The Blue Jays Soar Into Playoff Position
Mere weeks ago, the Toronto Blue Jays were 66-61, the last of five teams in contention for two Wild Card spots. They looked the part — their +112 run differential led those five, and adding José Berríos at the deadline helped stabilize their rotation. That’s all well and good, but they were 6.5 games out of the second Wild Card, and their bullpen was undoing a lot of the rotation’s good work, especially new acquisition Brad Hand’s 8.22 ERA and 8.12 FIP.
Despite their evident talent, our playoff odds game them only a 4.7% chance of reaching the playoffs at their nadir on August 27. A one-in-20 shot isn’t impossible — less than 5% of plate appearances end in a home run, and yet we see tons of those every day — but things didn’t look good for Toronto. But here we are, three weeks later, and the Jays are in the first Wild Card spot (in a tie for it, but still). How did those rampaging Jays do it? Let’s take a look. Here’s a graph of what we’ll be talking about:

First things first: if you want to overcome a big deficit quickly, stop losing. The Jays have gone 14-2 in their past 16 games, scoring a comical 7.5 runs per game while allowing just over four themselves. That’s good for a Pythagorean record of .774 (using the Pythagenpat formulation of it), or in regular English, “Stop using a record estimator when a team is scoring twice as many runs as they allow, of course they’re doing well.”
Partially, they’ve done it by dunking on the Orioles. Over the weekend, they scored 44 runs in a three-game stretch against Baltimore, surging into playoff position in the process. Seven of their past 16 games have come against the Orioles, in fact, and an easy schedule is one way back into contention.
But don’t go blaming this all on the O’s. The Blue Jays have gone 5-2 in those seven games, which means that teams with bird mascots have won each of the Blue Jays’ last 16 games. They also played a seven-game stretch against the Yankees and A’s, two teams they were chasing for a playoff spot, in this stretch — and went 7-0. Maybe we shouldn’t be too hard on the Orioles.
How do you score 125 runs in 16 games? You need everyone to contribute, and that’s certainly happened here. Over that stretch, Vladimir Guerrero Jr. is hitting .373/.425/.731 with eight home runs — and he doesn’t even have the best batting line among starters. That would be Lourdes Gurriel Jr., whose .392/.500/.824 contribution works out to a 243 wRC+. The team as a whole is hitting .304/.390/.582. That works out to a .409 team wOBA, a batting line that would be the fifth-best individual player in baseball over the course of the season. Put another way, since August 27 the Jays are collectively hitting like Fernando Tatis Jr.’s season-long line. That’s pretty good!
Even with that barrage of run scoring, it’s hard to go 14-2. You’re going to need to win close games virtually 100% of the time to put up such a good record. In this 16-game stretch, the Blue Jays have done just that. They’re 5-0 in one run games, though in fairness their last game before this stretch was a one-run loss to the lowly Tigers. But we’re looking from their lowest point, and since hitting rock bottom in that 2-1 loss to Detroit, they’ve simply been unbeatable in close games.
That’s perhaps too harsh on their pitching, though. Sure, they’re scoring a lot of runs and winning close games. But they’re also doing a great job preventing runs, and the starters especially have been up to the task. The starting rotation the Jays envisioned when trading for Berríos — him at the top, followed by Robbie Ray, Hyun Jin Ryu, Steven Matz, and Alek Manoah — has made 15 of the 16 starts, with Thomas Hatch chipping in a spot start when they had a double-header.
Health is never a given when it comes to pitching — avoiding bullpen games and frequent minor league spot starts is a good way to get ahead. But the Jays’ rotation has been more than that. They’ve looked excellent in addition to being durable — a 27.9% strikeout rate (second in baseball), 7% walk rate (11th-best), 3.65 FIP (sixth-best), and 3.64 SIERA (third-best) all underscore that their 3.99 ERA, fifth-best in the majors over that span, has been earned.
This seems like as good of a spot as any to talk about their dramatic comeback in our playoff odds. A 5% long-shot turning into an odds-on favorite to make the playoffs in less than three weeks is an indictment of the odds… right?
It won’t surprise you to learn that I don’t think so. Rather than just appeal to authority, however — These are our odds! We like them! Trust us! — I thought it would be useful to roughly explain what’s going on here. We’re going to start from what I consider a reasonable position: that today’s 66.3% odds accurately reflect reality. Given where they are — tied with the Red Sox for the first Wild Card spot, a mere one game ahead of the Yankees and three games ahead of some AL West interlopers — a two-thirds shot at the postseason seems about right. That’s a far sight removed from 5% odds, but the Jays’ recent performance has been far from average. If each game were a coin flip, their odds of winning 14 of 16 games would be roughly 0.2%. If we’re looking into how the Jays have gone from long-shots to juggernauts, we have to acknowledge that on August 27, we didn’t know that they’d go on a dominant winning streak.
Our playoff odds work by simulating the remainder of the season 20,000 times and working out how often each team makes the playoffs in those simulations. We use our estimate of each team’s strength, the actual schedule, and an adjustment for home-field advantage to create odds for each game, then simulate each game to work out final standings.
Our projections do better than my naive 50% estimation, so let’s account for that. The Jays have played an easy schedule on the whole, and we also think they’re quite good. Our game odds, which account for each team’s starting pitchers and lineups, gave them an average 60% chance of winning each of the games in this recent stretch.
That’s a huge tailwind. I plugged in the actual game odds and simulated this 16-game stretch a million times — no need to constrain myself to 20,000 for such a small snippet of the schedule. The Jays went 14-2 or better 1.5% of the time, nearly seven times as frequently as you’d expect if every game was a pure tossup.
In 20,000 simulations, you’d expect something with a 1.5% chance of happening to occur roughly 300 times. Our odds certainly knew that the Jays going on a run was a possibility — they simply didn’t consider it a strong one. And here’s the wild part: that’s not nearly enough. The second key part of the Jays’ resurgence has been almost completely outside of their control. Aside from a four-game series in New York, Toronto hasn’t had much to say about the Yankees going 3-12 since August 27, falling from 9.5 games ahead of Toronto to a game back.
That stretch of futility is even less likely than the Jays’ run of victories. We think that both teams are excellent — in fact, against a neutral schedule, we project them for matching .581 winning percentages the rest of the year. The Yankees have intermittently dealt with injuries, but even so, our odds gave them an average 57% chance of winning each of these past 15 games. Given that, the odds of winning three or fewer games (again, using a million simulations of our exact odds) are roughly 0.4%.
If these two events were independent, you’d expect them to happen together once every 16,500 simulations, or 0.006% of the time. That would have roughly no weight in our playoff odds — one-ish simulation out of 20,000 simply doesn’t matter very much. The odds are higher than that, though; the teams played each other in four games, and Toronto swept the series.
That means we’re actually asking for the Yankees’ odds of going 3-8 in non-Jays games, which comes out to just over 3%. The combined probability of a Jays winning streak and Yankees losing streak thus climbs to .05%, or one every 2,000 simulations. That’s still vanishingly unlikely — 10 simulations out of 20,000 still don’t matter all that much in the grand scheme of things.
This understates things slightly, of course, because we’d still be having this discussion if the Jays had gone 13-3 and the Yankees 4-11. If we set that as the cutoff — records that would put Toronto one game back in the Wild Card chase — that’s closer to a 0.06%-likely event, or once every 175 simulations. It’s still quite unlikely — one out of 170 is much closer to zero than you think. A batter is roughly twice as likely to get hit by a pitch in a given plate appearance, and that hardly happens all the time. Watch a random plate appearance today — only one. Did that batter get hit by a pitch?
The main point in all of this is that the Jays have gone on a tremendous run since August 27. The odds of them catching fire while the rest of the Wild Card field treaded water or collapsed simply weren’t that high. It’s not just that Toronto has ripped off their run; they’ve also gained more ground than you’d expect by doing so:
| Team | Wins | Losses | Games Gained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Blue Jays | 14 | 2 | – |
| Seattle Mariners | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Oakland A’s | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Boston Red Sox | 7 | 8 | 6.5 |
| New York Yankees | 3 | 12 | 10.5 |
Think of it this way: to get into pole position for a Wild Card spot, the Jays needed an opening. The rest of the AL provided it by scuffling through an uninspiring stretch. Still, it was a minute opening. If Toronto went 10-6 — that’s a 100-win pace for the year — they’d be three games back of the playoffs with only 19 games to play, a precarious position. If the Yankees had gone a desultory 7-8 — hardly an unachievable pace — the result would be the same. The reason this feels so sudden and exciting is because it issudden and exciting. The Jays got here by playing really well, and that’s a necessary ingredient, but so is having the right conditions for success — namely the teams around them faltering just enough to let Toronto roar past.
To underscore this point, I had FanGraphs overlord and overall playoff odds mastermind David Appelman re-run the odds with the Yankees’ record improved by four games (I took them away from the Orioles so that no other playoff teams would be impacted). Just that little bump — New York playing basically as expected rather than collapsing — would lower Toronto’s postseason odds to 46.4%. The Yankees would be at 90.9% to make the playoffs, the Red Sox at 62% — it would be a Jays/Sox duel for the last playoff spot, rather than a three-way brawl for two spots.
For me, “those odds were probably wrong” is a weird way to look at it. Things that are 5% likely to happen do sometimes happen. We gave the Giants a 5% chance of making the playoffs before the year, and that turned out pretty well for them. Odds often look silly in retrospect, because we know what happened after, not what could have happened.
I prefer to frame this as a credit to the Blue Jays. A mere handful of weeks ago, they were in a tough position. They were 6.5 games back of the playoffs with only 35 games to play. Not only that, but three teams stood between them and a playoff berth — four if you count the Yankees, who were in the first Wild Card spot and 9.5 games up on Toronto. It’s hard enough to catch one team with a 6.5 game head start — but you can at least get lucky and have that team collapse. Catching them while also passing intervening teams requires you to get really hot and also dodge hot streaks by multiple teams.
The rest of the teams gave the Jays a chance — not a big one, but a chance. Toronto responded with gusto, smashing the league to bits and pitching well to boot. Even knowing their competitors faltered, Toronto’s path was far from easy: they had to win at an .875 clip to get to where they are now, precariously perched atop the Wild Card table.
The wildest part of all of this is that even after that torrid stretch, their work isn’t done. If the Jays lose today and the Yankees win, they’ll be tied again. Given that Toronto is playing the perpetually-hot Rays while the Yankees are playing the down-and-out Twins, that hardly feels impossible. It’s hard work to climb back from a big standings deficit, not least because you can still miss the playoffs after you catch up.
So let’s call this what it is: an absolutely dazzling display of baseball by the Jays. They played their way into a hole by scuffling through a 13-13 August (through the 27th), after a 12-11 July, after a 14-12 June, after a 15-13 May, after a 12-12 April. Then, when it was crunch time, they caught fire, beating everyone in front of them when they absolutely had to. Forget playoff odds, and forget what happens the rest of the way: the Jays just put forward an absolutely epic effort, and flipped the AL postseason chase by doing so.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
“which means that teams with bird mascots have gone 16-0 in the Blue Jays’ last 16 games”
Well, teams with bird mascots have gone 16-7 in the Blue Jays’ last 16 games.
“Watch a random plate appearance today — only one. Did that batter get hit by a pitch?”
Missed opportunity for a Austin Adams comment here.
I just cannot get over that sentence about the bird mascots either. I’m kind of hoping for some other bird mascots too, just to cause even more confusion. Have they played the Cards in that stretch too? How about a crossover playing the Eagles? All the pictures of Angels they have wings, are they birds?
Edited to correct that part, as well as to add some alternative playoff odds.
Yeah the Blue Jays looked absolutely doomed about three weeks ago. They’re in a precarious spot but it’s better than the one the Yankees, A’s, and Mariners are in and the same as the Red Sox. Things are looking up.
The Orioles have three more games against the Blue Jays, but also three against the Yankees and six more games against the Red Sox. Meanwhile, the Blue Jays have 6 games against the Rays and 7 against the Twins, which at the minimum is going to be an interesting yo yo experience. Meanwhile, the A’s, Astros, and Mariners play each other a whole lot down the stretch. Should be interesting.
“Over the weekend, they scored 44 runs in a three-game set against Baltimore, surging into playoff position in the process.”
Small correction. Its was 47 runs in a four-game set. They lost game 1 of the series 6-3 on Friday night.
Also, the most amazing part of their recent 4 game sweep of the Yankees is that they never trailed in the series. It’s the 1st time the Yanks never led in a 4+ game series since June 23-25, 1924, against the Washington Senators.
And back to the O’s series. First game of the Saturday doubleheader, they’re down 10-7 heading into the last inning and they drop 4 runs on the O’s to win the game. Second game of the doubleheader, they’re down 1-0 and getting no-hit heading into the final inning. And they casually drop 11 runs on the O’s. Sunday, I guess they decided they weren’t fooling around anymore. BTW, the Jays had back-to-back games with 10+ run innings. Wonder when the last time that happened was?
I was totally dumbfounded that they won BOTH of those doubleheader games…I was checking ESPN intermittently through the day. Game 1 they trailed 7-3 early and then 10-5 later….at one point ESPN had Baltimore at like 98% to win, so I mentally chalked that up as a loss.
Later saw that they trailed 1-0 in the nightcap in the 6th inning of a 7-inning game, and ESPN had Baltimore at like 92% to win. So I go to bed thinking “crap, how did we drop two games to those bums?!”
Next morning the banner on ESPN was “JAYS SWEEP DOUBLEHEADER FROM ORIOLES” or something. I was flummoxed. Thought they had the headline totally wrong before reading to see how those games played out.
I’d love to see an article about what Lourdes Gurriel Jr. has done. He looked really bad in the first half and has been red hot since. Most interesting to me is how his plate discipline radically improved. Walk rate about tripled, K rate dropped by around a third. I feel like this would be perfect for an interview-style article because I’m sure something drastically changed with his approach (and maybe technique?) that maybe the coaching staff alerted him to?
Lourdes Gurriel Jr. career splits:
April & May: 0.664 OPS
June-Sept: 0.877 OPS
Classic Gurriel. He’s either one of the worst hitters in baseball or one of the best. He had a 95 wRC+ heading into August 27. He’s so streaky. Look at his past splits too from previous years, he has had incredible highs and lows.
This is more or less the story of guys who don’t walk much, don’t run particularly low strikeout rates relative to those walk rates, and who hit the snot out of the ball. Randal Grichuk and Keston Hiura are like that too. Salvador Perez is a good version of that player, as is Byron Buxton (although he’s such a freak he doesn’t really compare well to anybody).
But the fact that Gurriel’s walk rate and K rate changed so dramatically changes complicates that narrative. It’s not just that he’s depending on the right launch angle or the BABIP gods, he clearly did something different.
I think the indictment on playoff odds stems from ‘tail outcomes’ which seem to occur every few years rather than once a millennium as the probablities suggest they would.
A 5% probability are is not a once-a-millennium-level probability. And like Ben mentioned in the article, we very well may still be living in one of the 95% universes! Either way though it’s been super fun and I hope the wild card race stays this bunched up down to the wire.
I understand that 5% is not a tail outcome, but other odds discussed were (Jays w/l plus yankees w/l) yet it came to pass. My suggestion is that these playoff odds and how they’re derived are doing a poor job at evaluating the odds at the lower end.
Baseball is hard to predict, but the author offering up several premptive paragraphs in defense of the methodology plus (anecdotally I admit) what I see as distrust with the odds amongst fans suggest that we all intuitively know the odds are off in some way.
One of the complicating factors (for our intuitive assessment of odds) is determining what is the number of events for each probability.
For season-long results, it’s one. Each team has one shot at the post-season, so 5% is going to feel discouraging to Jays fans. On the other hand, there are a lot of opportunities to go 14-2 over the course of a season, so 1.5% odds actually happen quite frequently.
A common point for distrust in the odds is that they shift so fast toward the end of the season (“a win in May counts the same as a win in September” afterall), but it makes sense because with fewer events left, the odds will be more volatile.
Your feelings are, unfortunately, not based on a sound understanding of how probabilities are calculated but thanks for typing, I guess.
Thank you for the positive and educational response beepy.
Too, the odds of Toronto gaining 10.5 games on NYY over the course of 2.5 weeks is just unfathomable. Requires a pretty good team to be absolutely lights-out, and another pretty good team to be a complete dumpster fire. That probably happens like once in a thousand simulations…yet here we are.
I believe that the odds on the Yankees have been too optimistic all year long. As a fan who has seen them refuse to take easy wins (even when they prevail they turn games into nail-biters) and demonstrate a level of inconsistency that is jaw-dropping, I have to say that they are just not that good. [Especially with Gleyber Torres in the middle of the infield. ]
So much fun to be a Yankees fan the last two weeks. Like, fun fun fun. Sigh.
Do blue jays soar? I think them as more flappy birds.
Yeah, they’re not soaring birds (like eagles or hawks or seabirds like gulls or albatross). All of the jays live in the forest understory and flit from perch to perch. We don’t get blue jays out here west of the Rockies but even in the city I see Scrub Jays and Steller’s Jays (which I like to think of as goth Blue Jays), and up in the mountains you see Gray (aka Canada) Jays. The are all are pretty “flappy” birds. But, like all the corvids, very very smart.
This is the bird content I didn’t know I needed.
“The Blue Jays Scream Into Playoff Position”
Steller’s Jays are total a-holes. Scrub jays can hang though.
This spring we had a kind of war going on between the Steller’s and the Scrubs, both of which have nests nearby with defined territory; I happen to live about midway in between so for many days I got treated to very loud squawking about whose turf it was. I imagined it as an avian Westside Story, with the Steller’s cast as the Jets (the resident bad boys) and the Scrubs as the Sharks (more recent emigres from further south). Unfortunately all the Jays squawk rather than sing, so the result is hardly Bernstein.
Then both families got busy raising chicks and things calmed down to the point a few weeks ago I saw them feeding side by side. Apparently there’s a place for everybody, somewhere.
I would subscribe to this newsletter, in all seriousness.
Now launching #birdgraphs
They don’t normally soar. Just another way this team beat the odds
I had been made to believe that only the Marlins will soar among baseball teams. But, one should never trust Scott Stapp.
The question, at least to me, was why were the Blue Jays 66-61 on 8/27. The lineup is unmatched in the game, (I need someone to explain how the Rays, with an OPS .050 lower have scored more runs) Robbie Ray has been nothing short of outstanding all year long, Manoah has been a stud, Ryu isn’t bad, Matz’s ERA is under 4 and games started by #5 starters are a crap shoot for almost every team. The Pythagorean W-L is 8 games better than the actual record. Does Montoya’s game managing effect the team’s record that much? Whatever the reason I am not surprised that The Jays are winning a lot of games.
Some of it is just bad luck, some of it is that the Blue Jays when they get rolling tend to blow teams out and their opponents put in a bunch of bad pitchers. The pitching has been a bit of a problem overall. Manoah got brought up partway through the season, the #5 starter (and #4 before Manoah) were quite bad, and the bullpen has been terrible. Also, while the Rays OPS is lower keep in mind that the Trop suppresses offense more than most stadiums.
You are supporting my point. How can the Rays, with a lesser lineup playing in a ballpark that suppresses offense, score more runs than the Jays?
Look at the bullpens: Rays: 8 WAR; Jays: 1.5
Which supports my long held belief that starting pitchers should pitch more innings. I will never understand the urge to rush in poor relief pitchers whose only consistent trait is to CTB, my new favorite baseball term. Tonight the Pirates starter went 5, had a 6-0 lead, was yanked after 80 pitches and, in a flash, the Reds put 4 on the board. 2021 is now the leader in fewest innings pitched by starters and, as the season has progressed, more and more CTB occurrences are appearing in box scores as the relievers are being asked to do more and more. I just watched as Jeurys Familia gave up an important HR in the 3rd consecutive game he has pitched. It isn’t only the number of runs that constitutes CTB because this clearly qualifies. Maybe he wouldn’t be collapsing if he wasn’t grotesquely overused, but that is what the game is today.
Assuming neutral pitching, which lineup are you taking in a 7 game series?
2015 Jays
C: Russell Martin
1B: J Smoak
2B: Devon Travis/Ryan Goins
3B: Josh Donaldson
SS: Troy Tulowitzki
LF: Ben Revere/Danny Valencia
CF: Kevin Pillar
RF: Jose Bautista
DH: Edwin Encarnacion
Team OPS+ = 115
2021 Jays
C: McGuire/Jansen/Kirk
1B: Vlad Jr.
2B: Marcus Semien
3B: Espinal/Biggio
SS: Bo Bichette
LF: Gurriel Jr.
CF: George Springer
RF: Teoscar Hernandez
DH: Grichuk/Dickerson
Team OPS+ = 116
I personally would take the current iteration of the team. Vladdy is the best hitter listed, and that lineup is deep as hell.
The second lineup for sure.
The thing is that Tulowitzki was actually a huge drag on the offense and Reyes before the trade wasn’t much better. LF and 2B in 2015 were black holes of offense most games, and any night Martin wasn’t catching was another hole in the lineup. Chris Colabello and Smoak combined to be a pretty bad 1B with mediocre offense, truly awful baserunning and defense.
C – 2015
1B – 2021 (by a huge amount)
2B – 2021 (by a huge amount)
3B – 2021 (by a huge amount)
SS – 2021
LF – 2021
CF – 2021
RF – 2015
DH – 2015
The biggest advantage 2015 had over 2021 is that while Vladdy is the best hitter listed, Josh Donaldson is the best overall player. Donaldson was an elite hitter on almost the level of Vladdy, but was also a brilliant defensive player at a tough defensive position.
The tougher question for me is which rotation and bullpen would you take?
SP
2015 – Price, Buehrle, Dickey, Estrada, Hutchinson, with a little Stroman and Sanchez
2021 – Ray, Ryu, Matz, Manoah, Berrios, Stripling and Kay
RP
2015 – Hendriks, Cecil, Osuna, Sanchez, Tepera, Loup, Schultz, etc
2021 – Um… there are just too many to even partially list
I think I would take the 2015 pitching by a hair overall, with the rotations looking basically even, and the 2015 bullpen looking a fair bit stronger.
Estrada and Stroman stand out in my mind as big assets for 2015, but that’s largely because of what they did after 162 had been played. Hopefully by next season, we’ll have a few more postseason legends.
Hahaha, I just realized there’s a major typo in that. 3B should say “2015 (by a huge amount)”, but I obviously copy/pasted 1B, 2B, 3B and forgot to change the year on 3B.
wow its easy to forget how awesome that team was. regardless of who is better, both teams are extremely cool. I want to say 2015 cause its a fun what if, but the 2021 team is probably better. Especially since theyve missed most of the year of production from springer, who could have had the best season on the whole team if he had a whole season! crazy.
Baltimore knows what it wants. I can respect that.
With Simeon at 2b and Bo Bichette at SS, the Jays can trade away Cavan Biggio to the White Sox in the offseason.