The Big Maple Heads to Boston
As the hours wound down on MLB’s collective bargaining agreement, the Red Sox took one last flier, signing left-handed pitcher James Paxton to a one-year deal worth $10 million, with a two-year, $26 million club option.
Never a bastion of durability — he’s never thrown enough innings in a major league season to qualify for the ERA title — Paxton’s had a particularly rough couple of seasons. In 2020, he underwent surgery to remove a peridiscal cyst, a type of spinal lesion, but last year’s late July start gave him enough time to be ready for the season. Unfortunately, when the season actually did get underway, he was missing about 3 mph from his fastball and suffered from significant soreness in his elbow. That soreness was diagnosed as a flexor strain, but there was no ligament damage found at the time. The New York Yankees had initially been hopeful that he’d recover to at least make a postseason appearance, but further setbacks prevented him from returning.
After signing with his old team, the Seattle Mariners, the 2021 season didn’t go any better. It only took five batters for an injury to knock Paxton out for the year, requiring Tommy John surgery. This can’t be described as anything but a brutal setback for a player who, from 2016-19, had finally settled into a pattern of being mostly healthy if used carefully.
Having had surgery in April, Paxton will not be available for innings at the start of the 2022 season, which explains the structure of his deal with Boston. The base contract is a $6 million salary for 2022, with the two-year, $26 million club option covering ’23 and ’24. If the option is declined after this season, Paxton will have to decide whether or not to exercise the conditional player option, either taking $4 million for 2023 or becoming a free agent. Those salary figures aren’t out of whack for a player who carries the risks involved here. Last offseason, Corey Kluber was coming off two injury-ruined years, but no Tommy John surgery, and got a one-year $11 million deal with the Yankees.
The ZiPS projection for Paxton is for entertainment purposes only. While we have a lot of historical information about recovery from Tommy John surgery at this point, Paxton’s health record isn’t particularly clean and tidy otherwise.
| Year | W | L | S | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 4.47 | 17 | 17 | 86.7 | 86 | 43 | 13 | 30 | 95 | 105 | 1.4 |
| 2023 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4.66 | 15 | 15 | 77.3 | 78 | 40 | 12 | 28 | 82 | 101 | 1.1 |
| 2024 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4.88 | 15 | 15 | 75.7 | 78 | 41 | 12 | 28 | 79 | 96 | 0.9 |
The projected 2022 performance seems consistent with the contractual terms; ZiPS doesn’t know precisely what Paxton’s recovery schedule is, and I’d take the under on the 17 starts. To get an idea of how fair two years, $26 million would be, let’s somewhat arbitrarily imagine what a successful 2022 return would look like. Let’s call it 15 starts, 75 innings, with home runs, walks, and strikeouts consistent with Paxton’s rates from 2016-19.
| Year | W | L | S | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4.03 | 15 | 15 | 76.0 | 71 | 34 | 9 | 25 | 86 | 117 | 1.6 |
| 2024 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4.14 | 14 | 14 | 67.3 | 64 | 31 | 9 | 23 | 74 | 113 | 1.3 |
ZiPS still wouldn’t bank on 130 or 140 innings given his health. Assuming $7.4 million per projected WAR in 2023 and 3% growth, that comes to about two years, $22.4 million.
To get an idea of just how much injuries have affected Paxton, let’s do a quickie ZiPS Time Warp, going back to after the 2017 season. Let’s give Paxton his first ERA-qualifying season and let the chips fall from there.
| Year | W | L | S | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 3.22 | 29 | 29 | 162.0 | 139 | 58 | 16 | 45 | 185 | 128 | 3.5 |
| 2019 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3.38 | 26 | 26 | 143.7 | 126 | 54 | 15 | 42 | 159 | 122 | 2.8 |
| 2020 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3.57 | 26 | 26 | 141.0 | 127 | 56 | 15 | 42 | 151 | 116 | 2.5 |
| 2021 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 3.56 | 24 | 24 | 131.3 | 118 | 52 | 14 | 39 | 141 | 116 | 2.4 |
| 2022 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3.59 | 23 | 23 | 123.0 | 111 | 49 | 13 | 37 | 133 | 115 | 2.2 |
| 2023 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 3.68 | 21 | 21 | 115.0 | 105 | 47 | 13 | 36 | 125 | 112 | 1.9 |
| 2024 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 3.80 | 20 | 20 | 106.7 | 99 | 45 | 13 | 34 | 115 | 109 | 1.7 |
That’s a healthier version of Paxton, though I’m hardly making him into Old Hoss Radbourn. If I project out the rest of his career on those terms, he still ends up around 150 wins with an ERA of 3.85 and 30.1 career WAR. Hopefully, there’s still time for his body to find a way back to that path.
One thing I’m wondering — and it’s something that won’t be answered for months, for obvious reasons — is whether this might actually be it for Boston’s rotation work this offseason. The team’s 2021 largely worked out because the rotation, made up almost entirely of pitchers with long injury histories, remained incredibly healthy. It feels a bit like the Red Sox are poised to try that again next year. Chris Sale will start the season in the rotation this time, but given his recent health record, one can’t be super confident in his availability, and both Paxton and Boston’s other free agent signee, Rich Hill (whose deal Ben Clemens will address soon), have long had issues of their own. Nathan Eovaldi, Sale, Nick Pivetta, and Hill seem likely to be the front four to start 2022, with Michael Wacha and Tanner Houck competing for the final spot and Paxton occupying Sale’s 2021 role as the hopefully-conquering late-season hero. ZiPS doesn’t have a ton of confidence in Connor Seabold, but if he’s pitching well in Triple-A, I imagine he’ll be in the mix for starts at some point as well.
Even if the Red Sox do go after another free agent pitcher, though, who really moves the needle at this point? A lot of the better pitchers available have already signed, and Clayton Kershaw, who has to be considered an injury risk as well, seems more likely to end up in Texas than Boston if he doesn’t return to the Dodgers. Carlos Rodón is interesting — though likely not as safe as Kevin Gausman or Robbie Ray would have been — but there’s a big drop-off after that.
In any case, those answers will come later. For now, James Paxton has signed a deal with the Red Sox that I find to be fundamentally fair, giving him both some guaranteed cash now and an employer with a lucrative interest in him being a healthy contributor in 2023 and ’24. If the Red Sox make a big score, it also means that Paxton will hit the market after 2024 with a last chance to land a big contract and claw back the wins that his health has stolen from him. That’s an outcome worth rooting for.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Where can I get Statcast info on Old Hoss Radbourn?
The “Old” in Old Hoss Radbourn seems appropriate in more ways than one here.
According to Wikipedia, he was the first person ever photographed giving the middle finger to someone. Now that’s a legacy to be proud of.
Arguably more legendary than his 60 win season
Old Hoss’s curveball was +1 hindquarter of a foal in vertical drop, but he could tweak it to throw a sweeper that broke the width of a Burgundy barrel.
LMHAO!!!!!!!!!
It’s kind of limited since they could only calculate exit velocities by having guys on horses riding alongside batted balls to get velocity readings.
Yeah, it wasn’t until they switched to guys on motorcycles that the readings became at all accurate.
As a Yankees fan, I approve of this signing.
I know Old Hoss Radbourn is the go-to for guys who pitched a lot but that was a long time ago! In 1883, the year where he pitched about 630 innings, the guy led the league in home runs only hit 14 of them. This is so alien to us that it scarcely resembles the modern game.
In more recent times, the guy who I’ve always turned to is Nolan Ryan, who in addition to pitching forever also had a couple of 300-inning seasons under his belt in the 1970s. The 1970s were a glorious time if you liked pitchers 300 innings. Gaylord Perry, Wilbur Wood and Mickey Lolich all did it about 5 or 6 times (I think). From 1971-1973 Wilbur Wood threw for over a thousand innings, and he added another 600 in 1974-1975.
Ryan’s durability doesn’t get talked about enough. He was blessed with a great fastball, but more than that he was blessed with what may be the most durable arm in the history of baseball. In the live-ball era, only knuckleballer Phil Neikro has more career innings pitched.
It’s also worth noting that in the earlier part of his era where a lot of guys were pitching to contact he was striking out 9 or 10 guys a game (and, for that matter, walking 4-6). Ryan was throwing a ton of pitches.
In the latter part of his career he was a spokesman for Advil and I always thought “yep, that’s the kind of guy I want pitching* my painkiller.”
*double meaning not noticed until after I posted but I’m not taking it out now
There were certainly games where Ryan had over 200 pitches.
He had over a 10% BB ratio every year until he turned 37..then it finally dropped into the 9’s. In 27 years, he had 22 years with a BB ratio above 10% & 5 yrs between 9 & 10%.
While throwing 280+ innings 5 of 6 years between 1972-1977. He had over 500 combined K + BB 4x, maxing out at 569 in 1974.
We’ll never see anyone like him again.
Finding numbers on this are surprisingly difficult but in 1974 it appears he had a game where he threw 235 pitches, striking out 19 batters and walking 10 in 13 innings. He threw 26 complete games that year.
He’s only 5th in innings pitched all time but considering his combined K and BB rates were somewhere between 3x-5x more than Cy Young and Pud Galvin and twice as high as Walter Johnson (who only leads Ryan by 600 innings anyway) he may very well have thrown the most pitches of all time.
There was talk early last season from the organization that it felt Whitlock’s ultimate role would be as a starter, but that was back around the start of the 2021 season and I’m not sure if the organization still feels that way. Not that a guy in Whitlock’s situation can really be counted on either, but it will be interesting to see what roles some of these guys are competing for come Spring Training.
Just to clarify, you’re saying you’d project his 2022 at about what ZIPS does minus 2 starts? So overall you’re looking at:
2022: 1.2 WAR
2023: 1.6 WAR
2024: 1.3 WAR
That’s 4.1 WAR for $32. mil. Pretty good, I’d say. If he’s not healthy, it’s $6 mil down the drain and possibly another $4 mil. if he’s reaaalllly not healthy.
“One thing I’m wondering — and it’s something that won’t be answered for months, for obvious reasons — is whether this might actually be it for Boston’s rotation work this offseason. ”
I have the same question. They did a nice job patching together the rotation last year but losing ERod’s 30 starts leaves a big hole to fill beyond the 44 they got from Perez and Richards.
I’m not sure why it’s called a one-year $10 million deal. It sounds like $6 million for 2022 and if the Red Sox decline the two year team option, Paxson either has a $4 million option for 2023 (making it a two-year $10 million contract) or can become a free agent (so a one-year $6 million contract) I don’t see anything here about a $4 million buyout if the Red Sox decline the extra 2 years.
I’m also really confused by this.
I’m resigned to the fact that I’m going to predict James Paxton to be great every year, and every year he’s going to let me down
Although TJ surgeries are a mentally taxing endeavor, it seems to be an opportunity for players to re-evaluate strength and conditioning as they stare at the potential end of their careers.
As someone who targets value in fantasy, the disconnect between TJ returnees’ actual production and our expectations in their first 12 months since they returned to throwing, provides ample opportunity to profit. The over-expectation forces prices up to where the players become ignored due to how negative their values were for the season. This imparts lower-than-expected projections in their second season (post 22 months) than they are actually going to produce. Now, this doesn’t work the same in the pros, but the understanding that players have a recipe for returning down to a science where teams are comfortable with the risk.
Paxton’s injury history isn’t pretty, but the time off likely will provide him solid respite to figure out how to stay healthier and change his routines. If he fails to do this, the Red Sox’s investment in him isn’t massive so it doesn’t hurt them. If he succeeds, there are two seasons of solid production at limited cost for SP in this league.
This is how Bloom is acquiring solid SP for a team that has very little success developing SPs on their farm. Otherwise, they would be stuck doling out huge cash figures to free agents that eventually box out their positional players from getting the big raises and long contracts that solidify a team’s longevity as a contender.
This is a solid value gambit for Bloom. If Paxton comes back and is good, they get him for two extra years at what looks like will be a below-market rate. If he stays hurt or bottoms out, it’s essentially just 2 years $10M, which is a tolerable loss.
It doesn’t fix Boston’s stability problem, but I still think this rotation is less risky than last year’s, if only because they have more bodies in the mix this time
As a Sox fan, I’d feel much better about this deal if they had resigned ERod, as in hindsight looks like a very reasonable contract and they haven’t looked to improve at SP3. Wacha/Hill IMHO are going to give you the same innings/safety net as Richards/Perez and as much as fans want to see it, both Houck and Whitlock have options and had the trust of Cora to go 5 innings in a start or 2 innings out of the BP. Between these deals, the JBJ trade, and 40 man, I still think Bloom has a plan in place, but as a fan who pays top dollar for bleacher seats, $15 for a bud light, and $300 for a sports package when ownership feels the need to spend a billion on a Pittsburgh hockey team, the good faith is wearing thin. Despite the contrary, Boston is not a top sports market, we just like our teams. https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/nba-market-size-nfl-mlb-nhl-nielsen-ratings/
I’m not sure what your definition of top sports market is. Based on your link, it’s a top 10 market. It’s not New York, LA, or Chicago, I guess (though they each have two teams), but it’s not like Pittsburgh, KC, Cincy or Milwaukee.
You seemed to skip Whittlock and Crawford to get to Seabold. For the first time in a long time, I’m actually happy with the Red Sox starting pitching depth.
Unfortunately there are questions at the back-end of the bullpen. A hard-throwing, high-strikeout pitcher coming off an injury may just be the answer. I’m predicting he’ll be closing games come October (assuming there’s a season).
Kutter is definitely interesting, and we know that Whitlock has the stuff to make some waves.
I’m just not sure they mess with a good thing on Whitlock given that he stayed healthy.
Can’t see Whitlock going to the rotation. Between the injury history, the platoon splits, and the reliance on a velo bump, it doesn’t seem like a logical fit
I’m only aware of the one injury which required tommy John surgery (which is expected of pitchers at some point in their career) 3 years ago. Are there other injuries you’re referring to?
Velo bump is normal for all pitchers who move to the bullpen. As we haven’t seen him start since the TJ surgery, it’s hard to say how much it would affect the velocity of his fastball, as pitchers often come back stronger from the surgery.
The platoon splits are a concern, but he wasn’t used heavily in righty-righty situations (about 1/3 of PA against lefties in 2021) so this should affect his performance differently and given his 4-pitch mix, which includes a changeup, he has the tools to get lefties out (may just need more refinement/adjustment).
The Red Sox have consistently maintained that they see him as a starter (they were unable to use him in that rule last year due to the rule-5 restrictions preventing him from building up arm strength in the minors), and that’s likely where they gain the most value from him long-term. (Of course short term need is still in the bullpen, so we will see what happens this year)
Is there reason to expect he would not remain healthy? Aside from the common TJ surgery from 2018, and a back strain in college, I’m not aware of any other injuries.
Wouldn’t the greatest long-term value come from Whitlock starting? Maybe that’s 2023 out of necessity, but that’s been the Red Sox public plan for him to this point.
Happy for Paxton. Even though he hasn’t pitched much since 2019, he has made life changing money in that span. I got to watch him throw a complete game against Detroit in May of 2018, his first start since he threw that no-hitter in Toronto. He was every bit as advertised. Struck out a lot of hitters, brought his mid-upper 90s heater and nasty breaking balls, kept the ball in the yard, and gave his bullpen the day off. During that 3-4 year peak from 2016-2019 when he made it to the mound, the dude was nails.
The headline got me thinking, Brusdar Graterol’s new nickname should be “The Big Ample”
Can ZIPS see the difference between Paxton putting up 75 good innings next year after coming back midseason from TJ surgery and not getting injured again and starting the beginning of next season and getting injured again?
Never read the term” Big Maple” associated with anyone. I presume that the Maple, being a durable tree, is used as an oxymoron in this instance.
I’m totally on board with the Red Sox plan to sign Rodon and Kershaw to add to Paxton, Sale and Hill so they can have two rotation spots filled by lefties.