The AL West Now Has a Race

Houston, you have a problem. Less than two weeks ago, I suggested that the battle between the A’s and Mariners for the second AL Wild Card spot was “practically the last race standing in the Junior Circuit.” At the time, the A’s — who had won 33 out of their last 44 games — were still 5.5 games behind the Astros, who themselves had rebounded from a five-game losing streak (July 25-30) to win six out of seven against the Mariners, Dodgers, and Giants. A change in the pecking order atop the AL West appeared unlikely; at the time, our playoff odds gave Oakland just a 1.0% chance of winning the division.

Since then, the Astros have lost seven out of nine to the Mariners, Rockies, and A’s, with Saturday’s 7-1 loss to Oakland knocking the two teams into a tie and marking the first time June 13 that the Astros didn’t have sole possession of first. Though they regained it with Sunday’s 9-4 win (Justin Verlander’s 200th, a topic I’ll address in an upcoming post), Houston now owns a 7-8 record in August, an 11-14 since the All-Star break, and 20-19 since July 1. Over all of those stretches, they’ve outscored their opponents (177-148 for the longest one), and they still own the AL’s second-best run differential (+200), but the defending world champions have nonetheless frittered away their advantage. They’re still the overwhelming favorites in the division, but even after Sunday’s loss, the A’s odds are up to 9.6%; in the season-to-date version, based upon this year’s stats instead of our depth-chart projections, they’re up to 25.6%.

Perhaps most disconcertingly, the Astros are 10-15 against teams .500 or better since the start of July. They’ve fattened up by going a combined 8-1 against the White Sox, Tigers, and Giants, but lost three of five to the Rangers. Of their eight other series in that span, they’ve won just three (over the Angels, Dodgers and Mariners), lost three (two to the A’s, one to the Mariners), and split two (both against the Rockies). Overall, they’re just 37-36 against teams with records .500 or better, which is better than the A’s (31-39) but worse than the Mariners (38-35), and miles behind the Red Sox (37-22) and Yankees (36-24). Against those four teams, they’re a combined 19-20 this year; throw in the Indians (4-3) and they’ve played just .500 ball against the collection of teams they’ll have to beat in order to return to the World Series.

While the tightening of the division race owes plenty to an A’s team that has gone 39-14 since June 16, the Astros’ slump, now nearly a quarter of a season long, owes something to both the offense and the bullpen. Granted, the team lost Carlos Correa for 36 games (June 26-August 9) due to a lower back injury, and George Springer for eight games (August 6-16) due to a sprained left thumb. Both are back now, but still absent are Brian McCann (surgery to repair a torn meniscus in his right knee, out since July 1) and Jose Altuve (right knee soreness, out since July 26). That’s a lot of talent on the sidelines.

At the risk of reading too much into small sample sizes and somewhat arbitrary endpoints, here’s a quick look at the offense’s performance through June 30 and since (not including Sunday):

Astros’ Offense Through June 30 and Since
Name PA Thru June wRC+ Thru June PA Since wRC+Since
Jose Altuve 373 149 81 91
Alex Bregman 371 148 171 149
Carlos Correa 315 127 28 5
Max Stassi 155 127 78 65
Tyler White 19 125 75 189
Tony Kemp 111 123 101 122
George Springer 372 115 121 104
Evan Gattis 268 115 119 96
Josh Reddick 225 106 144 87
Yulieski Gurriel 279 103 154 83
Marwin Gonzalez 294 87 135 115
J.D. Davis 53 74 40 -12
Brian McCann 173 71
Jake Marisnick 156 66 35 195
Total 3264 113 1422 97
Statistics through August 18

Setting aside White, who wasn’t recalled from Triple-A until June 16 (and made a brief return in a roster crunch), the Astros had nine players supplying average or better offense (100 wRC+ or greater) through the end of June. Just three of them have been above average in the seven weeks since. Bregman, who spent some time at shortstop in Correa’s absence, and Kemp, an outfielder who had managed just a 64 wRC+ in 175 PA in 2016-17, have scarcely missed a beat. Springer has fallen off a bit but remained above average despite his injury. Gonzalez has gotten hot after a very slow start, and White, who has taken over the bulk of the first-base duties while the slumping Gurriel has either sat or played second base, has added one more potent bat to the lineup.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Correa is just 3-for-28 with four walks since returning from the DL. Wave that shaking-the-rust-off sample if you will, but that still leaves significant dips by Altuve (pre-injury), Gattis, Gurriel, Reddick, and Stassi. All have fallen off by 19 points of wRC+ or more between those two stretches, and all but Altuve have sub-.300 on-base percentages since July 1. And for as bad as McCann was before the injury, the since-departed Tim Federowicz (49 wRC+ in 28 PA) and his replacement, ex-Angel Martin Maldonado (36 wRC+ in 32 PA) have been worse. The team as a whole hit .263/.334/.435 and scored 5.07 runs per game through the end of June; since then (again, not including Sunday), they’re at .231/.311/.403 while scoring 4.42 runs per game, a hair below league average.

The flagging offense (and, as we’ll see, the defense) has squandered some particularly strong work by the rotation:

Astros’ Rotation Through June 30 and Since
Period IP K% BB% HR/9 BABIP ERA FIP
Through June 30 529.2 28.2% 7.7% 1.0 .266 2.96 3.36
Since July 1 223.1 28.9% 6.5% 0.8 .316 3.39 2.95
Statistics through August 18

Houston’s starters — and remarkably, they’ve used the same five all season, namely Verlander, Dallas Keuchel, Gerrit Cole, Charlie Morton, and Lance McCullers Jr., with nary an outsider taking a turn — have collectively improved their strikeout, walk, and home-run rates since July 1, but due to a 50-point rise in BABIP, the unit’s ERA has risen by 0.43 even while its FIP has fallen by a nearly identical margin. At the risk of squinting at even smaller sample sizes, the defensive metrics suggest that the shortstop situation is probably the largest culprit; Correa (0.0 UZR, 3 DRS) has been solid while Bregman and Gonzalez (a combined -6.7 UZR and -7 DRS in fewer than half the innings of Correa) have not.

Individually, there are things to knock with regards to the starters’ recent performance, such as Verlander’s .506 slugging percentage allowed over his last eight starts — even before serving up three homers on Sunday — or McCullers, who has been skipped a couple times in the span, 11.2% walk rate and 5.47 ERA over that span. Those issues are largely lost in the sauce, but what does stand out is that, where the starters were averaging 6.22 innings per turn through the end of June, they’re at 5.87 since — an extra out per game. And an extra out per game matters when your bullpen is doing this:

Astros’ Bullpen Through June 30 and Since
Period IP K% BB% HR/9 BABIP ERA FIP
Through June 30 236.1 30.5% 6.3% 0.7 .291 3.39 2.66
Since July 1 118.0 29.4% 6.8% 1.4 .280 4.19 3.71
Statistics through August 18

The relievers’ collective strikeout- and walk-rate changes pale in comparison to a home-run rate that’s doubled since the start of July. With the exceptions of Will Harris and Joe Smith, who have both generally worked in lower-leverage situations, all of the principals in the Astros’ bullpen have become more gopher-prone in recent weeks. Here’s a comparison of the individual relievers’ before and after ERA and FIPs, admittedly in small sample sizes:

Astros’ Bullpen Through June 30 and Since, Pt. 2
Name IP Thru June ERA Thru June FIP Thru June IP Since ERA Since FIP Since
Collin McHugh 37.0 0.97 2.08 19.1 1.40 3.42
Brad Peacock 35.0 2.06 3.02 18.0 5.50 4.55
Chris Devenski 33.2 1.34 2.36 5.0 23.40 14.96
Will Harris 30.1 4.15 2.80 15.1 4.70 1.99
Hector Rondon 30.0 1.50 1.96 14.2 4.30 3.78
Ken Giles 28.2 4.08 1.98 2.0 18.00 6.66
Joe Smith 19.2 5.49 4.84 13.0 0.69 1.32
Tony Sipp 19.2 2.29 2.71 10.1 0.87 1.81
Roberto Osuna 5.0 1.80 2.56
Ryan Pressly 7.1 2.45 2.35
Cionel Perez 7.0 3.86 5.16
Statistics through August 18

There’s a lot going on here, but the key matters are the struggles of Devenski and Rondon, the controversial trade of Giles for Osuna, and the acquisition of Pressly. Devenski, their highest-leverage reliever overall even though he has only two saves, was pummeled with increasing severity throughout July. He was scored upon in five out of eight outings, including his final two where he failed to retire any of the nine batters he faced, was charged with eight runs, and allowed all four inherited runners to score. Twice he surrendered late-inning leads in that awful span. He landed on the disabled list with left hamstring tightness on August 3, retroactive to July 31, and is now out on a rehab assignment but has yet to pitch back-to-back days, which the Astros will likely want him to do before returning. Rondon, their closer in the wake of Giles’ struggles and subsequent demotion and trade, has blown three out of 11 save chances within this period, including two against the Mariners and A’s last week, both of which turned into 10th-inning, one-run losses.

Beyond the soulless arbitrage and performative nonsense about “zero tolerance” that accompanied his arrival into the fold, Osuna has yet to return to closing since serving a 75-game suspension for violating the league’s domestic violence policy. While he snagged a win in his August 6 debut after the previously scoreless Astros erupted for three ninth-inning runs against the Giants, his four subsequent appearances have been in losses. He took the L himself on August 12 against Seattle, after Rondon served up a game-tying homer to Ryon Healy. Pressly, a smart, under-the-radar acquisition from the Twins, has yet to graduate to consistent high-leverage work, but he has whiffed 12 in 8.1 post-trade innings (including one on Sunday not reflected above).

While the projections still overwhelmingly favor the Astros when it comes to winning the division (89.0% as of Monday morning), they clearly need to shake this funk, lest they wind up int he AL Wild Card game against the Yankees or (if Seattle rebounds) miss the playoffs altogether. They may get Altuve back as early as Tuesday, and their bullpen could get stronger not only upon Devenski’s return but as Osuna (ugh) and Pressly work their way into higher-leverage roles. Still, if you’re a fan of playoff races, it’s a welcome sight — and, to this scribe, a cautionary tale — to see one of the AL’s divisions in doubt after it all seemed so buttoned up just two weeks ago. As Yogi Berra said, “It ain’t over ’til it’s over.”





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
OddBall Herrera
8 years ago

I just want to say that this season should be taken as a cautionary tale for baseball writers – after all the doom and gloom going into 2018 about how super teams had made the regular season preordained and were ruining baseball, we have legit races in the AL West and all three NL divisions.

It was really fashionable this past spring to bemoan the state of baseball and talk about ‘haves and have nots’, but things look pretty dang entertaining so far.

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago

In the American League, according to Fangraphs Playoff Odds Graph, nine of fifteen teams have had basically no chance of making the playoffs since July 1st. That’s half a season where 60% of the league is playing meaningless baseball except as a “spoiler” (with almost nothing to spoil) or developing players. Eight of those nine teams have not ever had a 50% chance of making the playoffs all season long – the Angels were at 56% on May 14th with three quarters of the season left. Tampa, Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Kansas City, and Texas have never been over 7 or 8%, and not over 5% since the season was a week old. 40% of the AL has had no chance to do anything all year.

OddBall Herrera
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

There will always be rebuilding teams, and I see little evidence that the fact that it just so happens that they are clumped into a couple divisions this year, rather than evenly distributed, or even that there are a couple more of them this year vs. other years, is a sign of a problem rather than just funny sequencing. That is a nuance that was not acknowledged prior to the season when people were throwing around words like ‘boring’ w.r.t. a playoff race that hadn’t even started yet.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

50% is a pretty high bar. Even 25% offers enough hope for fans to stay tuned. Only the six teams you mentioned minus the Rays who have a winning record have been bad or terrible.

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I see I am in the minority here, but to your 25% threshold:

The Twins fell under 25% April 21st, The Blue Jays on May 8th, and the Angels June 12th.

So that’s 9 teams with less than 25% post season chance since well before the end of Spring.

4 teams have been above 82% all year, None of those four has been under% since Memorial day and there has been no time all year when more than 3 teams other than those four have been over 25% at the same time and no time since May 8 that more than 2 have.

Basically it has been obvious since opening day who four of the five AL playoff teams are and that seven teams never essentially had a chance. Two of the four in the middle disappeared before kids were out of school.

Yes, this is cyclical and will change with time. But if you want to say that people complaining about a noncompetitive AL early in the year have been taught a lesson, I would say the lesson they have been taught is that they were right. It took the Mariners being extraordinarily lucky to make it even this interesting. If Seattle plays to its run differential, they would have been out of it early too.

Alfrs
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I honestly do agree entirely Mike, about the AL especially. The NL…. I mean yeah, until recently, has anyone really given anyone but the Dodgers a chance out west (Other than the first month or so when Kenley couldn’t get an out and Turner wasn’t great)?
The NL east however breaks the argument a little bit, after the first few weeks of the Braves and Albies playing phenomenally, since mid may I think it’s been obvious the Braves were a solid playoff contender, and I’ve no clue why the Phils were never seen as a serious threat to the Nationals with how much they improved in the off-season.

ThomServo
8 years ago

Boston, NYY, Cleveland and Houston were the obvious top 4 Al clubs going into the season. They are all top 4 at present. The projections have been dead on for the most part.

How does Oakland pulling close for a short period of time render this season a ‘cautionary tale’ for relying on projections? You are focusing way too much on the one ‘almost incorrect’ projection, rather than realizing all the projections were basically correct.

radiohead
8 years ago

To me, it is absolutely incredible that these two teams are virtually tied when you look at their respective starting rotations.

Raidas77
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

Same with their lineups, sure Chapman is great, but Houston has Altuve, Bregman, Springer and Correa.

Houston drastically underperforming its projections while Seattle and Oakland do the opposite has to be huge story going on here that no one is writing about. It’s an extreme version of the 2015 season all over again.

sebastian 44
8 years ago
Reply to  Raidas77

As an Astros fan, many of the losses the past 6 weeks have felt like curses from an angry baseball god. Late inning bloops and grounders that score a run… our guys hitting into a bajillion double plays, etc.

In 2017, it felt like the Astros had “luck” on their side and this year it feels the opposite.

Joe Joe
8 years ago
Reply to  Raidas77

Astros are still projected to win 99 games this season, or more or less what the preseason projections had. With the way the Astros have played, they should be outperforming the preseason projections. Despite all the doom and gloom, Astros are having a great season. If Oakland wins more than the Astros, it will mean they have a greater season. Oakland is the story, IMO.

Fircoal
8 years ago
Reply to  Raidas77

Their lineups are more even than not. The Astros do have a better wRC+ but only 3 higher at 109 vs 106. Add in defense where the A’s have 12.6 vs. The Astro’s -16.5 and there is a good argument to be made that the A’s are getting better production from their position players.

hobbes020
8 years ago
Reply to  Fircoal

Not saying you’re incorrect, but let’s not forget the Astros shifting a very high rates and the defensive metrics difficulties capturing this data reliably.

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  Fircoal

In fact the a’s are slightly higher on terms position players’ war.

selling jeans
8 years ago

Chapman is a historically great 3Bman Olson elite at first. Piscotty as well in RF– and Laureano– well you’ve seen all the you tube highlights his first two weeks– strengthens the OF as well. A’s have jumped from a poor defensive team to a very good one this season.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

A’s have addressed this by not letting starters pitch much. Twice through the lineup and the pen comes in. A’s relievers can match Verlander and Cole if they only have to do it for an inning or two.

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

This is a very big point. The 2014-5 royals starters were pretty mediocre but they had so many good relievers that it didn’t hurt them so much.

selling jeans
8 years ago
Reply to  radiohead

see above– that was true six weeks ago. Houston still has a superior rotation on paper– the actual performance in the past month has been closer than you think.

TerenceMember since 2016
8 years ago

It’s kind of striking that the Astros’ offense over the last six weeks graph doesn’t mention the team BABIP of .259 and the bullpen over the last six weeks graph avoids the HR/FB rate spike of 5% from basically best to worst. Even over this disaster of a time frame their bullpen has the best K/BB and K-BB in baseball. For a Fangraphs article this should read: The Astros have been bad for the last six weeks, but also really unlucky, and you should probably expect immediate positive regression.

jmsdean477
8 years ago
Reply to  Terence

On the flip Oak has beaten the Stros 5 of 7 in that time including doing a bunch of the damage to the pitching staff that it has endured. It should have been another win and a 4 game sweep if not for Lucroy blowing both the tag at the plate, the tag on the strikeout, and then Olson’s catch on the throw to first. Everything going wrong all at once is the only reason that OAK isnt 6-1 vs HOU since July 1st, and they are left with only one 3 game set in HOU at the end of the month where the Stros have played much worse so maybe they are stoked since they have outplayed most non OAK teams despite the second worst offense in baseball in July.

ThomServo
8 years ago
Reply to  jmsdean477

On the flip, maybe they are not stoked and it’s just small sample size noise.

ThomServo
8 years ago
Reply to  Terence

I’ve been surprised by how anti-empirical Jay Jaffe’s work has been. Given JAWS, I would have figured his work would be more empirically aware and progressive. Reading that his love of baseball is tied to the 98 Yankees, fair or not, has also put a dim on his work for me.

Again, I think part of this poor/anti-empirical writing comes down to a marketing decision, and the new ‘ESPN/FOX’ style or journalism at fangraphs: part of a broader, industry-friendly, dumbed-down appeal.

It’s perhaps ‘the grumps’ that point out numbers and sample size, saying ‘the projections are correct, this trend will regress to the mean.’ It is perhaps more ‘zippy’ and ‘magical’ to hype the AL West playoff race. Fangraphs has been very clear that, as an editorial decision, they are promoting zippy and magical takes on the game, rather than grumpy or boring insights.

As a matter of pure entertainment value and cheerleading, it makes way more sense for tabloid-style media to hype Oakland. It is ‘boring’ to state the obvious- that Houston is merely suffering some small sample size luck and will return to their normal status shortly.

selling jeans
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

41-14 is not small sample size, my friend….

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

Fangraphs also lost some statistically-oriented writers in the last year or two, maybe they’ve been having trouble finding replacements

johnforthegiants
8 years ago

The astros and a’s are virtually identical in terms of position players’ war. The astros are way better in terms of starting pitchers, and even their relievers are a little better in terms of overall war. What evens things up is that the a’s relievers are 8.6 games better in terms of wpa, because they have the best reiievers’ clutch score in the majors while the astros have the worst. This is because the a’s have relievers who they can turn to in high-leverage situations and get consistently good results, while the astros don’t. This is why overall war isn’t really a good way to evaluate how good a bullpen is.

ThomServo
8 years ago

How was this post upvoted? It is openly anti-math.

Clutch isn’t a thing, it does not test as statistically significant in any sport, in any study.

So while the As bullpen did do a great job, and did help secure some wins- it is not because “the A’s have relievers who they can turn to in high-leverage situations and get consistently good results.’ That is some of the worst analysis I’ve ever seen in fangraph’s comments. The As bullpen is carried by two flukey relievers who’ve never put up numbers like this, with BABIP and ERA-FIP numbers that will obviously regress.

The critique on WAR measuring bullpen value also suggests statistical inability. Quant work is about how much, not zero-one evaluations. So instead of arguing that WAR is either ‘good’ or ‘not good’ at assessing bullpen evaluations, why not use correlation analysis? As it turns out, reliever WAR and bullpen WAR do correlate highly (.6+) with most all other forms of bullpen valuation, even context-dependent ones such as WPA.

It’s amazing how popular anti-math memes like ‘WAR doesn’t work for bullpens’ are becoming on this site with its expanded ESPN/FOX audience.

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

It isn’t anti-math. Clutch measures how well a team does in high-leverage vs. Low leverage situations. For hitters and starting pitchers, this is more or less a matter of luck. For relievers, a team with very good relief pitchers and mediocre relief pitchers can get a good clutch score by using their good relievers in high-leverage situations and their mediocre relievers in low-leverage situations. That’s what the a’s are doing. The astros can’t do that because althought overall their relievers are as good as the a’s, they are more balanced in terms of how good they are.

selling jeans
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

Have you seen Treinen pitch? No fluke there… Trivino I’ll give you, but Rodney and Familia make his regression a bit more palatable

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  selling jeans

The question of whether treinen and trevino are flukes is independent of the question of whether overall war is always an accurate reflection of the effectiveness of a team’s bullpen. If you’ve got the two greatest relievers in the world and a bunch of lousy relievers, you’re going to predictably have a lower war but a higher wpa and clutch score than a team with all average relievers, as long as the managers uses the two great relievers in high-leverage situations.

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago

I get that it likely won’t happen, but if the Mariners were to pull off another sweep of the Astros…..

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago

Maybe the A’s are on to something that everyone else isn’t regarding pitching to contact. I get that this is very anti-fangraphs, but maybe striking people out isn’t everything? You can see that their starting pitchers jigged when everyone else jagged. Their “Ace” started out the year trying to strike out everyone, and it seems clearly obvious that they told him “pitch to contact.” While I do feel like that would generally be a bad idea, with the best defensive player in the game, and huge foul ground maybe they are on to something that the rest of the analytic community hasn’t quite caught wind of yet.

Moneyball 2: Pitching to contact. With Brad Pitt.

ThomServo
8 years ago
Reply to  carter

“maybe striking people out isn’t everything?”

These sort of statements appear to misundestand regression analysis.

Regression analysis simply finds the best fit and assigns appropriate weights for the best fit. There isn’t a better fit than the best fit- testing against future results, as well as backtesting, to avoid over fitness. Strikeouts have only ever been assigned a certain weight, along with other relevant metrics, to explain value. No one has ever said that strikeouts were everything.

It only appears that way to the anti-data crowd. The anti-data crowd likes to romanticize the game by imagining that there are endless possibilities on how to win, and that these possibilities transcend the laws of science.

No, as fun as it may be to imagine, the As certainly haven’t ‘jigged’ when everyone else ‘jagged’ (sic). Travis’ zig-zag nonsense meme was about how smart it was to overspend on mediocre FAs. It is not actually true that a club should adopt non-conformist strategies simply to be different, as if doing something different was necessarily a competitive advantage. If most clubs are doing something efficient (i.e. not paying big for Eric Hosmer), a club doesn’t necessarily benefit by ‘zagging’ (paying Hosmer big). Again, these sort of fabricated memes are just media puffery, hype meant to counteract the ‘boring’ aspect of by-the-numbers analysis.

“maybe they are on to something that the rest of the analytic community hasn’t quite caught wind of yet.”

This is what people always say when they want to believe in small sample size luck – ‘maybe the Orioles have figured out how to beat the projections,’ etc.

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

I was not aware that Travis had a zig-zag meme. I am not part of some “anti data crowd”. More that maybe, there is some data missing here that we aren’t aware of.

selling jeans
8 years ago
Reply to  carter

It still helps– Fiers last night and Cahill on saturday were both getting a lot of guys to either swing and miss or watch a slider or a splitter be called a strike Hitting it to Chapman, OTOH, is a good strategy

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  carter

With manaea it isn’t so much pitching to contact as cutting the number of walks a lot at the cost of losing some strikeouts.

ThomServo
8 years ago

“Perhaps most disconcertingly, the Astros are 10-15 against teams .500 or better since the start of July.”

That’s not predictive of anything thought- too small a sample size, and too random a cutoff (.500). So it can’t be ‘most disconcerting.’ Only sequencing luck has the As close, so the most disconcerting aspect for Houston is simply that luck has reduced their lead, and a small sample of remaining games could see the As ride luck to a division title.

Really none of the observations made in the article were anything but small sample size noise based on the past 40 games.

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  ThomServo

I don’t know about this. The american league has quite a few teams who seem to already be just playing out the season. Beating up on them isn’t a really good sign of a great team.

Johnston
8 years ago

Great article. This season has turned out to be anything but boring, putting the lie to the gloom and doom preseason predictions by the sports media complex about the “haves and have nots.”

I look forward to enjoying the division races in the next six weeks immensely and will be pulling for the A’s.

selling jeans
8 years ago

That’s the Houston side of the equation. The team that has now gone 41-14 in their last 55 games has done so because a) an offense heavy on power has kept producing and a defense already strong got stronger with Ramon Laureano, b) an effective but not deep bullpen just became effective and deep with the addition of Familia and Rodney in particular and c) a previously poor and injury prone rotation has now advanced through mediocre and actually become good. Manaea is still a #4 posing (well, not anymore as a #1) but Fiers and Cahill have been close to elite– Cahill for a while– Fiers in admittedly just three starts. But when those two face the defending WS champs (yes, no Altuve) and the team which has scored more runs than any other sice the break (Texas) and they each throw one hit ball for 7 innings (and those games were legit– no big Oakland foul territory helping much– both were dominant from the first pitch) one has to at least acknowledge this is now a surprisingly strong rotation (Jackson and Anderson have both been decent and consistent) Tough tests against Seattle and Houston on road– and Boston– still await– but I would not expect the A’s pitching to regress much in the final six weeks. Fangraphs has said for two months now this is a .500 team going forward– and is STILL DOING IT– and all they do is win 3 of 4 or 4 of 5 like clockwork…

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  selling jeans

A really big part of this is pulling the starters at the first inkling of tirimg or even before, which they can do now because the bullpen is so deep. This can.make mediocre starters look very good.

selling jeans
8 years ago

Anderson 7 IP 1H 0 Runs Has any other rotation had three games out of four this season where their starters all pitched 7IP of 1 hit scoreless ball? Not only is that answer unquestionably no, I would suspect it is a once every decade or so event. Of course a) games in Oakland, b) Manaea was roughed up inbetween those four starts and c) Houston at least was not at full strength and slumping,but still. Evidence growing that A’s rotation is far from liability

johnforthegiants
8 years ago
Reply to  selling jeans

The performance of their starters recently still looks like small sample size variation to me. What i can believe is that they can generally pitch well enough 2 times through the lineup to keep the a’s in the game before turning things over to treinen/trivino/rodney/familia/petit/kelley. That’s just a huge number of good relievers.

John Autin
8 years ago

The narratives I’ve read so far on Houston’s stumble seem to ignore what a climb it took just to get a grip on 1st place.

— At the quarter pole, they were over .600, but tied with the surprising Angels.

— Then the M’s got hot. So although Houston’s 12-game win streak through June 18 put them at 49-25 — a pace of 107 wins — scrappy Seattle was just 2 games back.

— And just when the Mariners leveled off, from WAY outta nowhere, here came the A’s, charging furiously. Meanwhile, Houston had several stars on the DL.

I think they’ve done well to hold the fort, given that they haven’t really been through a pennant-race TEST before; last year, they were up 11 at May’s end, and never less than that afterwards. If they don’t panic, their talent advantage should win out. It won’t be handed to them, and I don’t dismiss the A’s or Mariners. But it’s a reminder of how long a season is, and of how much we who follow it can get caught up in short stretches.

It should be a fascinating stretch run.

selling jeans
8 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

Yep– all the Astros have done is follow up a WS title with a 95-100 win season, despite a pretty brutal stretch of injuries. Commendable, indeed. Because the A’s are on an amazing run (for those with short memories, check out 2001. In a year where a team actually set the best record ever mark– Seattle 116-46– an Oakland team slightly under .500 just before the halfway point then proceeded to play .750 the remainder of the season and win over 100 games. Only difference this year is 1) A’s run began a bit earlier and 2) the best record ever shout is happening in a different division. But 42-14 is something Oakland has done before under Beane– and neither 2001 or this year will ever be as memorable as the other late season Oakland streak– the 20 game run immortalized in Moneyball) the Astros might, for all their efforts, have to go to NY for a one game playoff. Life isn’t fair.

Look at it from Oakland’s perspective. They have been best team in sport the past two months. If they finish playing a mere mortal .600 ball, they would win 97-98 games– have 4th best record in sport—defy every prognosticator– and for their reward, a one gamer at Yankee Stadium.