The AL West and One-Run Success
Sunday’s Mariners-Rays game in Tampa Bay ended in memorable fashion, with Seattle right fielder Mitch Haniger failing to make a sliding catch on Carlos Gomez’s bloop, mishandling the ball while attempting to pick it up, but recovering in time to throw home, where Johnny Field, who had been running on contact from first base, was out by a country mile. Catcher Mike Zunino could have paused to make an omelette between receiving the ball and applying the tag:
The play preserved the Mariners’ 5-4 lead and gave them not just their 41st victory of the season but their 21st in games decided by one run. With the Astros also winning, 8-7 over the Rangers, Seattle and Houston remained tied atop the AL West. If you haven’t been paying attention lately, the Mariners — while missing the suspended Robinson Cano and overcoming a 5.70 ERA/4.77 FIP from Felix Hernandez — have spent every day since June 2 with at least a share of the division lead. They’ve done this despite the fact that the Astros have by far the better run differential — the majors’ best, actually:
| Team | W-L | WPct | Run Dif | 1-Run W-L | WPct | Other W-L | WPct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariners | 41-24 | .631 | 20 | 21-9 | .700 | 20-15 | .571 |
| Astros | 42-25 | .627 | 127 | 6-12 | .333 | 36-13 | .735 |
Now there’s something you just don’t see every day: two teams whose run differentials differ by more than 100 but are basically even in the standings. Those one-run games are the reason. The Astros, who would be on a 109-win pace if they had merely gone .500 in such games to this point, actually won a pair of ’em on Saturday and Sunday, but when it comes to such those contests, they’re still tied for the majors’ fourth-lowest winning percentage and fourth-lowest win total in one-run games. The Mariners, on the other hand, have five more one-run wins than any other team and eight more than any other AL team, though they’re merely third in winning percentage:
| Tm | W -L | WPct |
|---|---|---|
| Yankees | 11-3 | .786 |
| Braves | 10-4 | .714 |
| Mariners | 21-9 | .700 |
| Brewers | 15-7 | .682 |
| Red Sox | 12-6 | .667 |
| Rockies | 10-5 | .667 |
| Angels | 12-7 | .632 |
| Phillies | 10-6 | .625 |
| Pirates | 11-7 | .611 |
| Athletics | 11-7 | .611 |
| Padres | 8-6 | .571 |
| Cardinals | 10-8 | .556 |
| Tigers | 12-10 | .545 |
| D-backs | 11-10 | .524 |
| Indians | 10-10 | .500 |
| Giants | 9-9 | .500 |
| Blue Jays | 7-7 | .500 |
| Rangers | 7-7 | .500 |
| Dodgers | 7-9 | .438 |
| Nationals | 7-10 | .412 |
| Royals | 8-13 | .381 |
| Cubs | 6-10 | .375 |
| Marlins | 5-9 | .357 |
| Rays | 9-17 | .346 |
| Mets | 7-14 | .333 |
| Astros | 6-12 | .333 |
| Orioles | 5-10 | .333 |
| White Sox | 6-14 | .300 |
| Reds | 5-12 | .294 |
| Twins | 3-13 | .188 |
Records in one-run games have a lot to do with luck and timing, and it’s rare that a team can sustain a Mariners-like pace over the course of a season. Rare, but not unprecedented: in fact, the two highest season winning percentages in one-run games occurred within the past decade. Here are the top-20 such non-strike seasons since 1901:
in One-Run Games Since 1901
| Rk | Tm | Year | W -L | WPct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rangers | 2016 | 36-11 | .766 |
| 2 | Orioles | 2012 | 29-9 | .763 |
| 3 | Pirates | 1908 | 33-12 | .733 |
| 4 | Orioles | 1970 | 40-15 | .727 |
| 5 | Pirates | 1909 | 33-13 | .717 |
| 6T | Senators | 1913 | 32-13 | .711 |
| 6T | Indians | 1954 | 32-13 | .711 |
| 8 | Senators | 1925 | 27-11 | .711 |
| 9 | Reds | 1961 | 34-14 | .708 |
| 10 | Reds | 1940 | 41-17 | .707 |
| 11 | Royals | 1980 | 29-12 | .707 |
| 12 | Red Sox | 1986 | 24-10 | .706 |
| 13 | Royals | 1977 | 31-13 | .705 |
| 14T | White Sox | 1959 | 35-15 | .700 |
| 14T | Giants | 2003 | 28-12 | .700 |
| 16 | Cubs | 1907 | 37-16 | .698 |
| 17T | Athletics | 1928 | 30-13 | .698 |
| 17T | Angels | 1985 | 30-13 | .698 |
| 19T | Athletics | 2002 | 32-14 | .696 |
| 19T | Giants | 1912 | 32-14 | .696 |
These Mariners would be tied for 14th in winning percentage in one-run games if the season were to end today. What’s perhaps more interesting is that, while they’re just about 40% into their season, they’re already halfway to the record for one-run wins:
| Rk | Tm | Year | W-L | WPct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Giants | 1978 | 42-26 | .618 |
| 2T | Reds | 1940 | 41-17 | .707 |
| 2T | Mets | 1969 | 41-23 | .641 |
| 4T | Orioles | 1970 | 40-15 | .727 |
| 4T | Orioles | 1974 | 40-21 | .656 |
| 6T | Reds | 1985 | 39-18 | .684 |
| 6T | Astros | 1979 | 39-27 | .591 |
| 8T | White Sox | 1972 | 38-20 | .655 |
| 8T | Yankees | 1943 | 38-23 | .623 |
| 8T | White Sox | 1967 | 38-26 | .594 |
| 8T | Giants | 1982 | 38-28 | .576 |
| 8T | Royals | 1993 | 38-32 | .543 |
Both of those lists contain teams that won it all (1907 Cubs, 1909 Pirates, 1940 Reds, 1943 Yankees, 1969 Mets, 1970 Orioles) or at least won pennants (1912 Giants, 1954 Indians, 1959 White Sox, 1980 Royals, 1986 Red Sox), but they also contain teams that didn’t even make the playoffs, such as the 1908 Pirates, 1913 Senators, the record-setting 1978 Giants, and so on — a reminder that eking out a few handfuls of narrow victories isn’t entirely skill-based.
Which isn’t to say skill isn’t involved. Bullpen performance has an outsized effect on a team’s record in one-run games, because unlike on offense, where the batting order may not be at its optimal point(s) at the highest-leverage moments of the game, managers have more control on when to deploy their relievers. In 2016, amid the Rangers’ success, FiveThirtyEight’s Rob Arthur showed a significant correlation (r = .28) between bullpen WAR and winning percentage in one-run games. As it turns out, the Mariners currently rank third in the majors in bullpen WAR (3.3) behind the Yankees (4.1) and Brewers (3.6), two of the teams in their neighborhood in one-run winning percentage. Then again, the Astros are tied for fourth (3.1) — and look where that’s gotten them.
Of course, there’s more to bullpen performance than just WAR, and actual runs allowed — and their timing — both matter. Timing matters in every phase of the game, and it’s worth looking at where the AL West co-leaders stand with regards to our win probability-based Clutch scores, which on an individual level measure “how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment.” The Clutch measure compares each player to himself — does he hit or pitch better in higher-leverage situations than overall? — and does a good job of describing the past but not of predicting the future.
On offense alone, the Mariners entered Sunday with four of the AL’s top six offensive clutch scores, with Jean Segura third (0.89), Kyle Seager fourth (0.85), Guillermo Heredia fifth (0.84), and Nelson Cruz sixth (0.83); each has added the better part of an extra win when it comes to Win Probability Added, average Leverage Index (pLI), and context-neutral wins (WPA/LI). At the other end of the spectrum, the Astros’ Carlos Correa (-1.10) ranks fourth from the bottom out of 125 players with at least 150 PA, ahead of only Teoscar Hernandez (-1.11), Mike Trout (-1.32 — it’s tough hitting like Mike Trout all the damn time!), and Giancarlo Stanton (-1.40), with Houston teammate Evan Gattis (-0.69) the 12th-lowest.
Here’s the tale of the tape between the Mariners and Astros:
| Category | Mariners (AL Rk) | Astros (AL Rk) |
|---|---|---|
| wRC+ | 105 (6) | 110 (3) |
| Batting Clutch | 2.90 (1) | -1.29 (7) |
| SP FIP | 3.97 (6) | 3.28 (1) |
| SP Clutch | 1.49 (4) | -0.06 (11) |
| RP FIP | 3.30 (4) | 2.83 (1) |
| RP Clutch | 1.08 (3) | -2.12 (15) |
Of the two teams, the Astros have the slight edge in wRC+, a modest edge in reliever FIP, and a big edge in starter FIP, and yet the Mariners have the better clutch scores on all three fronts — among the AL’s top three in each category, and with an advantage of at least 1.5 wins in each. There’s a whopping nine-win gap between the two teams on this front:
| # | Team | Bat Clutch | SP Clutch | RP Clutch | Total Clutch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mariners | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 5.5 |
| 2 | Blue Jays | -0.4 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.1 |
| 3 | Tigers | 1.6 | 1.1 | -0.8 | 1.8 |
| 4 | Red Sox | 1.0 | -0.4 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 5 | Yankees | 2.0 | -1.2 | -0.2 | 0.7 |
| 6 | Rangers | -0.9 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 7 | Indians | -1.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 8 | Angels | -1.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Athletics | -4.3 | 0.9 | 3.2 | -0.2 |
| 10 | Orioles | -2.8 | 2.1 | 0.3 | -0.4 |
| 11 | Twins | -2.1 | 1.5 | -0.4 | -1.0 |
| 12 | Royals | -2.1 | -0.6 | -0.3 | -2.9 |
| 13 | White Sox | -2.2 | 0.2 | -1.0 | -3.0 |
| 14 | Astros | -1.3 | -0.1 | -2.1 | -3.5 |
| 15 | Rays | -4.2 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -4.6 |
By comparison, the gap between the two teams in our BaseRuns standings is nine games (Astros 44-23, Mariners 35-30) despite their dead-heat actual records; meanwhile, they’re 11 games apart via PythagenPat (Astros 47-20, Mariners 35-30). The last time I checked, however, they don’t determine playoff status via BaseRuns or PythagenPat, and while it’s true that the AL playoff picture already boils down to just six teams (the Yankees, Red Sox, Astros, Indians and Angels being the others — thanks for playing, everybody else!) competing for five spots, it’s also true that the distinction between a division winner and a Wild Card team remains a major one. That the Mariners, despite their holes and flaws (no production at first base, only two above-average starting pitchers, some shaky contributors in the bullpen) are running neck-and-neck with the well-outfitted defending champions — and ahead of the Angels (37-29) — is impressive no matter how they’ve done it. It doesn’t guarantee an end to the longest postseason drought in professional sports, but it certainly hasn’t hurt.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
The regression monster is coming for the Mariners. Just a matter of when.
Yeah, but not necessarily soon enough to do the 2018 Astros or other wild card contenders any good. They’ve already banked 5 or so wins more than you’d expect in one-run games, and those wins aren’t coming off their record.
Think of that Keynes quote about markets remaining irrational longer than you can remain solvent– in a long enough time frame the M’s record in one-run games is gonna fall back to earth, but by the time it does they might already be in the playoffs.
And it’s not even like you would expect it to “come back to earth” to make up for their positive luck so far; assuming a random team would be expected to be .500 in 1-run games but they’re already +12 as the Mariners are, then in the long run you would expect them to finish around… +12. Not 0.
(Gambler’s fallacy and all that jazz)
Go M’s but let’s wait until the end of this month to get excited.
Why not? 49-48 ROS gets us 90 wins.
Because it’s the Mariners? Being excited about the Mariners in June is like being excited about a Cleveland QB in June.
“only two above-average starting pitchers”
Who did we trade for?
Marco Gonzales, who’s been good enough (3.28 ERA/3.3 FIP) to be tied for 13th in the AL in WAR https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=sta&lg=al&qual=0&type=8&season=2018&month=0&season1=2018&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0
That Twins’ record! Wow……
Kyle Gibson is their second-best starting pitcher this year. Let that sink in, and you’ll wonder how the Twins were even IN that many one-run games.
The Mariners are definitely a surprise, but they have played teams with a 0.490 winning percentage while the Astros have played teams with a 0.530 winning percentage. I’ll believe the Mariners are really this good if they are still near the top of the division after this very rough stretch they are about to face. They get the Angels, Yankees, Red Sox for the next 13 games. If they go 0.400 in those games I suspect they’d be happy. That’s 5-8.
Meanwhile the Astros play the A’s Royals and Rays. I wouldn’t be shocked if they went 8-5 or better. So the Mariner’s are likely about to find themselves in a 3 game hole.
Just to drive home this point some more.
During the Month of May, when the Mariners made most of their gains, the Astros had 3 games (Rangers) during the entire month against teams who currently sit below .500. The Mariners had 21 such games.
30 of the M’s 65 games have been decided by one run? Win or lose, that is a lot of Maalox.
We all thought the 2016 Rangers would eventually be hit by regression. It never happened. It might not happen to these Mariners, either. Just because regression is due it doesn’t mean it’s coming in a certain frame of time.
It happened! Just not until 2017 ( and 18)
Regression may have waited until 2017, but the Rangers were swept in the first round of the playoffs in 2016. Luck does run out…
The Mariners only need to go 49-48 to reach 90 wins this year. We have been extremely lucky early on, but it has gotten to the point where it puts the us very seriously into contention. A 4.5 game lead over LAA helps as well as a relative lack of competition outside of the Angels for the 2nd WC.
Injuries to Simmons and Ohtani have probably boosted the M’s chances for the postseason a little bit. Sad for baseball, good for Seattle (not that Seattle doesn’t deserve it, just Simmons and Ohtani are two of the most entertaining players in the game)
Slight inconsistency: The M’s are third in bullpen WAR behind the Yankees and Brewers. The Yankees and *Braves* are ahead of them in the one-run win% chart.
Great article, though!! Go M’s!
Drat. Brewers lost a 1-run game and fell from .700 in such contests, which I missed when refreshing the stats from yesterday.
I know the Rangers edged out the Astros in 2016 in a similar 1-run fluke fashion, but I can’t imagine that would still be the case this year given the talent gap this year between the two teams.
However it does look like there’s enough banked wins that the Mariners should be in the drivers seat for the second WC spot over the Angels. Especially if the Ohtani injury is a season ender.
Does it matter that; while the Mariners have a nutty high Win% in 1-Run games, they are only 9-7 in Blowouts with a +4 Run Differential while the Astros are 16-3 with a +103 Run differential? Blowout Win % is almost certainly more skill dependent than 1-Run Win %, but still, the Astros have spent a lot of time running up the score against exposed pitchers/bullpens. The Astros’ run differential is also +172/-71 vs. the Orioles, White Sox, Athletics, Giants, and Rangers. The Astros haven’t gotten more production out of Gurriel than the Mariners have received from Healy, and while the Astros have the better FIP, they have also switched out their closer, so I would call their bullpen at least as shaky as the Mariners, and while the Astros’ Starters have been excellent, there’s a pretty big dropoff from Verlander / Cole to the back 3, where at least LeBlanc / Leake aren’t much worse by FIP compared to McCullers / Morton.
McCullers has a 0.6 FIP edge on LeBlanc/Leake. That is a pretty substantial margin.
I admit it was truer yesterday when I wrote it, prior to LeBlanc’s 2 homer-allowing start…but over the last 30 days, Leake has been better than McCullers.
I personally just defer to what I think is a great talent differential between the two teams but if you truly believe that then mariners are similar with the Astros from a production perspective, you can make a killing in Vegas betting on the Mariners to win the division. As long as they stay in the race towards the end of the season, they don’t even have to win for you to make money. You can short your bet at that time and still make a tidy profit. Because currently Everyone is expecting regression from the Mariners.
on the positive side, mariners don’t have much in terms of high level minor league talent to commit to chasing this year’s postseason.
even of dipoto wants to go all in, the downside to the future shouldn’t be too harsh.
Lol so we can’t get rid of our future talent because we don’t have any to get rid of… and that’s the positive side