The Adjustment Noah Syndergaard Made
The first pitch Noah Syndergaard threw Friday night sent Alcides Escobar to the ground. Syndergaard didn’t give Escobar an opportunity to swing because the instinctive priority was for him to get his head out of the way, and Syndergaard didn’t bother trying to disguise his intent after the game. He owned up to it — he wanted to give the Royals a little fright. The Royals, in turn, were furious, as they’re allowed to be, but the rest of the game spun the narrative wheel, and it ultimately settled on “Syndergaard delivered a message.” In the end he pitched pretty well and the Mets emerged victorious, so Syndergaard gets the favorable press.
But for whatever it’s worth, if Syndergaard did succeed in intimidating his opponent, it didn’t look that way early on, when the brushback was most fresh. After Escobar got knocked down, the Royals scored a run in the first. They scored another two in the second. The immediate aftermath, for Syndergaard, was troublesome, and the national broadcast speculated that he’d only succeeded in waking the Royals up. It was only after Syndergaard turned his game around that the conversation grew more sunny. And as a part of that process, Syndergaard and Travis d’Arnaud made a change on the fly.
To be clear, in the early going, Syndergaard wasn’t exactly getting battered. One of the two hits in the first inning was an infield single. In the second, Salvador Perez led off and singled with a broken bat. The ball wasn’t flying, but it was going to places Syndergaard didn’t like, which is the most important thing. Like a lot of pitchers, and especially pitchers with heat like Syndergaard, he came out and attempted to establish the fastball, but it wasn’t going like he wanted. In the first two innings, nine Royals at-bats ended with fastballs. Six of those also ended with hits. Maybe there would’ve been more than three runs had Alex Gordon not gotten thrown out at third base. Syndergaard was in a bad way.
He got out of it. He lasted six innings. The Royals wouldn’t score again. The Mets offense finally came alive, and the way this felt toward the end, the Mets successfully pulled off a comfortable playoff win against Kansas City. It can happen, even if it was only comfortable for the final three frames.
Frequently, talk about in-game pitcher adjustments can be nonsense. What happens a lot of the time is that pitchers just pitch like pitchers, and sometimes that goes their way, and sometimes it doesn’t. So you don’t want to go in assuming something changed, and when Syndergaard spoke with Ken Rosenthal, he just said he did something minor and mechanical. Syndergaard didn’t provide an easy answer, but there was a little more than he let on.
Consider the first pitch of the third inning:
That’s nothing too special — that’s a first-pitch ball. Pitchers like to avoid first-pitch balls. But that’s also a slider. It was the first slider Syndergaard threw in the game. He would throw 15 more, breaking the pitch out the second and third times through the lineup. Over two innings and 39 pitches, Syndergaard’s slider rate was 0%. Over the last four innings and 65 pitches, Syndergaard’s slider rate was 25%. Right out of the gate, it looked like Syndergaard wanted to make the Royals afraid of his fastball. He started having success only when he put the fastball away.
By which I mean, over those four innings, fewer than half of Syndergaard’s pitches were heaters. The fastball itself was fine, and the velocity was there, but as we’ve all discussed several times over, the Royals are a fastball-hitting team, and Syndergaard has other weapons. Over two innings, Syndergaard threw more than 70% of his pitches over the plate, and he put almost 60% of his pitches in the zone. After that, he threw about 60% of his pitches over the plate, and just shy of 40% of his pitches in the zone. Syndergaard was looking to use the Royals’ aggressiveness against them. This might be an example, but this might also just have been a perfect situational pitch:
For a visual idea of how Syndergaard pitched, here are locations, broken down by time in the game. The first two innings, he was around the hitting zone:
Then came the expansion:
You see more offspeed stuff down. You see more offspeed stuff thrown to Syndergaard’s glove-side. A lot of those are sliders. He was locating that pitch well, which is why he started using it so much. And the Royals just couldn’t make any quality contact. Their timing was disrupted, and Syndergaard was pitching to different areas.
In the sixth inning, Syndergaard did find himself in a jam. The slider helped him strike out Lorenzo Cain, and then he used it to strike out Eric Hosmer in a full count. But Mike Moustakas hit a fastball for an infield single, and then Salvador Perez walked on five pitches. Alex Gordon came up to a full count, and he laid off a slider similar to the one that had put Hosmer away. So the bases were loaded for Alex Rios, and the score was 5-3. Terry Collins left his pitcher in there, for what would be the biggest at-bat of his life.
When Rios first batted, he turned on a first-pitch fastball. The second time, he saw two curveballs down, two fastballs up, and one slider up. This time, Syndergaard threw a perfectly-located first-pitch slider down and away for a called strike. Then he went right back to the well and threw what was more or less an identical pitch.
Something could’ve gone wrong, sure. Rios could’ve beat that out. Maybe the ball could’ve been bobbled. Contact offense, and everything. The Royals were trying to make something happen. But Syndergaard executed exactly the pitch he wanted to. He hit the right spot, and the ball left Rios’ bat at 69 miles per hour, on a downward trajectory. Syndergaard had never thrown a bigger pitch, and he protected a lead that was soon to get much bigger.
The story of Syndergaard’s slider is an interesting one. In the middle of this very season, he said he was still fastball/curveball/changeup. The slider was just something he’d play around with. Then the slider started to show up, and Syndergaard featured it in the NLDS against the Dodgers. Yet the last time out, against the Cubs, Syndergaard threw the slider all of twice. It didn’t mean anything to him. And then Friday, it didn’t show up for two innings. You could forgive the Royals for maybe being caught a little off guard. But Syndergaard folded that weapon in, and he believed in it so much he used it twice in a row in the most stressful pitching situation he’s ever experienced. He threw the slider on the first pitch, and he threw the slider on the second pitch, and both of the sliders were perfect. Syndergaard escaped that jam — in the World Series — with a pitch he didn’t throw in spring training.
A game so bad became a game so wonderful, for Syndergaard and for the rest of the Mets. Because of Syndergaard, the Mets offense had a chance to deliver a win. And because of the Mets offense, now we have a series. It never really counts until both teams are on the board.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.


The Warthen slider!
The best part of this, to me, is that Thor is this smart already … at 23 years old.
Except Thor isn’t calling those sliders, or even D’Arnaud. The Mets field management tried to do something like this with DeGrom Wednesday, but DeGrom couldn’t establish control over the movement in his two variations on fastballs, and so was forced to throw into the zone.
I like – because I agree with – Jeff’s take on what happened last night. It WAS a close thing for Syndegaard: all that good work, including his “adjustment”, could easily gone wasted if that one groundball hadn’t been converted. The Royals batting order’s high contact ratio STILL gives KS a ‘structural’ advantage: from game to game, it STILL comes down to them being able force opposing pitchers to make quality pitches on or just off the edges or else throw into contact. It’s STILL the case that whoever the Mets use to start on the mound in this WS will be faced with this same demanding problem.
The reason this WS isn’t a walkover is the Mets have starter who, tho not guaranteed to being up to the challenge, are capable of meeting it. Whether or not they DO meet it of course remains to be seen; it’s what makes this WS watchable.
I don’t know about a structural advantage. Could almost as easily be 1-2 and not 2-1. It is certainly a strong suit. It’s what they do well and they are ahead.
Neither of those identical, decisive pitches to Rios were strikes but the first was called one, forcing Rios to swing at the second. So depending on your mood, it’s either hats off to D’arnaud or boooooo to the umpire for being tricked.
You’re telling me …
If you’re going to correct for umpire mistakes, then Syndergaard might have gone 6 shutout innings. Zobrist was gifted a ball on a 2-2 count, on a pitch that was called a strike all night (and according to Fangraphs, Fox and Brooks Baseball, it was a strike). That led to a run in the first.
Then in the 2nd, Perez struck out but the 1st base ump inexplicably said he checked his swing. It was one of the rare times where the entire broadcast booth said the umpire was wrong on a check swing call. Buck said “wow, he went a looooong way on that” and Verducci said the Royals “got away with one”. The next pitch was a broken bat single, and they wound up scoring two more runs.
I’m not sure what took so long. Anybody who has watched the Royals should know they’re making contact with every fastball they see. How have they been shut down? In the ALCS it was when Price went to his curve early and often. When Estrada went to his change. In the WS it’s when the Mets stopped throwing first pitch fastballs and went aggressively to offspeed stuff in fastball counts.
I’m more surprised that the Mets haven’t been doing sliders/breaking balls early, especially with known first pitch hackers like Escobar. That’s how you shut this team down.
Start pitching backwards and using more offspeed stuff like Thor did and the Mets stand a good chance in this series.
“That’s how you shut this team down.”
It’s not like the Mets don’t realize that. It’s just that it’s easier posted than done.
When I see Harvey & DeGrom challenging Escobar with first pitch fastablls, then it’s clear they’re not trying to execute the strategy.
Harvey threw fewer fastballs than he ever has.
I’m still trying to figure out how this:
IP H R ER BB SO HR
6.0 7 3 3 2 6 0
Is sooooo much better than this …
IP H R ER BB SO HR
6.0 5 3 3 2 2 1
I’m not seeing it …
Well Syndergaard was great yesterday, and if not for some really bad breaks led by the umps and a little BABIP luck the Royals don’t score 3 runs. The zone to Zobrist was bizarre in the 1st inning and he should have struck out on the prior pitch (even Ball 2 was borderline). In the 2nd, Perez should have struck out as well on his check swing, the pitch before his bloop. The ERA doesn’t do Noah any justice but it was a phenomenal performance.
The greatest 4.50 ERA pitcher ever I guess.
I understand the idea that the line doesn’t quite do Thor justice, but even in the 2nd, Rios and Escobar hit him hard.
He also had the comfort of having Ventura squeezed in there. Luck or not, giving up 2 runs with a AL pitcher at bat and a replay overturned tag out at 3rd base isn’t “phenomenal” or “spectacular”, and not that much better than Harvey’s outing.
Thor had more swing-and-miss pitches, more strikeouts. Once he had a lead, he shut the door. And the runs off him were viewed as more flukey — a bad umpiring call on a checked swing, a broken bat hit, and a passed ball.
The runs off of Harvey seemed more legitimate — except for the first inning run where Cespy should have caught the ball. Moreover, he was given the lead and then coughed it right back up. Couldn’t shut the door mid-game.
This is why it’s terrible to just look at numbers. If you actually WATCHED the game you’d know the royals scored a run without hitting the ball out of the infield in the first after Zobrist pretty much took a strike 3 looking. Then the 2nd inning guys got hits off broken bats and Perez clearly swung at a strike 3. He also protected a lead something Harvey couldn’t do. 2 numbers you forgot to mention however was the strike outs Noah got compared to Harvey and the 16 swing and misses compared to Harvey’s 3. It’s so funny those numbers are ignored by the Royals homers. I don’t have a horse in this race and even I noticed how much more impressive the rookie was. Also … For what it’s worth I hope the Royals pitching steps up. Letting the Mets offense wake up is a big mistake and they’ve taken some good swings on the royals middle relievers. I wouldn’t ve comfortable with a 2-1 lead. Game 4 is the biggest game of the season for the Royals. Beating Harvey on the road with the Mets lineup more comfortable there this post season is a tough task.
“If you actually WATCHED the game …”
I watched the game and understand very well the poor contact and passed ball that led to the Royals runs in the 2nd, and how good he looked in innings 3-5.
It really doesn’t make a difference how awesome you looked when you weren’t giving up the 3 runs in 6 innings, the results are basically the same.
No baseball game is decided on which pitcher had more swing and miss strikes, or least hardest contact.
Saying Harvey had a bad outing and Thor had a great one is taking the looked great / pitched great divide a little too far.
I’m sure you have an ides who ought to win the Cy Young award, and I’m also sure you didn’t WATCH all of Greinke’s, Kershaw’s, or Arrieta’s games.
Maybe don’t throw baseballs at people’s heads though?
People vote you down but if Yordano did the same thing and you commented that it’s upvoted to high heavens
Yeah, totally.
Well, it’s own your fault for not having a Scandi name & Nordic look under long flowing blond hair & a supercool Euromyth nickname. If you’d stop with that Hispanic name & looking like some DR punk …
Think people are going a little overboard on this site by chalking all differences in how we treat players up to race – I know it’s become the fashionable explanation.
Ventura has a long, long, history of on field issues. Seemed like he was getting ejected from every game for a stretch there. Syndergaard does not. Why we would treat this differently if it were Ventura is as simple as that.
Granderson was nearly hit in the head earlier in the series, but neither he, nor anyone else, cried about it.
Or how about the royals pitching coach saying “murphy is too comfortable” and then he gets 3 pitches brushing him off the plate one of those being neck high. Murphy didn’t say anything after those games in KC and Niether did the Mets. Royals are cry babies I didn’t expect this
The other “adjustment” Thor made in the 3-5 innings is he pitched exclusively out of the windup. And in 1st and 2nd inning, he was only forced into the stretch because of two awful calls; he struck out both Zobrist & Perez. If the umps get those calls right, it’s likely there is no struggle in innings 1 and 2. When the Royals only got 3 strikes instead of 4, they were 1 for 13 against Syndergaard pitching out of the windup.
So it is okay to throw at peoples heads if youre white, but if he were brown like us, would he be facing suspension?
You color blind, bro?
you white privileged, bro?
No, bro, and if you had watched baseball this year, you would know it.
This article is bad abe you should feel bad.
Here is a better article on a similar subject:
http://www.bluebirdbanter.com/2015/10/28/9625362/looking-forward-to-2016
This article is not suitable Abe.
Where are the strikes/balls graphs? He was getting every corner..