The Book on Génesis

Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

In the beginning, there was nothing. Wait, no, that’s not right — in the beginning, there was Tommy Pham. Yeah, now we’re talking. In the beginning there was Tommy Pham. Then John Mozeliak said, “Let there be a trade,” and Pham decamped for Tampa Bay, San Diego, Cincinnati, Boston, and eventually New York. In exchange, the Cardinals got a sampler platter of minor prospects: Justin Williams, Roel Ramírez, and Génesis Cabrera.

Williams and Ramírez are long gone from the St. Louis organization, but Cabrera is still going strong. That might have oversold it coming into the year — in 157.1 innings across 142 games, Cabrera had compiled a 3.95 ERA, 4.32 FIP, and 0.4 fWAR. That’s hardly an imposing line, but the Cardinals hardly had an imposing bullpen, so he fit solidly into the middle of that group heading into 2023.

He’s only pitched 11 times in 2023, but those 11 times have been revelatory. Nineteen of the 45 opponents he’s faced have struck out. Only three have walked. That’s no fluke, either; he’s so deceptive and so hard to square up that he’s recorded more called or swinging strikes than he has balls this year, by a count of 68 to 60.

That’s a huge divergence from Cabrera’s earlier career, when he struggled with both his command and with missing bats. From 2019 to 2022, he racked up 260 more called balls than called and swinging strikes. You can think of that gap as a crude measure of how much a pitcher can attack the zone or entice hitters to leave the zone without giving up too much contact. If you simply pound the strike zone with so-so stuff, you won’t get many called or swinging strikes. If you nibble ineffectually, you’ll run up a huge tally of called balls.

Want proof that this is a decent statistic? Spencer Strider checks in at +50 to lead baseball, with the top five rounded out by Jeffrey Springs, Clayton Kershaw, Shane McClanahan, and Jacob deGrom. On the flip side, Cal Quantrill, he of the 11.7% strikeout rate, is at -104 already. He’s joined in the bottom five by Jordan Lyles, Brad Keller, Blake Snell, and Chad Kuhl. That sounds like a pretty good metric to me.

Just explaining that Cabrera is good isn’t enough, though. He was bad before, or at least he wasn’t good. If he can switch from throwing far too many balls to bullying hitters without changing anything, maybe it’s not a great metric. But luckily for my story, he has changed something. In fact, he looks like a very different pitcher than in recent years.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

First things first: Cabrera is throwing from a lower arm slot this year than he has in the past. Here’s his release point first in 2022 and then in 2023, using our game charts:

I’ve isolated his fastball to avoid a cloud of overlapping pitches, but you get the idea: he’s releasing the ball lower and further toward first base. Not coincidentally, his fastball now gets more horizontal movement at the expense of slightly less vertical ride. His fastball is still mostly vertical, avoiding Kevin Goldstein’s dreaded line of normality, but now it’s ever so slightly different.

From a raw pitch metric standpoint, this change hasn’t hurt Cabrera much. His vertical approach angle – the rate at which the ball is descending as it crosses home plate – has actually become less negative. In other words, despite less vertical movement, starting the ball lower has made it reach the plate at a shallow angle. It’s a tiny change, but it’s in the direction you’d like to see: flatter VAAs lead to more swings and misses as hitters misjudge fastballs at the top of the zone. It’s hardly the best fastball in the league, but the new lower shape hasn’t made it any worse.

There’s a benefit, though: whether it’s better training, more experience, or the benefit of the new arm angle, Cabrera has stopped giving fastballs away. He’s wasting only 3.6% of them this year – two out of the 55 he’s thrown – by throwing them so far out of the strike zone that they’re uncompetitive. That compares to 7.3% in his career before this year.

That’s not a giant difference, but turning three or four pitches out of every hundred from automatic balls to competitive fastballs does wonders for falling behind in the count less frequently. He’s living in the zone more with his fastball, which is important. When he’s behind in the count, he’s hit the strike zone more than 70% of the time with it, up from 56% before this year. Want fewer walks? Start throwing strikes when you’re behind in the count.

These fastball gains are nice and all, but there’s a much bigger change afoot here. Cabrera has gone from fastball-first to slider-first. Also, now he throws a slider:

That slider has gone from not even present to afterthought to the focus of everything he does. This isn’t a pitch classification change either; it’s not as though he used to throw curveballs and now systems are calling the same pitch a slider. He throws his slider 10 mph faster than his curve, and with a completely different shape: it’s a gyro bullet rather than a two-plane sweeping breaker.

How has the slider performed? Well, Cabrera has a 2.31 ERA and is striking out 42% of opposing batters. Remember that strikes vs. balls number from up above? He’s not doing that with his fastball – he’s doing it with this outrageous breaking pitch. Opponents have swung and missed at a third of the sliders he’s thrown this year. Not a third of the ones they’ve swung at – they’ve missed 58.7% of those – a third of all the sliders he throws period. That’s the second-best swinging strike rate for a slider in all of baseball, and the third-best whiff per swing rate.

What’s going on with this pitch? To explain it simply, Cabrera throws it very hard and with enough movement to keep it deceptive. Even in an era of increasing velocity, not many sliders flirt with 90 on the radar gun. Only three lefties – Reid Detmers, Yusei Kikuchi, and Snell – throw their sliders harder, and all three have a similar shape to Cabrera’s (Snell’s has more ride, so it’s not an exact match). And hey, wouldn’t you know it, all three of those sliders are great. In fact, if they weren’t starters, I’m sure that all three would use their slider more often, the way that Cabrera can in relief.

You probably want to see a pitch like that in action, so here’s a look at it, courtesy of Colorado’s pristine camera angles:

That’s a lot of horizontal movement — some from arm angle and some from pitch movement — for a pitch with that much zip. I’m not surprised that Stuff+ rates it as his best pitch and am equally unsurprised that batters are getting fooled by it. Like many hard sliders, it works well with his fastball thanks to its speed and release point. By the time batters realize they shouldn’t swing, it’s too late. As a bonus, this style of slider performs well against both lefties and righties, which means Cabrera doesn’t have to throw his below-average changeup against opposite-handed hitters. That pitch got him in trouble last year, and simplifying his arsenal without sacrificing platoon versatility feels like a great move for someone with control issues.

Another benefit of the slider: it gives him a trio of pitches that describe a movement and velocity spectrum, from fast and arm-side (fastball) through the slider to slow and glove-side (curveball). It looks something like this:

This excellent article on pitch tunneling, a SABR analytics nominee, came up with three rough criteria for fastball/slider pairings. The best pairings have 6-14 inches of horizontal movement separation, 8-16 inches of induced vertical break separation, and 6-11 mph of velocity separation. Cabrera’s old fastball/curveball pairing didn’t do that. His new fastball/slider pairing does, and as an added benefit, his slider/curveball pairing does too. That’s not the exact thing being studied, but it surely can’t hurt.

Put it all together and Cabrera looks like a completely changed pitcher. His new pitch mix blends together much more delightfully than his old plan. Leaning on the slider first and foremost makes sense; that way, both of his other pitches play well off of it. It’s a thoroughly modern plan: pitch off of the middle of your movement/velocity profile and vary off of that, instead of basing everything around your fastball because that’s how it’s always been done.

With that hagiography out of the way, let’s pump the brakes at least a little bit. Cabrera has made 11 appearances this year. He’s throwing a new pitch that might take batters some time to adjust to, which could be flattering his results. It’s still unquestionably a good pitch, but it might be playing up right now while hitters compile tape. His command has a lot to do with his surge, and reliever command is anything but stationary. He might lose track of the strike zone tomorrow and be more above average than unbeatable.

At the end of the day, even with those caveats, I can’t look at Cabrera’s recent form and be anything other than optimistic. Or, if you’d prefer it in the biblical terms that his name evokes, listen to Ecclesiastes 3:12: “I commend the enjoyment in life, because there is nothing better for a person under the sun than to eat and drink and be glad.” Stop sweating the future when it comes to Génesis. Focus on the glorious present – and maybe have a hot dog and a cold one while you’re at it.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
chipjoshMember since 2019
3 years ago

You have such an enjoyable style of writing. I can almost always tell it’s your work 1/2 way through the 1st paragraph without seeing who wrote the article. Thanks for the great and fun content as always!

Jon SealsMember since 2018
3 years ago

When Cabrera finishes aggressively with his back to the batter – and does that little shuffle – you can tell he’s pitching well. When he doesn’t feel it, when he isn’t as demonstrative, that’s when we’re in for a long inning.

I don’t know which comes first, but it’s great to see him pitching with flair lately.

Max Power
3 years ago

Missed the chance here for the title “From Genesis to Revelation”

jwblue
3 years ago

He is death vs. left handed batters, but right handed hitters still own him.

Glengarry Glenn Braggs
3 years ago
Reply to  jwblue

In 19 PA’s, righties hitting .333/.368/.778 off him. Yikes!

Trevor May Care Attitude
3 years ago

Love the deep pull from Ecclesiastes. One of my favorite things about the Bible is that they stuck a book in the middle that declares all human endeavors futile and meaningless.

Monk #1: “You really want me to transcribe these lines about ‘nothing new under the sun’ and all labor being futile and whatnot? I’m nearly blind, bro — I mean, what am I even doing here?”

Monk #2: “Solomon was, apparently, one of the wisest men who ever lived. I think we have to keep it in.”

tdouglas
3 years ago

The Cardinals will likely be sellers for the first time in a long time and probably won’t be competitive for a few years (they need to build an entire starting rotation in one offseason to be competitive — a monumental task for a team that has stopped spending). So, Cabrera could be a sneaky addition for a contending team. I’m sure other teams will need to see more of these results before fully jumping in, of course.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

If they are sellers at the deadline, which I still don’t think is that likely, I suspect they intend to compete in 2024. With Arenado, Goldschmidt, Edman, and Contreras all under contract for another few years this is a win-now team. So that would mean trading Chris Stratton and Jordan Montgomery. And since Montgomery is their only trustworthy starter I would expect them to try and sign him to an extension instead and maybe sign another starting pitcher like Mahle, E-Rod, Stroman, or Giolito to replace Flaherty.

I suppose it is possible they decide to do something more drastic like trade Paul Goldschmidt, in which case it’s possible Cabrera would be available (as well as most of the rest of their relievers too). But that would seem unlikely given the fact that the Cardinals haven’t pursued a rebuilding strategy in a very long time.

tdouglas
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think they tried extending Montgomery, but Mikolas got the extension instead. I’m not sure why they wouldn’t be sellers, though. The playoff odds are based on outdated projections — Flaherty, Mikolas, Walker, and Arenado are some examples of players who are significantly worse than projected. The outfield looks much worse than projected. Positive regression always comes, but the advanced stats are mostly in agreement with the overall record.

And it’s not luck. Eno Sarris tweeted about how atrocious the staff’s Stuff+ is — this is a terrible rotation, the type of rotation that forces you to sell. You’re right that there are a few lengthy contracts on the books, but a rebuild could clear them out. Teams would love to get Goldschmidt, and Edman would also be a hot commodity. That leaves two big contracts, but rebuilding teams often have one or two bloated contracts. It’s not like Contreras hasn’t been good; he isn’t overpaid by much. Disregarding no-trade clauses, maybe another team might want him.

As a thought exercise, try to build the best 2024 rotation for the Cardinals. Only Mikolas and Matz are under contract, and it seems the 16th-best payroll is the spending limit. There isn’t that much money coming off of the books (Wainwright’s deal was heavily deferred). The farm system isn’t good, and the front office has been decimated by terrible deals (Alcantara, Gallen, Arozarena, letting Adolis Garcia and Wisdom go for nothing), so they have been averse to making big prospect trades. How does the 2024 Cardinals team compete?

Last edited 3 years ago by tdouglas
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

I think they compete by benefitting from regression to the mean by Arenado and Mikolas; the former should still be a good player and the latter was a 4th starter. They then sign Giolito or E-Rod and let Graceffo and Liberatore compete for the last spot in the rotation. The Brewers aren’t getting any better and the Pirates still won’t be anywhere near their peak next year. It will cost money but they have enough money to do it—they have no shot at guys like Nola but midrotation starters are within reach.

tdouglas
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Graceffo just went down with a serious shoulder injury, so pitching at all in 2024 will be iffy. Certainly can’t pencil him in to the rotation. Liberatore has below-average Stuff+, so he likely won’t be very good. A Mikolas/Matz/Liberatore/Woodford/Thompson rotation is easily a bottom-5 rotation, and while adding a good starter would obviously help, the Cardinals have stopped spending and likely can’t afford E-Rod or Giolito. Even with one of them, it’s still a bottom-5 rotation.

Remember, the outfield is also suddenly a disaster. Carlson can’t hit, O’Neill is gone, Burleson is a 1 WAR type of player, and Nootbaar is likely a 2 or 3 WAR player. Jordan Walker is remarkably dreadful in the outfield and has serious swing issues. If you only add Giolito and give Arenado some positive regression, the 2024 Cardinals are still below 80 wins.

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

It’s not Tommy John, so Graceffo should be good enough to at least compete for a rotation job next spring.

Actual results matter much more than Stuff+. Liberatore is still a top prospect off to a great start at AAA. He should be up as a rotation improvement by midseason.

Why do you keep saying the Cardinals don’t spend?! They spent over $80M to fill the hole at catcher last offseason and then gave Mikolas a decent extension. Adding to the rotation just wasn’t an area of priority, since it was completely unexpected for everyone to collapse (well, not that badly for Montgomery) at once like this. Had the five of them (with Wainwright still about to make his season debut) been pitching up to their usual track records, it would’ve been an above average rotation with Wainwright’s return making it even better. Since it has become a huge hole, especially with the upcoming retirement and free agencies, the Cardinals will naturally spend on the rotation next offseason.

The outfield is somewhat problematic, but it’s far from a disaster. Nootbaar is playing well, and a 2 to 3 win player like him is pretty nice to have as one of your starters. Carlson is hitting decently, especially against lefties. Yes, O’Neill is slumping, but he just went on the IL with a sore back, so he should be better once he returns. Walker will be back before too long and likely much improved after his time in AAA. That’s why he’s there. The youngsters should then get even better in 2024 and beyond.

Add a great starter or two good starters in free agency, and that’s enough to expect a return back to a winning record in 2024 if nothing else and a return to the playoffs by 2025 if not sooner.

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac
Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

Actually, where did you hear about this supposed injury for Graceffo, anyway? I can’t find any online mention of him being injured, and he’s still listed on his team’s active roster.

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Actually, with Montgomery, Flaherty, DeJong, and Wainwright (there’s still $7.5M not deferred) coming off the books and the money they had available but didn’t spend last offseason plus the usual annual payroll bump, I think they will have a shot at signing someone like Nola, especially if they trade away some guys at the deadline. They’d just have to rely on internal options for the rest of the rotation with Mikolas and prospects like Liberatore and Graceffo, and let’s not forget about Zach Thompson and Dakota Hudson. They could also go for two mid-rotation starters instead.

By the way, despite a few poor trades along with a number of good ones, the farm system still ranks in top half of MLB.

I agree with you on Arenado and Mikolas. Arenado for obvious reasons. Mikolas was a 2nd starter at worst and is a two-time All-Star. Like with Arenado, it would be almost impossible for him to spend the whole season in such a terrible slump. It’s probably too late at this point, though.

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  tdouglas

The Cardinals do spend when necessary. It was logically just thought that catcher was a much more pressing need this past offseason. Do expect them to spend big on at least one starter this offseason, as they will have the money available for it, and they’ll still have Mikolas (assuming he can figure out what suddenly went wrong) and options like Liberatore, Thompson, and Hudson. I’m not sure what they’ll do about Matz at this point.

There’s just too much talent on the team to blow it up completely, and they’ll be contending again in a max of two years if not sooner. While they will be sellers if things don’t turn around, they’ll only be selling guys like Flaherty, Montgomery, and DeJong (who has been playing surprisingly well so far) on expiring contracts and maybe guys with only one more year of control left like O’Neill and Hicks (if the latter has any value left at the deadline).

Lanidrac
3 years ago

You’re late to the party. Cabrera was just as good when he broke out two years ago in 2021. He then had a lousy year last year leading into Spring Training this year where he had lost some velocity and command. He then figured it out again after starting the season in AAA and was called back up after only a couple of weeks to where he’s once again his old dominant self.