The 2020 Draft Prospect Rankings Have Been Updated

I’ve taken a fresh, top-to-bottom pass at my draft rankings, which have changed based on continuous discussion with team sources, review of my own notes and video, and the sourcing of data. The updated list, which includes approximately five rounds of players, can now be found on The Board, which is a benevolent spreadsheet-god that controls my thoughts, feelings, and choices.

The exact date of the draft and the specifics of its format (length, etc.) remain unknown, but team sources anticipate there will be about a month between when those details are announced and Day 1 of the draft, which those sources feel provides them with a reasonable, sufficient window to prepare for the specifics. Especially if that eventual announcement includes an adjustment to the length of the draft, it will likely trigger another update to this list.

At this stage, without games going on, there is no new information about players but there will continue to be information that is new to me, be it what I can get my hands on from a statistical standpoint or from sources I haven’t yet spoken to at length. These evaluations are still subject to change between now and the draft.

Player Movers and Surprises

I now have Heston Kjerstad not only in my 2020 Draft top 10 but in the 50 FV tier, in essence putting him on my top 100 overall list. He has two seasons plus one month of elite performance against mostly SEC pitching, longer and more resounding than any of the other college hitters currently projected to go in the middle-to-back of the first round. That also compares favorably to recent top 10 to 15 college bats. For instance, Hunter Bishop (45+ FV) had just one year of performance (and he was really only dominant during non-conference play), while Garrett Mitchell (45+ FV) had two but has a weaker visual evaluation than Kjerstad, just to name a few. Those two play center field, but I’d rather have the better hitter. Kjerstad’s swing is a little less traditional-looking but his track record and profile are more similar to JJ Bleday’s than the hitters who’ve recently gone in the middle of the round, or the ones I think will go there this year, and I think his tools fit in neatly with the corner bats who are scattered near the back of my overall list of pro prospects. The records for all the 50 FV or better draft prospects on The Board now include where they’d rank on the overall top 100.

A few other four-week shooting stars (mercurial Ole Miss shortstop Anthony Servideo, slugging Ohio State catcher Dillon Dingler, and thumping Baylor shortstop Nick Loftin, among others) also moved up and are now mixed among the college hitters who either have been hurt (Parker Chavers, Freddy Zamora) or floundered badly (Casey Martin) during the four weeks of games that were actually played. As usual, the up/down trend arrows on The Board indicate movement since the last update.

A Deep Dive on Reid Detmers

Unlike some of the players I just mentioned, I was not initially willing to move Louisville lefty Reid Detmers up based on his dominant four starts in 2020 (22 innings, 48 K, 6 BB). In fact, the opposite is true; I’m skeptical about his stuff playing to this level in pro ball. He doesn’t throw hard (88-93) and his fastball doesn’t clearly have the visual characteristics (points back to data acquisition hopes in third paragraph) consistent with fastballs that are effective against pro hitters despite mediocre velocity. I also worry because of how slow his curveball is, and because these kinds of big, looping curveballs that break like a cresting wave typically play best when paired with rising/riding fastballs, which Detmers’ does not appear to be. There are totally reasonable counterarguments to this opinion — his curveball is freakish and he has mowed down big conference hitters since he set foot on campus — but I think they ignore the quality of big league hitters.

Seniors

If this draft does indeed end up being just five rounds and any other players acquired thereafter can sign for a maximum of just $20,000, then seniors will play a larger role in this year’s selections. Even the best seniors typically only sign for $20,000 (fourth round senior and SEC hit king Jake Mangum signed for $20,000 last year) and signability might be a point of emphasis for teams in this draft, which could lead them to squeeze a priority senior into their top five picks to be sure they have enough pool space to get a deal done with a tough sign. I like Eastern Tennessee State senior Landon Knack, a husky, power armed righty who had a 51-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio in 25 innings this year, best among them.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

I also think the extra year of eligibility the NCAA granted to spring athletes will likely impact the signability of “stock down” college players and draft-eligible sophomores who came out of the gate slowly. I’ve begun to stack seniors I like at the bottom of The Board, which yes, has a bottom but is simultaneously endless. They’re denoted with a **.





Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
brentdaily
6 years ago

How many 20k signings are permitted per team? Seems like it could be a bonanza for the teams with a good development rep.

Kinsm
6 years ago
Reply to  brentdaily

Why would any college senior sign for 20K$ when they can just go back to school? I keep reading experts saying this could be a big year for NDFA’s but I see the complete opposite.

brentdaily
6 years ago
Reply to  Kinsm

It’s a good point, but even the 2021 draft is limited to 20 rounds so things won’t go back to ‘normal.’ Most college seniors (unless they crack the top 10 rounds) have no leverage and sign for $10k or less. Going back to school costs a year of pro reps for little guarantee of more money. This is going to create a supply glut in the system because 1,650 fewer kids will be drafted over the next two years (30 teams * 55 rounds lost).

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

It’s been interesting to watch the consensus emerge on Asa Lacy being co-equal to Hancock. Some people were in on it early, but I’m guessing the stuff has been so good for so long that the skeptics don’t care anymore.

I was also looking at some of the pictures of these guys, and I swear some of these must have been taken when they were 14. Kjerstad’s face is totally out of step with his body; if you just saw his face people not only card him, but assume his card was a fake when they saw it.

jeffstonMember since 2020
6 years ago

Is Kjerstad your Swaggerty this year? Do you not worry about his strikeouts, looks like his plate coverage and swing speed can make up for it?

Goms
6 years ago

I would be very excited for Gonzales, Veen, or Heston in Seattle.

SenorGato
6 years ago

I have to perform two different rituals for this draft: one so that Mick Abel falls to 16 and another so that the Cubs actually take him. I performed one in 2018 so that Rocker would get to 24 but did not take into account the league’s NCAA agenda and I guess the wishes of his mom

Pete Crow-Armstrong is underrated lately, seems to have slipped during the stoppage. I get the love for Veen, on the wagon too, but if Crow-Armstrong had his height there would be no question who the better prospect is. Way way better defender, faster, and he’s taken over stuff like last year’s NHSI offensively…I tier him with Howard as a well traveled prepster with all the tools to be an all around stud up the middle

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

Rocker’s no longer #1 for 2021 on the board!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

I am pretty convinced Abel isn’t getting anywhere close to 16. He is a classic underslot signs for teams like the Orioles in the Top 4-5. He’d have to get past all those teams and also the Pirates-Giants gauntlet which is full of teams that love spin rate. Having a hard time seeing it. Really, I would expect that every single one of those top 9 guys will be gone by the time it hits the Rangers at #14, except maybe Gonzalez if a team really didn’t think he could play defense.

I would guess that if the Cubs take a prep stud it’s going to be more like the Pete Crow-Armstrong type–a guy who some teams are really high on and others aren’t. Jared Kelly would potentially be available there too. And of the top guys likely to fall, I would guess that the Cubs have a real shot at Mitchell because he has some health concerns wouldn’t bother me but might bother other teams simply because they’re risk averse.

SenorGato
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

What makes Abel a classic underslot? He’s not a draft season riser or anything, Abel’s been considered an elite talent in this draft for years now, and time up top’s usually an indication of being an underslot candidate (OTOH I just made that part up). While I’m not as confident post-shutdown that Abel has any shot of getting to 16, I also don’t think he will be giving teams a discount just to go a little higher in the draft

Teams being so risk averse is the reason I’ve even played with Abel falling to 16. He’s a HS pitcher, there’s no higher risk demographic in the top ten outside of HS catcher. Mitchell’s risk is in the diabetes, but he’s a college bat who hasn’t stopped hitting since 2018 and has legit CF tools. I’d give him some shot to fall out of the top ten but funny enough imagine his floor is 14 to the Rangers off their Jung pick. Cubs have a new draft guy but all first round college hitters they’ve taken participated in the CCBL, something Mitchell did not do

I’m staaaartting to think Kelly is more serious than I’ve taken him, like how long he’s maintained his status so long. In general I think 16 is a spot to grab an elite prep pitcher, maybe prep player…New draft guy’s past has been pitching heavy in the first, mix of HS and prep, so I’m leaning heavy towards an arm on that too

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  SenorGato

It probably depends on what other teams are trying to strike a deal with him, but $1M underslot at #2 is still better than the #4 slot and and $2M under slot is better than #7. If the Marlins are offering him full slot at #3, obviously he’s not going to be striking any underslot deals. But I also don’t really see a lot of those teams in the Top 10 super-excited to draft Abel because so many of them are desperate to return to relevance quickly. The Orioles and the Pirates are the exceptions.

That’s interesting about Mitchell and the CCBL. Yeah, some teams are going to knock him down because of the diabetes, which is probably nothing, but someone will do it. The question is how many teams will do it and where they are drafting. Kelly has a ton of heat, so I would think that someone will decide to take him in the middle of the first.

SenorGato
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I get why teams would be find a way to offer Abel less based on what other teams can offer, that’s why those slots are there a little bit , just not sure why he’d take it I guess

SenorGato
6 years ago

Other hot takes, probably not enough:

– Markevian Hence is approved to be drafted by the Cubs outside the first, as are Dax Fulton and Timmy Manning. Hence was born on a pretty significant day in human history minus 14 years

– Andrew Abbott, Burl Carraway, FSU LH with 71 Ks last year, Georgia U LH…would very much like Theo to draft one of these guys as early as the second

– So many non-first college bats…Trei Cruz, Hudson, Haskin, Soularie, Wiemer, Toral, Rothenberg, Nwogu, Waddel, Cabbel, McSomething at one of the Miss schools, so on…

– Is it just me or are there more and more guys calling themselves switch hitters entering the draft in recent years and gaining some status? Not a hot take

recoveringbucsfan
6 years ago

Considering Kjerstad is now the projected 7th best prospect, the Pirates have the 7th overall pick, and the new Pirates GM is the great player developer in Ben Cherington, do you think the Pirates will pick Kjerstad?

Joe Vasile
6 years ago

Detmers is such an interesting case for me. It seems like he’s the kind of pitcher that is going to be made or broken based on which organization ends up drafting him. If its one with a strong pitching development in its pipeline he could really take off if they work to tweak the fastball and give him a more reliable third pitch. If not, well… then there’s a lot more risk there. He’s someone whose development I want to watch closely.