The Diamondbacks Are Already Screwed

I know this goes against the spirit of opening day, when anything can happen and everyone’s tied for first place. Opening day is a magical time precisely because no one’s yet been mathematically eliminated. The season hasn’t started to go down any path, which means the season could still go down any path conceivable. On opening day, everyone’s supposed to be happy; everyone’s supposed to be jazzed about baseball, because there’s not yet any reason not to be. Baseball’s back! It’s been a long time. The Royals just proved the numbers wrong the last time around. Maybe now it’s another team’s turn.

If you’re a fan in New York, you’re excited about baseball. If you’re a fan in Atlanta, you’re excited about baseball. If you’re a fan in Arizona, you’re excited about baseball. But: One of the dominant spring-training storylines was that the Dodgers were being undone by injury after injury. And it’s true; The Dodgers have already had their depth challenged, because they’ve got a busy disabled list. Yet, the Dodgers came equipped with reinforcements, so it seems like they should be able to handle this. Right at the end of spring training, the Diamondbacks lost A.J. Pollock. They might’ve lost him for the entire season. With one blow, Arizona has probably been hurt more than Los Angeles, and while anything is still able to happen, it’s a devastating turn of events. Their season hasn’t started yet, and the Diamondbacks might well be screwed.

I know there are people out there who think we’ve been too critical of the Diamondbacks this past year or so. There are people who think we’ve piled on, so let me make it clear: Yeah, we haven’t loved the way the organization has been run. But there’s no pleasure at all in writing this post. Pollock isn’t just a really good and important player. He’s a relatively underrated and underrecognized player, one of those sabermetric heroes. Your average baseball fan sure as hell knows Yoenis Cespedes. The same fan probably doesn’t know Pollock, yet Pollock is probably the better all-around player. He’s one of several underrated players on the Arizona roster.

Pollock debuted in the majors in 2012. Since then, 290 players have batted at least 1,000 times. Ordered by average WAR per 600 plate appearances, Pollock ranks 11th, right in between Lorenzo Cain and Carlos Gomez. His average is 5.3, and the player in fifth place — Joey Votto — shows up at 5.6. Pollock has been one of the most valuable position players in the game, and he’s 28 years old. Prefer the Baseball-Reference WAR statistic? By that measure, Pollock comes out at 5.8. So, better, if anything. Pollock contributes in every department, which is how he’s managed to so quietly climb the leaderboard.

This is a blow because Pollock is great. This is a blow because Pollock will be out for a long, long time. And this is a blow because the Diamondbacks don’t really have that much in the way of quality depth. Not that any team in baseball could easily replace a player of this ability, but Arizona might drop all the way to replacement-level. Recalling Cain again, it’s as if the Royals were to lose him. The Diamondbacks still have other good players, but they’re now missing a critical one.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Diamondbacks like Socrates Brito. I like Socrates Brito! Brito is going to slide in and take a lot of the time in center field. But, before, it looked like Brito could push for time in left field, ahead of Yasmany Tomas. Now the Diamondbacks are going to need both of them, and they’ll also look for outfield help from Chris Owings. For reference, in our 2016 Positional Power Rankings, the Diamondbacks ranked fourth in center field. Now, in updated projected WAR, they rank 30th. Dead last. And they rank dead last in left field, too. An outfield that once projected for 6.4 WAR now projects for 2.8, which is a drop of almost four wins. Maybe that even underrates the real-life impact. There’s no way to spin this into a good thing, and now they need both Brito and Tomas to build upon any spring-training gains.

When I’ve written about the National League, I’ve described three tiers. There’s the top tier, with the obvious contenders. There’s the bottom tier, with the rebuilding teams, and the teams that should be rebuilding. And the middle tier was just the Marlins and the Diamondbacks, two teams on the fringes, who were going to need health in order to stick around. The season is just starting, and the Marlins have already lost one of the most unhittable relievers in the game. The Diamondbacks have lost one of the best all-around outfielders in the game. Carter Capps is definitely done for the year; Pollock might be. Maybe we see him in September. Maybe September will mean something. But the Diamondbacks now project to miss the playoffs by nine games. There’s the same projected difference between the Diamondbacks and the Giants as there is between the Diamondbacks and the Braves.

Really good players remain. For chrissakes, the Diamondbacks project to win 48% of their games, and so do the Royals. I don’t need to tell you the significance of that. Talk to players on the roster, or to coaches, or to executives, and they’ll say, yeah, it’s a tough blow, but this is just an opportunity for someone else. The team’ll come together. Everyone just has to be a little bit better. And so on, and so on. It’s all true, and it’s all what you’d expect to hear at this point, when there are all of the games to be played. The Diamondbacks won’t feel sorry for themselves, and you can’t dismiss a roster that still has Paul Goldschmidt and Zack Greinke. Teams have rallied past injuries like this before. This can be overcome. Maybe both Brito and Tomas are ready to break out, and then Pollock will re-join a stacked roster down the stretch.

It’s just tough to imagine many more crippling injuries. This isn’t the Angels losing Mike Trout, but it’s kind of like that. The Diamondbacks lost one of the game’s best outfielders. We might not see him all season long. This one injury could alter the course of the year, which could alter the course of the front office’s dealings. This was supposed to be the opening of the Diamondbacks’ window. That window suddenly feels awful stuck.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JC
10 years ago

It does suck, but at least now Stewart fully understands how a team can add Greinke and Miller and not project to get better. I doubt he does anything from now on without visiting fangraphs.com.

Dave Stewart
10 years ago
Reply to  JC

I gotta take a dump. Visiting here first.

Hyperion
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave Stewart

I hope it’s of the CSV variety.

LenardMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  JC

No he doesn’t. If they underachieve this year, they now have their perfect scapegoat in Pollock’s elbow.

jcutigerMember since 2024
10 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

and if they miss the playoffs by 5.6 wins minus Pollock’s replacement(s) it could be said that the injury cost them the playoffs.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Lenard

Yup, although it does put focus back on the fact they traded inciarte, who by all accounts is an above average cf’r.

mas1012
10 years ago
Reply to  JC

But miller = heyward = 200 million dollars.

JimMember since 2016
10 years ago

Headfirst slide.

Lee TrocinskiMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Jim

I’d say it would have been even riskier taking a feet-first slide, since you always brace yourself with one arm, which is how he got hurt. Looks like he’s a right-foot-out slider, which means his left arm would be down, but the actual slide didn’t hurt him. He got hurt pushing to get up. If he gets hurt diving for a ball in the OF, do you have the same reaction?

Luy
10 years ago
Reply to  Lee Trocinski

“If he gets hurt diving for a ball in the OF, do you have the same reaction?”

Of course not. Diving to catch a ball in the outfield is the only way to catch that ball. Diving head first into home plate is not the only or the best way to touch home plate (especially in a meaningless game).
I’ll agree that it was a freak injury. But the analog you’re trying to create is nonsense.

Moranall
10 years ago
Reply to  Luy

Pollock had a sore elbow all spring long. He fractured the growth plate on a diving catch a few years ago. The speculation is that Pollock somehow reinjured this area earlier in the spring and the slide was just the catalyst that caused the fracture.

Pollock also stated that he hurt the elbow when he pushed himself off the ground (like a pushup) and not during the slide.

vonstott
10 years ago
Reply to  Luy

Granted, it was a long time ago – but when I was taught to slide, you had to get up whichever way you did it.

Luy
10 years ago
Reply to  Luy

I saw the play. If he slides feet first, he doesn’t have to push himself up.

Now, it seems injury was inevitable, but I’m curious why so many are defending the head first slide into home in an exhibition game. Even if Pollock were healthy, it’s a dumb play.

Luy
10 years ago
Reply to  Luy

When I was taught to slide we were taught to pop back up without touching anything.
Also, you put a lot less weight on your arms getting up from a feet first slide.
I don’t really care about this. It just blows my mind how stubbornly everyone is defending this slide. It was a dumb play. Period.

isavage
10 years ago
Reply to  Luy

The way he injured himself on that slide, I would say it was only a matter of time. If he didn’t do the damage there, some other baseball play would’ve done it. There didn’t appear to be any major impact or stress on the elbow. He had injured the elbow earlier in the spring, so seems there was likely already something there and getting up from the slide just pushed it over the edge.

jimbo22s
10 years ago
Reply to  Lee Trocinski

A player does not have to put an arm down when he slides feet first. Some would say it is improper technique to drag your hand behind you when you slide feet first. “Grab your ears” when you slide and keep your hands off the ground.

Greg
10 years ago

An absolutely devastating injury for any fan of MLB. Man is this guy fun to watch.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg

Even as a big Dodger fan I hated to see him get hurt like this. He’s a good and underrated player.

Spartacus
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Ahhh, now I understand why Johnston is so protective of his lawn… he’s from LA. Lawns are hard to come by in the desert.

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago

As if that trade with the Braves could look any worse. The risk of trading a depth piece at (perceived) peak value.

donnybeisbol
10 years ago

The bigger question is… how much is this going to impact Goldschmidt’s fantasy numbers?

And by fantasy numbers, I mean more specifically my 5×5 roto team which happened to select Goldy ahead of Trout (doh!) in a keeper draft short on 1B men.

Los
10 years ago
Reply to  donnybeisbol

I’m sorry but that is pretty low if that is the biggest question. I’m a Pirate fan so an injury to one of the primary contenders for a wild card spot benefits the Pirates but as a baseball fan this completely sucks. Worrying about the fantasy numbers of another player means you have your priorities in the wrong place.

Plus, a) no one cares about your fantasy team and b) Trout is better than Goldschmidt and 4 years younger so that was a bad keeper pick either way.

cs3
10 years ago
Reply to  donnybeisbol

Nobody cares about your fantasy team

donnybeisbol
10 years ago
Reply to  cs3

Yeah, it was meant as sarcasm.

I guess that doesn’t play well here.

Beer
10 years ago
Reply to  donnybeisbol

The problem is, it’s hard to tell if that’s sarcasm with all the idiot commenters that show up here.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  cs3

Nobody cares about anybody else’s fantasy team. Nor should they.

nscheer
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

i care.

Ozzie Albies
10 years ago
Reply to  donnybeisbol

The big question … how to streets to the desired figure GOLD SCHMIDT.

I think, I think especially at the 5 to 5 roto We happened to opt for salmon (DOH!) A short project Goldi 1 B.

waters96
10 years ago

On the fantasy side, anybody care to rank who will have the most value going forward:
1. Drury
2. Owings
3. Ahmed

Beer
10 years ago
Reply to  waters96

No.

BenSharpMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  waters96

Why is this getting downvoted? He just asked a question….

joecb91
10 years ago
Reply to  BenSharp

People don’t want to see fantasy comments on here

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago
Reply to  joecb91

There’s Rotographs and Eno Sarris chats for fantasy…sadly, a bit of mob mentality too.

Original Greaser Bob
10 years ago
Reply to  BenSharp

Because this place is like talking to a PhD who is very pretentious and only comfortable talking about one thing. All the time.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  BenSharp

Get that fantasy stuff out of here. Nobody cares about his fantasy team.

nscheer
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

i care.

johansantana17Member since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  waters96

None of them should be on anybody’s fantasy team, in any type of league.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

So do they trade for someone? since their window is pretty small, this year basically representing 25% of their window.

reggiethomaslive
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

This year represents half of their entire window. To keep them s team together in 2018 requires $40M+ a year more in payroll. Ken Kendrick has only paid more than $90M in payroll once in the last dozen years, he ain’t going to pay $130M+ in two years.

And the biggest piece Stewart should want to move, Yasmany Tomas is untradable cause he’s owed $45M alone in 2018-2020. Goodbye Pollock, Shelby Miller and others.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Miller and Pollack are under control thru 2018, albeit with unlocked prices in 2018. I was being generous and giving them goldys whole contract as a window though due to his cheap prices. But yeah it’s why the Miller trade didn’t make sense, I would assume godly gets moved with a year left, year and a half if they are out of it.

The Other DougMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

*** WINNER *** for Most Appropriate Typo (goldy = godly)

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

If the dbacks didn’t also have someone named godley I would agree lol

AnonMember since 2025
10 years ago

“I know there are people out there who think we’ve been too critical of the Diamondbacks this past year or so.”

Just going to guess that the title of “The Diamondbacks are Already Screwed” probably isn’t going to change that perception.

Johnston
10 years ago
Reply to  Anon

It’s just the plain truth. “Brutally mishandled DBacks will now suck canal water all year” would also have worked, but he went with the kinder option.

Beer
10 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

Man, I hope you’re not talking about the New River. Sucking that water is cruel & unusual punishment.

RadermecherMember since 2018
10 years ago

Welcome to early injury hell,Cards,and Dodgers are keeping your seat warm.

frivoflava29
10 years ago

Isn’t an elbow fracture 30-60 days or so? This only costs the Diamondbacks 1-2 wins, 3 at most, assuming he returns in good health right? It’s very late and I’m tired though, I’m genuinely asking a question here.

Fuck Barmer
10 years ago
Reply to  frivoflava29

Its the type of fracture and the surgery it requires. Plus everyone heals at a different rate. its very possible even if they make the playoffs he never plays…

jmsdean477
10 years ago
Reply to  Fuck Barmer

The general talk from most news sources is that he’s out for most or all of the year, I assume this recovery time is based on medical information. So yeah he aint putting up a years worth of WAR minus 1 or 2 in Sept.

Milendriel
10 years ago
Reply to  frivoflava29

I did my collarbone playing soccer, and it was 3 months from my surgery before I was cleared to play. That in a sport where use of the shoulder/arms is mostly incidental. Obviously Pollock will have access to much better care than I did (though I was very happy with my doctor), but I can’t imagine an elbow fracture for a player in a sport where use of the arms is primary taking less time to recover than my injury.

Shirtless George Brett
10 years ago
Reply to  Milendriel

3 months for a collarbone? That is a really long time AFAIK. I broke mine when i was 15 and was back playing hockey in under 2 months.

Granted every injury is different.

frivoflava29
10 years ago
Reply to  frivoflava29

Thanks for the informed responses everyone! I was wondering why there was so much talk about him being out all year, but I suppose injuries are like snowflakes, particularly something like a fracture.