The Angels Dared to Dream, But the Past Week Was a Nightmare

Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

Everyone likes an inspiring story. They don’t call it a Hollywood ending for nothing; people love it when the hero wins before the credits roll. Over in near near-ish the center of American film-making, it looked like the Angels were setting up for another iteration of that classic arc. They were down and out, deciding whether they could stomach trading the best player in the game before losing him forever. The previous best player in the game was out with injury, and the ship was taking on water. Then, a classic mid-story twist: they ripped off an 8-1 run in the latter half of July and decided to go for it one last time.

Yeah, about that. Since trading for Lucas Giolito and Reynaldo López to lean fully into this year, they’ve gone 2-9, slipping back below .500. After their playoff odds reached 22.7% on July 27, the Halos have crashed down to 1.3% in short order. That’s a seasonal low for their chances of making the postseason. Things are decidedly non-magical in the land of Disney these days.

What’s gone wrong for the Angels? Well, one thing’s for sure: it’s not Shohei Ohtani. He’s started at DH for all 11 games of the stretch and has hit a ludicrous .405/.542/.649, even better than his seasonal line. He left his lone start in that span early with hand cramps, but pitched four scoreless innings before departing. To the extent that one player can power a team, Ohtani is doing his best.

The problem lies where it always has: with the rest of the squad. The Angels are both thin and hurt; they have a whopping eight hitters and 10 pitchers on the injured list at the moment. The hitters represented most of the team’s planned lineup coming into the year: their starting catching duo of Logan O’Hoppe and Max Stassi didn’t even last through April, Anthony Rendon and Mike Trout have been out since the Fourth of July, and the injuries have picked up even more recently. Taylor Ward will miss the rest of the season after a horrific facial injury he suffered a week ago. Rookie sensation Zach Neto has cooled off, and now he’s also on the IL thanks to lower back tightness.

The replacements haven’t been able to pick up the slack. Mickey Moniak is having a tremendous season, but he’s hit a wall of late, with a 48.7% strikeout rate and 11 wRC+ in his last 11 games. Matt Thaiss hasn’t been much better; he’s hitting .111/.200/.222 while handling primary catching duties.

The various in-season acquisitions who were supposed to shore up weaknesses haven’t been much better. Eduardo Escobar looks cooked; he put up a 1 wRC+ in this recent bad stretch and has lost playing time even with all the injuries. C.J. Cron has started his second tenure with the Angels in a slump. Randal Grichuk and Mike Moustakas have been better, but hardly world-beaters. That group of names itself is troubling; that’s a bunch of players who didn’t have obvious spots on good teams and instead are starting for the Angels. Here’s the whole list (min. 15 PA) of recent performance:

Angels’ Recent Batting Woes
Player PA BA OBP SLG wRC+
Luis Rengifo 50 .302 .400 .488 148
Shohei Ohtani 48 .405 .542 .649 212
Hunter Renfroe 46 .244 .304 .390 88
Mickey Moniak 43 .171 .209 .244 11
Mike Moustakas 42 .293 .310 .439 103
C.J. Cron 32 .207 .281 .207 39
Randal Grichuk 31 .233 .258 .500 99
Matt Thaiss 30 .111 .200 .222 16
Eduardo Escobar 18 .118 .167 .235 1
Brandon Drury 16 .188 .188 .250 10

These 11-game stretches aren’t particularly useful from a predictive standpoint. Everyone has cold streaks here and there. But consider this: per our Depth Charts projections, the Angels have the best DH situation in the league. After that, the falloff is extreme. They have four different positions (catcher, first base, shortstop, left field) projected in the bottom third of the league. Only right field and center field project to be above average, both only by a hair, and center field relies on a strong return from Trout.

None of this will come as a surprise to followers of the team. The Angels have been built in this general stars-and-scrubs style for years. It’s almost poetic that the end of the Ohtani era has recapitulated the team’s last decade of struggles. Take a thin organization that never seems to develop average regulars, sprinkle in the inevitable injuries incurred during the long arc of a baseball season, and the result is almost a foregone conclusion: tons of playing time for guys who aren’t quite up to snuff.

The other constant of this recent era of Angels baseball has been lackluster pitching. That hasn’t been as much of a problem as feared during this recent terrible stretch. Two starters have stepped up – though Giolito is very much not one of them:

Angels Starters During the Slump
Pitcher Starts IP ERA FIP K BB HR
Tyler Anderson 2 11.1 2.38 2.92 8 4 0
Chase Silseth 2 12.0 2.25 4.10 16 1 3
Patrick Sandoval 2 11.2 3.09 4.90 11 5 2
Reid Detmers 2 8.2 9.35 8.58 9 4 4
Lucas Giolito 2 9.0 12.00 10.60 7 4 5
Shohei Ohtani 1 4.0 0.00 2.02 4 1 0

Again, cut up the major league season into stretches of 10 games, and plenty of teams would have runs like this. The bullpen has made it worse, though. Carlos Estévez has blown up twice in this recent stretch, allowing four runs to the Mariners in the ninth inning last Thursday and then six to the Giants in the ninth last night. The bullpen has a collective 5.58 ERA in that span, driven heavily by those two outings, and four of their last nine losses have come as a result of runs scored in the eighth inning or later.

As much “fun” as rubbernecking at their sudden collapse is, there’s a broader question to be answered here: Should the Angels have gone for it at the trade deadline after deciding not to trade Ohtani, and should they have held onto him in the first place? The results have been undeniably regrettable; the guys they traded for after taking Ohtani off the market have produced a combined -0.3 WAR since joining the team, and their earlier-season acquisitions have also been below replacement level thanks to Escobar’s swift decline.

The question of whether to trade Ohtani is more complex than just an on-field decision. It surely involved questions of owner and team legacy, fan interest, and other things that are enduringly difficult to quantify. Between the fact that the team never seemed particularly eager to deal him even when they thought that they should and the difficulty properly valuing Ohtani must have posed to both the Angels and teams trying to acquire him, they chose to stand pat. I guarantee that the first thing people will remember when they talk about the 2023 Angels will be Ohtani’s season and the decision to keep him. I don’t have anything more to add to that discussion at the moment, so let’s just take not trading him as a given and follow things from there.

From a process standpoint, I think you can separate their decision-making after deciding not to deal Ohtani into two phases: whether to add, and how to go about doing so. I’ll handle whether to add first. That’s a philosophical question. The Angels were long shots to make the playoffs when they started buying, and their trades couldn’t possibly move the needle enough to make them anything more than an unlikely contender. They were three games out of the final playoff spot, with two teams to pass in between and several teams right on their tail.

You can argue that adding this year is throwing good money after bad, hoping for a miracle instead of doing the long-term sustainable thing and writing this year off as a lost cause. From an extremely broad view – imagine an alien in 100 years who wants to know how many games the Angels won from 2020 through 2040 – they inarguably sacrificed wins this deadline. I contend that they aren’t giving up long-term playoff equity, though, or at least not much of it.

Because let’s face it, the Angels aren’t making the playoffs next year. Want to hear a wild statistic? Excluding the 2020 season, with its compressed and shifted timeline that makes calendar-based comparisons meaningless, the last time the team reached July 27 with even a 10% chance of making the playoffs was 2017. That’s before Ohtani debuted in the majors, if you’re keeping score at home. It’s not like they were playoff juggernauts before then, either, but it’s been a long dry spell in Anaheim. I don’t think it’s likely to get better after the best player in baseball leaves.

In other words, a single win this year might be worth many multiples of future wins, at least as it translates to the team’s odds of making the playoffs. They were still unlikely to pull it off. The odds were stacked against them, and their injury luck would have to turn around, which clearly didn’t happen. But this is it for the immediate future when it comes to the Angels competing for a playoff spot, unless there’s a seismic shift in how the team is run.

A year ago, that felt possible; Arte Moreno was exploring a sale. But now that he’s walked that back, and with the front office seemingly incapable of finding solutions, this deadline decision was a slam dunk to me. Even if you’d rather maximize fan happiness instead of playoff appearances, now is the year to double down. What will fans enjoy more: adding help around Ohtani in a noble attempt to snag just one playoff berth with him in the fold, or winning 70 games instead of 65 in 2026?

Maybe I’m painting too grim a picture of this team’s future. But they looked rough before the deadline. They came into the season as our third-worst farm system. The big league roster is in such shambles that the team is playing .500 baseball with Shohei Ohtani. They’re not exactly awash in young big leaguers, either; aside from Neto and O’Hoppe, the best of the bunch might be Patrick Sandoval and Reid Detmers. Next year’s Angels are going to be Trout and hope, and that’s been a pretty bad strategy historically.

Of course, that logic held all year, and the Angels only went for it because a winning streak brought them from far out of the playoff hunt to right on the fringes. If you’re making a counter-argument to my point, it’s that surely there is some cutoff below which they should capitulate. I happen to think that cutoff is very low; with a 20% chance of making the playoffs and Ohtani leaving after the season, I would have been sacrificing future for present all year. Honestly, the team has been doing that in various ways for years, whether it’s in pursuing free agents or drafting for near-term major league relevance. This is just another step down that path.

Okay, let’s stipulate that the Angels were going to trade from the farm system to bolster this year’s team. Did they make the right choices? Obviously, the early returns have been bad. The guys they’ve acquired have been below replacement level (though maybe not below specific Angels replacement level — this farm system is bad). But leave that aside for a second, and let’s consider the alternatives.

The biggest move the team made was trading for Giolito and López. Edgar Quero was the team’s only top 100 prospect, their best chance of getting help in the majors. Giolito wasn’t the best starter on the market by any means. But I’m not convinced that the Angels had the juice to get anyone better than him. The Cardinals traded a similar two-pitcher package – Jordan Montgomery and Chris Stratton – for a similar return, but they were targeting impact pitching prospects in their deals, and that’s not exactly a strength for Los Angeles. Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander almost certainly weren’t in the picture; no-trade clauses aside, those guys were both signed for next year and both cost money that the Angels clearly don’t want to spend. Aaron Civale would be a strange fit, since a lot of his value comes in the future. Jack Flaherty isn’t better than Giolito, at least in my estimation. Lance Lynn? Michael Lorenzen? I think that they did a good job of surveying the pitching market and picking a reasonable target. Giolito just hasn’t worked out. López was a nice complementary get, too, and he’s looking solid.

On the hitting side, I’m much less enthused by their tactics. Cron isn’t even last year’s news; he’s 2021’s news. The bloom is off that rose, to say the least. Grichuk hasn’t eclipsed 1.0 WAR since 2018. I’d rather have gotten Mark Canha to play first base, or Tommy Pham to play left field. I’d rather have torched the farm system a bit more to get Jeimer Candelario, who didn’t exactly fetch a mint. Is Ramón Laureano, who just changed teams for free when the A’s DFA’ed him, worse than Grichuk? If you’re going to go all in, do it! There were moves to be made on the hitting side, but the team threw up the Mission Accomplished banner instead.

Of course, there’s no guarantee that going slightly up-market would have changed much in the past few weeks, and we don’t know all the moves the Angels tried to make but ultimately couldn’t. The team needed to catch a hot streak both from its acquisitions and its existing players to make up ground in the Wild Card race. Instead, Ohtani continued to go nova and everyone else went dark. Candelario has been maybe the best hitter in baseball since being traded – .480/.552/.760 – and even he probably wouldn’t have led them to a better record than 5-5 at the very best.

So, what is there to learn from the past few weeks of Angels hijinks? The first lesson, to me, is that you should go for it when you get a chance if you’re rarely good. The second lesson is that long shots are still long shots. The third lesson is that even if you come up with the right strategy, executing on it isn’t easy, and sometimes you end up with Rockies leftovers instead of impact bats. The Angels aren’t completely done just yet, but they’re eight games out of the last playoff spot and daylight is quickly waning. That doesn’t make their unlikely bid at a playoff spot any less valid of a decision – but it’s fair to say that it hasn’t worked out like they hoped.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Twitter @_Ben_Clemens.

103 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
offthewall
1 year ago

The popular take was “yay Angels! Go for it!” But 2 weeks later they realize they will still need to win games in 2024 and beyond. Good luck with that now. 🤣

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  offthewall

I think the retort to that was that they were going to be bad in 2024 and 2025 no matter what. And that is likely correct, but it is definitely weird to say that the future doesn’t matter at all (which is my interpretation of the popular reaction to the trade as well).

mikejuntMember
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I thought the sentiment was more that Ohtani is a generational player and even if your odds are very low, your only real chance to retain him is to go on a fun exciting playoff run that gives him hope for the organization in the future. Yes, the overall ROI on that plan is probably bad because your odds are poor of it all working out, but the fact that we still know the name of the guy who traded Babe Ruth pretty much ensures no one else is going to volunteer to be historically noteworthy in a similar fashion, from ownership on down.

carterMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Right, I agree with mike here. Their hands were sort of tied.

snutilityman
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Do we think that people aren’t going to remember Moreno’s name for owning the team who had the two best players in the game on the same team for 6 years and didn’t make the playoffs once?

Come on now.

ascheffMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I don’t think trading the controlled rights to the entire future career of 25 year old Babe Ruth is a relevant comparison to trading two months of Shohei Ohtani. Yes, some people on social media would have made the comparison, but those people are ignorant. Running an MLB franchise to avoid negative comments from social media fans is not a smart long-term strategy.

People remember the Red Sox so badly for trading Ruth because it was short-sighted and harmed the franchise for 15 years. Ironically, the decision to double down and trade from the future is closer to the decision to trading Ruth than trading Ohtani would have been. The Angels certainly would have been criticized in the short term for the trade, but if they restocked the farm system, spent smartly in free agency over the next few years, and were back in playoff contention in 2-3 years, people would be excited about the team again.

They have left themselves far more open to long-term criticism with this approach of sacrificing the future to go all in on a pipe dream. It takes time to rebuild a farm system and major league roster with no valuable assets to flip, which is the position they have landed in now. They will be a laughing stock for years, which they had the chance to avoid by making the hard choice right now.

shampain
1 year ago
Reply to  mikejunt

If I was Ohtani, I’d be far, far less interested in re-signing for the team after watching them trade away what little promise for the future they still had in exchange for a pipe dream.

slz
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

From the Angels’ perspective, if youre going to be bad and irrelevant in the near future you may as well wipe out your uppers minors and go into an Astros/Orioles level tank. Sure if any of those guys came good you could recycle them into more prospects but it may be just as well that theyre not making you win more than 40 games to get those top picks.

I also have a fairly strong suspicion an Arte Moreno owned team without Ohtani is not going to be an Arte Moreno owned team for long and in that respect, the incentives of Arte Moreno employees are even more short term than those of most professional sports employees.

Dan B
1 year ago
Reply to  slz

This strategy wipes out the Angels for the last productive phase of Mike Trout’s career though.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  offthewall

It’s the fun take. People enjoy making long shot bets. The fact that they nearly always fail doesn’t seem to stop people from enjoying it. Especially when it’s someone else’s money

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

If one is betting on themselves a long shot bet is less about amusement and more about competitiveness. Almost everyone in MLB in any capacity made it there by betting on themselves despite statistical odds. Unlike betting on Green in roulette we can influence the odds with our own efforts