The Angels Appear to Have Baseball’s Best Defense
It’s time to say what I feel like I say every year. The overall team projections are right there, linked up top. You know where they are and you know what to do with them. We’ve talked about them a lot, already, even though the ZiPS projection system was only recently included. We here at FanGraphs are projections dorks. Estimated future baseball is the next-best thing to actual current baseball. And projections offer some relief to panicking over ugly spring-training results.
Mostly, what people care about are wins and losses. That’s obvious and self-explanatory, given that, what’s more fun than winning? But while it’s easy to look at the overall projections, less attention is given to projected components, because the data is harder to track down and see all together. We know the Astros are projected to finish with baseball’s best record. That’s because they’re probably baseball’s best team. They just won the World Series. Okay. But what if you want to know who’s projected to have the best defense? That information is provided. It just doesn’t have its own standings page. It has this blog post instead.
Before looking forward, let’s take a quick look back. Projected defense is pretty heavily regressed. What I’ve done, then, is convert all defensive numbers into z-scores, showing the number of standard deviations above or below the mean. For this first plot, I want to revisit 2017’s team defensive performances. All this is is a blend of Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) and Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), with pitchers excluded since we don’t have pitcher defensive forecasts. I doubt the following plot will surprise you very much. This is a season that’s happened!
DRS does track pitcher defense, but I’ve left it out, because later on I’m going to compare 2017 data to projected 2018 data. I want to keep things consistent. So, anyway, while I understand that defensive metrics aren’t perfect, the numbers suggest that, last year, the Red Sox might’ve had baseball’s best defense. They were 2.0 standard deviations better than average, here, just edging out the Dodgers and the Rays. A’s fans know why their team brought up the rear. Mets fans know why their team brought up the rear in its own league. We don’t need to look at this any longer. It’s over. The Astros won.
This is what’s more relevant. Here now are 2018 team projections, based on Steamer and ZiPS. Both systems have their own ways of estimating defensive true talent, and even if you don’t love modern defensive metrics, projections regress the numbers appropriately. Again, I converted the team projections into z-scores, so that it’s easy to compare between 2017 and 2018. That comes later. Here, another plot similar to the one above.
As I write this, the Angels are projected to have baseball’s best defense, at +2.3 standard deviations. That’s no slight against the Cubs; the Cubs lead the National League, and they’re close enough to the Angels that there’s room to argue for either. But, projected first place is projected first place, and to understand this, you have to remember what happened much earlier in the offseason. While Shohei Ohtani was the winter’s most meaningful splash, the Angels also traded for Ian Kinsler, and they signed Zack Cozart. Those two will play on either side of Andrelton Simmons. While first base might be a defensive adventure, the Angels look great around the rest of the infield, and the outfield has no problems, even if Mike Trout isn’t what he was when he was younger. You could say the Angels’ season will come down to whether enough of the pitchers stay healthy. But even if they have to give innings to guys who might not deserve them as much, the defense should come to their aid. The Angels have created something special.
Many of these teams are around where you’d think. The Cubs have had some great defenses for years, and maybe in 2018, Kyle Schwarber will find agility he didn’t used to possess. I’m personally skeptical that weight loss can make a professional athlete significantly better in the outfield, but it’s not like it could hurt. And Schwarber won’t define the Cubs’ defense, anyway. There are several other players who are better than average at their positions. To say nothing of the positioning of the players themselves, within team-specific schemes. That’s still a weak spot when it comes to measuring team performance. We use what we have.
Based on that plot, the Astros are the only team keeping the A’s out of the defensive basement. Now, with Matt Chapman at third base, the A’s should play stronger in the field, but you could say they have plenty to prove. As for why the Astros are where they are, they don’t have anyone dreadful. They just also don’t have anyone terrific. Mostly, they have their position players because they’re awesome at hitting. No other team’s lineup is even close to the Astros, offensively. This is just a relative weakness, which the Astros will accept. It’s worth noting that arguably their best defensive player is Dallas Keuchel, who is excluded from these measurements.
At last, here’s a plot of the projected year-to-year changes. This is all expressed in z-scores. A positive change reflects an improvement, while a negative change reflects a decline.
Although the Angels are projected to have baseball’s best defense, the Giants are projected to have baseball’s most improved defense, which is maybe more important. While the Giants aren’t young, they’re still positioned to put the 2017 catastrophe behind them, and part of that is just being rid of Denard Span in center field. The Tigers and Padres are also improved, although neither looks likely to contend in 2018. So, maybe your eye is drawn to the Blue Jays, who have quietly lined themselves up for a wild-card spot. The Angels are there in fifth, mostly, again, because of Kinsler and Cozart.
At the other end, it’s only fitting to see the Marlins getting worse, because, you know, they’ve decided to suck. By the second half of the season, there could be some interesting young players playing just about every day, but the 2018 season as a whole is going to be a bad one, so, why not make it bad in several different areas? Outside of the Marlins, the Mariners have the next-biggest projected decline, which just goes to show it’s usually not a great idea to let Jarrod Dyson walk. In fairness, while Dee Gordon has no track record playing center field, he’s already reportedly looking terrific. You see the Yankees next to the Mariners, but like with the Astros, the Yankees probably won’t fret too much about the defense as long as the lineup is going bananas.
Just how reliable all this is, I don’t really know. The shifting of the modern era makes defensive measurements far more complicated. But at the end of the day, you want to bet on talent, and the numbers can identify talent. The Angels have a whole lot of 2018 talent on the defensive side of things. It doesn’t exactly make them favorites to knock the Astros out of first, but consider it a potential key to the team’s plan for success. A good defense helps everybody, and the Angels might’ve built something extreme. That team is a lot more than Ohtani and Trout.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



So the A’s won’t be anywhere near as bad as they were last year, thanks to Ryon Healy being elsewhere and Khris Davis going to DH. But they appear to have decided that shortstop and center field defense are overrated, and that wasn’t a decision they just made last year (in fact, Semien is actually passable at shortstop now).
I like their chance to beat that number because Chapman is such a singular talent without a track record so he’s hard to project, and Semien gets a very pessimistic projection…but it still won’t be good.
Consciously throwing SS and CF may not be as bad as you think:
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/where-defensive-opportunities-have-declined-most/
So the AL West has the Angels and 4 of the 5 worse projected defenses. Seems like it would be a great place to be a contact hitting team.
Even with Pujols dragging them down or does this assume he doesn’t play the field?
1B is the least important defensive position
Last year Pujols played 50 innings at first base.
Right, but they aren’t going to allow Otani to play the field. Pujols is the 1B for a lot of games in 2018.
Good point, didn’t think of that.
(FWIW) Luis Valbuena (being LH) is projected for the most reps at 1B.
This. Yes, 1B is the least important but it still factors in. Pujols is so bad now that playing 50-80 games in the field would be a decent sized negative. A team with a player that horrendous defensively playing half the season would make being the best defensive team difficult. It’s possible they can overcome it with Simmons and Trout, among others.
I’m just legit asking how much Pujols played in the projection. I’m assuming it’s heavily based off last year and thus Pujols barely plays defense. Due to Ohtani, that likely won’t be the case and thus the Angels are a bit misleading in this.
Depth Charts has Pujols playing 280 ABs at 1B and 280 at DH
https://www.fangraphs.com/depthcharts.aspx?position=ALL&teamid=1
They have elite CF and SS – that trumps 1B and DH handily
Trout’s defense is no where near elite (anymore). He has become an average-ish defender in CF.
When does Trout move off CF permanently? His linebacker build is probably going to age better in right field.
He’ll go to left. His arm isn’t quite strong enough for right.
If I were to guess, I suspect it will happen right after he signs his next contract in Free Agency.
Shhh! I want to draft Angels pitching on the cheap in my fantasy league!
Jk. Good article!
Only problem for the Angels is that pitching is ~80% of run prevention, and they look more than a bit shy there.
On that note, it’s really strange to me to see the Astros projected as the worst defense, considering they probably have the best starting staff in the game. So, does the pitching pull-up the defense, or will the defense pull-down the pitching? Their lineup is so good, it probably doesn’t matter. But I’d be interested to see how much of their overall WAR comes just from offense.
So now Mike Scioscia has two opportunities to screw up what the Angels front office has done: (1) Keep batting Pujols in the 4-hole; and (2) Ignore all evidence on shifting when aligning the defense. There’s gonna be a lot of head scratching from fans come the end of the season.
The Angels have been one of the most-frequent shifting teams over the last couple of seasons.
Not really sure how the Dbacks defense is supposed to be worse or even average considering they’ve added Souza and Dyson to the OF while subtracting Martinez and Tomas and plan on going with a middle IF of Ahmed and Marte
I was thinking the same thing, unless the projections were done by someone who read the other Fangraphs article and is projecting Neil Walker to come to AZ. All kidding aside, they will lose some defense in the Catcher position, but the IF corners are the same (just 1 year older, could that make a difference?) and the OF appears to be better than last with combos of Perralta, Pollack, and Dyson (but Souza appears to be more of a regular than Dyson, and his defense isn’t so great, albeit better than JD Martinez and Tomas). A middle infield with Drury/Owings in there less and Ahmed and Marte in there more should definitely be an upgrade. The defensive dropoff shown isn’t THAT much, but it is surprising that it shows a drop at all.
But Cub fans kept bragging about how great their teams defense is
And they’re projected to have the second best defense in baseball. So… They’re right.
As a Cubs fan, Jeff pls make a 2016 z-score graph, I’m begging you
Much like everything else for the 2016 Cubs, their defense was quite overrated.
Jeff, do your projections take in to account another uptick in 3 true outcomes? They have been on the rise and there is no reason to assume they won’t be again.
COL’s projected improvement in the field is tied to what, exactly? CarGo being replaced in RF by Dahl?
Wait, what the Angels are projected to be great at something and it is not Mike Trout’s fault!?!