Team Entropy 2020: Suspenseful Sunday
Over the past two days, the playoff picture has begun to come into full focus. The Marlins, Reds, and Astros all clinched playoff berths on Friday night — the last of those not with a victory of their own but one by the Dodgers, of all teams — while the Rockies and Angels were eliminated. On Saturday, the Mets bit the dust as well. Thus as we head into the abbreviated season’s final day, the eight AL teams have been decided, albeit not all of the seedings, while 10 NL teams remain alive.
In the NL, the top four seeds have been secured: the Dodgers, Braves, Cubs (who clinched the NL Central on Saturday night), and Padres will be seeds 1-4 in that order. Still at stake are the middles of the NL East and Central standings:
| NL East | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Braves | Marlins | Phillies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braves** | 35 | 24 | .593 | — | 24-16 | — | 6-4 | 5-5 | |
| Marlins* | 30 | 29 | .508 | 5 | 21-19 | 4-6 | — | 7-3 | |
| Phillies | 28 | 31 | .475 | 7 | 21-19 | 5-5 | 3-7 | — | |
| NL Central | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Cubs | Cardinals | Reds | Brewers |
| Cubs** | 33 | 26 | .559 | — | 22-18 | — | 5-5 | 6-4 | 5-5 |
| Cardinals | 29 | 28 | .509 | 3 | 21-18 | 5-5 | — | 6-4 | 4-5 |
| Reds* | 30 | 29 | .508 | 3 | 21-19 | 4-6 | 4-6 | — | 6-4 |
| Brewers | 29 | 30 | .492 | 4 | 19-20 | 5-5 | 5-4 | 4-6 | — |
| NL West | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Dodgers | Padres | Giants | |
| Dodgers** | 42 | 17 | .712 | — | 27-13 | — | 6-4 | 6-4 | |
| Padres* | 36 | 23 | .610 | 6 | 24-15 | 4-6 | — | 6-3 | |
| Giants | 29 | 30 | .492 | 13 | 18-21 | 4-6 | 3-6 | — |
**clinched division title
In the NL Central, with the Brewers splitting Friday’s doubleheader with the Cardinals and then winning on Saturday as well while the Reds lost, the three teams enter Sunday separated by a game, with St. Louis hosting Milwaukee and Cincinnati at Minnesota on Sunday. Apparently, I missed a memo regarding the potential make-up doubleheader involving the Cardinals and Tigers; they would play one or two games in Detroit on Monday only if it they have the potential to give the Cardinals home-field advantage (no longer the case) or determine whether they’re in or out; if it’s seeding in the 5-8 range, they’ll be judged on winning percentage.
Long story slightly shorter, if the Cardinals win, they’re in at 30-28 and there’s no doubleheader. If the Reds also win to finish 31-29, the Cardinals would be the second-place team based on winning percentage, (.5172 versus .5167), though it’s also worth noting that they have the season series edge, so this isn’t a major miscarriage of justice; in that scenario, the Brewers would be 29-31, which may or may not be good enough depending on what the Giants do against the Padres (we’ll get to that). If the Cardinals lose and wind up 29-29 and the Brewers 30-30, that would mean gassing up the plane to head to the Motor City. If the Reds are in there at 30-30 as well, it would also mean that each of the three teams went 10-10 against the other two, which would kick the tiebreaker to intradivisional records; by that, the Reds and Cardinals would both be 21-19, the Brewers 20-20.
Now, what happens next is a bit unclear. Based on pre-2020 tiebreaker rules, which have been spelled out much more explicitly, once the three-team tiebreaker is broken, “If any two of the clubs have identical winning percentages, then then the two-Club tiebreak rules will break that tie.” In that case, the Cardinals have the drop on the Reds via their 6-4 season series advantage. If the untangling were to be based on each team’s last 20 intradivision games, the Reds’ 12-8 record would outdo the Cardinals’ 10-10. I believe the first case applies, not the second, but I’m not 100% sure at this writing.
| Seeds 1-3 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dodgers** | 41 | 17 | .707 | — | 27-13 |
| 2 | Braves** | 35 | 24 | .593 | 6.5 | 24-16 |
| 3 | Cubs** | 33 | 26 | .559 | 8.5 | 22-18 |
| Seeds 4-6 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
| 4 | Padres* | 36 | 23 | .610 | — | 24-15 |
| 5 | Cardinals | 29 | 28 | .509 | 3 | 21-18 |
| 6 | Marlins* | 30 | 29 | .508 | 6 | 21-19 |
| Seeds 7-8 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
| 7 | Reds* | 30 | 29 | .508 | +1 | 21-19 |
| 8 | Brewers | 29 | 30 | .492 | — | 19-20 |
| x | Giants | 29 | 30 | .492 | 0 | 18-21 |
| x | Phillies | 28 | 31 | .475 | 1 | 21-19 |
**clinched division title
Here you can see where the Cardinals’ doubleheader might be necessary, because the Giants and Brewers can both finish 30-30 along with the Reds (who can also finish 31-29). I’ve tried to game the combinations out; the NL Central second place team’s status as the 5th or 6th seed depends on whether or not the Marlins beat the Yankees. If Miami wins, we’ll need to know whether the Reds get to 31 wins; the Fish had a 12-8 record in their final 20 intradivision games, then a loss and a win before that, while the Reds were also 12-8 with two losses before that. Setting that matter aside, we have this:
| Cardinals | Reds | Brewers | Giants | Phillies | Seeding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W (30) | W (31) | L (29) | W (30) | W (29) | STL 5/6, CIN 7, SFG 8 |
| W (30) | W (31) | L (29) | L (29) | W (29) | STL 5/6, CIN 7, PHI 8 |
| W (30) | L (30) | L (29) | W (30) | W (29) | STL 5/6, CIN 7, SFG 8 |
| L (29) | W (31) | W (30) | W (30) | W (29) | CIN 5/6, MIL 7/8, STL @ DET x2 |
| L (29) | L (30) | W (30) | L (29) | W (29) | STL @ DET x2 |
I’ve highlighted the Phillies’ narrow slice of a chance. If they beat the Rays in Tampa Bay, they could get in with a 29-31 record, but only if the Giants and Brewers both lose; in that case, Philadelphia’s 21-19 intradivision record would elevate them above the other two. Our Playoff Odds still give that a 13.2% chance of happening.
If the Cardinals were to lose on Sunday and then lose both ends of the make-up doubleheader, winding up tied with the Giants and Phillies at 29 wins, St. Louis would get the number eight seed. The Giants would be eliminated from the three-team tiebreaker due to having the worse intradivisional record, and then the Cardinals, with their 10-10 record over their final 20 intradivisional games, would outdo the Phillies’ 8-12 record in that context.
You might find this helpful:
N.L. Playoff Seeds, after games on September 26th #MLB
Position Clinched:
1. Los Angeles
2. Atlanta
3. Chicago
4. San DiegoPossible Finishes:
Miami – 5th/6th
Cincinnati – 5th/6th/7th
St. Louis – 5th/6th/7th
Milwaukee – 8th
Philadelphia – 8th
San Francisco – 8th— MLB Magic Numbers ?? (@MLBMagNum) September 27, 2020
If the current seedings were to hold, we’d have Dodgers-Brewers, Braves-Reds, Cubs-Marlins, and Padres-Cardinals, but don’t get too attached to any of that. If I’ve missed something here, suffice it to say that we could still be talking about what happens next on Monday morning.
As for the AL…
| AL East | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Rays | Yankees | Blue Jays |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rays** | 39 | 20 | .661 | — | 27-13 | — | 8-2 | 6-4 |
| Yankees* | 33 | 26 | .559 | 6 | 23-17 | 2-8 | — | 5-5 |
| Blue Jays* | 32 | 27 | .542 | 7 | 22-17 | 4-6 | 5-5 | — |
| AL Central | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Twins | White Sox | Indians |
| Twins* | 36 | 23 | .610 | — | 23-17 | — | 5-5 | 7-3 |
| White Sox* | 35 | 24 | .593 | 1 | 25-15 | 5-5 | — | 2-8 |
| Indians* | 34 | 25 | .576 | 2 | 23-17 | 3-7 | 8-2 | — |
| AL West | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv | Athletics | Astros | |
| Athletics** | 35 | 24 | .593 | — | 25-14 | — | 7-3 | |
| Astros* | 29 | 30 | .492 | 6 | 19-20 | 3-7 | — |
**clinched division title
In the AL East, the Blue Jays could still swipe second place away from the Yankees. If they beat the Orioles and the Yankees lose to the Marlins, the two teams will have 33-27 records, a 5-5 season series split, and 23-17 intradivisional records, but the Blue Jays would be 12-8 over their final 20 intradivisional games, the Yankees just 11-9. Our Playoff Odds put the chances of this at 11.5%.
Over in the AL Central, the White Sox fell to third on Friday night but clawed their way back to second on Saturday night. The Indians can no longer win the division, but their 8-2 season series record against the White Sox gives them the tiebreaker advantage if they beat the Pirates and the White Sox lose to the Cubs. If the Twins lose to the Reds and the White Sox win, first place would go to Chicago because while the two teams split the seasons series, the White Sox have the better intradivisional record.
| Seeds 1-3 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rays** | 39 | 20 | .661 | — | 27-13 |
| 2 | Twins* | 36 | 23 | .610 | 3 | 23-17 |
| 3 | Athletics** | 35 | 24 | .593 | 4 | 25-14 |
| Seeds 4-6 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
| 4 | White Sox* | 35 | 24 | .593 | — | 25-15 |
| 5 | Yankees* | 33 | 26 | .559 | 2 | 23-17 |
| 6 | Astros* | 29 | 30 | .492 | 6 | 19-20 |
| Seeds 7-8 | Tm | W | L | W-L% | GB | IntraDiv |
| 7 | Indians* | 34 | 25 | .553 | +2 | 23-17 |
| 8 | Blue Jays* | 32 | 27 | .542 | — | 22-17 |
**clinched division title
There’s not a whole lot to see here; in fact, aside from the Yankees/Blue Jays situation and the placement of the AL Central teams, the only real action is whether the A’s can snag the number two seed. That can happen if they beat the Mariners and the Twins lose, because Oakland not only has the better intradivision record than Minnesota but also would have a better intradivision record (26-14) than Chicago. Here’s this:
A.L. Playoff Seeds, after games on September 26th #MLB
Position Clinched:
1. Tampa Bay
6. HoustonPossible Finish:
Oakland – 2nd/3rd
Minnesota – 2nd/3rd/4th
Chicago – 2nd/3rd/4th/7th
Cleveland – 4th/7th
New York – 5th/8th
Toronto – 5th/8th— MLB Magic Numbers ?? (@MLBMagNum) September 27, 2020
If these seedings hold, we’ve got Rays-Blue Jays, Twins-Indians, A’s-Astros and White Sox-Yankees, but again, don’t hold your breath.
While we can lament the lack of tiebreaker games in store, and bemoan the eight-team playoff fields, in the end we can at least admit that this silly and hopefully transient playoff format has produced its share of end-of-season chaos. That should make for a good deal of suspense on Sunday, particularly with every team starting its games shortly after 3 pm ET, and we could even have stuff up in the air on Monday. I’m not sure that exactly qualifies as bonus baseball, since those games in Detroit were actually scheduled, but like everything else in this weird year, you can hang your own asterisk on it if you choose.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Cubs/Marlins you say? Remember to sit on your hands on foul balls Cubs fans
So I want to come back to this and say something more intelligent about the article itself but for now can I just ask what in the WORLD is going on with the percentages of likelihood of winning a game? According to Fangraphs the Cardinals have a 96% (that is not a typo–ninety-six percent) chance of winning that game against the Brewers that has not started yet.
I’ve said this before–that the Fangraphs percentage likelihood of winning that game is much too aggressive about predicting a winner in a world where the very worst teams still win a third of their games but this is bonkers-level stuff going on here. Something is terribly broken with the predictions because unless Austin Gomber is actually the clone of Pedro Martinez and the Brewers are the 2019 Orioles starting Gabriel Ynoa or David Hess or something 96% to 4% should not be happening.
If David Hess is the starter, best case of a win is .0000001 percent.
So similar odds to those of Rob Drake still having a job next year (we hope)?
In the most important AB of the year the batter ( Austin Slater) is called out on a pitch in the dirt. Bring on the automatic strike zone. It can’t come soon enough!!
During Quick Pitch I just saw Mazara get called out, also to end the game, on another pitch that was well outside the zone. I think it is pretty hard to hit when the batter gets rung up on such poor calls. No wonder they start to chase.
Last WS all that was broken was the commentary with Nats v Astros chances in a 60-ish percent chance of Astros winning a game being called “overwhelming odds.” Now the actual model is broken.
Last year, the Yankees beat the Orioles in, I believe, 17 out of 19 games. So that is less than winning 90% of the time, in the single most extreme case I can think of. Except in some really wild fringe cases, getting more than a 70%-ish likelihood of winning a single game means you need to seriously tweak your model.
I think something was definitely broken with that projection prior to the lineups coming in. We really have it at 50/50. The most we’ve actually projected a game at this year is 75/25.But only 10 games even got to the 70/30 mark.
Thanks for the update. I mean, it had to be broken!
I feel like for Jay Jaffe’s birthday we should get Will Shortz to make a playoff tiebreaker scenario themed puzzle. Jaffe seems to have much fun untangling these each year. Reads so much like something out of a puzzle book.
As someone who watches the Cards regularly, there has never been a more .500 club. They could play 600 games and end up 300-300.
With everything on the line none of the three teams competing for the last NL playoff spot could muster a win to get in at .500. Pretty unsuspenseful as it played out, it’s just too many teams.
If MLB insists on the seeded format, there should be a cutoff and any team with more losses than wins forfeits and their opponent gets a bye.
IMO there are only four teams in the NL that are what we would call “good”–Dodgers, Padres, Braves, and Cubs, roughly in that order, and the Cubs seem to have produced almost no offense this year. The rest of the teams are not making a particularly strong case that the playoff field should be expanded. The Brewers, Reds, and Cards are average, and the Marlins had a pretty substantial negative run differential,
If you see the WS odds its really just 3 of those, and the Cubs are definitely a tier below.
Rob Drake had a strikezone unlike any i’ve ever seen
I’m just saying the Marlins have won the World Series in 100% of the the seasons in which they went to the postseason
With the Marlins pitching, watch out!