not only is Tanaka a baseball star of the highest order, he is also married to a Japanese pop star, Mai Satoda. (Close is also married to a media star himself, Fox News’ anchor Gretchen Carlson.) This is not going to just be a U.S. baseball story, this is going to be an international multimedia sensation, taking place during one of the slowest periods in the U.S. sports year. There will be NFL playoffs on the weekends, but Tanaka-fest is going to take root for the next month. Stand down, Matt Garza, Ubaldo Jimenez and Ervin Santana — we’ll get back to you during Super Bowl-hype week. Every team should absolutely commit to the $20 million entry fee. It’s terrible public relations for any club that doesn’t.
There will be some teams that, dubiously, don’t post the fee. There will be some that do, and are never considered contenders, either in their minds or Tanaka’s or Close’s. There will, however, be a critical mass of true contenders sprinkled across the country and in both leagues, and we are likely to be treated to a month-long reality show as Tanaka barnstorms from city to city. We don’t know much about Masahiro Tanaka, the person, but we’re about to find out. Will he be motivated almost solely by the financial component, as most current major league free agents are? Or will quality of life play a larger role? One has to assume he’s about to run a geographical gauntlet that includes multiple stops in the Boston-to-Washington metroplex, a stop or two in the Heartland, maybe one in Texas, possibly three in California, plus the Pacific Northwest. On each stop, the home city will attempt to put its best foot forward, and Tanaka will meet with dignitaries, tour neighborhoods, and potentially be cheered by thousands of people who have never seen him pitch.
Which brings us back to a significant point:
— Until very recently, clubs have been reticent to bestow contracts of more than four or five years upon even the best starting pitchers. And that’s with good reason. Pitchers get hurt. All the time. The ones who have broken through and got the big, longer-term deals — the Sabathias, the Felixes, the Verlanders — compiled massive major league track records at relatively young ages before securing big paydays. On the other hand, relatively little is known about Tanaka’s ability to perform on baseball’s biggest stage. And he is going to get PAID. Big time. As we’ve discussed, there is a pretty solid amount of circumstantial evidence to suggest he’ll be a very good major league pitcher, but there’s absolutely nowhere near the level of certainty that there was for the aforementioned starting pitchers who would appear on a Mount Rushmore of their peers in the past decade.
Is Tanaka’s stuff going to play? What about the workload? Remember, this guy threw 160 pitches as a starter one day in the recent Japan Series, and he came in to close out the clincher the following day. When you get down to it, there is arguably as much chance that he’s the next Matsuzaka as he is the next Darvish. And he’s going to be paid way more than either of those two. He’s going to be paid more than even the most optimistic of analysts has speculated to date. His talent, his timing, plus the real and perceived economics of the game and a good, old-fashioned gold-rush mentality, are all coming together in a perfect storm that will be televised for our enjoyment. This truly is going to be insane.
Could we please have a contract crowdsourcing for this? 7 yrs, $145m (plus $20m fee)
8 yrs / $164 M (plus $20M posting fee)
9 yrs / $183 M (plus $20M posting fee)
10 yrs / $202 M (plus $20M posting fee)
Are you guys just trying to outbid each other?
11 yrs / $212 M (plus $20M posting fee)
eleventy billion
4 yrs / $51 M (40 M to be paid 1 M per year for next 40 years)
5 years – $110 M, + fee. Then he can sign another deal in his age 30 season.
if half the teams have no intention of getting into a bidding war with the league’s deepest pocket teams then I don’t see the point in those teams going thru the motions of the posting process just for the sake of appearances. I doubt more than 10 teams put up the 20M.
I agree. The Pittsburghs and Tampa Bays aren’t going to waste their time on this.
They get the $20 million back if they do not win the bidding. Why not bid?
I don’t even think money has to be exchanged, but only a commitment to pay. And every team could use a 25 year old pitcher that is big-league ready and with a high ceiling. As a fan of an (ostensibly) small market team, I want to see an effort made to sign him even though I know the chances remain slim.
You probably have to put that money in an escrow or something until Tanaka signs, plus pay for paperwork/etc.. why even waste the small money/effort if you definitely can’t get him?
It wouldn’t have cost the Pirates anything to call up Jay-Z with some ridiculous lowball offer for Robinson Cano either, but I seriously doubt they did. What would be the point?
@psualum, even so, you have to risk the few bucks it costs to file the bid in the off chance that maybe, just maybe, Tanaka falls in love with your city and wants to play there even if you offer $50 million less than the Yankees.
Jay29:
that’s a fantasy scenario that has no chance of happening. A bunch of teams just aren’t going to waste their time here.
Neither are the Mets
I just hope he signs quickly and breaks the logjam.
So: Tanaka pitches like Kuroda, with better stuff than Iwakuma, and much better control than Darvish. He’s looked closer to Matsuzaka’s effectiveness in his years so far. Upside is Jared Weaver, downside is perhaps a somewhat homer-prone Matsuzaka with better health at this point. Hmmm. Not too happy about more than five years on that. On the other hand, I love me some November pitchers. And Tanaka’s strength seems to be that he knows how to _pitch_. I’d love to watch him play, just a bit worried about watching him get paid.
Here’s a factor in ‘where does he go?’ I haven’t seen much discussed, but I suspect is real. I doubt Tanaka signs to a team which already has a star Japanese pitcher. Seniority really matters in the Japanese context. Kuroda was not a star in Japan, but he’s a much older man who has had great success on the most internationally visible baseball platform in the world. Darvish and Iwakuma were both bigger stars in Japan than Tanaka has been, the best two pitchers of their time before Coming East. Tanaka is younger in age than any of them. If he goes to the Yankees, the Rangers, or the Mariners, Tanaka is automatically ‘the junior guy,’ both culturally and in the case of the Rangers and Mariners effectively in terms of the rotation. Why would he do that? Tanaka can have all the marketing opportunity as The Guy, no qualifier, in other places, but would always be lower in the pecking order at these places. I don’t rule out the Yankees because Kuroda likely only has one more year, but still I don’t see him signing with any of these clubs. And why would he go to the Cubs, a losing outfit years from contention?
To me, the Angels and the D-backs have an inside track. There is the issue, too, that going to a homer-surpressing park is likely in Tanaka’s interest. Sure, if Tanaka’s all about money he’ll go to somebody crazy enough to give him ten years. My guess is he goes to a team with talent and a chance to win, without a Japanese star already in place, and not with a bandbox stadium. And yeah, I’d like this to get done so the rest of the market gets itself sorted out.
Why would he avoid the Cubs, because they are “years from contention”, but then jump to the Angels or D-Backs? The Angels have an aging core, plus Trout, with a maxed out budget and no prospects whatsoever in the minors. The D-Backs are better than the Cubs now, but is their future really all that much brighter, considering the Cubs’ deep farm (Baez, Bryant, Soler, etc.)? The D-Backs have a nice core of Goldy, Parra, Prado, Hill, and a declining Montero, but have shown themselves to be a mediocre team the last two years.
I don’t doubt that the Halos or Snakes will be players for Tanaka, but the Cubs will be good soon. Why wouldn’t Tanaka want to adjust to the bigs in ’14, and then be a centerpiece on a potentially great young team?
And combine that with Epstein’s “we will not be outbid” approach, and you have yourself a really hard offer to refuse.
He has had one season of under .9 WHIP in his ages 20-24 seasons Darvish had one season OVER. He struck our fewer NBP hitters per 9 than Derek Holland struck out MLB hitters last year. Too much risk for me..
Well 2013 NPB league average K% was 17.53% where MLB was 19.86%.
The thing about comparing him to Darvish is that Darvish looks to be worth a ridiculous amount of money. Being worth less than Darvish still leaves plenty of room for an above average #2 starting pitcher or low-end #1. This doesn’t mean I think he will reach this ceiling, but even if he is not at that elite Darvish ceiling, he still could be worth a lot of money.
In his brief period of free agency I hope the Fangraphs brass(?) bids aggressively. I would hate to see Tony Blengino go back to the private sector. Don’t mess this up Appelman! This could be the one that got away!
Absolutely, don’t let him go! You never know what he might say about you to the press once he is an ex-employee!
The only pitch consistently rated as a plus offering is his splitter.
With the smaller ball out there in Japan, this pitch could disappear for him depending on his hand size (which he can’t control). I think this guy is going to be a disaster if that happens.
Hmm. In searching for the dimensions of the Japanese ball I found that in 2011 they switched to the same size ball as MLB.
What’s a $130,000,000 dollar bet amoung billionaires?
“This past season, however, was the year of the rabbit ball in Japan,..”
It was really just the end of the dead ball in Japan. The ball went back to “normal” for JPL – about the same as it was when Darvish was pitching.
Here’s an idea: if the posting team is worried about the monetary return, maybe one million of the twenty should be committed. Maximum impact to the posting team with minimal impact on small-market teams. This could help improve relations with the two leagues.
Ok, he sounds like a Japanese Maddox plus a splitter, a style that probably translates to mlb statistically even less than pure stuff. He could be great or mediocre. Maybe Koji can tell him how it’s done. I wonder if they have had a conversation.
Whoever gets Tanaka is going to be stuck with a borderline disaster. Control guys from Japan don’t fare well here, because the hitters are simply better. Allowing contact in Japan is not the same as allowing contact over here. Kenshin Kawakami was the same type of pitcher, and that did not turn out well…
Give me a break. Kawakami was a decade older than Tanaka when he made his debut in MLB. And Kawakami did not dominate NBL hitters the way Tanaka has. You are comparing walnuts to watermelons.
And I don’t know Kuroda’s numbers from Japan, but he has been a “control” pitcher since coming to America, and he’s worked out pretty well.
Baseball Reference is your friend:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/japan/player.cgi?id=kuroda001hir
Can I get another seven circular paragraphs
But this time, be just a wee bit more of a condescending d!ck about it.
Should I sign him Tony?
Besides the workload issues and his declining K rate, both of which merit serious concern, we have the fact that Tanaka pitches in a stadium that greatly suppresses HR’s.
http://nomprojections.com/park-factors/
Also, last years ball was not a rabbit ball. It was still a dead ball, just less dead than the previous 2 years where HR rates dropped almost in half and ERA’s plummeted by 1 run. Last years ball was still dead enough that HR rates were down 30% from 2010 and ERA down almost 0.5 runs.
Actually, HR rates were more like 20% down in 2013 from 2010 (0.7 HR/9 vs 0.9 Hr/9) up from 0.5 HR/9 in 2011-2012
Woah, woah, woah. Fangraphs big thing is discrediting pitchers with declining K rates because, for one thing pitchers can’t control balls in play, for two, K’s distinguish quality, and this Tanaka has a worse rate than Tillman, pitching against AAA batters at that? Lulz, good luck to the GM that hangs this supposed $20+m/yr contract on his super.
HFS, what great, energetic, clear writing!
This is how it’s done – are you listening, Internet? Thesis laid out, supported by statements that don’t strain credulity or otherwise appear forced, active voice, minimal typos or beginner errors, not bogged down with unneccessary details or stats that add no value…Best of all, so few of the baggage words and backward sentences starting to seem like cultural norms in baseball writing. It’s interesting, and laid out crisply, with a minimum of all the crap that slows down a reader. Even a nice balance between jargon and over explaining, and the guy is even smart enough to know not to use “however” to start a sentence. What a pleasure!
I loathe when people suggest these things aren’t important for baseball blogs. Good writing is ALWAYS better than bad. Huzzah!
Yawn.
In two years he’ll be another cratering Japanese pitcher.
I don’t know why Tanaka is almost universally dismissed as not being at Darvish’s level. As eye-popping as Darvish’s strikeout numbers are, he still has to improve on his innings load and control to be a true no.1 He’s not impeachable from both a performance and stuff standpoint. Their fastballs are similar: 91-94, topping out at 96 but coming in at a flat plane and not notable for its movement. The velocity might rate as a 60-65 but I think the lack of action and plane drop it into a 55 pitch. Darvish has a great put away slider but Tanaka also boasts a great put away pitch in his splitter.
If anything, from what I’ve seen, Tanaka has better control of his fastball than Darvish. I don’t think he’s as likely to suddenly lose control of it and walk a bunch of hitters with fastballs nowhere near the strike zone like Darvish has.
You can argue about the Tanaka v. Darvish comparisons, but I’m not sure how you can claim that a pitcher who ranks top-10 in WAR over the past two seasons while averaging over 200 IP per season still needs to improve to be a number one…
Everyone seems to be excited about Tanaka’s durability and talent, which could be off the charts good. But are we just going to gloss over the fact that he’s thrown 1300+ innings by age 24 in professional baseball? Counting on his arm to hold up is probably not a safe bet (although, I suppose no one ever overwhelmingly succeeded by being totally risk-averse).
Great piece, except the part where you referred to Gretchen Carlson as a “star”.
Tanaka is also reported by Japanese media as being very competitive and liking the spotlight, the later perhaps confirmed by marrying a singer/actress/idol four years his senior. The bright lights of Broadway and LA might have more to offer than money.