The Changing Look of the Average Outfielder
Remember Joe Carter? If you do, you remember a 6-foot-3, 220-pound slugger with plenty of big home runs peppered into the 402 he put together over the course of his career. He won a World Series with one of them! He was also an outfielder — and, according to the evidence available to us, he was a bad one.
Carter wasn’t an anomaly, either. In the late 90s, teams were fine with putting a dude like him in the corners because he was putting up numbers at the plate that made the whole thing work. A look around baseball in 2016, however, reveals that teams are no longer doing that these days — outfielders are fundamentally different now. In fact, they’re different than they’ve been for almost the last 100 years.
The game is getting less offense from the outfield than it used to get. For the first time since the game became recognizable as the game we see today — in 1925, men were back from the war, and players started hitting for some power and parks were more uniform — for the first time since 1925, the outfield is only giving the game league-average production as a group.
There’s a lot of different ways that this sort of thing can happen, but check out the power production in the outfield over time. It’s basically the same chart.
Conversely, more baserunning value has come from the outfield over time. The four best years by outfielders according to that measure have occurred in the last six years. It really looks like we’re putting lighter, faster players in the outfield: for the first time since before World War I ended, the league-indexed weight for the average outfielder dropped below league average in 2008, and it hasn’t quite recovered. This is also weighted for playing time.
To reiterate: this indexed it to league average, so the fact that players’ reported height and weight went from five-foot-nine and 173 pounds in 1900 to six-foot-one and 201 pounds last year is baked into the numbers.
In any case, the next chart should reveal an obvious outcome. It should be a chart about outfield defense, and how it’s gotten better because we’re putting Adam Eaton in the corner outfield instead of Joe Carter. But that sort of thing is seriously difficult to measure, you might have heard. I resorted to comparing fly-ball batting averages to league batting averages as far back as my elbow grease would allow me. In this case, we can look at how fly balls to the outfield have done since 1990:
Hard to see an obvious trend here. It might have ticked up this year because of the added 1.1 mph of exit velocity we saw this year compared to early 2015, but even if you squint, you wouldn’t say that outfield defense has become demonstrably better over this time frame. And yet we’ve seen changes in outfield offense and player size over that same time frame. So why are outfielders getting smaller and faster?
As much as we weighted these numbers by plate appearances, perhaps the difference is bench players. Are our fourth outfielders more glove and legs instead of pinch-hitting power-and-patience guys? Let’s just look at the fourth outfielders in 1987 versus last year. I immigrated to this country in 1986 and immediately jumped into baseball, which will help me judge the fourth outfielders, but 1987 is also right in the middle of the more traditional period for outfielders in terms of power, offensive production, and speed, so it’s a good comparison.
| ISO | BSR | wRC+ | Def Runs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 0.162 | 0.3 | 106 | -81.2 |
| 2016 | 0.131 | 21.9 | 84 | -71.0 |
It’s actually fairly difficult to judge who is a fourth outfielder, so there’s error involved in both my list for 1987 and my list for last year. I accept that. That said, it looks like we’ve really pushed defense and baserunning from our fourth outfielders in baseball recently, over the sluggard of old.
What does that mean this offseason? It’s a tough time to be Oswaldo Arcia or Michael Morse, is probably what it means — and maybe even Eric Thames. It’ll be easier to get a gig for Coco Crisp, Desmond Jennings, and Logan Schafer, though. But there might also be a team that can zig while others are zagging by going to get a more traditional slugger to fill in their fourth-outfielder spot — certainly Carlos Beltran won’t cost that much and will be the right fit for the right team, and Brandon Moss looks like he’ll be a relative bargain for the production his bat can give.
You can see that the average outfielder is getting skinnier and faster. What you do with that knowledge is another question.
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.




I’m most surprised that the defensive runs saved by the 4th outfielders in 2016 is still quite poor.
It includes the positional adjustment, which for LF/RF is about -8 runs per season
While OF’s are getting less sluggery, middle infielders are getting noticeably more sluggery. Not sure if there is a relationship there, but there’s no doubt 2B and SS are producing way more HR than in years past
yeah, that was my thought, too. looking at indexed stats to tell you about a change in outfielders only works if you assume the outfielders are the ones who have changed, rather than everybody else.
I hear you, but then there were the 30 homer middle infielders of the 90s that didn’t seem to change the game the same way..
as to the ides of “skinnier and faster”, I think that guys like Trout are sort of the opposite. I think that pre steroids guys were skinnier and since then guys are much bulkier. Trout is 235. Bonds went from somewhere in the 185 range to the Trout range , and over time much of baseball seems to have moved with him.
yeah, fair point
Ah,this is the kind of off-season article I love. Thanks,Eno.
Good piece. As to fourth outfielders, a big part of the change is relief pitching – bullpens are now so deep that there’s no room on the roster for a reserve OF who can’t play CF. (Similarly, the reserve IF who can’t play SS is almost gone; again, glove trumps bat.) AAA is now full of “AAAA” guys who would have been solid bench players decades ago.
Interesting that you pick out Joe Carter. When he was in Cleveland, he was actually a pretty good defender. The plodding, negative value guy we remember was mostly the guy who played in Toronto.
And that may speak to one of the factors here (I type, without having done even rudimentary checking to see if the data supports it). It seems we’re seeing a skew to younger 4th outfielder types today than we’ve seen in the past. That would seem to predict slimmer, faster guys in the group.
Also going to be interesting to watch this trend as there are a pretty good cohort of big-bodied corner outfielders with power AND good to above-average defense coming through the minors right now (think Jimenez, Judge, Lewis, Renfroe, Nick Williams, Winker and even Tucker and Rutherford and others who will be well north of 200 pounds when they reach the big leagues).
True about Carter, but I checked the age of the 1987 group (27) and it was two years younger than the 2016 group (29), weirdly enough. Might just be one year, but it is an interesting question.
Thank you for checking!
Just looking at some of his metrics, he played a lot of CF in those pre-Toronto years. He seemed to be a fine corner OFer for the majority of his career prior to his mid 30’s.
“Remember Joe Carter?”
“…yes”, replied the Phillies fans.
“ditto”, replied Cubs fans
Do cubs fans also remember Sutcliffe?