The Diamondbacks Were Just Impossibly Bad

Even though the Diamondbacks lost on Wednesday, they did still win the series against the Reds. Now, granted, many teams have won series against the Reds, but for Arizona, this was a much-needed step forward. You might remember that the Diamondbacks opened the season on a tear; they didn’t lose their first series until the middle of this month. Through play on May 1, no team in either league had a better record. Critically, nine games in the standings separated the Diamondbacks from the Dodgers. That particular gap is now down to two games, as Arizona fell on hard times. Since play on May 2, no team in either league has a worse record. After winning 21 of 29, the club has dropped 19 of 26. It’s not a lethal collapse, but all the early gains have been erased.

Here’s the Diamondbacks’ season, in visual form:

Since getting to 21-8, the Diamondbacks’ playoff odds have dropped by 50 percentage points. That’s easily the biggest drop over the span of time — the Blue Jays are down 36 points, and the Mets are down 27. There remains plenty of time to turn this around. The injury bug has been especially hungry. But it’s worth reflecting on exactly what’s happened. In certain ways, Arizona’s May has been historic.

How do you explain such a terrible month? And I’ll note here that the Diamondbacks don’t play on Thursday, so all their May numbers are in and official. When things go this poorly, it’s always about more than one or two players. It requires more of a team-wide effort. Unsurprisingly, the club’s pitching was worse in May than it was in April. And yet, that being said, in May, Arizona’s team ERA was basically league average. Not good, but also not bad. You want to see bad? You want to know how something like this can happen? Here is every team’s May wRC+:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

I know that, for now, wRC+ might not be totally fair to Diamondbacks hitters, because the park factors haven’t caught up to the new playing environment. But that doesn’t really matter here, for these purposes. Since the start of the month, the Diamondbacks rank second-worst in team strikeout rate. They rank worst in team isolated power. They rank worst in team BABIP. They rank worst in team average, and on-base percentage, and slugging. They rank worst in team wOBA, which is park-unadjusted, and they’re worst in wOBA by 23 points. Over his entire major-league career, Jeff Mathis has managed a wOBA of .250. The Diamondbacks spent a month hitting almost as bad as Jeff Mathis. That’s a sure-fire way to tank your place in the standings.

Baseball Reference provides a team-based game-log feature. Using that and switching now to OPS, here’s how the Diamondbacks’ team mark has moved with every game. This is cumulative; for the first game, only the first game counts. For the second game, the first two games count, and so on from there.

It’s beyond obvious that the lineup was awful. We can move on to the truly fun stuff — the historical context. I apologize for constantly changing the stats, but I can only go on what I have available. So making use of the Baseball Reference Play Index, I decided to take a look at sOPS+. All it is is a comparison of performance in a given split to the league-average performance in the same split. Going back to 1998, here are the ten worst offensive months in Diamondbacks franchise history:

Most Dreadful Months
Team Month Year Games sOPS+
ARI May 2018 27 60
ARI August 2004 26 70
ARI June 2008 27 74
ARI Sept/Oct 2004 30 78
ARI May 1998 29 80
ARI August 2012 29 81
ARI July 2004 28 81
ARI Sept/Oct 2014 26 81
ARI May 2004 29 82
ARI Sept/Oct 1998 24 82
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
sOPS+ compares team performance against the league average for the split.

The Diamondbacks had never been this bad in a calendar month. I know that using calendar months is kind of arbitrary; it would be better to compare to other 25- or 30-game stretches. But that’s simply far less searchable. So anyhow, in May, Arizona put up a team sOPS+ of 60. Here are the ten worst offensive Mays for any team on record:

Most Dreadful Mays
Team Month Year Games sOPS+
ARI May 2018 27 60
SLB May 1930 27 61
HOU May 1964 31 61
CHW May 1910 23 62
CLE May 1910 23 62
PHI May 1989 26 62
WSH May 1915 20 63
CIN May 2001 28 63
STL May 1918 27 65
CHW May 1948 27 65
SOURCE: Baseball-Reference
sOPS+ compares team performance against the league average for the split.

It’s close, but by this measure, the Diamondbacks take it. There is, at least, an argument that no team has ever had a worse-hitting May. For what it’s worth, there have been worse-hitting other months. If you can believe it, in April of 2003, the Tigers managed an sOPS+ of 38. In June of 2014, the Padres managed an sOPS+ of 42. The Diamondbacks haven’t hit an all-time low for any month. But, I mean, there have been a lot of Mays. There’s been a lot of baseball. It’s little consolation that the Diamondbacks aren’t coming off the worst-hitting month that anyone has ever seen. Having perhaps the worst May is sufficiently upsetting.

There’s blame for this to go around, some of it having to do with performance, and some of it having to do with misfortune. A.J. Pollock is one of the best hitters on the roster. He’s hurt, and ranked eighth on the team in May plate appearances. Steven Souza Jr. is hurt, and tied for ninth on the team in May plate appearances. Jake Lamb was hurt, and ranked 11th on the team in May plate appearances. But then, no one batted more in May than Paul Goldschmidt. That should be good, right? He struck out too much, and slugged .278. David Peralta slugged .305. Ketel Marte slugged .287. Nick Ahmed slugged .281, and Jarrod Dyson slugged .260, and Chris Owings slugged .247. The two best hitters on the team in May were Daniel Descalso and John Ryan Murphy. Murphy might be figuring something out; word is, they’re going to try to play him more often. But Daniel Descalso is Daniel Descalso. He’s never been anyone but Daniel Descalso. Imagine how much worse it would be if not for his little surge.

It should go without saying the Diamondbacks are better than this. Over three games against the Reds, they just scored 21 runs. When you have a data point extreme enough that it’s of historical significance, you should always, as a rule, expect regression toward the mean. And yet this is exactly the downside of the Diamondbacks’ construction. As good as the opening roster might’ve looked on the surface, it wasn’t a roster supported by depth. Even at the best of times, the Diamondbacks are held together by floss and scotch tape, and now that some of the best players are either injured or scuffling, there aren’t enough reinforcements. Pollock is going to return to the team. And me, I still choose to believe in Goldschmidt. But Pollock is still on the sidelines, and Goldschmidt is still striking out too much. A miserable May brought the team back to the pack. A miserable June would jeopardize the season.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BobbyJohn69
8 years ago

Makes the offensive struggles by the Rockies all the more frustrating. They should be up several games based on how their pitching has performed, but have instead failed to take advantage of this serious stumble by the DBacks.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

It really seems like no one wants to win that division right now.

J2butter
8 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

They often run out Ian Desmond, Noel Cuevas, Daniel Castro and Tony Wolters together in the same lineup. So no, they *shouldn’t* be anything. They’re lucky to be above .500

Joe
8 years ago

Were the Diamondbacks bad in May, no doubt, yes. But using wRC+/OPS+ or any other adjusted statistic (even WAR, really), and using them as your primary focus for analysis over a single calendar month the second month into the season where a park’s run environment has just dramatically changed is very far from what those statistics are intended for.

For example, they played 15 homes games and 11 away games in May. Yet the adjusted stats assume 1/2 played at home, and use park factors from a pre-humidor environment. The assumptions built into adjusted stats should be explained when they are used outside of the context for which they were designed (typically to evaluate a full season).

Joe
8 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Didn’t realize sOPS+ isn’t park-adjusted so I do appreciate the clarification. I do understand the “+” has nothing to do with denoting park adjustments. My point still stands though wrt park-adjusted stats used over a smaller sample size than they are designed for.

bombguy85
8 years ago
Reply to  Joe

You aren’t wrong, just don’t expect things to change a lot. The humidor will make a difference but not a dramatic difference. Chase Field will still be a major offensive park. Just take a look at Coors Field park factors in 2000/2001 compared to 2003/2004 after they installed the humidor. Most offense did drop a small amount but some went up such as triples.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  bombguy85

yes but arizona wasn’t as extreme as colorado plus with the extremely dry air in AZ that could have a bigger effect there. AZ could very well be a neutral park now.

However of course when a team is last in both contact and power we probably don’t need to look at park factors to see their month was really terribe, humidor or not.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

AZ is drier than CO but one thing I haven’t seen in all the speculation on the humidor is what sort of storage the balls were in prior to the humidor. It’s not like they set the balls out in the back alley behind the stadium. They were stored in some sort of storage area and it’s unknown what the atmospheric conditions were there. It was almost certainly drier than the humidor but it’s not clear how that compared to the outside air.

bombguy85
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

It has been close to Colorado though. Coors and Chase ranks for runs park factor in recent years:

2017 : Coors #1, Chase #3
2016 : Coors #1, Chase #2
2015 : Coors #1, Chase #8 (bad offense year in AZ?)
2014 : Coors #1, Chase #2

As for humidity you got me curious. Denver averages about 30-35% humidity through baseball season. Phoenix is much lower in May/June at about 20% and then July/Aug/Sept goes up to an average of about 35-38%. So it will be curious to see how the offensive environment in Chase changes once we hit mid to late summer.

AnonMember since 2025
8 years ago

How fun to relive that 2004 Dbacks team in this way. To think this team was not just worse but a lot worse than any single month for that team is staggering. That 2004 team gave up at the trade deadline and spent the entire 2nd half of the season playing mostly career minor leaguers, rejects and castoffs with just a couple legit major league journeymen thrown in.

Mahoney
8 years ago

Of course I had to look up the April numbers for the 2003 Tigers hitters.

Now I know why Mr. Ilitch had zero appetite for rebuilding in his later years. Without further comment, let these numbers just sink in:

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2003&month=4&season1=2003&ind=0&team=6&rost=0&age=0

YKnotDisco
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

The less you played the more you helped the team! They should have just tossed hats and gloves onto the field, and dropped a bat on home plate.

dcweber99
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Long live Nate Cornejo and his 2.13 k/9. 46 strikeouts in 194 innings. It’s incomprehensible these days. I was a teenager when he played AA in my home time- that team was also managed by Luis Pujols and won the Eastern League. The 2003 Tigers were basically the 2001 Erie Seawolves and Bobby Higginson.

mikecws91
8 years ago

I feel for the D-Backs, since this is how I felt as a White Sox fan in 2016. Going from 23-10 to 33-36 was absolutely brutal.

formerly matt wMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  mikecws91

I’ll see you and raise you with the 2011 Pirates. From July 26 (a 19-inning walkoff decided on a dubious play at the plate) to Sept. 1 they went from 53-47 to 62-75. And this was when we thought they might have a chance to finish above .500 and stop the stupid losing streak!

dbau3919
8 years ago

I’ll see you and raise you a 2018 Reds. Just bad in general.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago

all of a sudden the division doesn’t look all that strong. the rockies are still not hitting except for blackmon and arenado and the dodgers will get better but without seager and possibly a non 100% kershaw plus the regression of bellinger and puig they are still good but maybe not a super team. the return of turner helps and bellinger and probably puig will get better but also kemp is not going to hit like it is 2010 all year and maybe bellinger, puig and also really played at their limit and should be good again but not that dominant.

and with the dbacks I think pollock comes back and goldschmidt gets better but this lineup was never that deep to begin with and in april some guys clearly outperformed their projections.

I think the dodgers should still be the best team but they might not be on par with the cubs and maybe also the nationals (depending on whether to manage to get healthier in the second half which is not guaranteed given the age of veterans like zimmerman, murphy and even scherzer).

stever20Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Scherzer? He’s made at least 30 starts every year of his career and in 2/3 years for the Nats, he’s led the league in starts made.

Also for the Dodgers, they have the feel of a very overrated team quite frankly. I saw somewhere the other day a piece talking about all-stars for this year. The only Dodger All-Star was Jensen- and he was only there due to 1 player per team. And it didn’t feel outrageous. Their pitching staff is in tatters with some of the guys that they’re counting on now going to be subject to innings limits later in the season or have never gone as many innings as they’re counting on. They probably rushed back Kershaw as a result- with quite possibly disastorous results. And, their schedule will be much more difficult going forward.

david k
8 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

The Dodgers may not even be on par with the Phillies and the Braves this year. To me, the Braves feel like they’re for real, and I fully expect them to make a splash at the trade deadline to get even better. The Phillies are good, but I don’t feel that they are quite at the Braves’ level, but they might be poised for a deadline deal or two themselves. I don’t know how much payroll the Dodgers have to pull off a trade deadline deal, so it feels to me that they are more likely to come closer to standing pat than the other two teams from the East.

delv213
8 years ago
Reply to  david k

The Braves do have Nick Markakis with a 145WRC+. Their offense is due for a bit of regression but their as long as their pitching staff continues to dominate they’ll continue to be in contention.

J2butter
8 years ago

“Forgot how”? I believe the phrase you’re looking for is “never could”

John Autin
8 years ago

Two little points:

1) There’s some disconnect between sOPS+ and actual scoring, especially on a monthly basis. The 2018 D-backs’ 2.85 R/G in May is bad, but not one of the 30 worst months in modern history. It’s not even the worst of recent years, as the 2015 Red Sox scored 2.83 R/G (with an 86 sOPS+!) and the 2013 Marlins 2.82 (67 sOPS+). The ’69 Angels had the lowest-scoring May, 2.15 R/G over 27 games, which leads us to …

2) By listing just the “bottom 10” teams in the Most Dreadful Mays table, you’ve omitted those ’69 Angels, whose 65 sOPS+ was the same as the listed 1948 ChiSox and 1918 Cards. It’s not clear whether B-R carries those calculations to any decimal points, so the omission seems statistically inappropriate.