The Continuing Evolution of Justin Verlander

One of those baseball facts that might stick with me forever is that, after getting traded from the Mariners to the Astros, Randy Johnson put up a 1.something ERA. Specifically, including the playoffs, Johnson appeared in 13 games with Houston, and his ERA was 1.42. To be that dominant, in that era, under those circumstances, after having struggled before the deal — well, I don’t know what else there is to explain. I haven’t forgotten about it for 20 years. I’m sure I’ll remember for at least 20 years more.

We’re living in the middle of a similar fact. One that’s gone on longer, one that must be considered even more impressive. After getting traded from the Tigers to the Astros, Justin Verlander has put up a 1.something ERA. Specifically, including the playoffs, Verlander has appeared in 23 games with Houston, and his ERA is 1.36. In Verlander’s most recent start, against the Yankees, he allowed one run. That’s right on his season average — he’s allowed 12 runs over 12 starts. After allowing seven runs in the season’s first month, he allowed five in the second. Hitting Verlander of late has been more or less impossible.

Verlander was traded last summer, and was immediately good. We’ve already gone through a bunch of stories examining his turnaround, highlighting, especially, the improvement of his slider. That was a common conversation last fall — the one about how Verlander got better by making use of Houston’s slow-motion cameras. Yet Verlander only continues to grow. He remains, you could say, a work in progress, and he’s made a further adjustment in 2018 to get the most out of the pitches he has.

Over the course of his eventual Hall-of-Fame career, Verlander has possessed a dominant changeup. He’s possessed a dominant curveball, and he’s possessed a dominant slider. The pitch that will be remembered for decades, though, is the dominant fastball. So much of the whole Verlander story comes down to the fastball, how it refuses to lose any speed, how it can brush triple digits in the top of the ninth. From the beginning, Verlander has thrown heat, and as we’ve come to understand pitches better and better, we’ve seen that Verlander succeeds by throwing a rising four-seamer around the upper part of the zone.

In general, current Verlander doesn’t look very different. If you were to watch him now, you might not think anything has changed from his earlier peak. Of course, some tweaks are obvious, and some are more subtle. Here’s something subtle. Among starting pitchers, Verlander’s four-seam fastball has commonly ranked in the upper fourth, in terms of vertical movement. In other words, it’s consistently generated more rise than average. In this season, however, Verlander’s four-seam fastball ranks in second place, behind only Marco Estrada. He already generated rise. Now he’s getting more. The more rise a four-seamer gets, the harder it is to square up.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

How does a pitcher like Verlander do this? The easiest way to analyze what’s going on is by looking at a plot from Brooks Baseball. Here, then, are Verlander’s month-to-month vertical release points:

It’s not hard to spot the trend Verlander and the Astros have worked to reverse. Last year, after arriving in Houston, Verlander started throwing from a higher slot. This year, the slots have gotten higher still, which can’t be a mistake. Granted, Verlander was very good in 2016, so it’s not like there’s only one way for him to succeed. But this is an adjustment that’s taken place in an Astros uniform. Verlander’s arm is moving back up to where it used to be, before the core muscle injury, before the intentional drop to three-quarters. This allows him to pitch in a particular way.

I’ll borrow now from Texas Leaguers. Here’s a comparison of Verlander’s release points in May 2017 and May 2018:

Here are fastballs from May 2017 and May 2018, with the lower slot being from last year:

And here are sliders from May 2017 and May 2018, with the lower slot being from last year:

What can be the consequence of someone raising his arm slot? For one glimpse, I’ll return to Brooks Baseball. For Verlander’s fastball, slider, and curve, here are his year-to-year average vertical movements:

When a pitcher raises his arm slot, he can be more able to move pitches up and down. Breaking balls are more 12-to-6; fastballs have less run. What we can see with Verlander is more vertical separation. Now, the slider has changed for a couple of reasons — that isn’t just because of the arm-slot adjustment. But the separation in vertical movement between Verlander’s fastball and slider is the greatest it’s been since 2012. The separation in vertical movement between his fastball and curve is the greatest it’s been since 2012, as well. Verlander has always had these pitches, yet they’re ending up in slightly different places.

To drive the point home further, here’s another comparison between May 2017 and May 2018. For each Verlander pitch type, you’re seeing horizontal and vertical movements.

The slider has shifted substantially. Again, we talked about that last fall. That’s a part of the story here. But for the purposes of this particular post, focus on the fastballs. It’s not so much that Verlander has added a lot of rise; it’s more that he’s eliminated fastballs that don’t get much rise. There’s a shift up and toward the center. Verlander is throwing exclusively four-seamers. He’s always thrown four-seamers, but from a lower arm slot, sometimes he’d get more two-seam behavior. With the Astros, and especially now, Verlander is getting and staying on top of the ball, and his four-seamer is looking overwhelming.

So Verlander is back around a career-high arm slot. In a sense, he’s pitching how he used to. In another sense, he’s taken that old approach and tweaked it. For the final image in this article, take a look at Verlander’s pitch-type zone rates, covering the previous decade:

Verlander is getting plenty of separation between his fastball and his breaking balls. But now he’s pitching even more fastball-first, in that he’s using his fastball more aggressively. Verlander’s fastball has a career-high zone rate, by a large margin. He’s not the least bit afraid of the pitch staying over the plate. And because the heater is so good, that allows Verlander to mostly keep his breaking balls low. The curveball has its lowest zone rate. The same goes for the slider. The fastball is already hard to hit, and, because of that, the other pitches have become extra unhittable. Verlander is working up and down better than ever before, and as a result, these days he doesn’t even need a changeup. He has more than enough to get hitters out.

When ace-level starting pitchers reach their mid-30s, it’s usually a story of survival. A story of how a pitcher has to make some adjustments if he wants to be able to keep his job. In this and in so many other ways, Justin Verlander is an exception. He’s not pitching to keep a job. He’s pitching to win another award. Maybe another two or three. At some point, it’s inevitable that Verlander is going to break down. No one is able to do this forever. Verlander’s trying. And he’s doing an admirable job of it.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

This is only one of three times that the Astros have taken a high-velocity starting pitcher who was underperforming and dramatically improved them. Verlander, Cole, and Morton are currently #1, #3, and #26 in starting pitcher WAR.

Made me think of this:
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-astros-arent-the-only-team-whose-pitchers-are-adding-spin/

I wonder if the Astros are doing the same thing with each pitcher, or are just really good at finding a pitcher’s strengths and playing to it.

Joe Joe
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Cole has added an inch in vertical release. Vertical separation on fastball with curve increased by about 2.5 inches and with slider about an inch. Morton doesn’t fit, and most of his change seems to be related to throwing harder.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

How much credit goes to Brent Strom? I hear the Astro’s FO get a lot of credit for developing/molding pitchers a certain way, but I don’t hear that much about Strom himself. During the Pirates run of excellence, I often heard about Ray Searage and his impact on the pitching staff, but when it comes to Houston I mostly hear about the Front Office or the individuals. I think its time to give Mr. Strom his credit for bringing the best out of pitchers who were otherwise special before taking their talents to Houston.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

That’s a good question. I had literally never heard the name before, but every scenario I can imagine has the pitching coach playing a major role in these career changes.

I googled him. Relevant and/or interesting tidbits:

-He became the pitching coach for the Astros in 2014
-Before that, he was a minor league pitching instructor for the Cards

-He was actually briefly a pitching coach for the Astros in the 90s, and then for the Royals for two years (2000-2001).

-The Royals had awful pitchers the years he was there, and the Astros didn’t have any breakout pitchers in 1996 either (some pitchers improved during his tenure, like Darryl Kile, Donne Wall, and Mac Suzuki…but nothing quite like what we are seeing now).

-He was the second player to ever have Tommy John surgery

I would love to know more about this guy. I get the sense he was an adequate pitching coach back in the day, but for some reason he’s really good with sabermetric backing. But that is nothing more than conjecture.

Raidas77
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He may not be a national name, but Astros fans are well aware of him. He’s been great and was one of the first people talking about pitch tunneling. Don’t know who is leading the charge, he or the FO, but they are in sync with each other.

Less of a dynamic impact, but their first reclamation project was Collin McHugh who was, to put it mildly, not a good MLB pitcher. They took him off the waiver wire and started working on his great curveball and combining it with a high fastball coming out of the same tunnel.

The FO has thought very highly of him from the get-go as they brought Mark Appel to Houston to throw a bullpen session with Strom back when he was struggling in Houston’s farm system. Obviously, he can’t fix them all.

AndrewMember since 2016
8 years ago

My favorite pitcher of all-time. I came back to baseball after a brief (college) hiatus around 2010-11 and watching Verlander CGs from that era are something I’ve never seen another pitcher do.

kbn
8 years ago

I thought Verlander was a pretty solid, middle-to-back of the pack HoF candidate before 2017. His peak ranks solidly among the great aces of history. He clearly seemed to be declining, but he also seemed to be doing a good job of adjusting to his later years and seemed to be ready to step into a dependable mid-rotation role.

That’s before he decided to just forget the fact that he’s 35 and not 25. I’m not a Tigers fan. I’m not an Astros fan. I’m, in fact, a fan of another AL team and I’m terrified of him. Verlander is incredible. It’s almost even better than watching contemporary greats like Sale and Kershaw – or even slightly older generational greats like Kluber or Scherzer – because Verlander is demonstrating that level of dominance with a TON more miles on his arm and a lot more aging in the rear-view mirror. (btw it still blows my mind that the 2014 Tigers had Price, Verlander, AND Scherzer all at the same time)

He’s incredible. If he does this for a few more years… Heck, if he just resets his aging curves based on this year and declines normally from here on out… He’s going to be inner-inner-circle Hall of Fame. As a PITCHER. And he’s going to deserve it.

cuniculus
8 years ago
Reply to  kbn

That’s only 3 of the 4 Cy Young winners they had that year… crazy.

Saga
8 years ago
Reply to  cuniculus

…and in 2013 the rotation was twice as good by WAR. Great season. Wonderful time to be a Tigers fan. Can’t remember what happened in the playoffs that year, though. Nope, can’t remember at all. It’s a blank. A black space. I just assume they did great.

scooter262
8 years ago

You can credit the Astros for much of Verlander’s improvement. The one thing that comes from Verlander himself, and him just being a freak, is the ability to keep his velocity into his mid-30’s. Very few guys have this.

And, as Jeff noted, Verlander has always been something of an outlier, with his ability to throw harder in the 9th than he does in the earlier innings: his ability to “take it up a notch” into overdrive, seemingly whenever he needs it, is not something that you see very much.

JCav75
8 years ago

good article on the separation of his pitches, and the data shows he’s getting more accurate and more consistent behavior with his pitches from this higher arm slot.

I gotta gripe with you though…on a very basic part of your article that you repeat multiple times…. You state that Verlander is getting more “rise.” Like twice. It makes me cringe. Fastball’s don’t …rise. it just drops less than our brain’s anticipate. Physics. The ball can’t rise. The only riseball that’s thrown is in women’s softball because they are pitching underhanded… I’ll quote you two sources… one from your own site, Fangraphs: https://www.fangraphs.com/tht/the-physics-of-a-rising-fastball/
https://thought.artsci.wustl.edu/podcasts/physics-baseball

Have a good day my man, but I don’t know what to say, it’s kind of a major thing to flub…

FedericoMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  JCav75

You must be joking, right?

dodgerbleu
8 years ago
Reply to  Federico

Based on the mic-drop valediction, I fear he is not.

I hope JCav isn’t a Cavaliers fan, because if he is and he learns that they are not in fact royalist supporters of King Charles I, there will be a reckoning coming.

WerthlessMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  JCav75

The authors on this site understand fastball movement, and what it means to say that a fastball rises. It’s the common vernacular in the industry, and readers of the site understand what is meant. It’s tedious to demand that they explain every industry term with each use.

JCav75
8 years ago
Reply to  Werthless

and if that “industry term” is wrong and no longer used by said industry because it’s outdated, we should keep using it in inappropriate contexts?

A. Green
8 years ago

I’m a big Detroit Tigers fan, and as much as I long that Verlander was pitching this well for us this year, I realize that he wouldn’t have been able to optimize his abilities if he stayed with an organization like the Tigers instead of going to Houston (yes, I realize in 2016 he probably should have won the Cy Young and that he pitched at an elite level in his last 2 months with the Tigers before being traded to Houston… but still, nothing like this!)

I feel like Verlander is an excellent study in just how valuable analytics are to an organization. The Tigers are way behind the curve while the Astros are near the peak, and after he was traded it only seemed natural that Verlander would improve significantly just from going to a team like the Astros.

This just reinforces my conviction that analytics has now moved well beyond simply valuing players into the realm of being able to add value to the players themselves.

SertoriusMember since 2023
8 years ago

I just want to mention how impressed I am that you found pictures at Minute Maid from when he was a Tiger so that the camera angle was exactly the same for both pictures in the GIF. As always your attention amazes.

Giolito's changeup
8 years ago

Jeff,

I don’t take the opportunity often enough to thank you for a wonderful. The graphs and videos bring further light to the great prose. Yes, JV is a work in progress, great to unhittable.

KingAsshole
8 years ago

One thing i find weird is that Verlander has a period from like 2013-the first half of 2016 when he was throwing fastballs at average of 92.8. Then from 2nd half of 2016-2018, his fastball velocity jumped back up to 95’s where it was during his peak years (2009-2012).

That is something that I really havent been able to find from ANY pitcher in his early to mid 30’s. Regaining lost velocity at 34?? Wonder what King Felix would do if he could jump back up to 95?? Arm slot and slider efficiency are nice but I personally think this guy got on an AROD gummy regimen. The science of cheating is pretty advanced now. Take something and it can be out of your system in 2 hours!! Dude’s on the juice!! Schilling, Pedro, Randy Johnson, Clemens and the list goes on and on and on of guys that lost velocity in their 30’s. I am yet to find one that was able to regain it to PEAK levels during age 35 season like Verlander magically has. Seems like a case of SCIENCE more than mechanics and slow motion cameras.

fredsbankMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  KingAsshole

It’s also kind of like Charlie Morton and his famous “decision to just throw harder” once he went to Houston. Definitely nothing to see there.

GELeaguer
8 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

Add me to the list of doubters. The turnarounds experienced by Cole, Morton and Verlander upon arriving in Houston, defy history and statistics.

southie
8 years ago
Reply to  GELeaguer

Cole doesn’t need juice with the easy schedule he has had.

dmgutie
8 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

Great point, except for the fact that Charlie Morton and his decision to throw harder happened in 2016 with the Phillies. That’s the whole reason the Astros signed him – they believed his velocity and strikeout improvements from 2016 were sustainable.

TheWrightStache
8 years ago
Reply to  dmgutie

And Verlander’s velo was creeping back up before he got to Houston. Check this chart out; it basically shows a steady rise in FB velo from beginning of 2016 through the end of 2017:

https://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfxo.aspx?playerid=8700&position=P&statArr=&legend=1&split=base&time=daily&start=2016&end=2018&rtype=mult&gt1=15&dStatArray=FA&ymin=&ymax=

As with Morton, it looks like the ‘Stros bought into a trend that was already occurring, rather than create the change themselves.

Captain Tenneal
8 years ago
Reply to  KingAsshole

Holy shit, you’re right. I can’t believe no one else noticed his velocity drop and subsequent recovery. Have you brought your PED findings to MLB? Thank you for you brave service in keeping this game clean.

WoundedSprinterMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  KingAsshole

Thanks for that, Asshole. (I assume you’re happier when called by your surname.)
I’m always looking for a good laugh, preferably provided by somebody who doesn’t quite understand how ignorant he is (Yes, I know, cruel), and here you are. Love the caps, btw: science ain’t science until it’s SCIENCE. And I also enjoyed the random list of pitchers, in which list you missed Pettitte (I have sympathy with Andy P) and somehow included three obvious non-roiders
Super!
But, to be brutal about this, you are a phenomenal idiot. Verlander is not a PED guy, he’s just an outlier.
There is a difference. You wouldn’t know, because you are an imbecile.
Keep taking the PEDs, mate.

rosabellagm
8 years ago

This article has suggested to me many new ideas. I will embark on doing it. Hope you can continue to contribute your talents in this area. hotmail sign in

Slappytheclown
8 years ago

For all of us that appriciate baseball what Justin Verlandar is doing is truly remarkable and HOF worthy. Just four more full seasons of 200IP and 4 WAR per year and he will be at 80WaR, 200+ Wins and ready for his HOF plaque right next to Curt Schilling and Mike Mussina who also have about 80War of 3200+ IP and…oh wait….right um, yeah. HOF you suck

John Autin
8 years ago

Another great use of graph-GIFs to tell this story, Prof. Sullivan.