The Best Call of the Season
If you’re like me, then, before Tuesday, you didn’t know the name Stu Scheurwater. We all know the names of some umpires, and maybe you know the names of most umpires, but it’s almost impossible to keep track of all of them. Scheurwater, previously, wasn’t anywhere on my radar. And honestly, that’s probably a good thing, since we get to know umpires in the first place because they do something that ticks us off. We don’t seize many opportunities to congratulate umpires for a job well done. In that way they’re kind of like closers — their success is almost assumed. They’re supposed to get it right. They can’t always do that. Every little mistake makes thousands of people upset.
I’d like to take this moment to applaud Scheurwater’s performance. One call in particular has placed him on my good side. Scheurwater didn’t do anything he wasn’t supposed to do. He simply followed the rule book, which is much of an umpire’s job. Yet many other umpires wouldn’t have made the same decision. When it comes to how baseball is played, I don’t have many strong opinions. I’m open to the pitch clock, I’m open to changing the mound, and I don’t care either way about the DH. With Brandon Nimmo at the plate Tuesday, Scheurwater called a ball. I strongly believe any such sequence should be called the same way.
In Tuesday’s top of the sixth, the Mets were losing. That’s not uncommon. The Mets already lost another game today. Yesterday, the score was just 1-0, and there was a runner on first. Nimmo was working with a 2-and-1 count, and then Jesse Biddle threw an inside breaking ball. The ball hit Nimmo on the elbow, and he started running to first. He didn’t get very far.
Scheurwater called Nimmo back. Instead of awarding the hit-by-pitch, Scheurwater said the count was 3-and-1. That happened because, according to his judgment, Nimmo didn’t try to avoid the pitch. In fact, he stuck his elbow out in the way. Nimmo, in other words, appeared to attempt to get hit on purpose, and that’s not allowed. You can see in this screenshot how Nimmo has struck an unusual pose:
Generally, when a player defensively turns his back, he’ll tuck in his arms, presumably due to an instinct to protect the ribs. Nimmo didn’t tuck his right arm. Nevertheless, Mickey Callaway emerged from the Mets’ dugout to argue, and he was shortly ejected. Callaway’s argument:
“They thought [Nimmo] kind of put his elbow out over the plate to get hit on purpose,” Callaway said after the game. “My argument was that the ball was in the batter’s box, kind of at our player and when you are in that position it is hard to get out of the way.”
I’m sympathetic to the position that pitches go fast, and it can be hard to avoid them sometimes. And based on Callaway and also Nimmo’s words, there seems to be some unwritten understanding that, when a pitch is inside the batter’s box, it shouldn’t really matter what the batter does. The pitch to Nimmo shown above, however, was slower than a fastball, and it was over the batter’s box chalk. It was also breaking away from Nimmo’s body. Allow me to share with you the letter of the law:
The batter becomes a runner and is entitled to first base without liability to be put out (provided he advances to and touches first base) when:
[…]
He is touched by a pitched ball which he is not attempting to hit unless (A) The ball is in the strike zone when it touches the batter, or (B) The batter makes no attempt to avoid being touched by the ball;
That’s official rule 5.05(b)(2). The pitch to Nimmo clearly wasn’t in the strike zone, but Nimmo also clearly didn’t make an attempt to avoid being touched. This isn’t some obscure rule buried deep in the text where no one is ever looking; this is one of those things that almost everyone knows. Many baseball fans know it from childhood. As a hitter, you’re supposed to make an effort. Failing that, you’re at least supposed to not get in the way on purpose. Just about everyone is familiar with the rule. Every professional player is familiar with the rule. The issue, though, as you know, is that the rule is seldom ever enforced. I’m given to understand you see this called far more often in college, but when it comes to the major leagues, umpires will typically just send any hit batter down the line. They see it as the path of least resistance.
Remember when Max Scherzer threw a no-hitter against the Pirates? There’s a reason that no-hitter wasn’t a perfect game.
Jose Tabata was awarded first base after dropping his elbow. Here’s Yadier Molina blatantly sticking his elbow out, and still getting the bag:
Derek Dietrich is a little more subtle, but this pitch easily could’ve been avoided:
Here’s Brandon Guyer making zero effort:
Here’s Corey Seager making zero effort, aside from an arm lift deliberately timed right after impact to throw the umpire off:
Here’s Anthony Rizzo just throwing his entire upper body in the way:
These aren’t all the best examples. These are just some examples, since this isn’t the easiest thing to search for. I remember Shane Victorino welcoming just about any HBP opportunity. I remember Prince Fielder dropping his elbow in the way. You all, I’m sure, have your own memories, because this is always so easy to notice. Much of the time, watching on television, you can see when a batter doesn’t try to get out of the way. You can see when a batter tries to get in the way. But we’ve all become accustomed to just shrugging it off, assuming the batter will be awarded a base. It’s just there as a mostly unenforced rule. Selectively enforced, perhaps, depending on your perspective on Don Drysdale’s shutout streak.
To the umpires’ collective credit, the Scheurwater call doesn’t have *zero* recent precedent. This happens maybe, I don’t know, once a season. Possibly twice. Again, there’s no database of which I’m aware, but I was able to track down some clips. Here’s Joc Pederson looking like an idiot:
Here’s Ji-Man Choi pulling a Nimmo:
And here’s Josh Donaldson doing the same:
In those three cases, the hitters were called back. Donaldson didn’t even protest, although his manager did. But managers generally argue, and players only try to do this in the first place, because the call is so uncommon. Pederson shifted his leg in front of a knuckleball because he saw a cheap and easy opportunity to get on base. No part of his brain signaled that he’d be called on his bullshit. If he were any more subtle, he probably wouldn’t have been. That’s the major-league precedent, established over time.
It takes balls to call a hitter back. It’s always easier to just send him down — when pitchers hit batters, they didn’t execute well, anyway. So the pitcher will at least partially blame himself, and the hitter will be thrilled to reach. Calling a hitter back is the baseball equivalent of a hockey ref calling a penalty for a dive. It’s provocative, and almost sure to lead to a confrontation. I’d believe this as an explanation, too, but for the fact that so many umpires already seem to be confrontational people. Consider the Tabata hit-by-pitch. In that situation, the umpire could’ve gone by the book and kept Tabata in the box. Instead, precedent prevailed. The umpire believed so strongly in not enforcing the rule that he ended a perfect game with two outs in the ninth.
Scheurwater isn’t a hero, but he’s an umpire who deserves his time in the spotlight. He’s an umpire who saw a hitter try to get hit, and he called the hitter on it immediately. That’s how it’s supposed to be done, recent history be damned, and while I’ll grant that maybe sometimes making an effort to get out of the way isn’t the easiest thing to do, umpires need to at least enforce the rule when a hitter leans in. Such behavior should be discouraged at every level, and players like Nimmo should be made to feel shame when they try to opt out of an active at-bat.
Nimmo, incidentally, drew a walk on the following pitch. The next time he came up, the first pitch was inside:
For a split second, you can see Nimmo prepare to toss his bat away, trying to sell that he got grazed. Scheurwater wasn’t having it. Scheurwater wasn’t having any of it.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

I see you brought up facts and all, but I can’t support anything anti-Nimmo.
Therein lies the double edged sword: anything Anti-Nimmo (bad) is also Anti-Mets (funny), so I’m conflicted.
“Here’s Joc Pederson looking like an idiot”
If I had a nickel…..
This whole article made me smile, thanks Jeff.
That pitch was nearly a strike! If that were allowed, and with Joc having two legs and all, he would be a switch hitting, OPB machine. With a little yoga, he should be able to cover the outside edge of the plate as well.
None of those hitters would be throwing their elbows into pitches without that armor.
Anthony Rizzo would like to have a word with you…
And Don Baylor, back in the day…
Ron Hunt.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-year-ron-hunt-got-hit-by-50-pitches/
Rule Change Suggestion: If you get hit in the armor, no free pass.
Love it. Incidentally, I believe this happened to Martin Maldonado last week as well.
I’m of two minds about this. On the one hand, I think in this case, Nimmo probably should have just gotten out of the way. On the other hand, it seems kind of ridiculous that a pitcher could more or less drill a batter and get away with just a ball rather than a HBP. What if a guy throws at a player’s ribs, and he just takes it because he gets a deer in the headlights moment? If you bean a batter and it’s clearly inside the batter’s box, that should be a HBP.
Yeah, especially with gambling being a Thing again soon, I’m not wild about adding more levels of umpire discretion. It’s one thing if the batter leaned out of the batter’s box, but if the pitch was inside the batter’s box and a guy gets hit, they get first base whether they moved or not.
Whats wrong with the UMPS having discretion with respect to gambling being a thing?
It is almost always a breaking ball when this is called. Umps can tell the difference i reaction time to a fastball and a 75-80mph pitch. I dont think Umps are going to make this type of ruling on anything with velocity (drill-worthy).
I’d be fine with changing the rule so that it says you can’t move into the ball, but in almost all the examples Jeff brought up, the batter extends an elbow (or knee . . . ) into the ball. That’s not ok. And that’s what’s clearly going on. I think stoically not moving (or not being able to react in time) is one thing, but that’s not really the issue here. The issue is lunging at balls to take a free base.
It bothers me that that Jose Tabata elbow drop against Max Scherzer could potentially affect how a Hall of Fame plaque ends up getting written.
I hate seeing that replay just as much as the Jim Joyce call on Armando Gallarraga’s near-perfect game.
I forgot it was that blatant. *!@# that guy
That says more about the Hall of Fame selection method than anything else.
How do you FIND all these incidents?
Step 1: Be Jeff Sullivan
Step 2: Work for FanGraphs
whether it’s in the rulebook or not, I’m not a fan of a rule being enforced so haphazardly like that. Either enforce it consistently or don’t enforce it at all. Anything in between diminishes the integrity of the sport.
I agree with this… would be interesting to see video of some/many/most of Stu Scheurwater’s HBP calls and how often very similar incidents send the player to first.
lighten up, francis
Per BP umpire stats, he does have the 8th lowest HBP rate of 62 umpires with 200+ innings this year.
But last year he had the 14th highest, min 500 innings [n=53]
The most surprising this about this comment to me is that people still believe baseball has integrity, I thought that much like Vegas, baseball sold it’s integrity to corporations and rich white men in the 80’s & 90’s.
You mean like the strike zone?
lol joc pederson for the win.
Anyone else completely cringe when they see a batter take a pitch on the elbow, armor or not?
What does Chase Utley have to do to get a mention? My man has made a career out of this.
May 31, 196 8 – Giants at Dodgers – Top of the 9th inning, bases loaded, Dick Dietz at bat. Drysdale was trying to nail down his 5th consecutive shutout. On a 2-2 pitch, Dietz is hit, but instead of forcing in a run, the umpire ruled that he didn’t make an effort to get out of the way. Drysdale gets the final two outs and goes on to set the consecutive scoreless inning record (until Hersheiser broke it.) I will never forget watching and being puzzled by what I had never seen.
I think the Nimmo example is debatable for this reason: when you are a batter facing a same-handed pitcher, you are trying as best you can to stay in on a breaking pitch. That means keeping your shoulder in and bat ready. Otherwise you risk bailing out and then seeing the pitch breaking back over the plate. If you are lefty who crowds the plate like Rizzo, what are you supposed to do in that situation? You are not going to risk bailing out too early and I don’t think you should be penalized for staying in. In the gif above, I think he turned like that in order to ensure he got hit in the back rather than the arm. It’s a stupid rule if you ask me. It probably would not have been called if Nimmo had reacted AFTER THE PITCH in a different way, i.e. let’s say he keeps his elbow like that, gets hit, but then spins backward instead of happily tossing the bat away. Then at least he’s pretending to have tried to get out of the way even if he didn’t, actually. So really I think he was just penalized for being too smug about it.
I think we can all agree that the batter should not be allowed to move unnaturally into the path of a pitch, like that hilarious Joc Pederson example. Actually, if you ever get hit by a knuckleball, you obviously aren’t trying to get out of the way, so it should be an automatic ball.
R.A. Dickey has hit a couple guys in his time who were definitely trying to get out of the way. When it’s really working and you can’t tell which way it’s going to go, it happens.
If you’re a lefty who crowds the plate, the solution is to not crowd the plate. No one is making Rizzo play like this. It’s mostly that he just would not succeed without doing it. He would probably be a much less effective player if this rule was more regularly enforced.
Any contact involving Rizzo near the plate should be immediately scrutinized and reviewed. Rizzo literally turns and leans into the pitch above. That isn’t natural. And batters drawing HBPs this way promotes a dangerous mindset at the plate that could lead to more injuries. Particularly I’m thinking about hits to the head. If Rizzo reads that pitch wrong and it’s a fastball, that could be a disastrous hit to the helmet.
It was a good call, but I think that rule 5.05b(2) should be rewritten so that instead of “makes no attempt to avoid…”, it says something like “makes an attempt to get hit…” It’s unfair to expect hitters to move out of the way when the ball is moving so fast.
Also, many pitchers will throw breaking balls that start inside, and break out over the plate, so it’s very possible that Nimmo was unsure if the pitch, which was a curveball, would cross over the plate in that at-bat.
I think if a major league hitter has the ability to swing a skinny piece of wood to hit a small spherical object moving very fast they also have the ability to at least attempt to move their bodies in a direction that is away from said spherical object.
If you look at Nimmos plate discipline numbers and his extremely low O-Swing %, he would be one of the worst players to make the “he didn’t know what pitch/where the pitch was going” argument with. Not saying it isn’t valid, but come on Nimmo has elite plate discipline, he knew hahaha
I want to see more fixing of these kinds of situations not less, look at the ground rule double, an ump can rule a ground rule double either a single or a triple depending on their discretion of how the play out have played out had a fan not interfered or it hadn’t gone over the fence on a bounce.
Mmmm, I believe the umpire has discretion on fan interference, but not for ground rule doubles. How many times do you see runners get called back to third when they would have easily scored?
Is it really a ‘good call’ by the ump when it is never, ever called? What he did here was completely inconsistent with how things, in practice, are generally expected to play out. If MLB came out and said they were going to start enforcing the rule that’s another thing, but to have one rogue ump make the call like this, I’d say he’s actually in the wrong.
Rogue Umpire Enforces Rules of Sport
I don’t know why this is getting downvoted. Arbitrary and selective enforcement is unjust.
Is there any evidence it’s selective? Not that I’d like the enforcement to be this inconsistent either, but it’s perfectly game-theoretically fair to have a rule on the books that gets enforced 5% of the time as long as that 5% is chosen more or less at random.
What percentage of enforcement is the minimum for blaming the umps who don’t call the rulebook instead of the ones who do?
Hear me out on this. It is quite possible they are bracing for impact by making their body parts rigid as the ball’s coming to them. Helps to avoid serious injuries, surely, at least consider it a strong possibility.
Scheurwater’s swagger-waggle in that last gif.
HBP-Framing Leaderboard:
1. Corey Seager
2. Derek Dietrich
3. Anthony Rizzo
4. Ji-Man Choi
5. Brandon Guyer
.
.
21. Josh Donaldson
.
.
55. Jose Tabata
.
.
89. Yadier Molina
.
.
233. Brandon Nimmo
.
.
Bottom. Joc Pederson
*1 Craig Biggio (not pictured)
Calling it on Tabata would have been so tough given the circumstance. A very reasonable reaction given how it is normally called is that the ump was carrying water for the perfecto.
But it was SO blatant. Even Tabata didn’t take off for first, he waited to see if he’d gotten away with it.
“Calling a hitter back is the baseball equivalent of a hockey ref calling a penalty for a dive.”
I’m not sure how you get the equivalent result to an NHL diving call here. Call it a strikeout and award the batter first base anyway?
The problem is the NHL refs call both penalties at the same time, which can be a non-sense. Either there was an trip or there wasn’t. They’re basically telling the diving guy “the trip was real, but you really should’ve stayed on your skates anyway”. I agree the comparison with intentional HPB is weird.
I don’t see anything unusual about not trying to get out of the way of an inside breaking ball from a same-side pitcher. If you’re a left-handed batter and you see off-speed inside from Biddle, you’re expecting either curveball or slider, both of which break back into the zone, and you can’t expect batters to flinch from that.
I enjoy seeing Rizzo get called a strike on a HBP in the zone as much as the next person, but either the rule has some flaws, or its interpretation has some flaws.
I’m just commenting to say this is fantastic and thank you.
And, irrespective of the ins and outs, it’s rather wonderful to see a baseball post praising an Umpire for getting it right.
A very rare and welcome sight, that.
I was watching the game and it was a great call. Not only did Nimmo not make an effort to get out of the way he stuck his elbow down into the path of the ball. Without his elbow guard there is no way he does that. This rule needs to be enforced more often and more consistently.
I always though Derek Jeter would lead the league in that.
This has been so infrequently called in my lifetime… and blatantly that the league has effectively condoned the behaviour. There’s an expectation through decades of practice , and based on that I fully agree players/managers have grounds to complain. If you enforce the rule 1% of the time you’re setting things up to be argued. It’s a lot more serious than it seems because it could affect the outcome of the game. And therefore even a playoff spot. No matter how small an unfair advantage (or disadvantage in this case) it could affect a playoff spot and serious revenue. If the rule is not going to be enforced, get rid of it. Otherwise discipline people who won’t.
I was watching a college game this weekend and this was called on a much more defensible hitter (the guy didn’t move, but he didn’t lean in, and it was a fastball). My wife was dumbfounded that you could get hit and not get the base, and I told her that this never gets called in MLB, so naturally she was watching when this happened. So I think Stu was just trying to make me look stupid in front of my wife.
I feel that regular enforcement of this rule would drop Rizzo’s OBP like ten points.
I distinctly remember Wally Joyner with a walk off HBP on a slow curve where he made no effort to get out of the way and it infuriated me. My memory could be completely messing with me, but does anyone remember this?
I don’t remember that, but I remember the Don Baylor-coached Rockies having a player jump out the way of HBP which would have been a walk-off. I can’t find anything about it on the Googler.