The Astros Gave the Rangers a Quality Outfielder

I don’t know how else to begin, so let’s begin like this: Over 126 games spent with the Astros, Carlos Gomez was worth 0.6 WAR. Over 25 games spent with the Rangers, Carlos Gomez has been worth 0.7 WAR. Now you know the story — there are characters, there’s a plot. When the Astros acquired Gomez in the first place, they figured he could be a real difference-maker. He’s making a difference now, just for a division rival instead.

I want to make it clear: I don’t blame the Astros for the decision they made when they let Gomez go. They had run out of patience, and pretty much literally every single number backed them up. I wrote about Gomez at the time, and I just couldn’t find much of any reason for hope. The lone positive was Gomez’s longer track record. But everything more recent had sucked. Gomez looked like a bad player. Bad players don’t start for contenders.

After the Astros made their initial decision, I remember reading a report suggesting the Astros were looking to trade Gomez, getting a real return. That was never going to happen, and Gomez was simply released. The Rangers plucked him up and made an immediate commitment to keeping him in the lineup. He’s played like someone who would’ve warranted a trade return, though. He wasn’t directly handed off from one Texas team to the other, but that’s how things have played out, and in the weeks since Gomez returned, he’s re-discovered his power stroke.

Gomez has gone from a 60 wRC+ to 138. He’s gone from slugging .322 to .529. He already has more homers with the Rangers than he had with the Astros this year, and it shouldn’t surprise you that all this productivity is backed up by the Statcast stuff. Using information from Baseball Savant, check out how some of Gomez’s averages have moved:

gomez-averages

Twenty-five games. Gomez has played with the Rangers for 25 games, and from an analytical perspective, sometimes 25 games might as well be zero games. But those rolling averages reveal progress, in particular in the launch-angle department. The batted-ball speed really has improved, though. It’s a simple story: Gomez is hitting the ball hard more often, and he’s hitting the ball in the air more often. That’s Gomez getting back to his roots, and that’s why he’s doing such a good job of helping the Rangers today.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

As a different way of examining the same data, here’s another plot. This one makes the differences look awfully dramatic.

gomez-ranks

As an Astro this year, Gomez’s exit velocity through the date of his last game ranked in the 20th percentile. Since he returned with the Rangers around the end of August, his exit velocity ranks in the 83rd percentile. Meanwhile, as an Astro this year, Gomez’s launch angle ranked in the seventh percentile. With the Rangers, he’s up to the 91st. Gomez, weirdly, was a ground-ball machine. He was rolling over on way too many pitches. Now he has his better balance, and balls are being hit into the air again. Far, far more than the average. Gomez is still striking out pretty often, but his profile looks far more disciplined, and he’s generating the batted balls that he needs to in order to be a successful player.

Gomez has chased less often out of the zone. He’s swung at fewer first pitches. I wouldn’t say we’re seeing prime Carlos Gomez — he’s in an outfield corner now, and he’s stolen four bases. But this has been an absolutely massive turnaround, after Gomez was dumped by a team that could’ve badly used him. Most of the time, change-of-scenery transactions don’t work out so well for the player. If a player is no longer good enough, it doesn’t really matter which uniform he’s wearing. But Gomez now looks rejuvenated. Or just healthy; I don’t know. He’s found a more comfortable setting with the Rangers, and he’s thriving just in time for the start of the playoffs.

There was one reason to believe in Gomez when he was dropped: He still projected to be pretty good, on account of his history. Maybe that’s the most important thing. Maybe that should be the takeaway. But remember, the Astros are smart — at least as smart as any other ballclub — and they knew more about Gomez than anyone, and they let him go. Jeff Luhnow said they’d tried everything, and he never accused Gomez of a lack of effort. They just gave up on trying to find a solution. The Rangers willingly assumed the risk. None of the indicators pointed to this happening, with Gomez sort of challenging the limits of modern baseball analysis.

It’s enough to make you wonder. Maybe the Rangers really do just have a more suitable team environment. Maybe Gomez is responding far better to the clubhouse and dugout tone set by Adrian Beltre. Maybe, with Houston, he didn’t feel like he could be himself. Alternatively, maybe the struggles in Houston got psychological. Maybe Gomez got to the point where he felt buried, and maybe he just needed the time off and the fresh statistical slate. Numbers can’t accurately capture health, nor can they accurately capture emotion. I don’t know why Gomez is better, now. He just is. It’s just another thing that’s gone right for the Rangers. Regardless of whether they’re actually a special team, you can see why people would believe that.

For Gomez, it’s all better late than never — if he maintains something like this the rest of the way, he might not have to settle for a one-year pillow contract as a free agent. Maybe he’s showing enough now that his perception can be salvaged. For the Rangers, they were up 6.5 games when Gomez debuted, and they’re up 9.5 now. They were already going to make the playoffs. Gomez just stands to make them better when they’re there. Turns out, not a bad move to pull off for free.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
ab03
10 years ago

Two things

1) Beltran is apparently Gomez’s idol/guru (which makes sense given playing style) so that worked out pretty well.

2) Not sure how accurate it is but the Rangers broadcast has talked about Gomez shortening his swing significantly. I think the credit for this goes to Iopace. But someone should probably get video evidence of that to confirm.

dirtbag
10 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

He’s not swinging so hard that his helmet frequently falls off like he was with Houston.

He has especially cut down on out-of-control swings with 2 strikes.

ab03
10 years ago
Reply to  dirtbag

I think it’s more this than anything else. I didn’t really notice a swing change before they mentioned it on the broadcast

wildginge
10 years ago
Reply to  dirtbag

Seemed like he’d lose his helmet every other AB in Milwaukee. Not sure why it worked for him with the Brewers but not the Astros. I’ve not seen a single game of him playing for Texas but it’s hard for me to visualize him NOT swinging all out.

AA1989
10 years ago

Regression to the mean.

EltnegMember since 2020
10 years ago

Did the Rangers try anything new health-wise? I remember seeing a few people suggest that he could just be hitting an aging wall prematurely because of those hip problems that scared off the Mets.

Paul Molitor
10 years ago

Nice article. As a Twins fan who saw Gomez “develop” and flail away with the Twins and then have success with the Brewers, a lot of his game seems to be psychological and perhaps the change of scenery helped him. Or, perhaps he has been reading Fangraphs and his lack of production and learning about lots of soft contact given his pending free agency provided some motivation.

He surely didn’t seem to be playing healthy this year before the trade to the Rangers or last year after his trade to the Astros given his production.

Gomez is a curious bird to say the least.

bersmrMember since 2018
10 years ago

Can you explain what it means to have a 90th+ percentile launch angle? Is that in comparison to an ideal launch angle r just 90th percentile for highest launch angle? Obviously the highest angle isn’t the best as that would be a pop up.

burts_beadsMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  bersmr

90% percentile of league-wide launch angles doesn’t mean he’d be hitting pop-ups every time.

Mahoney
10 years ago

It’s beginning to look like the roller-coaster that Alex Rios became, before he sucked more or less permanently.

Johnston
10 years ago

I wish I could see a rational explanation for this.

jfree
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Maybe he wants a multimillion$ deal in free agency and not just a one-year incentives contract. Once it was clear no one thought he was worth anything (ie no trade offers), he realized that he only has one chance left. That is also the sort of ‘hit bottom’ scenario that often makes people finally listen to those trying to help rather than resist it.

If I’m right, the easy evidence will be that a)he gets a big contract this offseason and b)he immediately deteriorates.

ProfarMVP
10 years ago
Reply to  jfree

Does there exist a single atom that could suggest Carlos Gomez is apathetic about baseball and just wants a fat check? Does such an atom exist even in a parallel universe? Your “evidence” could easily happen but will hardly serve as proof of your hypothesis.

sputniksickle
10 years ago

Gomez has talked about Texas’ hitting coaches, Iapoce & Mashore, teaching him things that he’d never known before, and that it’s helped him. Not sure exactly what that is, though.

Lark11
10 years ago

I really wonder what the Astros were teaching him with respect to swing mechanics. I remember over the offseason one of the beat writers on Twitter saying that they were trying to get him to “not swing so hard.” Or, something along those lines and maybe A.J. Hinch even commented on it at one point, but I could be wrong about that.

Still, I thought it was an odd change to try to make, as Carlos Gomez had been a very productive hitter prior to joining Houston. I would think you’d want him to stay exactly the same and do exactly what he had done to be successful prior to Houston.

It almost feels like, for whatever reason, Gomez reverted back to his Mets/Twins days, complete with the same terrible offensive profile. The Mets/Twins wanted Gomez to hit the ball on the ground to utilize his speed. He took his big step forward with the Brewers when he started swinging hard, really letting it rip. Trying to hit for power.

Maybe, by trying to get him to “not swing so hard,” the Astros inadvertently triggered everything that came along with his Mets/Twins “not swinging so hard, hitting the ball on the ground” mechanics and approach.

I don’t know, but the unpredictability of baseball is part of what makes it great. Carlos Gomez bouncing back is a great and intellectually interesting development.

Sixto Lezcano
10 years ago

Lucroy made analogous comments after joining the Rangers and working with their hitting coaches to recapture a shorter swing:

http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/texas-rangers/rangers/2016/08/13/lucroy-turned-power-rangers

Maybe we are looking here at the quantification of an improved team culture in several dimensions for both players.

grandbranyanMember since 2017
10 years ago

From 2013-15 with the Brewers Gomez put up a 125 wRC+ in 1548 PAs. Most of that damage was done in 2013/14 as he was at a 104 wRC+ in 314 PAs in 2015 before the trade to HOU. & with the Mets famously nixing the original deal over physical concerns maybe there was something going on there.

With the Astros Carlos recorded a 68 wRC+ over the course of 486 PAs.

Would be curious to see what a historical comp group would look like. Players who hit say 20% or more above league average for an extednded time (1,500+ PAs) then had an extended stretch (say 400+ PAs) of well below league average production like Gomez. How many bounced back and had some amount of success again? How many were done for good?

Slappytheclown
10 years ago
Reply to  grandbranyan

Fred Lynn in 81 had a pretty bad year and rebounded well. Eric Davis is another comp I thought of off the top of my head. He was pretty bad in 92-94 but rebounded pretty well from 96-98 before injuries finally got the best of him. Perhaps the best ‘buyer beware’ comp on Gomez, that hip is likely a good amount of the problem?