The Braves Are Running Out of Time

Dale Zanine-USA TODAY Sports

Before the start of the season, the Atlanta Braves were the consensus pick to win the NL East. While it wasn’t unanimous – try getting a few dozen writers to fully agree on something – 22 of 25 FanGraphs writers predicted the Braves to win the division for the seventh straight season. Sportsbooks offered odds on Atlanta that had an implied probability of 75-80% for winning the division. ZiPS projected the Braves to win the most games in the majors and gave them a 63% chance to take the NL East crown. But as we approach the end of the first third of the season, it’s the Philadelphia Phillies who are on top of the division with the best record in baseball. The team’s six-game lead over Atlanta isn’t an insurmountable barrier, but it’s still a comfortable cushion for this point of the season. So, how concerned should the Braves be? And how long do they have to overcome their rivals and keep their division streak alive?

Frequently, when I discuss surprise first-place teams at this point of the season, I compare the situation to a hypothetical foot race between Usain Bolt and me. It goes without saying that Bolt is a much faster runner than I am, to the degree that he’d probably beat me in a race hopping on one foot. But what if he gave me a head start so I could get a sufficient lead? How far ahead would I have to be to have a chance to hold off the world’s fastest man? Uhhh, 10 steps from the finish line by the time he starts running might get it done. Obviously, this isn’t the perfect analogy, because even if Bolt is the Braves of running, I certainly am not the Phillies. But you get the idea: At some point in the season, a division race becomes a question of time, not talent.

First things first, let’s take a look at the current simulated ZiPS projected standings, through Thursday night’s games.

ZiPS Projected Standings – NL East (Morning of 5/24)
Team W L GB Pct Div% WC% Playoff% WS Win% 80th 20th
Philadelphia Phillies 98 64 .605 62.2% 34.4% 96.6% 10.8% 103.8 91.4
Atlanta Braves 94 68 4 .580 36.4% 53.7% 90.1% 11.1% 100.7 87.5
New York Mets 79 83 19 .488 1.4% 23.2% 24.6% 1.2% 85.8 73.0
Washington Nationals 69 93 29 .426 0.0% 2.1% 2.2% 0.0% 75.8 63.1
Miami Marlins 67 95 31 .414 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 73.4 61.0

Well, at least if you go by the ZiPS projections, Atlanta fans aren’t getting the happiest version of this tale. ZiPS still thinks the Braves are the better team, but the margin has narrowed considerably. What was a 10-win gap in March has thinned to just a hair over a three-win separation per 162 games (20 points of winning percentage, to be exact). In fact, the Phillies are now projected to have an almost identical probability of winning the division as the Braves did at the start of the season, despite Atlanta’s aforementioned 10-game edge; as I remind people, the future is almost always far more uncertain than you think.

This is actually an impressively durable change, which further complicates matters for the Braves. Projections for teams don’t usually move quickly because, well, baseball history says they shouldn’t. ZiPS has been doing team projections since 2005. If all you had to go on to project the last two-thirds of a season was a team’s preseason projection in ZiPS and the team’s actual record for the first-third of the season, the best mix based on two decades of projections is about two-thirds ZiPS and one-third actual record.

The offenses tell much of the story, so let’s start with Philadelphia’s offense. Here are the differences between ZiPS preseason WAR and the current projected final WAR. The latter consists of the WAR already on the books and the rest-of-season projections. Remember, this already includes all those grumpy old regressions toward the mean.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Phillies Offense – ZiPS Preseason vs. Final 2024 WAR
Name Preseason WAR Projected Final WAR Difference
Alec Bohm 1.61 4.68 3.06
Bryce Harper 3.69 5.13 1.45
Bryson Stott 2.58 3.94 1.36
Edmundo Sosa 1.28 2.33 1.05
J.T. Realmuto 3.22 4.17 0.95
Brandon Marsh 1.74 2.55 0.80
Trea Turner 5.05 5.62 0.56
Johan Rojas 0.94 0.98 0.03
Kyle Schwarber 1.76 1.72 -0.04
Whit Merrifield 0.76 0.53 -0.23
Cristian Pache 0.82 0.53 -0.30
Garrett Stubbs 0.32 -0.11 -0.43
Nick Castellanos 0.52 -0.65 -1.18

That’s eight players projected to finish with at least a half-win more than at the start of the season. Castellanos is the only Phillies player whose projected WAR is now a half-win worse, but the projection systems didn’t expect much from him going into the season anyway. None of the hitters who are smashing the ball right now are expected to turn into midnight pumpkins. Even Bohm, the infielder ZiPS was most suspicious of, is now in the top 10 for most projected WAR added for 2025. And it’s not shocking that Harper, Realmuto, Turner (who is currently on the IL), and Stott are projected to maintain their strong starts.

As for the pitching, we projected the Phillies to have the second-best rotation in baseball, so their awesomeness is hardly surprising. Philadelphia’s stars have more than balanced out some of the outfield question marks and its depth hasn’t truly been tested yet, except for Turner’s injury — and as Jon Becker noted in his morning column on Tuesday, Turner’s replacements in the lineup, Sosa and Kody Clemens, have excelled in his absence.

As for the Braves, their vaunted offense has come out rather impotent. They rank seventh in the NL in runs scored, which isn’t disaster territory, but Ronald Acuña Jr., Matt Olson, and Austin Riley have all been just barely above league-average hitters this year. Sean Murphy has been out with an oblique injury that he suffered on Opening Day, but that’s been less of an impact because Travis d’Arnaud has been solid as the everyday backstop. Things might be a lot worse right now if not for the performances of d’Arnaud and Marcell Ozuna.

Atlanta’s current place in the standings is the fault of its underperforming stars, not its complementary talent. And that’s what makes it tough for the Braves to turn things around with a few trades, as they did in 2021 before surging to win the World Series. It’d be one thing if the problem were someone like Orlando Arcia, because the Braves wouldn’t think twice about benching or trading him to acquire a better shortstop. But when it comes to Acuña, Olson, and Riley, all Atlanta can do is wait for them to catch fire. What adds to this general feeling of helplessness is that the team’s biggest problem on the pitching side is Spencer Strider’s season-ending UCL injury. Even if the Braves were to try and swing a trade, their farm system is one of the weakest in baseball right now and only a few teams are currently out of contention. Major reinforcements aren’t on the way anytime soon.

The good news for Atlanta is that its stars are capable of breaking out of their funks at any moment, but the longer it takes them to turn things around, the more time the Phillies have to pull away. To get an idea of how much time the Braves have left, I took the current projected standings and had ZiPS simulate the rest of the season with both teams posting the same record going forward (for the sake of the example, I’m going with a 94-win pace) to see how quickly the divisional probabilities would change. Without picking up ground but also not losing any, Atlanta would slip to two-to-one divisional underdogs by June 10, and hit the three-to-one spot on the last day of the month. If this continues to the morning of the trade deadline, the Braves would find themselves with only an 18% projected chance to win the NL East, while the Phillies’ divisional odds would climb to 81%. (The Mets would still retain a few tenths of a percentage point.)

Let’s be clear: Despite the relatively gloomy outlook for Atlanta, a six-game deficit heading into Memorial Day Weekend is not insurmountable. In fact, the Phillies have the same divisional odds now as the Braves did two months ago. That said, for the first time since 2011, the NL East is the Philadelphia’s division to lose.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Da Bear
2 years ago

Frequently, when I discuss surprise first-place teams at this point of the season, I compare the situation to a hypothetical foot race between Usain Bolt and me. It goes without saying that Bolt is a much faster runner than I am, to the degree that he’d probably beat me in a race hopping on one foot. But what if he gave me a head start so I could get a sufficient lead? How far ahead would I have to be to have a chance to hold off the world’s fastest man? Uhhh, 10 steps from the finish line by the time he starts running might get it done. Obviously, this isn’t the perfect analogy, because even if Bolt is the Braves of running, I certainly am not the Phillies. But you get the idea: At some point in the season, a division race becomes a question of time, not talent.

This is pretty much the same premise the Braves already consider at every home game with their “Beat the Freeze” promotion, but instead of running against Bolt (who’s now retired), fans get a head start against groundskeeper Nigel Talton.

Bernie Sanders
2 years ago

Thanks Dan, very cool!

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
2 years ago

I ultimately understood the second sentence after reading it a couple times but I’m not sure that’s the least confusing way to say that

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

Being an editor whose job it is to *preserve* the idiosyncrasies of the writers while still preventing nonsense can’t be an easy job; thanks, Meg 😛

chipjoshMember since 2019
2 years ago

Does zips account for the differences in strength of schedule? I’ve seen a lot about how weak the Phillies schedule has been thus far, and can’t help but think water finds it’s level.

Justin1025Member since 2020
2 years ago

It’s really a testament to how good the Phillies are. The Braves aren’t terrible. Right now they are on track to win around 100 games. The Phillies are just on another level. Can they keep it up? I don’t know but they seem better positioned to than the Mets from 2022.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Justin1025

If the 2021 Giants could win 107, the Phillies certainly could. I’d still bet on some regression, but it may not be enough to matter.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Justin1025

I was about to say this. The Braves have underperformed a little but the Phillies have absolutely earned that first place spot. The Phillies have the best record in baseball and the Braves are third in the NL.

The Phillies have the best starters in baseball in the moment and a top 5 offense and bullpen. And the defense has been much better than in past years too (although that’s not a high bar).

formerly matt wMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yes, and though the article is gloomy about the Braves’ chance to win the division, it still projects them with a higher chance of winning the World Series than missing the playoffs. (And a higher chance of winning the Series than the Phillies.) I’d take that kind of gloom!

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 years ago

Someone is going to get a really nasty matchup in the wildcard round, that’s for sure. Seems likely that Philly and ATL will meet again, again, in the playoffs. I’ll happily watch that again.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

It’s unfortunate that it won’t be 7 games. They should consider reseeding.

cowdiscipleMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Seven would be better. Reseeding would be better. I’d still appreciate the extra spiciness of letting the high seeds pick their opponent, though.

keithk
2 years ago
Reply to  cowdisciple

Nah. It would be better if we had a real pennant race between two great teams. I have friends who still bitch about the Giants finishing behind the Braves in ’93 but that was a great race.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

It could be the Best-of-7 NLCS if the Dodgers snatch the NL’s best record, thus leaving the Phillies and Braves to take the #2 and #4 seeds (in either order) and that #4 seed manages to take out the Dodgers in the NLDS.

lacslyer
2 years ago
Reply to  Justin1025

It’ll come down to the Phillies schedule getting harder in July and August and how well their starting pitching keeps up with consistently going 7 innings. Banking wins now and cutting back on starters going so long will help, but surely they’ll start cutting them back soon, right?

OtterMember since 2016
2 years ago

I still wanna know why Acuna didn’t strike out last year and only last year.

JupiterBrandoMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Otter

Maybe it’s just pure randomness. And maybe JFK’s head just did that.

OtterMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  JupiterBrando

25% K guy for five years cuts it in half for one year and one year only as he goes back to being a 25% K guy after that one random year he cut his strike outs in half. It’s suspicious. Maybe not Brady Anderson suspicious, but suspicious.

The Braves as a team are a shell of what they were last year at the plate. SLG and ISO are down big time, K% back up, while walk rate and BABIP are basically the same. Maybe everyone had a career year together last year but that would be super duper random.

si.or.noMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  Otter

I’m confused. What’s the actual theory here?

synco
2 years ago
Reply to  si.or.no

One year transplant of Ted Williams’s frozen corneas?

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  si.or.no

It’s moot now, but how can it be suspicious? Matt Olson curiously did a very similar thing one year with the Braves as well, but performed worse overall. Maybe the Braves know something other teams don’t? Because Acuna K rate is so far out of line with rest of career. I don’t see what it could be though, like it just makes zero sense.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Otter

Everyone’s gonna have a best season, by definition, and great players are gonna have transcendent best seasons. Winning teams are gonna have a lot of guys who are having their better/best season(s). This isn’t unusual, as you imply–the reason most franchises don’t repeat is, in fact, because so many of those same players had performed unsustainably well and will regress towards their mean (at the same time). It’s why teams that *do* sustain success keep churning enough to avoid complacency (see: LAD).

I don’t know how you get yourself to the implication that the Braves cheated in some way you haven’t figured out yet, but as someone who lived through the 1990s as a non-Atlanta baseball fan, if *a decade of noncompetitiveness* didn’t make me believe that aliens and Bud Selig’s Magical 12 sided die had conspired to build a Hall of Fame Rotation and MVPs in Ted Turner’s stadium, one fantastic season from some fantastic players who everyone expected to be fantastic isn’t gonna get me there, either.

carterMember since 2020
2 years ago

Got you, but without looking his k rate was one of the lowest in the league. Like 10-11%. I feel like that is beyond transcendent. I struggle to find any other recent examples, except Matt Olson who cut k rate drastically then returned to career normals after, he also played for the Braves. Maybe it’s a hitting coach? Who knows. It didn’t benefit Olson however.

evo34Member since 2023
2 years ago

6 games back in late May.. “not insurmountable”

NSS

RMD4
2 years ago

I’ll take the Phillies for sure, but they’ve played a soft schedule and I’ll take the over for production from Acuña, Riley, Olsen, Murphy.

RMD4
2 years ago
Reply to  RMD4

I just had to look at the last weekend of the season and the Braves play the Royals at home. For all we know, the mighty Braves could very well have a shot at the division while Kansas City could be scoreboard watching Cleveland as well. Baseball!

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
2 years ago
Reply to  RMD4

Welp, no over for Acuna.

wokegraphs3
2 years ago

Perfect that this article hit the day the Braves get beat badly—11-5—by the lowly Pittsburgh Pirates.

jcoopertaylorMember
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs3

And the Phillies got walked off by the Rockies!

wokegraphs3
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs3

I’m pretty sure my posts get downvoted purely on the basis of the username which is proof in the pudding.

youppi4pm
2 years ago
Reply to  wokegraphs3

If it makes you feel better, I downvoted you before I even noticed your name – in this crybaby second comment.

nobodyukno
2 years ago

It’s not just a hot start or easy schedule for the Phillies. Over a rolling 162 game schedule the Phillies are at 104 wins and the Braves at 102

norisk
2 years ago
Reply to  nobodyukno

It is both of those things. But that doesn’t mean Philly ain’t great!!

szielinskiMember since 2026
2 years ago

The Braves just dropped two against the Pirates. Their starting pitchers were not impressive. Sale pitches today. The Pirates can win games when their bullpen does not implode, which it hasn’t so far this series. But the Braves haven’t been impressive. It remains to be seen if the Braves can turn this around, although that is an odd thing to say about a team nine games over .500. The Pirates are a better team with Skenes in the rotation, Gonzales at second, Tellez on the bench, Suwinski and Davis in Indianapolis. So, the two wins are not total flukes. But, the Braves are genuine pennant contenders. The Pirates are not.

David Klein
2 years ago

And now Acuna hurt his knee hopefully it isn’t as bad as it looked.

Last edited 2 years ago by David Klein
DavidMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

About as bad as it gets, it seems.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
2 years ago
Reply to  David Klein

It’s bad.

norisk
2 years ago

ACUNA NOOOOOOOOO

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
2 years ago

The Braves are on pace for about 97 wins even with guys playing horribly. Even losing Acuna they’ll be fine.