The Best Year at Second Base… Ever
The group of young shortstops emerging in major-league baseball has gotten a lot of deserved attention, with Xander Bogaerts, Carlos Correa, Francisco Lindor, and Corey Seager — all 23 or under — potentially ushering in a renaissance at the position. Third base gets a lot of attention, too, offering a combination both of young stars (like Nolan Arenado, Kris Bryant, and Manny Machado) and the American League’s most recent MVP (in Josh Donaldson). Historically, second basemen tend to generate less attention — perhaps because players often end up at second only when they appear unable to adequately handle shortstop or lack the size to play third. This season, however, second basemen have turned the tables and are having quite possibly the best collective season ever at that position
Second basemen have not typically been responsible for great offensive seasons as a group. Last year, Wendy Thurm looked at offense by position throughout history. Second basemen, Thurm found, have generally hovered around the low-90s when it comes to wRC+, easily below average. The graph below shows the league-average wRC+ for second basemen over the past 50 years, including this one.

Second base has rarely reached (or crossed) the 95-wRC+ threshold. This season, however, they’ve produced a 101 wRC+ on the season. We can go back further and the trend continues. In the last 100 years, the only time second basemen have recorded a collective mark above 100 wRC+ is 1924, the year Rogers Hornsby hit .424/.507/.696 and accounted for more than 5% of second-base plate appearances. With Hornsby, second basemen produced a collective 103 wRC+; without him, it would have been 96 on the season. This year’s top second baseman, Jose Altuve, has recorded an impressive 167 wRC+ is impressive, but that figure doesn’t have nearly the same impact as Hornsby’s did in the 1920s.
The chart above considers all players considered second basemen in those years, but since 2002 we have more precise split numbers for positions, and we can see the numbers for the games actually played at second base. The chart below tracks second-base offense during that time.

The MLB-wide group of second basemen has gone from Jose Valentin‘s career wRC+ to Ichiro’s career wRC+ in just one season. While offense is up throughout baseball, wRC+ is league- and park-adjusted so the improved numbers this year are relative to the league as a whole. Here are the principal rate stats and how they’ve changed since last year:
| Season | BB% | K% | OBP | SLG | ISO | BABIP | wRAA | wOBA | wRC+ |
| 2015 | 6.6 % | 17.4 % | .318 | .393 | .129 | .305 | -64.7 | .309 | 94 |
| 2016 | 7.2 % | 17.4 % | .334 | .434 | .158 | .313 | 154.9 | .330 | 105 |
| CHANGE | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.016 | +0.041 | +0.029 | +0.008 | +219.6 | +0.021 | +11 |
Not only have second basemen improved this season, they’ve done so at a level in competition with other positions more associated with offensive production. The graph below shows offensive production by position this season.

It shouldn’t be a surprise that first base is on top with traditionally offense-first positions like third base, designated hitter and right field falling not too far behind. What is a surprise is that second base is close behind in the top tier and not near the bottom. The difference between second base and either center field or right field is greater than the gap between first and second base. Left field is actually posting its lowest numbers in the last decade, having previously posted a wRC+ in excess of 100 in 13 of the past 14 years.
Of the positions situated in the top half of the graph above, first base, designated hitter, and right field all have considerable negative positional adjustments while second base and third base are all on the positive side of the defensive spectrum. As a result, when looking at WAR totals by position, those two leap to the top of the list.

Only third base is above second base in WAR this year. After those two, there’s a decent-sized gap to center field followed by another one to shortstop, then down the line. In a normal year, second base would likely fall right in line with catcher and right field. The 23-WAR difference is made up essentially by the extra 220 runs the position is producing on offense.
It might be easy to conclude that second base is a position of considerably more depth, but is lacking in the best players of the game. That might be true in terms of players you would choose to start a franchise, but based on individual WAR totals this season, second base stacks up as well as any position. Jose Altuve is right near the MLB lead, but the first page of the WAR leaderboards is littered with second basemen.

Second and third base feature more players than any other position among the top 30 of the WAR Leaderboards and second base has players just beyond the top 30, as well. Still, second basemen don’t get a whole lot of attention. As mentioned, the position itself does not lend itself to stars and hype generally — and it seems as though another factor is probably hurting them in terms of notoriety: age.
While second basemen are producing at high rates, there aren’t rising stars in the group. The closest is Jose Altuve, who is a star, a fantastic player and still just 26 years old. However, he’s in his sixth big-league season, hardly seems new, and he’s the youngest one of the group. Of the top-10 second basemen by WAR this year, Altuve is the only one younger than 29 years old, and four of the top 10 are 32 years of age or older.
| Name | Team | PA | HR | ISO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR | Age |
| Jose Altuve | Astros | 532 | 19 | .208 | .365 | .429 | .573 | 168 | 6.3 | 26 |
| Daniel Murphy | Nationals | 456 | 22 | .263 | .348 | .388 | .611 | 159 | 4.6 | 31 |
| Jason Kipnis | Indians | 502 | 20 | .209 | .294 | .354 | .503 | 130 | 4.5 | 29 |
| Ian Kinsler | Tigers | 523 | 22 | .198 | .286 | .342 | .484 | 121 | 4.3 | 34 |
| Robinson Cano | Mariners | 522 | 26 | .224 | .291 | .347 | .515 | 133 | 4.0 | 33 |
| Dustin Pedroia | Red Sox | 517 | 12 | .144 | .307 | .372 | .451 | 120 | 3.8 | 32 |
| Brian Dozier | Twins | 500 | 26 | .261 | .265 | .339 | .526 | 128 | 3.6 | 29 |
| Ben Zobrist | Cubs | 474 | 13 | .167 | .276 | .384 | .443 | 123 | 3.4 | 35 |
| Neil Walker | Mets | 440 | 22 | .191 | .279 | .341 | .470 | 120 | 3.3 | 30 |
| Matt Carpenter | Cardinals | 395 | 15 | .255 | .289 | .406 | .545 | 153 | 3.0 | 30 |
| DJ LeMahieu | Rockies | 485 | 9 | .156 | .342 | .415 | .498 | 129 | 2.9 | 27 |
| Jean Segura | Diamondbacks | 512 | 10 | .151 | .312 | .361 | .463 | 117 | 2.8 | 26 |
| Logan Forsythe | Rays | 393 | 15 | .196 | .280 | .341 | .476 | 123 | 2.4 | 29 |
The list above does not include Cesar Hernandez, Rougned Odor, Joe Panik, Jonathan Schoop, Devon Travis or Kolten Wong, who are all young and have shown some degree of success in the big leagues, but that group is behind the veterans above and well behind the young groups of players at third base and shortstop. The jump in production at second base has been led by veterans like Cano and Pedroia and Zobrist, with Murphy continuing his power surge and Kipnis continuing to play well. Given the age of the players in the chart above, we are likely not seeing the start of a multi-year trend. Second basemen have been great in 2016, and while it is just a blip, what a blip it has been.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
New slide rule having an impact?
Jose Altuve and Daniel Murphy are having an impact.
Ryne Sandberg took heat for not attempting the pivot on many DP chances, said it helped him to remain healthy (and kept his bat in the lineup). if more 2nd basemen can avoid injuries (minor or otherwise) related to the pivot, they may perform better offensively.
I suppose one could check the number of DL days by 2nd basemen, though that wold only catch the more severe ones.
No. Not even on Shortstops, who are far more likely to be affected by the rule.
Probably are right, but do remember Bill James saying 2nd basemen had the shortest career of any non catcher, and he guessed it was due to pivot related injuries.
SS has the runner in front of them. They can see the runner when waiting for the throw from the 1b and 2b. Second baseman have their backs to the runner when catching a ball form 3b and SS. I’d think for this reason it would be more dangerous for the 2b than SS.
Just a guess, but ….
I think shifting has meant that all-fields hitters are doing better relative to their peers.
This favors middle infielders overall.
So what does this mean for the positional adjustments? Shouldn’t all positions have roughly the same WAR? I guess it needs to be looked at with a larger sample than this.
The positional adjustment is more defense based. A great defensive SS has a much bigger impact than a great defensive 2B.
Does this lower the value of 2nd baseman, and raise the value of a LF? I debated this with someone 2 days ago. I contended that until all 30 teams have a “good” 2b, the value of a 2b will always be higher than a LF, assuming all things are the same. His point was that if a 2b could play LF, he would have more value as a LF.
Does a Ben Zobrist have more value as a 2b or LF, seeing as there is a positional scarcity in LF, and not one at 2b?
Interesting question but how would you really test it? In reality Ben Zobrist has more value because he is both a 2b and LF. How would you isolate Ben’s value at any one position?
The exact example I’m referring to was this. Nick Franklin is surging in TB, and playing LF and 2b. The Rays have Duffy, Forsythe, Adames, and Daniel Robertson capable of playing middle IF. Meanwhile, their LF situation next year is bad. If Franklin keeps hitting, some fans want him to be the Rays LF. My thought was don’t take him off 2b. Trade him to a team who needs a 2b, and get back a better hitter to play LF.
If you have a spare middle infielder, like Franklin, does it make sense to convert him to outfield? Half of baseball has a 2b who is posting a 115 wRC+, but only 22 OF’ers are posting a 115 wRC+.
I really don’t see what the problem here is. Put one of Miller/Franklin/Duffy/Forsythe in the outfield. You choose the one that will give your lineup the best combo of offense and defense. And if you can trade one for a better LFer, you do it.
I’d say you keep them all and move one to LF for now. Better depth.
Zobrist has 63 innings at LF vs 775 at 2B. He is not both positions anymore.
The point remains the same. For the history of baseball, if a guy could play LF and 2b, you played him at 2b, because good hitters there are rare. Not this year. Good hitters who play LF are rare. So, is a LF more valuable than a 2b, assuming his wOBA/wRC+, baserunning, will be the same, and he’ll be an above average defensive LF? Do you convert the backup 2b, or do you trade him because you’ll get more offense in return? Does that offensive LF exist, to keep Franklin on second base?
He also has quite a few in RF as well. He has 226 total innings as an OF this season.
I look at it this way. Someone capable of playing 2b defensively is capable of learning LF. Someone in who is in LF exclusively is, except in rare cases, not capable of transitioning to 2b. Playing 2b is harder, more athletic and more valuable because of the frequency they make plays.
Yeah the position adjustments are because of defensive reasons, not offence. Just because 2B are hitting better doesn’t change the fact it’s a tougher position.
LF offence is down because it used to be sluggers with poor D. Now it’s better defenders with weaker bats.
I remember the Mets trying to put Daniel Murphy in left field. The experiment literally lasted one day.
Not to say he’s a great defensive 2B, but Murph the LF made Murph the 2B look like Robby Alomar
Murph the LF made *me* look an All-Star. Worst experiment ever.
Wish I could have seen that. Almost as much as I could unsee the Hanley LF experiment. Bottom line is that OF is a huge adjustment for a guy who’s been exclusively an infielder for years. Not automatically doable.
Yes, the Blue Jays and Red Sox proved last year that while LF might be the place to put your weakest defensive players (after 1B), you can’t put just anyone out there. Collabello and Hanley were so bad they actually managed to cost their teams wins with LF defense, which is pretty amazing.
Since 2000, there have only been 20 30-HR seasons by second basemen (and a lot of those are the same few guys), and only 43 25-HR seasons by second basemen. Those are averages of a little over 1 and about 2.5 respectively. This year, there are 2 guys sitting at 26 right now and another 8 within striking distance of 25-HR seasons.
“list above does not include Cesar Hernandez, Rougned Odor, Joe Panik, Jonathan Schoop, Devon Travis or Kolten Wong, who are all young and have shown some degree of success in the big leagues, but that group is behind the veterans above and well behind the young groups of players at third base and shortstop. ”
incorrect.
Devon Travis is accumulating WAR at a rate better than all those names other than Altuve this year, and right there with the young players at 3B and SS.
Yeah there’s a massive PA difference. Not to mention that FG article the other day showing that this season Travis had one of the highest WAR/600 or WAR/700.
2.2 WAR in 66 games. If that is his true talent level, then he is a 5 WAR player as well. For his career he now has 4.5 WAR in 128 games, which is a bit larger sample size.
I was going to mention this, but since someone else did, I’ll just throw a “yeah” on things, and point out that if you pro-rate his production to the same number of games or PA as the leaders he lands right on the edge of the top 5 for WAR at 2B.
The lack of quality players in LF this year has been staggering, but it has in fact been among the game’s least productive position for a number of years..
Wins above average, LF:
2010: -0.3
2011: -0.5
2012: -0.1
2013: -0.5
2014: -0.1
2015: -0.4
2016: -0.5
On the hand, this is wins above average, 2B:
2010: 0.3
2011: 0.3
2012: 0.0
2013: 0.2
2014: 0.0
2015: 0.1
2016: 0.6
I think this makes some sense. Historically many major-league 2B were either failed or converted SS, selected from a pool that was below-average offensively. Lately teams have been more willing to consider bat-first infielders for 2B and try to work on making them adequate with the glove if that had been an issue. Guys like Kipnis, Murphy, Carpenter (and arguably Cano) would have been moved down the defensive spectrum much earlier in their careers.
Now it appears that LF has taken hold as the catch-all position for failed players from other positions (outfielders with weak arms, former infielders with poor range, etc.)
is this ALL ryan schimpf or MOSTLY ryan schimpf?
Having Matt Carpenter on that list as a 2B is definitely misleading… He has started 49 games at 3B, and another 9 at 1B, with only 29 at 2B.
His bat plays amazingly well at 2B but, to this point, he hasn’t logged as many innings there as 3B.
And furthermore, with Jedd Gyorko raking the way he is, and Matt Holliday and Matt Adams on the disabled list, I would suspect that MCarp continues to get the bulk of his playing time at 1B this season.