The Astros Have Been Completely Unstoppable
I think every article about this year’s Astros is supposed to begin in the same way, so, who am I to defy convention? Let’s just embed this and move on:
We don’t need to review the feature. We don’t need to review the things it got right and the things it got wrong. It’s unlikely to be remembered for more than the headline, because that’s the way the reading public works, and here we are, three years later, and the Astros have baseball’s best record. The best record by a decent margin, at that, and the Astros also happen to have our second-highest odds of winning the World Series. No team has improved its World Series odds more since the start of the year. I just got an email an hour ago from some gambling business that currently has the Astros as its World Series favorites. This could become a reality. Chances are, it won’t, yet the Astros’ odds have never looked better. The Astros are good. That doesn’t sound as weird as it used to, but the process is complete. Winning is all that’s left.
Winning is what the Astros have already done. They followed a 16-9 April with a 22-7 May, and May ended with a seven-game winning streak that saw the Astros sweep the Orioles and then completely dismantle the Twins. In case you haven’t looked lately, the Astros lead their division by 11 games. Only one other division has a spread of more than two games. The Astros came in as the AL West favorites, and they remain the AL West favorites, but you never expect so much distance so quickly. The Astros own baseball’s highest playoff odds. They have the highest odds of making it to the Division Series. The Astros’ expected season-ending win total has increased by nine, since opening day, to an MLB-best 99. To be precise, it’s 99.4.
At 38-16, the Astros have five more wins than the next-best total. The last team to start so well was…last season’s Cubs, who opened 39-15. The last American League team to start so well was the 2001 Mariners, who opened a laughable 42-12. The Astros are just the 29th team in history to win at least 38 of its first 54 games. This is what an elite baseball team looks like, and although those 2001 Mariners are most remembered for not winning it all, we’ve got the Cubs as the more encouraging data point. A very good start can point to a very good finish.
We should get into a few numbers. Nine other teams in history have opened exactly 38-16. That’s good for a winning percentage of .704. Over the rest of the season, those same teams averaged a winning percentage of .608. Every single one of them won at a reduced clip, but you’re smart enough you didn’t need to be told that the Astros will inevitably slow down. No team could be expected to keep winning quite like this, but even .608 would be a 98-win pace over a full year. If the Astros played at .608 the rest of the way, they’d finish 104-58. The worst rest-of-season winning percentage for a team that won at least 38 of its first 54 games was .520. That pace would have the Astros finish at 94-68. We basically know, after two months, that the Astros are going to finish with an excellent record. If they didn’t, that would be nuts.
Now, how good are the Astros, really? Are they best-team good, or are they simply very good? We can never tiptoe around this section. It’s less fun than straight-up gushing, but I have to share what I see. Once again, the Astros do have baseball’s best record. However, they have baseball’s third-best BaseRuns record, with the actual wins exceeding the BaseRuns wins by a league-leading five. The Astros project for the fourth-best rest-of-season winning percentage. The numbers aren’t yet convinced that the Astros are a juggernaut, but none of this is to suggest they aren’t fantastic. The Astros are fantastic. Look, here’s a plot of more than a century of baseball! Using information from Baseball Reference, this shows team OPS+ for, and OPS+ against. The greater the difference, the better the team.
You want to be toward the lower right. The Astros, in yellow, are toward the lower right. Obviously, this mixes two months of the Astros with five or six months of every other historical team, so that’s an issue, but you can at least see where the Astros stand. The Astros have hit for a 119 OPS+, while they’ve allowed an 88 OPS+, which yields a difference of 31 points. Only 14 teams have ever finished with a difference greater than 31 points. That point way out there, because I know you’re curious, belongs to the 1927 Yankees (51 points). And I’ll note for now that this year’s Yankees also have a difference of 31 points, while the Dodgers are at 30. Those teams have been great, but the Astros have collected the greatest number of wins.
What gets me about Houston is the balance. Now, even before the season began, I think we had a shared understanding that the Astros profiled as a balanced ballclub. But, as I write this, they rank fifth in baseball in position-player WAR. They’re 11th in baseball in rotation WAR, and fourth in baseball in bullpen WAR. None of those ranks are particularly outstanding, but when you put them together, you have a team almost without flaw. It’s the offense that’s led the way. It’s been the best-hitting offense, especially lately, and, again, balance is key. This shows every team’s hitters with at least 50 trips to the plate, broken down by how many of them have been at least average, or below average:
There are 12 Astros hitters with at least 50 plate appearances. Nine of them have been good for an OPS+ of at least 100. I know that we ordinarily use wRC+ instead, since that’s the FanGraphs stat, but the numbers are closely linked so nothing ought to be meaningfully different. No offense has been more balanced in this way. Only the Dodgers are all that close. What the Astros lack in, say, hitters like Joey Votto, they make up for with relentlessness.
Sure, one would expect Jake Marisnick to cool off. He won’t keep slugging .557. And one would also expect Marwin Gonzalez to cool off. He won’t keep slugging .638. But then, one of the below-average hitters to this point has been Carlos Beltran, who’s better than his stats. Yuli Gurriel is probably also better than his stats. There’s not much in the way of an offensive let-up, and now Carlos Correa is beginning to look more and more like a future MVP. Any team-level regression here is likely to be more mild than dramatic.
If there’s any concern about the Astros, it’s focused on the same area where it’s been for months. All offseason long, rumor people were waiting for the Astros to trade for a top-of-the-rotation starter. That didn’t happen. What they’ve actually gained is a rejuvenated Dallas Keuchel, and a healthier Lance McCullers. Both of those pitchers are possible aces. Yet, behind them, Collin McHugh is still on the DL. Charlie Morton is on the DL, and Joe Musgrove is on the DL. Mike Fiers can’t stop allowing home runs. There’s still a potential shortage of depth, especially if the Astros grow in any way worried about McCullers’ durability. There could be a midseason trade to be made.
But any such trade would be made with the playoffs in mind, because the regular season is effectively settled. The Astros don’t need help for the next four months. They could need help for the fifth month, either addressing the rotation, or maybe addressing first base. I’m not sure what they might do, or how aggressively they might act, but this isn’t a team in need of much, at least as long as Keuchel and McCullers can both take the mound. Those two match up well with anyone. The lineup matches up well with everyone.
The bullpen is every bit as deep as it looked. The lineup is every bit as deep as it looked. The rotation might be a little less deep, but it’s terrific at the top, which is what makes the biggest difference in October. I can’t tell you whether the 2017 Houston Astros will actually end up as the World Series champions. Too much can happen between now and then, and so much of the playoffs comes down to chance. What I can tell you is that few teams profile as well as the Astros do. This might very well be baseball’s best ballclub. I’m not sure there’s anything the Astros can’t do.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.



Imagine their record if the Indians didnt just SWEEP them in their own house. GTFOH Astros!
The same Cleveland team that lost their previous 3 series before and 2 series after the Astros series? Baseball happens sometimes…
How about you guys look at the actual factors behind how and why Cleveland won those series instead of… this? Isn’t that we do here on Fangraphs?
Considering the Astros just swept the Twins, helping Cleveland get back into their rightful spot as the division leader, shouldn’t there be slightly less animosity coming from Ohio?
You’ve clearly never been to Ohio. The. Worst.
I imagine it would be between 1-3 wins higher.
Bingo!
I want to respond as an Indians fan that it was nice for them to go 5-1 against the Astros, but I expect the Astros to play better than a true-talent 1-5 team for the reasons Jeff articulated, as they seem like a pretty swell team.
Correa has been running a 200 wrc+ in May. He has looked Jeter-ish at the plate.
23 readers have been running amok downvoting a simple truthful comment. They look fool-ish in any language.
It’s being down-voted because it is a bizarre and inappropriate comparison. Carlos Correa looked Ted Williams-ish at the plate last month. He’ll will be lucky if his career ever holds a candle to Derek Jeter’s, but the comment acknowledges Correa’s 206 wRC+ in May and then seems to imply that this kind of hitting would be typical of Jeter. The Captain had only two months in his career with a higher wRC+ than what Correa just put up May, and he only had one season where he cracked 140 wRC+.
It’s just a really really weird thing to say.
Jeff wrote an article about the Astros and didn’t mention Devenski by name. For shame!
Of the positions that the Astros have below 100 RC+, they are 1B, LF, and DH. It shouldn’t be difficult to upgrade those positions. Though, the Astros have had trouble there.
Question: How long do you stick with Beltran at DH? When do you decide he’s done? If he’s still hitting like this at the All-Star Break, do you assume he’ll come around? Or do you say, “he’s 40, the old Carlos is never coming back”?
(The other spots–rotation, 1st, left field, those seem less controversial)
He put up a WRC+ of 114 in May. He’s not destroying the ball, but he’s playing better after an abysmal start.
Beltran will be watched. Aoki and Gurriel likely bigger issues if they don’t improve soon.
Since everyone agrees Aoki and Gurriel might need upgrades…Do you give Derek Fisher and AJ Reed a crack now to see if they can handle MLB pitching? Or do you try to trade? I lean towards giving Fisher a chance, not sure about Reed.
I would imagine Fisher is given a look before Reed, he brings more versatility to the table and is off to a hot start this year.
Problem Astros have is none of the position players have options except Bregman. If they bring up Fisher, the Astros would have to cut Aoki. I don’t have a problem with that, but Astros hate giving up on talent even in small amounts. Also, if Fisher turns out not ready, Astros would be stuck with him or someone else from minors until they can trade for someone.
Do you have a source for the Astros’ option situation? Roster Resource shows several Astros position players with options, including both Aoki and Gurriel – http://www.rosterresource.com/mlb-houston-astros/
I worded that wrong as I should have excluded veterans (I’d consider Gurriel one even though he’s new to MLB) and great players, but still amazed at how wrong I was about the non-veterans. I am shocked that the Astros still have options on Marisnick and Marwin though those guys aren’t being sent down. I assumed Aoki was out of options as Astros got him off waivers. I guess Mariners thought he wasn’t worth taking to arbitration…and they may have been right.
This Astros team is looking a lot like the 2001 Mariners. You know what happened to them.
This Astros team is looking a lot like the 2016 Cubs. You know what happened to them.
See, I can write pointless things too!
good write up, astros wont be going anywhere without another ace pitcher. They need elite guy. Also you mentioned maybe 1B being traded for, but what about 3B. Bregman has been flat out terrible this year and under performed expectations. hes about 10 in avg away from being shipped to AAA. Can the astros still get anyone for him if they traded him? The corner IF is weak as well as rotation depth, really need a clayton kershaw esque guy in their. I remember when astros couldve gotten chris sale in straight up trade for bregman, man what was lunhow thinking!
If you don’t live in Houston, you should find a way to stream Houston sports talk radio. You’ll absolutely love it.
“really need a clayton kershaw esque guy in their”
Agreed, them and 28 other teams.
Bregman did get off to a slow start, but he hasn’t been terrible. He posted a 105 wRC+, which is league average and he’s been performing much better in May and especially late may than he was earlier. And he’s only been in the majors for 4+ months, so it’s not unreasonable for him to improve. He doesn’t strike out much and he’s hit very well with runners on base.
agreed…hes been average. But you could’ve straight up traded him for 1 of the best pitchers in mlb in chris sale at one time. was a blown opportunity in my opinion.
Hahahaha…..no, you couldn’t have. Sale was traded for the #1 prospect in baseball…and 3 others. Perhaps you’re thinking of Quintana (and it still wouldn’t have been straight up).
I thought your original comment was tongue in cheek, but now I don’t know what planet you’re on.
http://climbingtalshill.com/2016/12/06/astros-miss-out-on-sale-they-wanted-alex-bregman/
Man Baerga, I used to think you knew what you were talking about ion here. Boy i was wrong. Do a google search and have fun reading about the bregman/sale trade. You are dismissed
That tweet from Heyman said “chisox wanted bregman in astros package”. So no, that doesn’t at all imply that the White Sox would have taken Bregman straight up for Sale. Bregman would have been the headline name in a package that would have included other prospects.
couuld they have gotten sale or not? exactly. Now they are stuck with a mediocre 3b in bregman with an wrc+ of 98 and they are a chris sale away from winning the ws. lunhow blew the opportunity.
I realize this reply is too late to matter, but you’re arguing in circles now and you know it. Bregman for Sale would have been great, but Bregman/Tucker/Martes for Sale? Also, you have a poor understanding of what “mediocre” means. Bregman is average. Eduardo Esocbar is mediocre.
The Astros and Indians have teams to envy, I think both are not far off being perfect.
It’s going to be Indians vs Red Sox, Astros vs Yankees in the 2017 ALDS. If Red Sox get the WC then it’s Astros vs Red Sox. That’s a tough matchup for the Astros.
I’m going out on a limb, but I think every team in the ALDS is going to have a tough match up.
As much as I rail against big-market centric coverage, there’s no denying the fact that the Cubs sucking article got 3-4x as many comments as the pro-Astros article. I can only imagine the number of actual hits or page views is similar in disparity.
Saddens me as a sports fan.
Not sure what mean by the 3 yrs ago referred to but happy the Indians killed them as both these teams provide great stackable lineups as of late. Get Daily Lineups set for fanduel & draftkings @ http://dfsfreereport.com/get-free-access