The Cardinals’ New Hitting Problem
Last year, the St. Louis Cardinals scored nearly five runs per game and bashed their way to the World Series. Okay, the pitching helped too, but the 2013 Cardinals were far better at scoring runs than any other NL team — the Rockies were #2 in the NL in runs scored, but were still 77 runs back — and that was their competitive advantage. And then, over the off-season, they replaced Pete Kozma with Jhonny Peralta, which is about as large of an offensive upgrade at a position as any team made over the winter. Sure, they lost Carlos Beltran, but he was replaced by Matt Adams, and swapping out David Freese for Kolten Wong didn’t appear to be a significant offensive downgrade.
The 2014 Cardinals aren’t exactly the same team as the 2013 Cardinals, but this is more of a tweaked line-up than an overhauled one, and the general core remains the same. And yet, after finishing third in the majors in run scoring last year, St. Louis currently finds themselves 28th in the majors this year, and has hit so poorly that the team has already made a few adjustments to their roster. So, what’s going on in the Gateway City?
First, we have to acknowledge that the Cardinals offense was bound for a good amount of regression. A good part of last year’s offensive success was built around their crazy .330/.402/.463 performance with runners in scoring position; by bunching their hits together, they scored far more runs than could have been expected based on their raw offensive numbers. While clutch hitting is a fun story to tell, it’s not actually a thing that persists over time, and the Cardinals had to expect some natural regression in this area. And they have. Here are their wOBAs for the last two years by baserunner state.
| Year | Empty | Men On | RISP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.292 | 0.362 | 0.370 |
| 2014 | 0.290 | 0.303 | 0.268 |
The Cardinals have regressed well past the mean, and for the first month of 2014, have posted the fifth worst wOBA with runners in scoring position of any team in baseball. Just as there was no reason to expect them to keep hitting at their 2013 rate, this too should regress, and the Cardinals should be more efficient driving in runs than they have been for the first month of the season. But, even with a wOBA closer to their bases empty/men on base splits, it’s not like runs are going to just start falling from the skies again; the Cardinals aren’t hitting particularly well in any baserunner state.
A team going from 3rd to 28th in run scoring can’t have just one person to blame, but Allen Craig is at least the primary culprit in the team’s run scoring troubles this year. Through the first 26 games of the season, he has been baseball’s very worst player, and a .212 wOBA from a bat-only player like Craig is a huge problem. Even over just 103 plate appearances, the difference between Craig’s .363 wOBA last year and his .212 wOBA this year equates out to a 12 run difference, or about .46 runs per game. If you simply replace Craig’s 2014 line with his 2013 line — just the raw numbers, not even the silly RISP performance — the team would be scoring at basically the same rate as the Dodgers.
It’s too early to give up on a guy with a strong track record of offensive performance, but Craig is single-handedly responsible for a huge chunk of the team’s offensive woes thus far. As Tony noted last week, Craig’s extreme ground ball rates thus far are a bit of a worrying sign, and if playing the outfield is part of the reason why he hasn’t been able to get the ball in the air, the Cardinals might have to consider re-aligning their roster to allow Craig to go back to first base on a regular basis. Matt Adams is a nice enough player, but he’s not so good that having him and Craig split the first base duties, as they did a year ago, is a waste of a guy who must play everyday.
Of course, benching a guy with a .365 wOBA to try and jump start a guy with a .212 wOBA isn’t exactly how you improve a struggling offense. So, the Cardinals instead are switching things up at second base, as they shipped Kolten Wong back to Triple-A and have recalled Greg Garcia to take his place, though Mark Ellis‘ presence probably means he’s not up to play everyday. While not as heralded as a prospect, Garcia is interesting in his own right, and was driving the ball in Triple-A; something Wong hasn’t done as a big leaguer. Garcia is worth a look but probably isn’t a long term solution at the position, but it will be interesting to see if the Cardinals consider shifting Matt Carpenter back to second base in the second half of the year if neither Wong nor Garcia can provide enough offense to justify a line-up spot.
After all, it should be easier to find a rent-a-third-baseman who can hit than to find a middle infielder who can swing the stick, and Carpenter did show that he could handle the position well enough last year that there wouldn’t be a huge defensive decline. Perhaps if the Padres get serious about moving Chase Headley this summer, the Cardinals should consider whether their best alignment still includes Carpenter at second base.
And none of that even addresses the team’s mish-mash of outfielders. While they acquired Peter Bourjos in the Freese trade to give them outfield depth, he’s been relegated to the bench while Jay has reclaimed his starting CF job, and now the team has recalled Randal Grichuk — the other guy acquired from Anaheim — to replace the punchless Shane Robinson. It seems unlikely that the Cardinals would call up a legitimate prospect to sit on the bench, so Grichuk is probably in line for more playing time than Robinson received, which means that Bourjos may very well now be the team’s fifth outfielder. And Oscar Taveras still hanging out in Memphis, the Cardinals second half outfield might very well look a lot different than the one they are running out there now, especially if it is determined that Craig might not be physically capable of playing right field on a regular basis.
Bourjos is still useful a player to be relegated to pinch-running, and the Cardinals high-level outfield depth could give them the option of shopping him around to a team looking for a defensive wizard in cetner field, perhaps one with a third baseman to spare. It might be a little odd for St. Louis to try and trade Bourjos for a third baseman not long after they traded a third baseman to get him, but with Mike Matheny showing some preference for Jay as their regular center fielder, perhaps Bourjos is a better fit for a team that doesn’t have the Cardinals depth of outfielders.
Perhaps some of this will just fix itself. Maybe Craig goes back to hitting the way he did previously, and either Garcia or Wong show that they can hit enough to earn a job share with Mark Ellis, leaving the original pieces in tact until the team decides that Taveras is big league ready. The Cardinals pitching has given them enough of a cushion that there’s no need to rush into any kind of panicked decision making, and patience is probably a virtue here.
But there are signs that perhaps the original plan isn’t going to work out as well as the team had hoped. Moving Craig back to first base would open up a spot for the team’s young corner outfielders, and Adams would probably be a pretty highly coveted piece in trade. Depending on how the middle infield situation shakes out, the team could potentially look for a second or third baseman in return.
Or maybe Craig just fits better with an AL team, where he could ignore his glove entirely and just focus on hitting the crap out of the baseball again. Trying to figure out how to piece too many talented players together isn’t a terrible problem to have, but the Cardinals do have some problems, and it may very well take another trade or two to get this line-up straightened out. The organization has done a great job of collecting assets; in looking at how all the pieces fit together, however, there might be some more arranging to be done.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Dave focused more on Craig, but up until a couple of days ago, Peralta had been a total disaster. Holliday slugging .380 isn’t helping matters much either.
Peralta’s struggles are basically all BABIP. Craig’s crazy ground ball rate is more worrying.
and Peralta’s success a year ago was also babip related.
True, but his BABIP has been pretty consistently in the high .200’s to low .300’s. A BAPIP of .167 just seems like its bound to change
of course. just saying that what he did a year ago isn’t representative of his true talent level either.
Yeah, it seems to be team-wide, least year they were top 10 in wOBA and wRC+, this year they are bottom 10 in both.
Regarding Craig, he only has 2 full years as a regular, so obviously this season’s crapfest weighs heavily on the stats, but his wOBA and wRC+ for March/April are .254 and 59, respectively, and no lower than .349 and 123 for any other month. Last year, in his real first “regular” March/April he was only at .289 and 83. He seems like he might be a slow starter and there is more than enough time to turn things around, even if there is not a lot to go on.
He seems like a slow starter? If you threw those monthly wOBAs into a hat, and July was the low month, would we assume he hated America and fireworks? If it were May, and not April, would he seem like he hated mothers?
Dude, just throwing out a theory, where I said twice that there’s not a lot of data to go on. Just observing a possible trend as his month-to-month splits are pretty consistent, otherwise. Some guys don’t like cold weather and/or take a little while to get into a groove. Maybe he’s one of those guys.
Or maybe he hates humor, international guitars, keeping America beautiful, lawns and gardens, poetry, pecans, welding, records and information management, stress awareness, and sexual assault awareness.
If it was July he kept faltering in, perhaps one could say he tends to breakdown midway through the season, and if it was May it’d be the same starts slow except the second month and not the first. If someone keeps doing bad around the same time, it is worth looking into or considering if he may have some issue that could cause it: The question is mostly on if Craig has enough sample size to even be able to gleam anything.
Peralta a total disaster? Despite his OBP being below .300, he sports a .336 wOBA because he’s hit three home runs. His BABIP is .167, and judging from his batted ball rates, that should be at least 120 points higher. Peralta would be one of the best players in the game so far in a vacuum.
*Six home runs, rather
The Cards really need an RBI guy like Ryan Howard.
Considering that the Cardinals got Bourjos and Grichuk for pretty much nothing if they were to trade either of them off for an actual third basemen they should be looking at a rather large capital gains tax from Uncle Sam.
I wouldn’t say the Cardinals got Bourjos and Grichuk for nothing, per se. Freese was a 4 WAR player in 2012 and while that may be his ceiling, it’s wasn’t absurd to think he could be useful this year.
Jkl2349…just goes to show how shallow third base is these days. Shortstop, on the other hand, is deep, especially with all the minor league talent about to breech the majors.
and the Mets sadly have none of it…
Erik, then there’d be a great match with Boston. I’d bet they’d jump on a Middlebrooks for Piscotty/Grichuk trade. They’d then either bring up Cecchini or move Hogwarts to third and sign Drew.
No, no, no. St. Louis does not want Middlebrooks, Topcreeks, nor Bottomstreams for that matter. You got to do a lot better than him for a guy with the upside of Piscotty.
Or just put piscotty back at third if Wong doesn’t work, and move Carpenter to second, and enjoy the incredible depth for a year.
piscotty can play third
Brewers are the new Cardinals
anyone know how much Matheny intends to play Garcia?
Preliminary indications are that Mark Ellis will get most of the time at 2B until they fix whatever was wong with Wrong, or vice versa. That isn’t a big surprise; it’s basically what they got him for. Note that Garcia is better at shortstop than Daniel Descalso (which isn’t saying much), so he will probably see occasional action at both middle infield positions.
Yeah, pretty much the way I see it. The problem is the Cards aren’t better today than they were yesterday. It is fun to see Grichuk up, but don’t look for him to see much action unless it is against lefties perhaps, and in the NL Central that is a rarity.
was just wondering if this was going to be a real opportunity for Garcia or not.
First the Shelby Miller article, now one on Craig?
I can only assume that by pointing out these factual issues with the Cardinals, Dave, that you have finally revealed yourself to be a Cardinal hating, anti-St. Louis, EastCoastBiased (TM) media member.
No. He’s just like the rest of us; tired of seeing a good organization treated as if their shite don’t stink.
I believe Mr. Cranker was making a funny.
Bourjos for Nick Franklin might make some sense.
I’d bet the M’s would like a prospect in return (Piscotty/Grichuk) rather than Bourjos, who has proven at this point to be mostly valuable only for defense while also being made of papier mache.
While I sure would love to see Franklin in a St. Louis uniform, my guess is Grichuk would be needed to get him. But Butler is another option that could interest Seattle.
Might make sense for the Cards. Not sure why the Mariners would do that.
Because they’re the Mariners.
The overvaluing of Peter Bourjos rolls on…
stephen drew?
The Wong move tells me that the Cardinal Way is no different from every other team’s way– misunderstand small sample sizes, attribute all kinds of profound meanings to the essential mystery of streaks and slumps, and scapegoat young players whenever a scapegoat is needed. Nevermind the long-term plan. Wong will no doubt go back to AAA, get on a hot streak, get recalled just as his hot streak has run its course, and when he inevitably cools off, it will be attributed to his inability to adjust to MLB pitching. How many times have we seen that dreary script play out? Briefly, the Cardinal touters had me convinced that the Cards knew better, but here we are, still in April and Wong is back in Memphis and Mark Ellis is playing second in St. Louis.
Isn’t the opposite of regress progress?
“Just as there was no reason to expect them to keep hitting at their 2013 rate, this too should regress…”
1. I don’t think anything of what you’re complaining about had stuff to do with the Cardinal Way.
2. You complain about teams using streaks improperly, you then proceed to basically do the same thing they are doing but with hot streaks.
3. It’s possible Mark Ellis would be better than Wong this year anyway, given he had 2.8 WAR two years ago and 1.7 WAR the year before, Wong’s minor league stats don’t suggest he should be amazing overnight and rookies can have adjustment periods (Or even flop: For all we know Kolten Wong isn’t even any good).
I’m happy to discuss it with you Ruki, but it appears you misinterpreted what I wrote about streaks and slumps. I am just disappointed in the Cards’ handling of this situation– I thought they would treat the break-in of a promising prospect with more finesse than, say, the Royals did with Giavotella.
The Cardinals understand small sample size as much as any other team in baseball (which is to say, better than pundits generally give teams credit for), and they aren’t doing anything panicky with Craig, Peralta, or any other solid players who are off to low-OBP starts. With Wong, they have detected a problem that needs to be fixed; in the article announcing the move, Matheny — and Wong — said as much. So they set to work fixing it. Ho hum.
What’s Wong’s problem, specifically?
Matheny indicated, and Wong was quoted as confirming, that something had gone wrong with his swing, that it had gotten “long.” This is frequently baseball shorthand for “there’s something wrong with the swing, but we’re not sure what it is.”
well, something’s Wong… 😉
See post below. Craig’s issues with declining power and increasing gb rate date back to second half of 2012. At this point you can’t say that this is a sample size issue, unless you also say that Craig’s brief period (1.5 seasons) of great hitting success were also a small sample size.
Wouldn’t honestly surprise me if we found out later on that peds were involved. Would explain a lot here.
Plus he’s not exactly young and wasn’t exactly young when he was first called up. That whole crop of old prospects (freese, Craig, jay, Lynn) I thought they’d trade by now once their prime was over
I have never been a Bourjos fan at all. Very overrated player who is best-suited as a 4th OF on a good team. Defense aside, at some point a MLB OF has to be able to hit a little bit.
Career 94 wRC+ isn’t too horrible for a CFer, is it? And if he gets a full season basically all of his years ar 2+ WAR. Problem is getting that full season.
allen craig would be a perfect fit in Baltimore in the mode of edgar Martinez. his frozen ropes would find the seats. throw in some high end pitching for machado. the door is closing in Baltimore. I think conversations concerning adams or craig having been going on in earnest for months and could see a move soon.
Machado?? I’d like to have some of what you’ve been smoking…
You should have just stopped when he compared craig to edgar martinez.
Craig is not hitting frozen ropes. He is hitting 15 hoppers, 1 out of every 8 of which dribble into right field.
Further, he is a disaster in RF, and I submit the worst fielding RF’er in the NL. His ground-ball tendency, low walk rate, limited power, poor baserunning, and bad fielding make him a detriment.
Craig’s descent into powerless hitter actually began in the second half of 2012, when his fb% dropped and his gb% increased, a trend that continued into his injury plagued 2013 and of course in more extreme form through this season. At this point, we have about 1.5 seasons of Craig demonstrating good power and a decent fb% to go with his usual ld% and strong batting eye. And about 1-1.5 seasons of Craig looking like basically a slap singles hitter with some gap power. I’m officially worried about him. And the idea of sitting Adams, who is demonstrating some nice improvements vs. lefties so far this season, for what looks like a rapidly aging Craig, seems idiotic to me.
I hope Craig comes back to “normal” but have concerns that even “normal” right now for Craig isn’t particularly good. Even a 45% gb rate for a player like Craig means he’s not a particularly valuable player, esp. when you factor in his defense and propensity towards injuries.
Craig just hit a home run. He must have read Dave’s article this afternoon.
“Matt Adams is a nice enough player, but he’s not so good that having him and Craig split the first base duties, as they did a year ago, is a waste of a guy who must play everyday.”
Ouch. That’s about the lowest evaluation I’ve heard of Adams so far.
Could playing OF really be what is killing Craig? And even if it is, you would rather have one in the lineup instead of both?