The Dodgers’ Addition of Albert Pujols Didn’t Make Sense Until…

It’s always a strange thing to see an all-time great donning an unfamiliar uniform at the tail end of his career. Even if the sights of Willie Mays in Mets pinstripes or Hank Aaron wearing a Brewers pullover — to say nothing of Babe Ruth as a Brave — predate your time as a viewer, they probably produce a double-take. Examples such as Ken Griffey Jr. in White Sox garb, Mike Piazza in A’s green and gold (or Padres blue and sand), or Randy Johnson in Giants black and orange might be more recent, but those sights are no less alien. Which brings us to Albert Pujols of the Los Angeles Dodgers.

The 41-year-old Pujols, a future Hall of Famer who is one of four players to attain the dual milestones of 3,000 hits and 600 home runs, was designated for assignment by the Angels last week. Not surprisingly, given that he was hitting just .198/.250/.372 while still due the bulk of this year’s $30 million salary, he cleared waivers, thus sticking the Angels for the lion’s share of that amount. After clearing waivers, he reportedly drew interest from three or four teams, but while it was easy to spitball a few possible destinations — the Cardinals given his status as franchise icon, the Reds because they’d just lost Joey Votto to a broken thumb, the White Sox because they’re managed by Tony La Russa, the Marlins because they could use an attendance bump — nobody saw the Dodgers as contenders for his services. Yet on Saturday afternoon, the Los Angeles Times‘ Jorge Castillo reported that the defending champions had signed Pujols to a major league deal for the remainder of the season. They’ll pay him the minimum salary while the Angels pick up the rest of the tab.

In a vacuum, the move was something of a head scratcher, but the Dodgers are amid an incessant wave of injuries that on the offensive side had already claimed center fielder Cody Bellinger, superutilityman Zach McKinstry, and infielder Edwin Ríos, and kept growing over the weekend. On Friday, left fielder AJ Pollock reaggravated a left hamstring injury that had limited him to three plate appearances in a week, and on Saturday, just hours after the Pujols news broke, so too did the fifth metacarpal in Corey Seager’s right hand, via a pitch from the Marlins’ Ross Detwiler. Given all the moving parts among the Dodgers’ multiposition players, the injury opens up a lane for Pujols to get some playing time, but whether he can improve upon his meager production to date is another story.

The Dodgers don’t have anybody likely to produce at the level of Seager while fulfilling his role. Even with the 27-year-old shortstop going through a power outage — two extra-base hits and a .304 SLG in his past 66 PA — his .265/.361/.422 line still equates to a 121 wRC+. The good news is that he won’t need surgery, but the early estimate on his absence is that he’ll be out at least a month. A lineup that hasn’t been whole since Bellinger suffered a fractured left fibula on April 5 will have to wait that much longer.

While Seager is sidelined, the Dodgers plan to give Gavin Lux the bulk of the playing time at shortstop, with Chris Taylor getting some starts against lefties. The 23-year-old Lux has yet to live up to the promise that rocketed him to the second spot on our Top 100 Prospects list heading into last year, a season in which he showed up late to summer camp for undisclosed reasons, struggled on both sides of the ball, spent half the season at the alternate site, and hit for a 63 wRC+ in just 69 plate appearances. This year, he’s hit just .231/.274/.317 in 113 PA, though he’s been a bit better since the calendar flipped to May (.292/.346/.396 in 52 PA), most notably clubbing a go-ahead three-run homer on May 11 against the Mariners. That was just the second ball he barreled all season, though it came two days after the first, so charitably we could say he’s trending in the right direction.

Lux has now hit for just a 71 wRC+ in 264 career PA spread over three partial seasons; splits-wise, that translates to a 91 wRC+ in 215 PA against righties and an unfathomable -14 wRC+ (.109/.143/.174) in 49 PA against lefties. The question is whether he can hold up his end of a platoon while playing a more difficult defensive position; while scouts believe he has the athleticism, range, and pure arm strength for shortstop, he’s battled the yips before, and most of his errors have been throwing ones, so this bears watching.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Taylor, the Dodgers’ everyday superutilityman, is no stranger to shortstop, having made 133 starts there since coming to the Dodgers in 2016, including 15 last year and one this year. He can hold his own at the position defensively and is one of the Dodgers’ core hitters, batting .288/.425/.483 (155 wRC+) so far this year. With Bellinger out, he’s played mainly center field this year, starting 23 games there; if he’s in the infield — either in place of Lux at shortstop or alongside him at second, where he’s started five times — that likely means Mookie Betts in center field and a lesser hitter in right. Adding to the Dodgers’ headaches is that Taylor was scratched from Sunday’s lineup just before first pitch due to right wrist soreness. Stay tuned.

If Lux is at shortstop, the Dodgers have the option to go with Taylor, Max Muncy, or Sheldon Neuse at second base. While the burly Muncy doesn’t look much like a second baseman, he’s put up 6 DRS and 0.1 UZR in 886.1 innings there since joining the Dodgers, thanks in part to good positioning. Neusy, like Muncy a product of the A’s system, is a 26-year-old righty who has hit just .179/.179/.333 with two homers but no walks in 39 PA. He might be the guy squeezed off the roster once the dust settles.

Given this litany, the best fit for Pujols is to start at first base against lefties when Taylor’s at shortstop and Muncy’s at second. The righty-swinging Pujols has fared much better against southpaws in recent years, hitting .253/.295/.490 (105 wRC+) in 275 PA against lefties since the start of 2019, compared to .225/.290/.375 (77 wRC+) in 525 PA against righties. Obviously, in his heyday he was capable of much, much better than that, and given the timing of his addition relative to Seager’s injury, this alignment wasn’t explicitly in the plan, but at a time when the Dodgers are trying to plug a couple of major holes, this comes down to a bet that Pujols can hit lefties better than Lux.

That seems likely, and it’s worth noting that despite his meager slash line, Pujols has swung the bat a bit better according to Statcast. On his 73 batted ball events, he’s posted an expected batting average of .265, an expected slugging percentage of .513, and an xwOBA of .348 (compared to a wOBA of .269). Granted, on a major league-wide basis, hitters are seven points of batting average, 22 points of slugging percentage, and 11 points of wOBA short of their expected numbers, but at least there’s a sliver of optimism that Pujols has more life in his bat. If nothing else, he could help the Dodgers improve upon the 78 wRC+ (.196/.286/.357, with a major league-leading 46.0% strikeout rate) they’ve gotten from their pinch-hitters this season.

With the 33-year-old Pollock going down for at least a couple of weeks, the Dodgers have lost yet another solid contributor; he’s hitting .277/.333/.457 (116 wRC+). While Matt Beaty will get the bulk of the playing time in his absence, the Dodgers do have one more bat to add to this mix, namely Yoshi Tsutsugo, whom they acquired from the Rays on Saturday in exchange for a player to be named later or cash considerations. The 29-year-old lefty-swinging Tsutsugo spent parts of 10 seasons with the Yokohama BayStars of the Japanese Pacific League before being posted. He signed a two-year, $12 million deal with the Rays, but struggled mightily, batting just .187/.292/.336 in 373 PA; this year, he’s hit just .167/.244/.218 without a homer in 87 PA. His big problem since coming over is that he’s been unable to adjust to the higher velocity of major league pitching. Against all four-seam fastballs, he’s hit .167, slugged .284, and produced just a.274 wOBA with a 10.8% swinging strike rate. Given his ability to play both corner infield positions as well as some outfield, the Dodgers can hope he’ll fill the shoes of Ríos, who was lost for the year due to surgery to repair a torn right labrum after going just 3-for-51, that after hitting for a particularly potent 152 wRC+ in 139 PA over the previous two seasons.

As noted, it’s a lot of moving parts, and while Pujols is in the mix, he’s not nearly as central to it as Lux and Taylor are, as if the Dodgers needed more worries. Still, the sight of him in Dodger blue is likely to be a jarring one, though it’s part of a long tradition of sorts. Last year, for reasons I can’t quite recall, I came up with a list of Dodgers late-career “legends” — great players who spent a relatively short and in many cases fruitless time with the team at or near the tail ends of their time in the majors. Tweaking it slightly to shoehorn a couple extra players into the conversation:

Dodgers Late-Career “Legends”
Pos Player Year Age G PA wRC+ WAR G PA wRC+ WAR
C Gary Carter* 1991 37 101 280 102 1.4 2295 9019 116 69.4
1B Jim Thome* 2009 38 17 17 21 -0.1 2543 10313 145 69.1
2B Willie Randolph 1989-90 34-35 171 746 108 4.4 2202 9461 109 62.0
3B Ken Boyer 1968-69 37-38 108 279 112 0.9 2034 8268 116 54.8
SS Mark Belanger 1982 38 54 57 63 0.0 2016 6602 71 34.9
LF Rickey Henderson* 2003 44 30 84 77 0.1 3081 13346 132 106.3
CF Kenny Lofton 2006 39 129 522 101 1.0 2103 9235 109 62.4
RF Frank Robinson* 1972 36 103 405 134 2.7 2808 11743 153 104.0
UT Michael Young 2013 36 21 53 98 -0.1 1970 8612 104 25.3
Pos Player Year Age IP ERA FIP WAR IP ERA FIP WAR
RHP Greg Maddux* 2006, ’08 40, 42 114.1 3.94 3.95 1.9 5008.1 3.16 3.26 116.7
RHP Juan Marichal* 1975 37 6.0 13.50 9.09 -0.3 3507.1 2.89 3.04 61.2
LHP David Wells 2007 44 38.2 5.12 4.64 0.4 3439.0 4.13 3.99 58.3
CL Hoyt Wilhelm* 1972 49 43.0 3.14 2.93 0.2 2254.1 2.52 3.06 27.3
* = Hall of Famer. Blue shading = final team of career.

Even with a list that’s confined to the expansion era, with the exception of Belanger and Young that’s a list of players who are at least worthy of long Hall of Fame debates if not enshrinement. As you can see, such additions became something of an annual tradition during the Ned Colletti era. Thome and Young were August 31 acquisitions who looked like plausible World Series DH candidates, albeit for trips that never arrived. Likewise, Maddux was traded for on July 31, 2006 and August 19, 2008, while Wells was picked up off the waiver pile in August ’07. The rest joined the Dodgers earlier in the season, and often at its outset. Randolph was the only player among these who truly thrived as a Dodger, and while I could have instead included Chase Utley at second, the latter played 386 games with the team, a much longer stint than any of the above. Beyond Randolph, Robinson was pretty good as well in his first year away from the Orioles. Belanger, his longtime Baltimore teammate, is represented above but first baseman Boog Powell just missed this list, though his stats (10-for-41, all singles, in 1977) are forever embedded in a useless fold of my brain.

That list was a fun exercise that was accompanied by entries for the Angels, Athletics, Blue Jays, Braves (multiple ones), Giants, Mets, Pirates, Royals, Tigers, White Sox, and perhaps others. If you feel like taking a stab at a version in the comments, by all means go ahead.

In the end, I don’t think the Dodgers-Pujols experiment will endure. Bellinger could go on a rehab assignment this week, and while first base isn’t his primary position anymore, he could still be in the mix. The injuries of Pollock and Seager, annoying as they are, aren’t season-enders, and unless Pujols is producing, at some point the roster reckoning will come. I still think he winds up taking his final cuts in September as a Cardinal, which will look a whole lot more familiar than what we’re about to witness.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

88 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
phinsfanuk
5 years ago

Was that swipe at the marlins necessary?!

Maggie25
5 years ago
Reply to  phinsfanuk

Was that even a swipe really? Did I miss something?

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  phinsfanuk

I didn’t even notice a swipe? Went back and read what Jay wrote, and I still didn’t see a swipe.

shaq_diesel
5 years ago

Surprised the Rays didn’t sign him so that he could Join Wade Boggs in Cooperstown wearing a Rays cap.

Kevbot034
5 years ago

Wow, 2009 wasn’t all that long ago and the peak of me getting into baseball – I never knew Thome was a Dodger!

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
5 years ago

Braves Legend Squad
C: Ted Simmons
1B: Orlando Cepeda
2B: Bret Boone (before his peak, but he was not a very good player in Atlanta)
3B: Troy Glaus/Ken Caminiti
SS: (at work and can’t think of a good one, Alex Gonzalez maybe?)
OF: Babe Ruth
OF: Jim Wynn
OF: Raul Mondesi
P: Bartolo Colon
P: RA Dickey
P: Doyle Alexander
P: Bruce Sutter
P: Billy Wagner

vslykeMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Renteria for SS maybe? He might have been too good to qualify for that list.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  vslyke

I was an adolescent who adored Raul Mondesi in the 90s, but he does not belong on any list that begins “Ruth, Wynn…”

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
5 years ago

I did this off the top of my head on my lunch break from my phone. I just thought it would be fun to remind everyone that Mondesi was a Brave. Honorable mention to Garret Anderson

Mean Mr. Mustard
5 years ago

His list actually began “Simmons, Cepeda…”, but regardless of where it began I think everyone who saw Raul Mondesi play would agree he had a legendary arm. So, while it may be stretching the idea of a legend a little bit, Mondesi’s perfect for a list with fairly specific and meaningless parameters.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
5 years ago

Just having fun with it!

gtagomoriMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Assuming you used relatively similar criteria this team rocks. Lol

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

In fairness. Wagner was flat-out awesome with the Braves. I remember thinking, don’t retire, you’re building a HOF career. Somehow, Billy didn’t get my thought waves or just ignored them!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I’m generally of the mind that you probably don’t need players like Pujols on your roster…at all. I know that Beaty and Tstsugo (and Zak Reks) are left-handers and Pujols is a right hander but he can’t even really play first base anymore, or hit, or run. It is generally a good idea to have a player who can either play one position or hit if you want to give them a guaranteed contract. There has to be somebody, anybody else who is a better choice to cover a rash of injuries in the middle infield and outfield than Pujols.

edwinblumeMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

but will those others sell tickets better than Pujols?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  edwinblume

I sincerely hope the Dodgers don’t need Zombie Albert Pujols to sell tickets.

Cave Dameron
5 years ago
Reply to  edwinblume

The Dodgers stadium has severely limited capacity right now and they have sold out every game so far. They’ll likely sell out every game while they are still under limited capacity. Under normal circumstances they lead the league in attendance every year. Selling tickets isn’t a concern of theirs.

They should probably be more concerned about doing anything they can to win the division. Their division odds went from 86.9% on April 21 to 58.0% right now.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Cave Dameron

I just assumed this was the Chase Utley Endowed Roster Spot for Well Loved Vets, recently-vacated by David Freese

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago

I really liked Freese!

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

I saw him racing against some poor dude in Atlanta the other day, the other guy stumbled at the finish line and the Freese just flat smoked him…

Oh wait a minute…

hypg10
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Normally with the Dodgers depth that would be correct but they just have so many injuries and guys like Neuse, Peters and Raley have been strikeout machines. They are trying to catch lightning in a bottle and the one thing Pujols can still do is hit LHP. Dodgers have a lot of open roster spots so they can bring in Pujols and still give Reks a look by swapping him with one of the struggling rookies. Blankenhorn is the only other position player on the 40 man who isn’t in the majors so options are definitely limited.

Lanidrac
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Pujols still makes for a decent pinch-hitter if nothing else. While his surface numbers this season so far don’t look good in such a small sample size, the talent he’s continually still shown since his production went south starting in 2017 is still better than the good majority of MLB bench bats.

The only reason he’s put up negative WAR numbers in recent years has been due to the unfair defensive DH penalty in WAR (seeing as any “replacement player” at DH would suffer the exact same penalty thus making the penalty pointless by definition, as well as the fact that playing no defense at all doesn’t actually hurt a team’s ability to win games ). With Pujols not actually playing much DH this year, there’s a pretty good chance he actually will post a positive WAR this year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

From 2017 through 2021, Pujols has ranked 354 out of 437 players in MLB with at least 500 PAs in wRC+. I think it’s fair to note that probably about half of those guys would be classified as starters and not bench players, but also that about half of those players below Pujols hit so badly they aren’t in the league anymore.

I mean, you can have him hit for your pitcher, but that’s a pretty low bar to clear…especially since he can’t run or field. He’s probably the single worst hitter on the Dodgers’ active roster right now.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

he is batting 4th tonight!

Dmjn53
5 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

The negative WAR probably has more to with his 84 wRC+ over the last 5 years, one of the worst marks in the major leagues.

If you’re not going to field, you have to hit. Pujols does neither

Mean Mr. Mustard
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Y’know, nine times out of ten I’d agree with this take, but for a World Series or Bust team, this feels more like “veteran presence to remind the younger guys how to handle adversity and go about your business of being the best” than “man, I sure hope he can carry us for a month”. He’s been through multiple championship runs, he’s been on teams that got hit hard by injuries. From all accounts he’s a pro’s pro when it comes to preparation. There is some unquantitative value in being a calming influence that might outstrip the expectations of him on the field. That said, even if he is at 1 life he may find a rejuvenation potion hidden in the weeds of an Honest-to-Dog playoff run and go on a tear. That would be a real fairy tale story; it just kind of depends on how he embraces what the Dodgers want from him.

Dmjn53
5 years ago

Most of the players on the Dodgers roster won the World Series 7 months ago. I don’t think they need a washed-up Pujols to show them how to be a winning team

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Hey for the league minimum is not a bad deal as long as he hits lefties fine. The work ethic is still there.

Mean Mr. Mustard
5 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Sure, they won a World Series, and in a year where the entire world was uncertain as to what was going to happen, to boot. I’m not suggesting that he’s going to come in and install The Pujols Way or something like that. But it’s a little ridiculous to think that having a guy who practically everyone on the roster grew up watching put together a Hall of Fame career would have no soft skill value in addition to whatever he has to give against lefties.

sogoodlooking
5 years ago

“From all accounts he’s a pro’s pro when it comes to preparation. ”

–Maybe that’s still true, but he’s extremely chunky for a guy who’s only 41 and hasn’t hit for 5 years. It’s unfortunately evident there are things Pujols is _not_ trying in order to stay in shape.

catmanwayne
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He’s cheap.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago

Eh, I still don’t think it makes much sense. It seems like he’ll just be DFA’d again as soon as the team gets healthier. Over/under 30 games played as a Dodger for Pujols?

Lanidrac
5 years ago

…at which point he’ll still be decent pinch-hitting option for them.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago

To me this sentence from your last paragraph is the reason I still find it so strange: “In the end, I don’t think the Dodgers-Pujols experiment will endure.” It seems like his end with the Halos was acrimonious specifically because he felt he wasn’t being respected for his overall career contributions. The plan for how a team was going to use him for the rest of the season had to come up in the negotiations.

To me the only way this move makes sense is if the Dodgers have determined that Neuse and Lux need to make pretty significant developmental strides that will require them to go down to AAA once Taylor and McKinstry are healthy again. In that case, they can make Taylor the everyday starter at short until Seager gets back and slide Muncy back to second, opening up first for Tsutsugo and Pujols. Unless he has rapidly changed his mindset in the past week, I don’t think Pujols would sign anywhere unless promised significant playing time, and there’s no way he gets significant playing time while Neuse and Lux are on the MLB roster.

FunFella13Member since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff
Roman AjzenMember since 2020
5 years ago

Here goes a Padres list (from 1996 to the present). Not as pretty as the Dodgers’ list, but some HOFers and HOVGers here:

C: Piazza
1B
2B: Ian Kinsler
SS: Miguel Tejada
3B: Vinny Castilla
OF: Ricky Henderson
OF: Ron Gant
OF Jim Edmonds

SP: Langston
SP: Maddux
SP: Tewksbury
SP: Fernando Valenzuela
SP: David Wells

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Roman Ajzen

Rickey’s gonna show up on multiple lists–Mariners, Dodgers, Padres, and Red Sox.

Barney Coolio
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay Jaffe

Yeah, I was thinking of McCovey. He was in SD from 1974-1976, but he lingered in the majors until 1980, so perhaps his stint wasn’t “late enough.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I’m sure someone has done a list of “all-time great having not-so-good final seasons on a team that no one identifies with them”. The all-time greats–Babe Ruth, Hank Aaron, Willie Mays–all had them. Others include Joe Morgan, Randy Johnson, Rickey Henderson (on 4 different teams, no less), Steve Carlton (also something like 4 different teams), Frank Robinson, Pedro Martinez, Wade Boggs, Frank Thomas, and Jim Thome.

morandis
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Obviously not an all-time great, but Fernando Valenzuela retired as a St. Louis Cardinal. Tough to swallow, that one.

Sarachim
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Don’t forget Yogi Berra on the Mets!

isntthisrichMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Sarachim

. . . or Warren Spahn on the Mets!

. . .or Richie Ashburn on the Mets!

. . . or Duke Snider on the Mets!

. . . or Gil Hodges on the Mets(as a player)!

And that’s only looking at their first 3 seasons in existence!

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  isntthisrich

You know as painful as it is I had to let a few people go over the years. Yogi Berra, Lou Piniella, Bucky Dent, Billy Martin, Dallas Green, Dick Houser, Bill Virdon, Billy Martin, Scott Marrow, Billy Martin, Bob Lemmon, Billy Martin, Gene Michael, Buck Showalter, … uh, tut!, . . .George, you didn’t hear that from me.

g4Member since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  isntthisrich

Spahn was a Met? Thanks for ruining my day.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

As I mentioned below, no franchise is going to match the Philadelphia/KC/Oakland A’s on this one. Off the top of my head there’s Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, Joe Morgan, Mike Piazza, Nomar, Frank Thomas, Billy Williams, Eddie Collins (partial credit, played an earlier stint with the A’s), and Zack Wheat. I’m prob definitely forgetting a few more.

They also had a ton of near misses like Don Sutton, Tommy John, Willie McCovey, Tim Raines, Orlando Cepeda, Goose Gossage, etc.

synco
5 years ago
Reply to  synco

To clarify, the first para is players who actually played their last year with the A’s. The second is dudes who played a near-last year. To which you could also include Willie Randolph, Willie Wilson, Denny McClain, Dave Righetti, Danny Tartabull, Kevin Mitchell, Rocky Colavito, Hank Bauer, Jack Quinn, and many more.

docgooden85Member since 2018
5 years ago

It seems to me: (a) Pujols wants to win a World Series and (b) Pujols is an awesome option to pinch hit in the playoffs when you need a HR or just as a matchup vs. LHP. The trick is getting to October with everyone still on that same page.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

Pujols is an option to pinch hit in the playoffs, but an “awesome” option is a pretty major stretch. He hasn’t hit more than 25 homers in a season or had a wRC+ above 100 since 2016. His exit velocity and overall quality of contact did tick up a bit this year in a small sample, but that came with a career low 3.3% walk rate.

The fact that they’re signing Pujols is a major warning sign that things have not gone as anticipated with the bench depth for the Dodgers. If everyone is healthy, then a normal Dodger playoff lineup would have one of AJ Pollock or Chris Taylor plus Sheldon Neuse as right handed bench bats available off the bench. I’m sure that they had internally projected those options to be much better than they project Pujols to be right now. The fact that they’re settling with Pujols is an indication that they don’t think Neuse is ready and that they’re concerned with the ongoing nagging injury issues Pollock and Taylor are working through.

Obviously the Dodgers still have an incredible rotation and top of the lineup when healthy, so they should be fine in 2021. They will likely win the NL West and be the favorite in the National League again. The future is less clear though, because they obviously hoped Gavin Lux was going to turn into a franchise cornerstone. They already have $150 million in committed money next year that doesn’t include Seager, Taylor, Kershaw, or Jansen (who are free agents). For them to stay the best team in baseball, they will need a lot better production from the pre-arb and arb guys like Lux.

docgooden85Member since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

The argument for Pujols as an awesome pinch hitting option is sort of situational. In some situations you just want a HR (or a double or a sac fly) — Pujols still has plenty of power. You don’t want Pujols where you need to avoid a K at all costs (for this you want Astudillo/Madrigal/Fletcher) or you need to avoid a GIDP.
Two more things that work in Pujols’ favor: 1. Since he doesn’t really have a position, he’s generally available to pinch hit almost any time. 2. Given his experience and status, he is going to have a good idea of how to approach the at-bat, AND he shouldn’t be intimidated by a high-pressure situation…bonus points if a 24 year old reliever is pitching to the guy on their favorite baseball card as a kid. This might be overblown day-to-day but I put some stock in it with the game on the line deep in the playoffs.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

Pujols’ power at this age is pretty modest by 2021 MLB standards. He doesn’t have ~45 HR power anymore – it’s more like 25 if he can stay healthy, and that comes combined with a below average OBP. And while there are certain pinch hit scenarios when a home run is even more valuable than usual, avoiding making an out is always the top priority, and Pujols makes outs at the plate at a well above average rate. Again though, I agree that this signing makes some sense if the Dodgers have determined internally that several of the players they thought could contribute meaningfully are either not developmentally ready to do so or likely will not be healthy to do so in October. I am just pointing out that this is a major step backward from what the Dodgers had planned their bench depth to look like going into the season.

A lot of NL teams have to settle for guys with a ~75 wRC+ pinch hitting late in games because they don’t have the depth to have average or above average MLB hitters take those ABs, but the Dodgers clearly thought they would have better options. The 2017-2020 Dodger teams did have much better options, which is why they are on one of the all time great four year stretches.

Lanidrac
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

That’s still better than most MLB bench bats.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Pujols is probably about average for MLB bench bats, and average is definitely not what the Dodgers hoped for in their bench depth. Depth has been a hallmark of the team over the last several years of dominance, and that depth just doesn’t look like it’s there this year.

JoserMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

I agree with both parts. It’s entirely possible that’s Pujol’s plan (with maybe an added pinch of salt in the wound he’s hoping to inflict on the Angels by doing it in the same media market, which might partly explain this landing spot vs some of the others that were rumored, if those teams were indeed interested). The problem with the plan, for Pujols, is that if he’s still on the team in September it’s probably because it didn’t get all of those players back and/or other moves they made didn’t work out. Which means the Dodgers may be looking up at the Padres and Giants (!?) in the division and maybe even a couple of other teams in the NL wildcard race. If the Dodgers do get back (or otherwise replace) all of these injured players and reassemble the fully functioning deathstar we expected them to be going into the season, Pujols may find himself pushed off the roster by the time the postseason rolls around.

ascheffMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Joser

Pujols’ agent had to know that though, and that had to have come up in the discussion. If the Dodgers believe that they are going to be able to put the fully functioning deathstar together, then this signing of Pujols is idiotic, has almost zero upside potential, and will only earn them bad headlines and bad blood with a beloved icon when they inevitably release him.

That’s why I think the signing indicates that the Dodgers don’t believe the deathstar is fully functional and won’t be in October. If you don’t think Lux or Neuse will be developmentally ready to contribute on a playoff roster and are worried about the health of Chris Taylor and AJ Pollock, then suddenly bringing on an aging, one-dimensional rental bat as a depth option makes sense.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  ascheff

Sometimes you just have to take the offer on hand.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Joser

Meh. I don’t know why anyone would assume that Pujols and his agent had a choice in where he ended up. He’s not an obvious upgrade for 29 teams at 1B (thank you, Evan White). The Dodgers, at least according to this logic, signed him because they want Muncy to play 2B and Rios is hurt, Beaty and Tsutsugo are needed to provide outfield depth, and they don’t have faith in Zak Reks. In other words, the logic is that they have literally no other option to play 2B. Exactly who else is beating down the door to sign what remains of Albert Pujols?

Although the Dodgers might actually buy this theory of why Pujols will help them, I’m not buying it. I think it’s a terrible idea to play every infielder and outfielder one spot too high on the defensive spectrum and that they’d be better off, I don’t know, seeing if they could get their hands on an actual second baseman or outfielder so they don’t have to mess around with this. The Pirates are just BEGGING the Dodgers to pick up the phone and give them a prospect, any prospect at all, for Adam Frazier. Ben Gamel got DFA’d like a week ago. Cameron Maybin is on a minor league contract; so is Delino DeShields. The crazy thing is that none of these guys are worse offensive players than Albert Pujols.

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Evan White can make plays other first basemen can’t (sarcasm)!

Barney Coolio
5 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

I didn’t recognize the name so I looked him up. Yeah, he currently is a bad player. I can’t believe he won the gold glove last year as a rookie.

Dmjn53
5 years ago
Reply to  Barney Coolio

Awful hitter so far, but White absolutely deserved that Gold Glove. His defensive numbers were off the charts

LHPSU
5 years ago
Reply to  Joser

If you’re 40+ years old and have made several hundred millions of dollars in your career, maybe you just don’t want to move across the country and away from LA for a stint that might last several weeks, if even that.

AnonMember since 2020
5 years ago

Gotta have ManRam on the Dodgers list. They traded for him at the trade deadline in 2008 (his age 36 season) and then dealt him mid-2010 (his age 38 season). He actually crushed it in Dodger blue – .322/.433/.580 over 892 PA. (Though I have to admit, would be tough to push aside Rickey and Robinson so you’d have to ditch Lofton and move Rickey to CF)

AyrahvonMember since 2019
5 years ago

Hank Aaron played more seasons in Milwaukee than Atlanta, it’s just those last two being with the Brewers instead of the Braves. At the time there was contention about the move to Atlanta given current race relations. To me it I really don’t find the ‘switch’ back to the Brewers in his case to be all that jarring, more like a natural move back to his ‘home’ team city, which was Milwaukee. Not that this invalidates it being jarring, just blabbering about Hank.

Lanidrac
5 years ago

Even if semi-regular playing time weren’t available, signing Pujols would’ve made sense for any team that doesn’t have a good right-handed pinch-hitter (like the Cardinals, not that their left-handed bench options are much better).

Wu-Bacca
5 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

One of the (many) big problems with the Cards signing Pujols is that, if he underperforms, they can’t really cut him.

Vegas Baby
5 years ago

What evidence exists of Pujols actually being 41?

If you had to wager money on Pujols age, what would you do? You know you would bet on him being at least 43.

All True Outcomes
5 years ago
Reply to  Vegas Baby

Yeah he’s about 44 but some people will attack you as being a racist for saying so.

AlbyMember since 2017
5 years ago

Others will point out that despite much searching, no evidence of a false age has been found.

Dmjn53
5 years ago
Reply to  Alby

Evidence and proof are two different things. There’s a ton of evidence that he’s older than his listed age, more than enough to make a judgement, but not stone cold proof

NATS FanMember since 2018
5 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Eyes are frequently fooled, but he looks 50 to me and I am 55.

All True Outcomes
5 years ago
Reply to  Alby

Yes, that’s how he gets away with it, that’s why MLB put safeguards in place to prevent others from doing likewise.

MikeD
5 years ago
Reply to  Vegas Baby

…and I’d be more impressed that he’s still swinging a bat in the majors at 43 or 44. If he is older, he’s not going to come out and tell anyone as Arte Moreno is exactly the type of owner who would try to claw money back saying he signed Pujols believing he was younger. That would be a lie, since pretty much everyone believed Pujols was older than his stated age. Now, I really don’t know if he is older, but that was the belief, and Moreno knew that. He signed Pujols because he likes the bright shiny toy, and he just signed a massive $3B regional TV contract and part of the negotiations was they’d have a star draw. Moreno got what he wanted.

synco
5 years ago

There is no team that comes close to matching the A’s in this exercise.

DDMember since 2020
5 years ago

Phillies HOFer list is pretty diverse, I’m struggling to get a full lineup:
DH: Jim Thome (20212 version)
1B: Tony Perez
2B: Johnny Evers
2B: Joe Morgan
SS: ??
3B: Jimmy Foxx
OF: Hack Wilson
OF: Hugh Duffy
OF: ??
SP: Tim Keefe
SP: Pedro Martinez
SP: Kid Nichols

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  DD

Art Fletcher at SS? Andrew McCutchen in OF?

Mike NMN
5 years ago

Juan Marichal as a Dodger is just…..weird.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
5 years ago

Is this the most clickbait-y headline ever from Fangraphs? Find out below….

dukewinslowMember since 2020
5 years ago

It’s pretty easy, just a quick walk across the street from the California Angels of Los Angeles of Anaheim ,Orange county to Chavez Ravine. No wonder Pujols took the offer.

steelehere
5 years ago

Jim Bunning (RHP – HOF), Dick Allen (3B – soon to be HOF), Andrew Jones (CF) should be on the list as well.

Barney Coolio
5 years ago
Reply to  steelehere

Allen and Jones still played several more years after leaving LA. And when they came to LA, nobody thought, “Ah, nice to see a great player in his twilight in LA.”

steelehere
5 years ago
Reply to  Barney Coolio

Couldn’t the same be said for Willie Randolph (who was signed as a Steve Sax replacement and went on to play for the Brewers and Mets after his time in LA) and Frank Robinson (who played for another five seasons with the Angels and Indians after his one year in Los Angeles)? Neither player was finishing out their career when they signed with the Dodgers.

Also after a month with the Dodgers, plenty of Dodgers fans suddenly thought Andrew Jones was in the twilight of his career.

Barney Coolio
5 years ago

Fred McGriff was a 2003 Dodger.

terry mesmer
5 years ago

Northrop Frye once said you can join any two points into an argument if you write long enough in between them. So it is no surprise that it took 1939 words to make sense of Pujols as a Dodger.

Icebox
5 years ago

Just came here to congratulate you on this felicitous pair of clauses: “… just hours after the Pujols news broke, so too did the fifth metacarpal in Corey Seager’s right hand.”

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
5 years ago

You could take Jimmy Rollins instead of Belanger if you want to.

miltonfriedman
5 years ago

Lets be honest. Pujols and Miguel Cabrera are probably 3-5 years older than what they say they are.

MichaelMember since 2017
5 years ago

The first three you mentioned, Aaron,Mays and Ruth all finished their careers in the same city they started only with different teams than their originals.

gfunk
5 years ago

Not highly important to the topic, but regarding Tsutsugo, Yokohama BayStars are in the Central League of the NPB, not Pacific League. Just letting you know you got some Japanese readers.