The Astros’ Staff Is the Best Ever*
*Or would be, if the season ended today.
We know the Astros’ pitching staff has been absurdly dominant.
The truth is, they’re historically dominant at the moment.
Just a season after the Indians became the first team to strike out 10 batters per nine innings, set a record with a 27.5% strikeout rate, and finish with the highest pitching WAR total of all time (31.7), the Astros are a threat to top those marks.
The Astros have already recorded 11 WAR this season, while the next closest pitching staff, that of the Red Sox, has 7.9. The Astros are on pace to shatter the Indians’ WAR mark, and their 10.35 strikeouts per nine and 29.6% strikeout rate would also be records. Gerrit Cole, Charlie Morton, and Justin Verlander — who was outstanding against Wednesday — all have sub-2.00 ERAs.
(The Astros and Indians met last weekend, with the Astros taking two of three games, and Houston travels to Cleveland for a four-game series beginning Thursday. Get your popcorn ready.)
The Astros rotation alone has accumulated 8.9 WAR. With just over one quarter of the season played, they are on pace to surpass the 1970 Cubs and 2011 Phillies rotations, which have the all-time WAR record of 26.0.
Of course, WAR is an imperfect way to compare eras, as it is an accumulative measure and there are more games played today. If you’re trying to compare starting pitchers, for instance, they have a lesser workload in the modern game. A better way to compare pitching staffs of different eras is to employ a measure like ERA-, which adjusts for park and run-scoring environments.
Here’s the most remarkable Astros pitching fact: by ERA-, the Astros are the best staff of all time at the moment. Let’s think about that. Since 1901, there have been 2,512 team seasons, and the Astros currently have the top ERA- mark in history.
| Team | Season | ERA | WAR | ERA- |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astros | 2018 | 2.39 | 11.0 | 59 |
| Cubs | 1906 | 1.75 | 17.6 | 66 |
| Cubs | 1909 | 1.74 | 22.4 | 68 |
| Cubs | 1905 | 2.04 | 17.2 | 69 |
| Cubs | 1907 | 1.73 | 17.8 | 70 |
| Athletics | 1910 | 1.79 | 16.4 | 73 |
| Cardinals | 1944 | 2.67 | 22.5 | 74 |
| Athletics | 1926 | 3.00 | 21.1 | 74 |
| Indians | 2017 | 3.30 | 31.7 | 74 |
| Yankees | 1939 | 3.31 | 14.6 | 74 |
Their FIP- of 69 would also stand as another MLB record.
By more traditional measures, the Astros’ 2.39 team ERA stands as the best of the Live Ball era and the best mark since the 1919 Cubs and Reds. The 1967 White Sox posted a 2.45 mark and the 1968 Cardinals posted a 2.49 ERA.
In 1969, baseball lowered the pitching mound. Perhaps baseball will have to lower the Astros’ mound when they are pitching.
The top 39 starting rotation ERAs of all time occurred prior to 1920. Ranking 40th? This Astros rotation.
How they’ve arrived here is remarkable in its own right. No one has spun gold like the Astros.
Last season, Houston turned Verlander and Morton into ace-level performers in the second half en route to a World Series run. This winter, they acquired another pitcher not maximizing his talent in Cole, a former No. 1 overall pick, and have turned him into Pedro Martinez circa 1999. The cost for the Astros was spare parts.
As you might have heard, the Astros are one of the teams that has seemingly focused on increasing fastball spin rate. Houston leads baseball in four-seam fastball spin rate at 2,377 rpm, about 100 rpm above average.
But the Astros have also made adjustments to the pitch type and location of arms with like Cole, Morton, and Verlander (as Jay Jaffe noted noted). Cole’s spin is up, but he’s also shelved his two-seamer, located his slider better, and pitched more up in the zone.
With the Astros, Morton elected to start throwing harder and stop throwing to contact. The Astros lead baseball in fastball velocity at 94.8 mph.
As Morton went away from a softer approach, the Astros have abandoned the changeup, throwing an MLB-low 450 changeups entering play Thursday.
Dallas Keuchel has been and remains one of the better starting pitchers in the game. Lance McCullers took his game to another level with extreme curveball usage last fall and has found ways to be effective without a great feel for the pitch early this season, as May resident Jake Mailhot explored. And this author is not even digging into the bullpen in this post, which still houses Ken Giles and Chris Devenski.
The Astros have acquired talented arms at discount prices and extracted a ton of value out of them. They’ve done it all without the help of a natural first-round selection — McCullers was selected 41st overall in 2012 — or a big-dollar free agent signing. That’s a pretty good model.
There is a copious amount of amazing Astros pitching facts. They have the lowest zone-contact rate (82.2%) in the majors. In fact, it is the lowest zone-contact rating as a staff in the pitch-tracking era. When opponents do make contact, they do so at the fourth-weakest rate in the majors, with an average exit veto of 87.2 mph. We could go on and on, but the point has certainly been made.
Maybe the Astros won’t keep this up. It is unlikely that they will. It’s an outlier of a level of performance. Still, to pitch this way for more than a quarter of a season is remarkable. Since the Astros didn’t arrive at this success primarily through the draft or high-dollar free-agent signings, more teams are going to become curious and attempt to copy their success. It will be interesting to see how long the Astros can hang onto their value-extracting competitive advantage. They’ve already created tens of millions of surplus dollars in added performance value and won a World Series title. We’ll have to see if others can catch up, but for now, the Astros have a chance to make some history.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
After the best offense ever last year. Houston isn’t fair
I’ll bet you they don’t win the WS this year. They were very fortunate to win it last year as they were down to their last game several times. Houston is playing well, but they are not some historic juggernaut… these historic claims are absurd.
They can be a historically great team, particularly in some specific facet of the game, while still not being likely to win the WS. Winning the WS is hard.
Astros currently have 11.4 pitching WAR and projected by Depth Charts for another 19.0. It looks like they will get close to the Indians WAR mark even with some regression and some minor injuries.
Bullpen has been incredibly rested. WPA leaderboard lists both positive and negative WPA. Astros bullpen has the least amount of negative and positive WPA by almost half the 29th ranked team’s value (i.e., bullpen isn’t being used and when it is, it isn’t stressful).
Interesting article. As a Giants fan, painfully so.
You’ve had your time friend.
But I thought the 2016 Cubs were the best ever? That “dynasty” fell fast
And Brad Peacock!
Collin McHugh too.
“The Astros’ Staff Is The Best Ever”
Are we not doing phrasing anymore?
Do you agree that the current season of Archer is not nearly as good as previous seasons? Even last season (also a dream) seemed quite a bit more enjoyable than this season so far.
Yeah, this season of Archer feels disjointed and kind of lazily written. I really liked last season which had a tight coherent plot running through it — even with the usual Archer zany antics, tangents, in-jokes, and conceits — but this season has felt sloppily episodic.
And yell-y. There’s a lot of yelling. It worries me because it reminds me of when other shows have devolved into “people love when character X does this so let’s have them do lots of that”, like when they decided that Rebecca should have an emotional breakdown in every episode of Cheers, or George should have a screaming fight with his parents every other week on Seinfeld.
As a side note on the above, I am completely unfamiliar with “Tales of the Gold Monkey”, the 80s TV series that served as the inspiration for this season, so it’s possible the show is attempting to ape the writing style and the tone of that show. Regardless though, it isn’t working for me.
Any and all complaints about ‘tanking’-style rebuilding will fall on utterly deaf ears in MLB front offices while Houston continues to succeed like this.
I understand how awesome Astros’ pitching has been and that writers need something to write about.
Having said that, when you are making these kind of posts, I really wish you could have comparison with corresponding fractional seasons rather than full seasons.
For instance, Indians had an era- of 62 for the second half of 2017 (75 games) and to me, that is more impressive than era- of 59 for 50 games.
But you wouldn’t know it from the table in the article.
There’s a major difference between starting off as something great and being great for X portion of the season. The former allows for the potential of continued greatness. It is possible, even if unlikely, that we are witnessing truly the best pitching staff and best starting rotation in the history of MLB. And there’s value to note that mid season because fans like to witness greatness as it unfolds.
When a team has a hot second half, that is valued less for the sole reason that potential is much less, because presumably the same team wasn’t as good earlier and therefore whole-season stats would be more pedestrian regardless of the late season surge. That isn’t the case when the hot start (or potential history in the making) happens at the beginning.
Also, there were so many effusive praise of the Indians last season during the second half on this site. And just as those were all well deserved, shouldn’t this be the same with this staff?
I am fully aware of the distinction and yes, it would be unfair to compare Astros’ results to the best 50 game stretch of any team.
I brought up the 2017 Indians only because I knew that they had a great second half and I couldn’t easily find the monthly splits of those early 20th century Cubs team.
A legit approach would be to compare the Astros’ start to other teams’ first 50 games.
And then perhaps also show how much those teams regressed in the next 110 games or so.
Right, this was one of my many criticisms of Travis¨Aaron Judge article from last week. In that article, he compared what Judge did in his first 41 games this year to what he did all of last year. And used that comparison to conclude that Judge has gotten better. Had he compared similar time points between the two seasons, he would have found that Judge has done worse this year
I believe writers compare to full seasons because, quite frankly, no one cares about partial season stats. This may not be the objective way to do things and I do admit this site is different from most places that write about baseball. But I think we can agree that for the most part, no one cares what’s the best ERA for 50 game stretches. We care about what teams did for an entire season or as a streak. Would people be more willing to read an article comparing the Astros to the best 50 game stretch in history? Maybe? But even for fangraphs I think that’s reaching.
The 2005 Astros had a devestating top 3 as well, very historically underappreciated IMO.
1. Oswalt 3.16 FIP 144 ERA+ in 241.2 IP
2. Pettitte 3.07 FIP 177 ERA+ in 222.1 IP
3. Clemens 2.87 FIP 226 ERA+ (!!) in 211.1 IP
If you think they’re not doing something to artificially get here, you’re kidding yourself.
Whether it’s Bauer’s pine tar hypothesis or something else, and whether or not it’s rulebook cheating or not, this is absolutely not just a case of “got gud”
Skepticism is fine, but to say, for example, “they’re astonishingly good, therefore their goodness must be artificial” strikes me as strange. I guess if you’d offered some shred of evidence or argument in support of your statement – or even just posed it as a question – I’d be fine with that too. But to say “you’re kidding yourself” to believe otherwise, and that we should just all take it for granted that this level of accomplishment is not naturally possible, is frankly obnoxious.
To be an entire run better than the previous modern record simply based on talent is so extremely improbable that IMO it isn’t worth considering, especially in a sport with a century+ of, shall we say, “unsanctioned” activity by teams
A legit approach would be to compare the Astros’ start to other teams’ first 50 games.
http://colorswitch2.com
FIP- of 69?
nice
At the beginning of last year Dallas Keuchel was considered the ace of the staff. His name didn’t even appear until the last quarter of the article. Whether or not it’s the best staff ever they are having a great year.
As an Orioles fan, I cheer for the Astros – better them than NYY/BOS. If Britton comes back healthy, would there be a trade to work out? Seems like all the roster is “missing” is a dominant lefty
Any idea where their 1/4 of the season stacks up compared to the other best 1/4 of the seasons historically?
Only 2 ER tonight in 9IP so Astros Team ERA drops another fraction. Now the entire pitching staff save one pitcher is at 3.72 ERA or lower including 7 pitchers (3 starters and 4 relievers) at 2.04 ERA or better. Amazing!
One article quibble. The Astros at 50 games at time of article are closer to one-third through the season (54) than one-quarter (40.5 games)
To the tung_twista thread about fractional comparisons: Agreed, but I don’t know of a publicly accessible database that enables just what you want. The Baseball-Reference Play Index, for example, will give teams’ raw ERA for any N-game stretch of the year, but it won’t give total runs (which is what I’m most interested in) nor put the ERA into context.
As a proxy for Houston’s incredible start, I gathered all teams’ totals through the end of May, since 1917. The Astros currently stand 4th on that list with a flat 2.50 RA/G. The only teams better were the 1917 White Sox (2.10 through 41 games, 27-13 record, en route to a WS victory), the 1945 Tigers (2.48 through just 31 games, 19-12 record, WS champs), and the ’68 Clevelands (2.26 in 47 games of the AL’s lowest-scoring season).
Incidentally, Houston’s Pythagorean W% through 52 games would be the best ever, a ridiculous .774 that projects to 125 wins for the year.
Blowouts are another remarkable aspect of Houston’s first 52 games. Their 16-1 record in games decided by at least 5 runs is a pace of roughly 50-3, which would set modern records for most blowout wins (currently 47, by 1936 Yankees) and fewest blowout losses (4, by the 1909 Cubs).
Almost 31% of their games have been blowout wins, another record pace.
Moving on from the Indians as the best staff ever. As little as that meant a year ago, this means even less. These declarations mean even less when you make them every year, which I am sure you intend to do. You may want to read the story about the boy who called wolf… In reality that Indians rotation is better this year -still fronted by Kluber and Carrasco, but Bauer and Clevinger are pitching much better, but this was never about reality.
its not that they have the best players ever, which they do have really really good ones. The big story is they get absolute most out of each player. They create these players and develop them. And the ones they trade for get insanely better because of what pitches they tell them to throw and when. There analytical team is whats making aj hinch look good, he’s really just a bozo who had a terrible track record. All aj hinch is, is a monkey with a wrench…he does what the unbelievable best in class analytic dept tells him to do. All teams need to follow astros analytic department.