Teams Should Be Careful What They Wait For

(Photo: Arturo Pardavila III)
This slow offseason has many fans and teams already looking toward — and maybe salivating over — next year’s free-agent class. The star power available next season is incredible. Josh Donaldson, Bryce Harper, and Manny Machado are among the top-nine position players on our Depth Chart Projections. All three will be free agents in November. With Charlie Blackmon, A.J. Pollock, Brian Dozier, Clayton Kershaw, Daniel Murphy, and Andrew McCutchen also set to hit the market, the class boasts quality depth, as well.
Those are certainly some impressive names. Notably, however, almost all of them belong to position players. While next year’s free-agent class could be unrivaled in terms of overall talent, it’s possible that the glow of the top hitters has obscured how lopsided that class is likely to be. Kershaw is great, but there’s only one of him. Multiple teams, meanwhile, will be searching for pitching upgrades next winter. A preliminary glance at things reveals that their options could be limited.
Before getting to next year’s crop of pitchers, let’s perform a brief refresher on the one wrapping up. We had Yu Darvish at the top of the class, with Jake Arrieta a rung below followed by Lance Lynn, Alex Cobb, Tyler Chatwood, Jhoulys Chacin, and Jaime Garcia. This year’s group of free-agent starting pitchers lacked both firepower and quality depth, an unexpected development considering how things looked heading into last season. In December 2016, I naively believed in this year’s crop of starters. The projections backed me up, too: at that time, three pitchers appeared likely to produce four-win seasons, six to top three wins, and eight pitchers total to put up at least 2.5 WAR. By November, only Yu Darvish hit free agency with a season above 2.5 WAR, and even he missed his projection by a full win.
The table below shows the free-agent starting-pitching class I expected over a year ago, including projections for 2017, their actual production last season, and their resulting contract, if any.
| Name | 2017 Proj. WAR | 2017 WAR | Difference | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu Darvish | 4.5 | 3.5 | -1.0 | 5/$126 M |
| Johnny Cueto | 4.2 | 1.2 | -3.0 | Did not opt out |
| Jake Arrieta | 4.1 | 2.4 | -1.7 | 3/$75 M |
| Masahiro Tanaka | 3.9 | 2.7 | -1.2 | Did not opt out |
| Michael Pineda | 3.5 | 1.1 | -2.4 | TJ Surgery, 2/$10 M |
| Danny Duffy | 3.1 | 3.4 | 0.3 | Signed extension |
| John Lackey | 2.8 | 0.5 | -2.3 | Free agent |
| Wei-Yin Chen | 2.5 | 0.5 | -2.0 | Did not opt out |
| Tyler Chatwood | 2.3 | 1.1 | -1.2 | 3/$39 M |
| Jaime Garcia | 2.3 | 2.1 | -0.2 | 1/$10 M |
| Jeremy Hellickson | 2.2 | 0.2 | -2.0 | Free agent |
| Bartolo Colon | 2.2 | 0.6 | -1.6 | Minor-league deal |
| Ian Kennedy | 2.1 | -0.2 | -2.3 | Did not opt out |
| Francisco Liriano | 2.0 | 0.8 | -1.2 | 1/$4 M |
| CC Sabathia | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1/$10 M |
| Jhoulys Chacin | 1.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 2/$15.5 |
| Lance Lynn | 1.9 | 1.4 | -0.5 | 1/$12 M |
| Alex Cobb | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.8 | Free agent |
| Marco Estrada | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 1/$13 M |
| Chris Tillman | 1.4 | -1.0 | -2.4 | 1/$3 M |
| Jason Vargas | 1.4 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 2/$16 M |
| AVERAGE | 2.5 | 1.5 | -1.0 | — |
Of the 14 pitchers projected for at least two wins in 2017, only five cleared that bar. Of those five pitchers, only three (Arrieta, Darvis, and Garcia) made it to free agency. Johnny Cueto was ineffective after a great 2016 season, and he remained with the Giants. Masahiro Tanaka was good last season, but he chose to take the Yankees up on his three-year, $67 million option. Michael Pineda is now recovering from Tommy John surgery. Danny Duffy signed an extension last January. Further down the line, we see some players who met expectations, but none of the them proved to be difference-makers, and many come with age or injury concerns.
Last year’s class didn’t have to turn out so poorly, but at least it started from a pretty high base in terms of expectations. By contrast, consider next year’s class. Below is a table showing the top projected free agents for next season, including players with opt-outs. Included here are last year’s performance, this year’s projections, and each pitcher’s age in the 2019 season (that is, the first in a potentially new contract). Players with team options are not included because, if they are good, the team figures to pick up the option. If they are bad and become free agents, they probably don’t merit much discussion. (Cole Hamels might represent an exception to that rule.)
| Name | 2017 WAR | 2018 Proj. WAR | Age in 2019 | Player Option |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton Kershaw | 4.6 | 6.2 | 31 | 2/$65 M |
| Dallas Keuchel | 2.5 | 4.3 | 31 | — |
| David Price | 1.5 | 3.6 | 33 | 4/$127 M |
If he finishes the season healthy, Kershaw seems a lock to opt out of his contract and — as Jay Jaffe discussed last month — seek another $200 million deal. After Kershaw, things get a bit dicier. Keuchel is projected for a very good season, but he’s only been worth around five wins the last two seasons combined. He pitched very well in the playoffs, but it might be a stretch to think he can sustain that performance across an entire season when he hasn’t done so since his 2015 Cy Young campaign. If David Price merely hits his projection, he seems unlikely to walk away from the remaining years and dollars on his contract. He would need to put in a great performance to try to induce a team into paying him more than $25 million per year though his age-37 season. That’s a pretty tall order. The most likely scenario is Kershaw on top with a solid Keuchel lined up behind him.
Next, we get to a collection of pitchers who are above average but probably wouldn’t be slotted into the top-two spots of the rotation — and maybe not even the top three on some contenders.
| Name | 2017 WAR | 2018 Proj. WAR | Age in 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gio Gonzalez | 3.3 | 2.9 | 33 |
| J.A. Happ | 2.9 | 2.9 | 36 |
| Garrett Richards | 1.0 | 2.7 | 31 |
| Drew Pomeranz | 3.1 | 2.5 | 30 |
| Charlie Morton | 3.3 | 2.4 | 35 |
| Patrick Corbin | 3.0 | 2.1 | 29 |
| Brandon McCarthy | 2.4 | 2.0 | 35 |
| Adam Wainwright | 1.5 | 2.0 | 37 |
Half of these guys will be 35 or older during the 2019 season. Most have been injured or ineffective in recent seasons. Gio Gonzalez has been consistently good for nearly a decade, but it’s hard to say what that might be worth in free agency as he enters his mid-30s. If teams are looking for players to help them contend and be a part of a playoff rotation, the pickings appear slim. There’s some depth beyond these players, as the list below illustrates.
| Name | 2017 WAR | 2018 Proj. WAR | Age in 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan Eovaldi | 0.0 | 1.7 | 29 |
| Hyun-Jin Ryu | 0.8 | 1.7 | 32 |
| Lance Lynn | 1.4 | 1.6 | 32 |
| CC Sabathia | 1.9 | 1.6 | 38 |
| Matt Harvey | -0.8 | 1.4 | 30 |
| Jason Hammel | 2.1 | 1.2 | 36 |
| Francisco Liriano | 0.8 | 1.2 | 35 |
| Josh Tomlin | 2.2 | 1.1 | 34 |
| Miguel Gonzalez | 1.4 | 0.7 | 35 |
Some intriguing options exist here. Lance Lynn, another year removed from Tommy John surgery, could recover some value. Matt Harvey has pitched like an ace in the not-too-distant past. Eovaldi and Ryu could be beat their projections. That said, next winter could look a lot like this offseason — literally in the case of repeat free agents like Gonzalez, Liriano, Lynn, and Sabathia.
For clubs seeking a star position player, next winter provides a free-agent class worth anticipating. For those searching for the same on the pitching side of the market, however, there’s going to be Clayton Kershaw. After the best pitcher on the planet, the free-agent class of starting pitchers could prove disappointing.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
I don’t think this offseason has been about waiting for next year’s pitchers, but more about not giving long contracts to aged pitchers. Outside of kershaw I see that continuing next year
That still doesn’t explain what happened with guys like Lynn and Cobb who are good pitchers and still young enough to have expected 3+ years with a strong AAV.
Kershaw’s in such an enviable position, beyond the fact he’s one of the greatest of all time.
Another good article. You’re on a roll today.
i want my summer job back! heck, with this year and next year, they could fill out les nouveaux Expos with all the unemployed FAs.
Ummm Garrett Richards not slotting in as a 1 or 2 on any team is just stupid. I understand if you wanted to say it was because of injury I can buy it but performance is wrong. The guy has been able to pitch at ace level when on the mound (other than 2015 when coming back from the knee injury, it takes time to build subconscious level trust in the knee after something like that), if he doesnt’t get injured in 2014 he probably wins the Cy Young over Kluber and King Felix. When on the mound he pitches to the level of Kluber and Sale, but his problem has been getting to the mound. Look if I am a GM I put him #1 in most rotations and look for some good starting pitchers as a contingency plan, then again don’t they try to do this for every pitcher in a rotation.
I could downvote this but I’ll actually post it: you’re way overstepping your position here. Everyone gets what you’re saying. He’s been good. But, damn, the guy has pitched 62 innings the last 2 years combined. He elected stem-cell voodoo over surgery last season. He’s pitched 170 innings in a season once in his career at any level (& that year he was more good than really good). He’s now almost 30 YO so most of his career is likely behind him now.
I get it. I know this isn’t rotographs but I’ve had the guy twice the last couple years on my fantasy team because I see it too.
I really hope he stays healthy and puts it together because nothing sucks worse than injuries, but no GM is picking up Richards and slotting him in at #1 or even #2 and thinking “Yeah, damn, I’m set now. Just need to build around this guy.”
There is a subtext here that Craig didn’t say but should have made explicit which is that because so many pitchers underperformed this year, we can expect a lot of underperformance next year. But that is a really radical position because it means that the projections are systematically biased in a positive direction for pitchers, at least in this population.
That would be a pretty big deal, so I would like to see that explored more. But if the projections actually do represent next year’s performance well for this population you’d have a market similar to this year with a couple of top arms (like Darvish was) a couple of mid rotation arms (like Arrieta and Cobb) and a slew of older bounce back candidates to fill out a rotation.
How much of last year’s pitcher underperformance could be attributed to changes in the “juiced” ball? And how quickly would future projections take that into account?
Maybe I’m just arguing with the headline, but is anyone expecting teams to “wait” for free-agent pitching, specifically? I feel like the majority of teams has already largely decided that free-agent starting pitching is an expensive, risky band-aid solution at best, and that they’ll largely have to either identify undervalued pitchers in trade, or develop their own, to fill the gap. I don’t really think anyone’s claimed there was a parallel to the Harper/Machado situation in pitching — the main observable trend in pitching free agency seems to be the reallocation of dollars toward relievers and away from lower-end starters.
It’s going to be terribly disappointing when Kershaw inevitably signs an extension.
My thoughts, 100%.
Please, please, please let it be so. Oh, and, um, he stays healthy….
Two errors: Darvish got six years and $126 million, and Gio Gonzalez has not been a free agent yet so he can’t fit in this quote “That said, next winter could look a lot like this offseason — literally in the case of repeat free agents like Gonzalez, Liriano, Lynn, and Sabathia.”
Miguel
I think he meant Miguel Gongalez but I agree, it’s a little confusing.
Price needs to convince a team to give him more than $31.75 million per year through his age-37 season, not more than $25 million per year. That is a much taller order
Of course, Jose Fernandez was supposed to be part of the upcoming class…
It boggles my mind that Cobb hasn’t signed yet.