The Astros are Entering Baseball’s Upper Tier

The Astros had themselves a busy Thursday, picking up Brian McCann from the Yankees, and then signing Josh Reddick out of free agency. This is not intended as an overreaction to that. There’s no such thing as a team being “put over the top,” and the Astros haven’t been dramatically altered by adding a decent corner outfielder and a veteran catcher whose contract was partially paid down. The reality is that an awful lot was already in place. It’s just worth talking about what’s being constructed, instead of me focusing specifically on Reddick. The smaller story is that the Astros signed Reddick for four years and $52 million. The bigger story is that the Astros are entering the league’s upper class.

Reddick does, of course, make the Astros better. This isn’t something to be dismissed, and there’s a reason the Astros gave a guarantee of half of a hundred million dollars. Reddick’s usual right-field position is occupied by George Springer, but there’s flexibility here. Reddick could play left. Springer could play center. The whole lot of them could mix and match. Springer could even conceivably be dealt. Now, I wouldn’t bet on that. The Astros just have a lot of pieces to play with.

Reddick isn’t an elite everyday player, and he’s going to turn 30 at the start of spring training. I’m guessing he signed so quickly because the Astros were willing to go to four years, which seems like it could be an over-extension. Reddick isn’t great now, and he has a history of getting hurt and missing time. He’s statistically declined in the outfield, and, because it can’t not be noted, to this point he’s been historically unclutch. He has a lot of trouble hitting lefties! With the Dodgers, he was nearly a platoon player. He had a horrible August.

That was a very negative paragraph. Now, the Astros wanted to improve their left-handed hitting. Reddick checks that box. The Astros wanted to improve the clubhouse presence of veteran leadership. Reddick checks that box. Over the last three years, he’s been worth 2.9 WAR per 600 plate appearances, tying him with Chris Davis and David Peralta. Steamer has him projected to be worth 2.4 WAR in 600 plate appearances, basically tying him with Kole Calhoun and Adam Jones. As Colby Rasmus showed, and as Carlos Gomez showed, there’s no such thing as a veteran guarantee, but Reddick ought to be all right. This is the going rate for a roughly average player.

The Astros, on Thursday, picked up a roughly average outfielder. Just before that, they picked up a roughly average catcher/DH. Unsexy moves, the both of them, but they’re both roster improvements. They both improve the Astros’ hitting from the left side, and they’re both considered reliable veterans for a clubhouse that hasn’t had many of those. There’s no way for us to quantify any clubhouse effects. We can try to quantify the quantifiable.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

So then! Here is our projected standings page. The eternal caveat is that nothing on that page is ever perfect, but, there are the Astros, presently projected for baseball’s third-best record. They’re also presently projected for baseball’s third-highest team WAR. Not a big fan of our numbers? That’s no problem. Consider this tweet, from NEIFI Analytics:

It doesn’t matter the numbers you use — any numbers worth a damn are going to love the 2017 Astros. I know that the 2016 Astros somewhat underachieved, and I know that projections do miss, every single season. But the Astros are already getting stronger. They’ve built up some enviable depth. The Rangers this offseason might take a step back. The Mariners don’t have much flexibility to improve. The A’s are doing whatever it is the A’s are ever doing. The Angels have a competitive roster, but it could all come undone in the blink of an eye.

The Astros are set up to win the AL West, and from there, who knows? Also, they don’t have a one-year window. Also, it’s November 17. If the Astros, as built, have a weakness, it’s reliability in the rotation. There are injury questions surrounding most of their starters. They might be able to get through the season as they are, but they also have the pieces to make a splash. Is Yulieski Gurriel going to play first base? Is he not? What of the young first basemen? What of other players who might be blocked? I’m not going to speculate on who the Astros might target, but they can aim about as high as anyone. The roster could take it, and the roster could justify it. The Astros can be ultra-aggressive.

If you want to see the Astros’ organizational cycle in one easy plot, check out nine years of Opening Day payrolls (projecting next year’s based on what they have today):

astros-payrolls-2

There’s the Astros winding down, and there’s the Astros building up. Let’s just focus on the second part.

astros-payrolls

The Astros are going to spend at least four times more than they did at their nadir. At that point, the product was humiliating, and they got a lot of crap for it. Some of it was deserved. Yet ever since bottoming out, the Astros have built every season, and now they’re back, clear of the $100-million mark. They can presumably afford to spend even more. Maybe that goes toward a better starting pitcher. The Cubs just demonstrated the legitimacy of tanking. They won the World Series four years after their low point. This’ll be four years after Houston’s 51-111 low point. These things can move quickly, even if it sometimes feels like they’re taking forever.

Here are the Houston Astros — not good because of Brian McCann, and not good because of Josh Reddick, but just good, already good, good enough for adding McCann and Reddick to make sense in the first place. They should fill holes in the lineup and holes in the clubhouse, and that leaves precious few holes for the Astros to worry about. They won’t be the only team in baseball that looks good in March, and depending on what happens on the pitching side, they could still very much stumble. But on paper, the Astros are there with the class of the American League. It’s where they always said they’d be.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
ginsugarland@gmail.com
9 years ago

Jinx!

MichaelRM
9 years ago

We already have a word for rebuilding. Let basketball have tanking.

Further, baseball fans go through too much to have their success denigrated so fast by you, Jeff. If you used basketball-sized seasons, this drought took us a collective era of time nearly as old as the United States. Lincoln would be so pissed at you right now.

Sincerely,

-Irate (annoying) Cub Fan

FunFella13Member since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  MichaelRM

Well you got one thing right

Aaron Judge's Gavel
9 years ago
Reply to  MichaelRM

Good thing that baseball has baseball-sized seasons then?

Greg
9 years ago

“Springer could even conceivably be dealt. Now, I wouldn’t bet on that. The Astros just have a lot of pieces to play with.”

I know you said you wouldn’t bet on it, but even including the possibility of Springer being moved is strange to me. It seems he’s one of the least likely trade candidates in all of baseball.

JJWattsArmBrace
9 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Yeah, the conversation for best right fielder in baseball starts and ends with Mookie, obviously, but Springer is solidly in that second tier, and is still on his rookie deal, coming off a season in which he was one of the 30 most valuable players in baseball. Swapping him for Chris Sale would seem like a lateral move, so unless Mike Trout is coming back in return, I’m not really sure why the Astros would move Springer.

fjtorres
9 years ago

Pitching.
Rays, Braves, Phillies, Mets.

Greg
9 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Yea but Springer is 27 with 4 years of team control, so his value is tied to the present.

Dave ranked him 30th on his trade value series, so if he isn’t a one-for-one swap for a top-of-the-rotation arm, he’s at the very least 75% of the package.

The Astros shouldn’t trade that many wins from their MLB roster. Subtracting Springer would deplete their outfield.

Springer for Degrom is the only deal I can imagine and that seems uber risky for both teams.

Springer for one of Archer, Quintana, Carrasco or Salazar seems even less likely.

fjtorres
9 years ago
Reply to  Greg

The implied question was *why* would they trade Springer *if* they were to trade him at all.
Right now the Astros only need high end pitching, the one thing they can’t get in the FA market.
As Mr Sullivan said, it is unlikely he would be traded but if it came to that you did identify the least unlikely deals.
I would further refine it to DeGrom, Quintana, Salazar, and Archer, with spare parts moving both ways.
Wouldn’t bet on it but it isn’t inconceivable.

bananas
9 years ago

Bryce Harper: 2nd tier RF.

Goldsteins_Tool_Fedora
9 years ago

Ive said it as well with Springer. If someone gets moved it will be him. He can handle center for the time being though. The question would remain, who can handle CF? If they can land Fowler or Desmond, they could potentially flip Springer, Martes, AJ Reed/Kyle Tucker for Chris Archer.

houstonputman
9 years ago

That is a huge overpay. So far Springer has been as valuable as Archer. Throw in 2 top-75 prospects and the Astros are getting robbed.

Goldsteins_Tool_Fedora
9 years ago
Reply to  houstonputman

Archer is on a good contract with two team options after 3 years of a very affordable price. Dallas Keuchel is a free agent after next season and the Astros rotation is extremely green after him and Mchugh.

Im an astros fan and its really not an over pay in the current starting pitching market. Springer is a corner outfielder, 50 percent of scouts think Martes is a reliever and frankly AJ Reed was completely lost at the MLB level and probably will take years to hit left handed pitching, if he ever does. Springer hits arbitration this year.

JJWattsArmBrace
9 years ago

Francis Martes is universally considered one of the 30 best prospects in baseball. 140 ABs don’t suddenly make AJ Reed, himself a former top 50 prospect, worthless. Those are two guys who would headline a deal for a starting pitcher, along with Kyle Tucker. Martes/Tucker/Reed is a starting point for Quintana or Archer.

E L
9 years ago

What would that payroll graph look like if the Y axis were “(Astros payroll) / (League Average payroll)” instead of nominal dollars? I’m guessing the graph wouldn’t look nearly as pretty.

Baltar
9 years ago

The Astros are the new Cubs.

TheGoodDoctor81
9 years ago

Now imagine if they’d taken Bryant instead of Appel.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

Good for the Astros. For all the slack they caught in those rebuilding years, it’s nice to see their focus paying off.

538’s ELO rankings had them as the worst team in baseball from basically early-2011 to mid-2014. That’s pretty drastic going from that to now maybe the best (or tied with Boston) team in the AL.

http://i.imgur.com/AzcFFQ6.png