The Cardinals’ Impressive Winning Streak Doesn’t Guarantee October Success
With a doubleheader win on Friday, a bizarre 3-2-5-4-2-8-6 double play and a ninth-inning comeback on Saturday, and more late-inning heroics on Sunday, the Cardinals ran their winning streak to a franchise-record 16 games. The streak is the longest in the majors since Cleveland won 22 consecutive games in 2017, and the longest in the National League since the Giants won 16 in a row in 1951 as part of the comeback that culminated in Bobby Thomson’s pennant-winning homer, “The Shot Heard ‘Round the World.”
The Redbirds’ winning streak has turned a team that was 71-69 with just 5.0% Playoff Odds into one that’s on the verge of cinching the NL’s second Wild Card spot, suddenly giving the Cardinals a look of invincibility. “With 16 Straight Wins, the St. Louis Cardinals May Never Lose Again,” reads one headline. “Cardinals Look Unstoppable Right Now,” reads another.
For as unbeatable as the Cardinals appear right now, the history of late-season winning streaks tells us that while this run may certainly help the team secure a playoff berth, it doesn’t tell us anything about how they’ll fare in October. Look no further than that aforementioned Cleveland team for a harsh reminder of that lesson. From August 24 to September 15 of the 2017 season, the defending AL champions steamrolled opponents, piling up wins in close games and in blowouts until they’d set an American League record. The team finished with 102 wins, the highest total by the franchise since 1954, and hopes were high that they could secure the title that they’d come so close to winning just the year before. Yet when the postseason rolled around, Cleveland was unceremoniously bounced, losing a tight five-game series to the Yankees.
The story was similar for the team whose AL record they broke. The 2002 A’s won 20 straight games from August 13 to September 6 and finished with 103 wins, the franchise’s highest total since 1988. Yet they too were defeated in a five-game Division Series, losing to the Twins.
In fact, no team that’s run off a late-season streak — starting in August or September — of more than 11 wins has even reached the World Series during the division play era (1969 onward):
| Team | Strk Start | End | Games | Div Win | WC | WC Win | DS Win | CS win | WS Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland | 8/24/17 | 9/14/17 | 22 | x | |||||
| Athletics | 8/13/02 | 9/4/02 | 20 | x | |||||
| Royals | 8/31/77 | 9/15/77 | 16 | x | |||||
| Cardinals | 9/11/21 | 9/26/21* | 16 | ||||||
| Orioles | 8/12/73 | 8/27/73 | 14 | x | |||||
| Phillies | 8/3/77 | 8/16/77 | 13 | x | |||||
| Orioles | 9/7/99 | 9/22/99 | 13 | ||||||
| Diamondbacks | 8/24/17 | 9/6/17 | 13 | x | x | ||||
| Yankees | 8/14/21 | 8/27/21 | 13 | ||||||
| Twins | 9/19/80 | 10/3/80 | 12 | ||||||
| Red Sox | 8/3/95 | 8/14/95 | 12 | x | |||||
| Astros | 9/3/99 | 9/14/99 | 12 | x | |||||
| Astros | 8/27/04 | 9/8/04 | 12 | x | x | ||||
| Tigers | 9/2/11 | 9/14/11 | 12 |
Prior to this season, nine of the 12 teams with late streaks of 12 wins or more made the playoffs, seven of them by winning the division. That tally stands to improve given that both the Cardinals and Yankees currently occupy Wild Card spots, though the latter hardly has things sewn up. This year’s teams aside, of the group above only the 2017 Diamondbacks, who won their Wild Card game before losing to the Dodgers in the Division Series, and the 2004 Astros, who beat the Braves in the Division Series before falling to the Cardinals in the NLCS, even advanced in the playoffs. That none of these teams, even those with 100-plus wins, played further into October is quite a fluke, but it just serves to remind that these winning streaks don’t guarantee anything.
Interestingly enough, several teams with late-season winning streaks that ended right at 11 games fared better than those with 12 or more wins:
| Team | Strk Start | End | Games | Div Win | WC | WC Win | DS Win | CS win | WS Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orioles | 9/20/70 | 10/1/70 | 11 | x | x | x | |||
| Orioles | 9/19/71 | 9/29/71 | 11 | x | x | ||||
| Pirates | 8/27/78 | 9/6/78 | 11 | ||||||
| Phillies | 9/16/83 | 9/26/83 | 11 | x | x | ||||
| Yankees | 8/31/85 | 9/10/85 | 11 | ||||||
| Red Sox | 8/30/86 | 9/10/86 | 11 | x | x | ||||
| Pirates | 9/12/96 | 9/22/96 | 11 | ||||||
| Blue Jays | 8/27/98 | 9/7/98 | 11 | ||||||
| Athletics | 8/2/01 | 8/12/01 | 11 | x | |||||
| Cardinals | 8/9/01 | 8/19/01 | 11 | x | |||||
| Twins | 9/13/03 | 9/24/03 | 11 | x | |||||
| Rockies | 9/16/07 | 9/27/07 | 11 | x | x | x | |||
| Phillies | 9/12/10 | 9/24/10 | 11 | x | x | ||||
| Blue Jays | 8/2/15 | 8/13/15 | 11 | x | x | ||||
| Red Sox | 9/15/16 | 9/25/16 | 11 | x |
Here 11 of the 15 teams with late-season streaks of exactly 11 wins made the playoffs. Seven of them won at least one postseason series, and five won the pennant, but only the 1970 Orioles, the middle child from a run of three consecutive pennant winners, brought home the World Series trophy; they did so by beating the Reds in a five-game series. There’s no particular reason why these teams with shorter winning streaks than the first group would have more postseason success, but that’s the way it’s crumbled, cookie-wise.
Considering those two groups together touches upon a point I’ve made annually for over a decade, based on studies that I did while writing for Baseball Prospectus and then SI.com: there’s no correlation between a team’s performance in September and its subsequent performance in October. I first wrote about this in 2009, examining 112 playoff-bound teams from 1995 to 2008 and how each performed in their final seven, 14 and 21 regular season games as well as those from August 31 to the end of the season, which sometimes trickles into the first week of October (for the rest of this piece, I’ll refer to this as September records or September winning percentage despite the spillover). At each of those increments, what I found was an essentially random relationship between the winning percentages in those fragments and the results of the Division Series — correlations ranging from -0.042 to 0.019, a whole lot of nothing.
That was a very counterintuitive finding, given that just two years earlier, the 2007 Rockies had won 13 of its final 14 games, including a Game 163 tiebreaker, and stormed through the postseason field before being swept by the Red Sox in the World Series. That run made it easy to forget counterexamples such as the 2006 Cardinals dropping nine of their final 12 regular season games yet winning the World Series, or the 2000 Yankees going 3-15 over their final 18 games, evoking comparisons to the 1899 Cleveland Spiders given the lopsided run differential during that stretch yet winning their third straight championship.
I reprised that study in 2017, dispensing with the “week” intervals but adding 2009-16 data to the mix, and again found no predictive relationship between September record and October success. That piece goes into circulation around this time every year, but with my address having changed from SI.com to FanGraphs, I figured it was worth revisiting again, this time by including 2017-19 data as well; alas, last year’s pandemic-shortened 60-game season and the novel playoff structure with the extra round meant that I couldn’t include the data.
So here we are, this time covering the September and October performances of 216 teams from 1996-2019. These teams combined for a regular season winning percentage of .582, and as a group improved down the stretch, winning at a .578 clip through August, and a .600 clip in September, an uptick that serves as an opportunity to note the selection bias at work. While 27 teams did back into the playoffs with records below .500 after August 31, many clubs who entered September in playoff positions did badly enough that they didn’t make the cut at all, and so their October results can’t be tracked. For example, this year’s Padres entered September at 72-62, half a game ahead of the Cardinals for the second Wild Card spot, but they’ve since gone 6-16 and been eliminated; they and their ilk thus don’t have October showings to compare to their September bellyflop. Oddly enough, the lowest September winning percentage of any Wild Card-era playoff team was the 1998 Padres’ .375 (9-15) — yet they reached the World Series before being swept by the Yankees.
So, here’s what I’ve found:
| Category | 1995-2019 | 2012-2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Season Win% to Postseason Win% | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Regular Season Win% to Postseason Wins | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| Regular Season Win% to Postseason Series Wins | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| September Win% to Postseason Win% | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| September Win% to Postseason Wins | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| September Win% to Postseason Series Wins | -0.01 | 0.03 |
I’ll begin the guided tour by noting that I’ve broken out a separate set of correlations covering only teams in the two Wild Card era, lest the evidence point to conditions that have changed dramatically from the single Wild Card era (it does not). The first row compares the correlations between a team’s full regular season winning percentage over 162 games (give or take one due to tiebreakers and rainouts) and its postseason winning percentage. As you can see, there’s a faint relationship visible, the strongest of any in this particular set but not very strong at all.
The second line is the correlation between regular season winning percentage and postseason win total, because really all that matters is getting to 11 wins by winning the Division Series, League Championship Series and World Series, or 12 wins if the team has gone the Wild Card route. It doesn’t particularly matter how many times a team loses so long as it doesn’t hit three or four at the wrong time; a division winner that goes 11-2 in the postseason team and one that goes 11-8 will both be champions. The third line shows the correlation between regular season winning percentage and the number of postseason series won. Here I should note that these correlations are slightly higher than those from the 2017 study, which came in at 0.24 for postseason winning percentage, 0.17 for postseason win total, and 0.15 for postseason series win total.
Those correlations are pretty slight, but still considerably more robust than what comes next, as the September winning percentages just don’t tell us very much at all about what happens in October. Again, these figures are a bit ahead of the numbers in the 2017 study (0.09 for postseason winning percentage, 0.03 for postseason wins, and -0.01 for postseason series wins) but that’s not saying much at all. For each category, the full season winning percentage is much more predictive than the September winning percentage.
Within this study there are a few other interesting findings to update:
| Group | # | Through August 31 | September |
|---|---|---|---|
| All postseason teams | 216 | .578 | .600 |
| World Series winners | 25 | .590 | .590 |
| Pennant winners | 50 | .590 | .591 |
| Non-pennant winners | 166 | .575 | .603 |
I noted above that the postseason teams collectively did improve in September, which makes sense, but what’s at least somewhat interesting is that the World Series winners (and losers) did not; their level of play as judged by wins and losses was unchanged, possibly because the typical late-season gains by some teams were offset by others that had the breathing room to rest their fatigued or injured players late in the year.
As previously noted, a total of 27 teams have made the postseason despite sub-.500 September records; the White Sox (11-12 this month) could run that count to 28, and even the Yankees (13-12) could wind up in that group if the other remaining AL teams fail to capitalize. Only four teams have won the World Series after a sub-.500 September — the aforementioned 2000 Yankees (13-18) and 2006 Cardinals (12-17), plus the 1997 Marlins (12-15) and 2015 Royals (15-17) — but five others have won pennants, most recently the 2017 Dodgers (13-17). The September Stumblers, who won at just a .446 clip down the stretch after playing .598 ball prior, nonetheless compiled a .527 winning percentage in the postseason, which is to say that they fared better than the average postseason team, since the group collectively produced a .500 record.
With one more win or losses by both the Phillies and Reds, the Cardinals (20-6 this month) will clinch that second Wild Card spot, and their epic winning streak will be part of the story. They may or may not have another October run in them, but don’t fall into the trap of believing that this winning streak is the reason why.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
This is all correct. But if they could just hang on to this awesomeness long enough to knock out the Dodgers in the wild card that would be super fun.
Well they wouldn’t have to face Scherzer in a WC against the Giants but that would be less fun
If the Giants and Dodgers tie (which is very much in play right now – If the Giants go 3-3 and the Dodgers go 5-1, we have a tie), Scherzer starts game 163 to win the division, most likely. That’s my dream scenario, as a Cardinals fan…
Buehler is no walk in the park either. But it looks like they’d be in line to pitch over the weekend so Cards could get Urias or Kershaw.
Giants ain’t losing 3 more games vs AZ and SD. I’d be mildly surprised if they lose one. Watched them all weekend. There is some serious magic pixie dust going on with that team right now. Really all year, but especially now. They just cannot lose and everyone is so locked in. They don’t miss mistakes, or make any while pitching. Never quite seen a team like that.
I’m kind of hoping that the Cardinals have to do something really ill-advised like start Jon Lester against Max Scherzer, and then they come out victorious anyway. I’m not a Cards fan but after the Dodgers traded for both Turner and Scherzer at the deadline I’d like maximum chaos for them. Knocking out the Giants wouldn’t have the same oomph for me.
Don’t you mean, “start Jon Lester”? No need to add the extra qualifier
There’s a lot of space between “the Cardinals are unstoppable” and “the Cardinals have a one-in-sixty chance of winning the World Series”, which is what Fangraphs playoff odds give them. Winning streaks are statistical oddities. If the Cards had lost a game or 2 in the past couple weeks they wouldn’t be getting as much press, but they’d still be playing great. They’re healthy. They’re playing with a lot of swagger. Are they better than the Dodgers? Nah. But if anyone wants to give me 60-1 odds I’ll happily put some money down.
That’s a good way of putting it
60-1 odds (at this point) to win the WS is different than 60-1 odds to (merely) knock the Dodgers out though…
Can we please just enjoy and acknowledge a historic streak
We can do both. We can both enjoy a significant winning streak while also acknowledging that it doesn’t necessarily mean the Cardinals are the team to beat in the NL.
Are we not doing that?
Acknowledge? Yes. Enjoy? As a Pirates fan who lives in St. Louis, I’m not sure I can. The streak really has reinvigorated Cardinals fans here, so good for them.
While I’m here, thank you for this article. There is plenty of great information here!
No no no no nononononono! Not now, Jay, not RIGHT NOW! Let me enjoy and, as Ted Lasso would wish, believe!
As a cardinals fan who has been ribbed about the 2006 team (83 wins) and 2011 teams (“lucky”), I tell those critics I’ll trade both WS titles for a WS title each year the Cardinals won 100+ regular season games since 2000. Three of those.
But there is no place to go to right the scales of cosmic justice.
My only point is that I appreciate the Cardinals FO plan to be competitive every year – beautiful, ugly, awkward, graceful – and see what happens in the Playoffs.
A 16 win streak means nothing predictively. Just a ticket to the dance. And the beautiful thing then is, who knows?
People write off the 11 Cardinals? That team was great
Agreed. They were great.
But my NYY points out their luck: dead in August. Squeaking in the last day of the season. Down to one strike twice in Game 6 of the WS.
To me as a fan this is terrific stuff. But it offends my friend’s sense of cosmic orderliness.
Btw – Malcolm Gladwell said he grew up rooting for favorites in sports event because underdogs winning upset his sense of cosmic balance.
Malcomb Gladwell is a Yankee fan so he has a very poor sense of cosmic justice.
People dismissed the 2006 team as well despite 4 probable or “should be” HOF.
Why would you trade in those world series? I never understand that philosophy of caring about how other people view your teams championship. As long as they didn’t cheat, you should cherish those seasons and wins. You out played the supposedly “superior” teams.
I agree.
My cosmic trade is meant as a rhetorical device. I’ve enjoyed the scrappy WS wins. And all I can ask of the FO is to give us fans a chance each year.
I agree, ncgostl. People love to point out how unfair and cheap the Cards’ ’06 title is, but then neglect to mention how the Cards got knocked out of the playoffs by a team with a worse regular-season record in ’00, ’01, ’02, ’04, and ’05. (To be fair, some of those teams they lost to – notably the ’01 D’backs and the ’04 Red Sox – were quite awesome, but the point remains.)
Any playoff system has to balance a sense of fairness with a sense of surprise – you want to good mix of both: too much fairness leads to predictability; too much surprise leads to flukiness. In aggregate the Cards seem to have won about the appropriate amount of title this century (2 championships in 14 playoff appearances), but by drawing out only the teams that overperformed, it’s easy to forget the ones that underperformed.
Not to mention the 1985 team
Very surprised by that winning streak table showing no one with 11 or more has reached WS. I really had thought the Rockies were on that list, and not the 2nd one, but I guess I just remembered it wrong. That was one of the saddest WS ever though 🙁
All true but it’s not worse for October success than not having a 16 game winning streak…and counting. It’s not just the 2011 Cardinals. It’s also the 2019 Blues. Max Scherzer in the WC game is a problem though.
Then again, beating Scherzer and the Dodgers in the Wild Card Game and then the Giants 3 out of 5 times might actually be easier than the other way around. Having to face Scherzer, Buehler, and Kershaw for (potentially) 4 out of 5 games is a huge buzzsaw waiting to happen!
The degree to which projections aren’t buying the Cards, win streak or not, is pretty well expressed in the fact that going into this weekend they had a 90% percent chance of making the playoffs, while the Jays and Phillies were somewhere below 30%, yet the latter two teams had a better chance of winning the World Series.
Obviously anyone can get hot and win it all (see some previous iterations of the Cardinals, in fact), but I certainly wouldn’t want my home team to be rolling into the playoffs with that rotation.
This has less to do with their roster and more to do with the fact that they’d have to win a wild card game, and the Phillies would be guaranteed at least three games if they won the division. But yeah, Lester and Happ may not fly too well in the postseason.
Giants after Gausman and Webb aren’t fantastic either. Flaherty and Wainwright are acceptable postseason options. They would only have to get a couple of rainouts after that
True, hadn’t thought of that with the Phillies. Though the projections even now like the Jays’ chances better than the Cardinals’.
I will laugh so hard if J.A. Friggen Happ pulls a Jeff Weaver, turns into an ace for the playoffs, and they steamroll the big name pitching staffs. That’d be flip the chessboard and storm off level stuff.
Oops sorry I don’t know how to delete this
It’s also the fact that, assuming they get the second wild card, they have to then win 1/1 vs the Dodger/Giants and then 3/5 against the other, when those look like two of the best teams in baseball. I’d be really interested to see what the projected odds are if the Cardinals were a true talent 590 team or so, or just the curve of pythagorean win percentage vs WS percentage for a team in this situation. Closest parallel I can think of is 2015 NL wild card.
Thankfully, they can now add Flaherty into the playoff rotation mix. Give him another start this week, and he could potentially throw at least 60 pitches in a Division Series start and even more the deeper they go. A playoff rotation led by Wainwright, Mikolas, and Flaherty actually has quite a bit of potential.
This isn’t 2018 Mikolas or 2019 Flaherty. They both have mediocre FIP’s, and there’s no way Flaherty will be 100% sharp. Wainwright is fine, but a maximum bullpen attack after him would probably be more effective.
I’m actually a bit more interested in seeing if Dakota Hudson can throw 50 or 60 meaningful pitches in a few games if the Cards make it that far. His stuff looked great the other day, and he’s more stretched out.
Mikolas has gotten better every start. In his last start, he was fantastic. He should be back to at least 2019 Mikolas if/when he starts in the playoffs.
Agreed on Flaherty, but even a non-sharp Flaherty is still a much better option than Lester or Happ and probably still better than Hudson despite not being as stretched out.
Jay don’t you dare anger the devil magic, we’ve already suffered enough!!
While I don’t believe the streak is a reason to think the Cardinals will win it all, I think the *way* they’re winning is a great sign for their postseason chances. They’re the perennial “Not that great team that you don’t want to face in a short series”, because they’re winning with defense, power, opportunistic baserunning, a “hard 9” attitude, and a deep bullpen. If you don’t put them away early, you’re in trouble.
The Cardinals can field a team that is good or great defensively at 7 out of 8 positions (Dylan Carlson being the one average defender), with significant speed on the basepaths at 7 of 8 positions (Yadi being the lone exception) and significant pop – their starting 8 hitters each have at least 10 HRs, and their 2, 3, and 4 hitters have 30 HR apiece. Crazy things happen when you play great defense, take extra bases at every opportunity, and threaten to hit home runs in every plate appearance.
Is their starting pitching any good? No, not really. But they’re getting guys back from the DL (notably Flaherty and Hudson) who can help, and their bullpen has a solid top 3, and pretty good depth. Plus, pitching is way easier in front of a great defense. They took J.A. Happ and Jon Lester’s dumpster fire seasons and instantly turned them into slightly-above-replacement-level pitchers just by having them pitch to contact. I wouldn’t put it past Miles Mikolas to have a Jeff Suppan 2006 postseason, soaking up 6+ innings a start, and having a random MVP win after going 3-0 in the NLCS with his throwback mustache.
It’s going to be fun to watch, anyway. Maybe not the optimal statistical strategy, but this team reminds me of the 2015 Royals, but with more power, and a less-dominant bullpen. Better not count on a small, early lead to hold up in the late innings!
They are winning with defense, power, speed, a good bullpen, and a great attitude. So basically just about every trait ever?
Their contact hitting and starting pitching are inconsistent at best, though.
I was just thinking “all the Cards need is Jeff Suppan to come out of retirement to snag some key postseason wins”. Mikolas is a nice choice to maybe reprise that role.
Even Carlson is an above-average fielder if he’s not forced to play CF.
Technically, it’s their backup SS who has 10+ homers, not their starter; but he’s otherwise forgotten how to hit when he doesn’t hit a home run, which is why he no longer is the starter.
Otherwise, you make some good points.
“what’s at least somewhat interesting is that the World Series winners (and losers) did not; their level of play as judged by wins and losses was unchanged,”
But the non-pennant winners improved greatly in September, outperforming those who made the World Series after underperforming through August. These lesser teams made the playoffs because they got hot (lucky?) at the right time which allowed them to beat out the other lesser teams; it’s a selection bias.
When I checked the playoff odds today the Cardinals had a better than 99.9% chance. I think the .1 would be a fun outcome because of its degree of surprise. I’m sure Reds fans would agree! Not reaching the playoffs would be more epic than reaching at this point.
The 2011 Tigers actually *did* advance, beating the Yankees in five games in the ALDS before running into a Nelson Cruz buzzsaw.
I am wondering if separate correlations here make the most sense instead of a regression including March-August win percentage and September-October win percentage as separate covariates. In general, we would expect March-August win percentage to be correlated with September-October win percentage, but less noisy. Seeing that both are slightly positively correlated to postseason wins, with the larger sample one being more correlated, shouldn’t be surprising. Overall, we’d expect a similar result but with a weaker signal.
However, if we wanted to analyze at the margin what an improvement in September-October compared to the rest of the season should suggest about playoff performance in general, that is a more interesting question that would require multivariate analysis. Though, we need to be careful we don’t fall into a similar trap to this:
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/09/01/he-was-fooled-by-randomness-until-he-replicated-his-study-and-put-it-in-a-multilevel-framework-then-he-saw-what-was-not-going-on/
There’s a “pretty slight” correlation between regular season winning percentage and wins in the postseason. Let’s all remember this as MLB looks to expand the playoffs for no reason other than $. As fans, we may, depending on where we stand, look at it differently. As the significance of the regular season gets diluted, any claim a WS winning team has to being the best in baseball weakens. Only if you achieve top regular season success along with postseason success can you stake a claim to being the best in baseball. Otherwise, you need to share that with the Giants this year.
IF (and that’s a big IF) streaks mean anything predictive at all, I’d think they only matter for a small number of games to follow… so arbitrarily choosing such a large window as Aug-Sept for the study seems wrongheaded/counter-intuitive to me. Plus this is about the Cards’ current hot streak, which extended to 17 and into the middle of the final week of the season, not being far off (likely mostly 2-plus weeks away) from the postseason like most of those long streaking teams that didn’t win a single postseason series, not to mention 1-game WCs that are super-flukey anyway.
None of the teams that were remotely close to being as hot as these Cards actually ended their streak w/in 2 weeks of the postseason. The ’80 Twins and ’99 O’s came closest, but only won 12 and 13 straight respectively and didn’t actually even make the postseason, so of course, they didn’t win anything… meanwhile, the Cards has locked up a WC spot.
IF you narrow the window down to only include those playoff teams that ended their hot streak (of >=11) w/in a week of Oct (to be much more comparable to these Cards), you find much more postseason success even though still only 1 WS win, but also only 2 playoff teams that didn’t win any at all (vs 5 that won at least 1 postseason series).
And perhaps interestingly, the only ones that made it to the WS were the ones that ended their streaks w/in a few days of postseason, including the ’70 and ’71 O’s — and the WS-winning ’70 O’s were even the only one to end their streak in Oct (10/1).
So seems like largely just a poor selection process for this study, if we’re looking for good comparisons to these Cards, me thinks…
But is 14 teams truly a big enough sample size? We always hear during the season how certain stats needs so many at bats to normalize. Well what if late season winning streaks:postseason success needs another 200 teams to truly analyze? I’ll be waiting until then to make up my mind 😉