The Biggest Losers in a Seasonless Season

While we can hope there’s a 2020 season that provides both quality baseball and sufficient safety protocols for players, team personnel, and those who work in the game’s orbit, a lot of things have to come together to make such a season happen. A number of COVID-19-related health concerns and continued issues between labor and ownership could cause the season to stall before it ever starts.

In a very real sense, if this happens, everybody loses. But in a baseball sense, the consequences of a lost 2020 season won’t weigh equally on every team. While we maintain the fiction that every team enters the season with a real chance to win the World Series, our story’s ending is more like that of one of those German fairy tales; even if Ron Gardenhire is unlikely to be eaten by a wolf, the Detroit Tigers were always long shots to go 70-92.

Teams had different ideas about what they wanted to accomplish in 2020, and for some teams, this season was more crucial for their long-term goals — in one way or another — than it was for others.

Cincinnati Reds

Many analysts, myself included, have bemoaned the lack of ambition many teams have displayed the last few offseasons, with winning clubs seemingly most concerned with not paying luxury tax penalties or spinning tales of financial hardship too fanciful even for the Brothers Grimm.

With so many teams content with a zig to mediocrity, the Cincinnati Reds have tried to take a very refreshing zag. After losing 95 games in 2018, the Reds decided to push open their window rather than waiting for it to do so on its own, acquiring Yasiel Puig, Sonny Gray (plus a contract extension), Tanner Roark, Alex Wood, and Matt Kemp. And the year prior, the Reds went all-in, putting a great deal of effort into their long shot quest to sign Shohei Ohtani, who eventually signed with the Angels.

For this good-faith effort to put together a winning team, the Reds were rewarded with…87 losses. But they didn’t give up their ideas about contending quickly, acquiring Trevor Bauer and, over the offseason, signing Mike Moustakas, Nick Castellanos, Wade Miley, and Shogo Akiyama. With these additions, ZiPS projects 2020 as Cincinnati’s greatest concentration of talent over the next five seasons. Bauer and Anthony DeSclafani are both free agents after 2020 regardless of whether games are played this year. Castellanos is unlikely to opt-out given baseball’s financial situation, but very little of the team’s core of talent projects to be better in 2021 than they do this year.

Tampa Bay Rays

The Tampa Bay Rays don’t face the same kind of ticking clock that other teams do, with no players headed to free agency and team options on Charlie Morton and Mike Zunino. But with the much-reduced amateur draft likely resulting in more players deciding to go to college rather than take forced-and-deferred pennies on the dollar, there may be less new talent entering baseball this year than at any other time in recent memory. This is important for the Rays, whose model of — let’s be generous — thrift relies on a constant inflow of talent.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

That makes the “now” more important for the Rays than it typically is, and they were in an excellent position to win more than 90 games again. The ZiPS projection system has the Rays essentially the equal of any team except for the Yankees and Dodgers, and even in the AL East, ZiPS still gave Tampa a puncher’s chance of toppling New York. With a short season, those odds get even better, as it’s easier to best a better team over 82 games than 162. The Rays are one of the teams least reliant on attendance for their revenue, so there’s less to lose in fanless games. With no other realistic contenders in the division other than the Yankees – sorry, Toronto — this may have been Tampa’s best chance to win their first AL East crown since 2010.

Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers are quite likely to be an excellent team in 2021 and beyond, but as with the Reds, there’s some storybook cruelty here with the Mookie Betts situation. Without a season, the Dodgers will still retain the services of David Price and Brusdar Graterol, but the primary reason the Dodgers were willing to give up Alex Verdugo and Jeter Downs was to retain the services of Betts. Now there’s a chance that after the trade that most represented the Dodgers going all-in, Betts never plays a game in a Dodgers jersey. Even Marlins fans have that week of Mike Piazza to remember. Just imagine if the Red Sox had successfully held out for Dustin May or Gavin Lux!

After the Angels’ confusing case of cold feet, the Joc Pederson trade fell through before the pandemic hit, leaving the Dodgers missing one of the possible fill-ins for Justin Turner, a free agent entering 2021. Assuming a 94% chance that the Dodgers pick up Jimmy Nelson’s $2 million option for 2021 — that’s the probability ZiPS gives for him being worth it for the team — the Dodgers will have 15 depth-chart projected 2020 wins walking away after the season, the most in baseball.

Baltimore Orioles

This was largely a “throw-things-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks” season for the Orioles. The team has a lot of interesting names in the minors, but most of those players need to accumulate experience rather than add one last coat of polish. The diminished amateur draft and its budget and the (likely) lack of a minor-league season will result in Baltimore answering none of their myriad unanswered questions. With a partial major league season and a taxi squad, there would at least be an opportunity to learn more about Adley Rutschman. A lost development year arguably hurts the Orioles more than a team of established veterans.

Oakland Athletics

The Mariners are rebuilding, the Rangers have serious offensive holes, and the Angels have some depth concerns and an predilection for still playing Albert Pujols. With the Astros reeling from their trash cananigans, the loss of Gerrit Cole, and Justin Verlander recovering from groin surgery, Oakland had a real shot to topple the reigning World Series runners-up. Without a season, the unsigned Marcus Semien may have played his last game in Oakland, with his 4.7 projected wins accounting for nearly half of the 11 that are forecast to hit free agency next winter (fifth in baseball). With the world economic collapse, the odds of building a new stadium anytime soon have gotten longer, meaning 2020 may be as good as it gets.

…

Using the projected depth charts, I ranked all 30 teams by 2020 wins projected to hit free agency this winter. For players with player or club options, I pro-rated the wins by the projected likelihood those options are picked up or exercised after the season. The Yankees mostly get to “keep” their wins, as Giancarlo Stanton is projected as being overwhelmingly unlikely to opt-out, while the Rockies “lose” Jake McGee‘s and Bryan Shaw’s projected wins, as those options are not being picked up (all zero wins).

Departing 2020 Wins
Team Departing WAR
Los Angeles Dodgers 15.0
Minnesota Twins 12.3
New York Yankees 10.7
New York Mets 10.7
Oakland Athletics 10.6
Philadelphia Phillies 10.4
Boston Red Sox 9.8
Atlanta Braves 8.8
Houston Astros 8.5
Arizona Diamondbacks 8.1
Cincinnati Reds 7.4
Los Angeles Angels 7.2
Detroit Tigers 6.9
Texas Rangers 6.5
Cleveland Indians 6.5
San Diego Padres 6.3
Chicago Cubs 5.9
San Francisco Giants 5.7
Toronto Blue Jays 5.1
St. Louis Cardinals 4.6
Washington Nationals 4.5
Milwaukee Brewers 4.4
Kansas City Royals 4.4
Miami Marlins 3.8
Pittsburgh Pirates 3.4
Chicago White Sox 2.9
Seattle Mariners 1.6
Tampa Bay Rays 0.9
Baltimore Orioles 0.7
Colorado Rockies 0.0




Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 years ago

Excellent work, Dan!

HamelinROY
6 years ago

I would be interested if you would add a column with the number of players that make up the WAR that each team is losing. If Team A is losing 5 WAR across 5 players, they are likely in a much better situation than Team B losing 5 WAR from just one player.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019🏆 MVP
6 years ago
Reply to  HamelinROY

Yep. This begs for a series with all of the teams discussed!

Willians Astu-stu-studilloMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  HamelinROY

How about a column with the combined 2020 salaries of all departing players? The Yankees are losing eleven wins, yes, but they’re saving $40M on Jacoby Ellsbury and JA Happ alone.

Sarachim
6 years ago
Reply to  HamelinROY

I’m not sure it makes sense to count players who’ve already been through free agency once as “lost” when they hit FA again- the team can generally re-sign or replace them at a similar cost and end up back where they started.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  HamelinROY

On the other hand, if Team B manages to resign that one 5 WAR player, then they’re the ones in better shape for next season.

frazier15n
6 years ago

Great work, Dan!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

I must have missed this: If the season doesn’t happen, does everyone get a year of service time anyway?

jtmorgan
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

In the March agreement if the season isn’t played all players earn service time equal to what they earned in 2019.

jsolid
6 years ago
Reply to  jtmorgan

Most importantly – does Ichiro also get service time credit, yet again pushing back his HOF clock?

Dag Gummit
6 years ago
Reply to  jsolid

Oooh. That’s a good question RE: the unique situation with Ichiro.

Sarachim
6 years ago
Reply to  jsolid

The HOF is independent of MLB and not a party to its deals with the MLBPA, so they can do whatever they want with Ichiro (and Sabathia, and anyone else who retired after 2019 that I’m missing.) I’d be surprised if they make anyone who doesn’t play in 2021 wait an extra year.

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  jsolid

Eligibility rules from the HOF website:

C. Player shall have ceased to be an active player in the Major Leagues at least five (5) calendar years preceding the election but may be otherwise connected with baseball.

https://baseballhall.org/hall-of-famers/rules/bbwaa-rules-for-election

Joe23
6 years ago

“cananigans.” Brilliant.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago

Seems like the Twins are a bigger losers here than the Orioles, right?

ajb3313
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Yeah. I’d rather be a bad team with no intention of being good losing a year of opportunity to see what I have in young players than a good team intent on a deep postseason run losing a year of production from good players.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

I don’t understand the inclusion of any bad teams on a “mist to lose” list. The real answers are any teams that were supposed to be good that aren’t huge payroll teams. The Yankees and Dodgers can realistically never have their windows close by being smart.

The interesting team here is the Astros. By most measures, this is devastating as they are in danger of a precipitous decline and 2020 could have been the last good shot at another title. On the other hand, you know…..

emh1969
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Also the Indians. Although I don’t agree, the general consensus is that their window is closing rapidly. And it means one less year of Lindor. Plus, no 2020 means that they’ll have to make a decision about what to do with him for 2021 without the benefit of data from the 2020 season.

DustyColorado
6 years ago

The Twins can easily replace that 12.3 WAR by simply promoting Wander Javier.

Kevbot034
6 years ago
Reply to  DustyColorado

This one made me laugh, I appreciate it.

AnonMember since 2020
6 years ago

I’m sure this has been covered and I have just missed it, but if there is no season (or for that matter, a shortened season at reduced payroll) do teams get to reset the competitive balance tax?

AS to the article, I have to agree with the others that the Twins are the big losers here. They were the absolute most obvious small-market team built to win now and with no season:
– they lose Cruz (who is now a year older and will be 40 if they decide to resign him)
– Both their big acquisitions (Donaldson and Maeda) are now a year older and on the wrong side of 32
– They lose years right in the primes of Kepler, Sano, Polanco, Buxton and Berrios who are all 26-27

Spa City
6 years ago

The Rockies could really benefit quite a bit relative to other teams. Not only do they lose no WAR… They get to avoid paying the final year of Davis, McGee, Murphy and Shaw, while getting a big step down on Desmond’s salary in 2021.

Colorado’s horrible contracts are mitigated by a lost season. They have nearly $60MM going to Davis, Murphy, McGee, Shaw, and Desmond in 2020 – which they could avoid paying if the season is canceled. With buyouts and reduced salaries next year, the Rockies could save nearly $50MM that would buy them (at best) zero WAR in 2021.

Of course, they will probably blow that $ on a few more absurd contracts. Rockies will do what they always do.

Sarachim
6 years ago
Reply to  Spa City

I’m not sure what exactly the benefit is, here. The Rockies turn a profit when they play, bad contracts or no. They won’t gain any advantage in future seasons by skipping one in which they could have made money.

Spa City
6 years ago
Reply to  Sarachim

Clearly yes. I am only speaking of the benefit relative to other teams. I think the point of the article was to assess the impact of the shut down on some teams relative to others.

In my view, Rockies’ have a LOT of negative value tied up in a few bloated contracts. They can basically offset nearly $60MM of their losses by getting out of paying on negative-value contracts, and when (if) baseball returns in 2021, the players they will “lose” in expiring contracts are players they look forward to losing.

I don’t mean they benefit by 2020 being cancelled. I only mean the damage to them is less relative to other teams.

sadhulkMember since 2020
6 years ago

I wonder what kind of impact cancelling the minors will have on prospect development. I think guys in rookie ball are probably just getting delayed working on stuff in a compound setting, but I’m worried this might stunt the development of players closer to the majors who aren’t quite ready for the majors but need that high level competition to continue to polish.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019🏆 MVP
6 years ago

Really enjoyed this one, thanks Dan. It has me thinking. The Betts trade was in February, when COVID was well under way overseas (and anecdotally even in the U.S.). What if….what if the Red Sox suspected the season would be in serious jeopardy *before* the trade? Suddenly, a year of Betts isn’t a year of Betts, it’s something potentially a lot less. And they got back Verdugo, who wasn’t ready to help yet…but didn’t really need to help, since by Boston’s theoretical position, the season might be gone. And Verdugo & Wong are young enough to still retain their value after 2020.

It’s wild speculation but it’s fun to think about. Because teams had to know about the virus by February. There’s no way front offices weren’t considering its potential effects.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

I’ve been joking about this for forever but yeah john Henry knew

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

The Chinese Communist Party . Communists = Red. RED SOX.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

I mean, I stopped doing fantasy drafts in early February because I was pretty certain season would be delayed if it happened at all. Now, if I didn’t do fantasy drafts with thousands on the line, one would think an owner of a team worth more than a billion dollars would have access to the same information, right? He had to at the very minimum have some advisors

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  carter

Given he owns my other true love and didn’t pull the trigger on Werner because of this, well, it’s hard to think they weren’t at least contingency planning

yeahnah
6 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

He didn’t pull the trigger on Werner because he believes on an even playing field. A front 4 of Werner, Salah, Firmino and Mane is just not fair.

Stevil
6 years ago

I’ve wondered if Colorado might be the least hurt by this. Lot of bad contracts coming off the books this coming offseason and Desmond’s final year drops to 8 million, so it isn’t surprising that they’re at the bottom of the chart above.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Stevil

If Ian Desmond didn’t exist Paul manafort would have to invent him (they’ll give, I dunno, Ryan Zimmerman or josh Donaldson a ton of money to shag flies and fall off the aging cliff)

fjtorres
6 years ago

What’s the story on minor leaguers?
Does the team or the player lose tbe year? The MLBPA deal doesn’t cover them.

Lanidrac
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Ah, that’s right. Minor league service time counts for both minor league free agency and Rule 5 draft eligibility. That’s a good question.

schwejk
6 years ago

Is there a way of measuring which teams are most negatively effected by Covid?

Teams with a lot of talent in the minors like the Marlins who miss an important year of develepmont? Is a year of misssed development more harmful to a 19 year old rookie in the Gulf Coast league or to a 23 year old player in AAA who is on the edge of making the majors? Does not playing for a year have the same positive/negative effect on a player’s performance like one year of wear and tear and development?

OR teams with aging, soon to be free agents, players like the Dodgers? Is not being exposed to wear and tear and potential injuries for a player like Mookie Betts more beneficial than adding number to his impressive stats? How would weigh potential bidders for Betts this year not playing?

Spitball McPhee
6 years ago

ditto Jays 🙁

Brad JohnsonMember
6 years ago

The Phillies might be 6th on the departing WAR list, but it sure feels like they’re losing this a lot harder than anyone else. They spent all that Bryce Harper money for this specific season to take this specific shot. In a Covid-less alternate universe, they probably have Realmuto on a contract extension by now. At the very least, they get 2 seasons for the price of Sixto and Alfaro. Now, Realmuto is looking likely to test the market (with or without a season). They miss out on a bargain year of Gregorius, Wheeler slips to the wrong side of 30, and they remain no closer to sorting out which of their back-end SPs are playable.

And while you can point to some similar parallels with the Dodgers, their farm system is stuffed to the gills. They literally have 50 MLB quality players – guys who could be league average in some role right now. The Phillies have Spencer Howard, Alec Bohm, and a bunch of unripe, suspect fruit.

BirdyMarte6
6 years ago

Pirates lose their entire roster next year? +2WAR! Go Bucs

Lanidrac
6 years ago

The good news for Orioles fans in the event of a cancelled season: That’s one less season they have to watch Chris Davis being massively overpaid to be a black hole in the lineup.

Daevric
6 years ago

I think the Red Sox should be on this list, though for a very different reason than the others. Moving Betts and Price gave them the ability to reset their tax penalties this season, presumably in order to go back over next year like the Yankees did this off-season with Cole. With no season, there’s no reset, so any major free agents they might have had their eyes on next winter will likely be off the table, thus wasting another year of prime Bogaerts and Devers.