The Even Scarier Eric Thames Stat
As Nick noted yesterday, Eric Thames is destroying the baseball right now. Through his first 48 plate appearances, he’s hitting .405/.479/1.000, good for a ridiculous .604 wOBA and 287 wRC+, both the best in baseball. He’s homered in five consecutive games, and 11 of his 17 hits this year have gone for extra bases. Power was the one part of Thames’ game in which we were fairly confident, but he’s putting to rest any doubts about whether his thump would translate back to the big leagues.
In reality, the uncertainty with Thames was what his control of the strike zone would look like. That was his undoing before he went to star in the KBO, as he struck out about five times as often as he walked back in 2011 and 2012. And while the projection systems were in agreement that he was likely going to hit, this was the area where they differed.
The numbers aren’t quite as optimistic (as Steamer), pegging him for a 116 OPS+, which is more like a 114 wRC+ (since OPS overrates the SLG component, and Thames’ OPS is slanted towards SLG), about 10 points lower than what Steamer has for Thames now. But ZIPS is also buying the power to the same degree that Steamer is, projecting a .246 ISO, almost exactly the same as what Steamer has. The difference between them is that ZIPS sees fewer walks and more strikeouts, so the question is more about how much of his plate discipline from the KBO might carry over, not whether Thames has learned to drive the ball better than he used to.
The skeptical view of Thames was that, while he might still hit the ball a long ways, spending a few years crushing low-quality pitching doesn’t mean that he wouldn’t still be exploited by big league stuff. And as a guy without a lot of defensive value, if he was still a low-contact slugger, that wouldn’t make him much different than Chris Carter, the guy the Brewers non-tendered in order to make room for Thames at first base.
So, while the dingers are fun and get all the attention, I’d like to present the real reason the Brewers should be pretty excited about the first two weeks of the Eric Thames experience.
| Rank | Player | Z-Contact% |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A.J. Pollock | 100.0% |
| 2 | Jose Abreu | 98.3% |
| 3 | Jorge Polanco | 98.2% |
| 4 | Mookie Betts | 98.1% |
| 5 | Joey Votto | 97.3% |
| 6 | Melky Cabrera | 97.0% |
| 7 | Daniel Murphy | 96.9% |
| 8 | Troy Tulowitzki | 96.5% |
| 9 | Chris Young | 96.4% |
| 10 | Eduardo Nunez | 95.9% |
| 11 | Joe Mauer | 95.8% |
| 12 | Nolan Arenado | 95.5% |
| 13 | Jonathan Lucroy | 95.2% |
| 14 | Elvis Andrus | 95.0% |
| 15 | David Freese | 94.9% |
| 16 | Joe Panik | 94.9% |
| 17 | Jordy Mercer | 94.6% |
| 18 | Brett Gardner | 94.6% |
| 19 | Victor Martinez | 94.6% |
| 20 | Jason Heyward | 94.3% |
| 21 | Christian Yelich | 94.3% |
| 22 | Michael Brantley | 94.2% |
| 23 | Kole Calhoun | 94.0% |
| 24 | Anthony Rizzo | 93.9% |
| 25 | Danny Valencia | 93.9% |
| 26 | Kevin Pillar | 93.9% |
| 27 | Yunel Escobar | 93.8% |
| 28 | Eric Thames | 93.6% |
| 29 | Mitch Haniger | 93.2% |
| 30 | Andrelton Simmons | 93.2% |
Z-Contact% is contact on swings at pitches in the strike zone, and is one of the skill stats that doesn’t need a huge sample to give a decent overview of a player’s abilities. As a Major Leaguer, you either have a swing that puts the bat on the ball with regularity or you don’t, and it’s really hard to fake contact skills even in a couple week span.
The names at the top of the list are no surprise, really. Pollock has a career Z-Contact% of 93.3%, and has been over 91% every year of his career. The rest of the list comprised mostly of lower-power elite contact types or guys with line-drive power, the Vottos and the Murphys of the world. The one 40-homer guy on this list is Nolan Arenado, and he plays at altitude. You don’t find the Exit Velocity leaders anywhere around here, as guys like Giancarlo Stanton and Miguel Sano make a conscious decision to give up contact by swinging as hard as possible.
In fact, this group of 30 hitters has an average 2017 exit velocity of 88 mph, right in line with the league average among guys who have at least 10 tracked balls by Statcast this year. Their ball-in-air exit velocity is 92.0, below the league average of 92.4, so this is not a group that is regularly crushing the ball. There are a few guys who can turn on fastballs here and there, but mostly, it’s slap hitters and line drive guys who make the most contact on swings at pitches in the zone.
Except Eric Thames. He’s got an average EV of 91.6 this year, and he’s at 97.0 on balls in the air; both of those marks are tops among this group of top-30 Z-Contact% hitters. He’s crushing the ball like a slugger while making contact like a guy who doesn’t strike out.
Or, we can look at it the other way. Among hitters with at least 20 plate appearances this year, Thames’ 97.2 mph ball-in-air EV ranks tied for 37th, with Jake Lamb, Wil Myers, and Matt Holliday. So let’s just look at the Z-Contact% marks for guys between 96.0 and 98.0 mph on balls in the air.
| Player | Avg EV (mph) | Avg FB/LD EV (mph) | Z-Contact% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joc Pederson | 95.0 | 98.0 | 73.7% |
| Scott Schebler | 90.2 | 97.9 | 87.5% |
| Charlie Blackmon | 91.4 | 97.9 | 86.7% |
| Bryce Harper | 93.6 | 97.8 | 91.4% |
| Ryan Braun | 93.9 | 97.8 | 86.7% |
| Brad Miller | 90.1 | 97.7 | 76.1% |
| Michael Conforto | 91.3 | 97.4 | 91.7% |
| Brandon Moss | 89.3 | 97.4 | 71.4% |
| Andrew Romine | 84.3 | 97.4 | 71.4% |
| David Peralta | 92.1 | 97.3 | 88.5% |
| Eric Thames | 91.6 | 97.2 | 93.6% |
| Jake Lamb | 92.3 | 97.2 | 82.3% |
| Wil Myers | 89.5 | 97.2 | 78.8% |
| Matt Holliday | 89.5 | 97.2 | 78.0% |
| Edwin Encarnacion | 89.7 | 97.1 | 80.6% |
| Matt Davidson | 91.1 | 97.0 | 83.0% |
| Yasmany Tomas | 91.7 | 96.9 | 81.8% |
| Manny Machado | 92.2 | 96.8 | 89.8% |
| Justin Bour | 92.1 | 96.8 | 68.5% |
| Kyle Schwarber | 88.7 | 96.7 | 83.3% |
| Justin Upton | 88.5 | 96.7 | 78.4% |
| Trevor Story | 91.1 | 96.7 | 76.9% |
| Eugenio Suarez | 89.8 | 96.5 | 85.9% |
| Mark Canha | 89.3 | 96.5 | 83.3% |
| Trevor Plouffe | 93.5 | 96.5 | 66.7% |
| Jedd Gyorko | 90.1 | 96.4 | 87.0% |
| Corey Seager | 92.5 | 96.4 | 85.9% |
| Jonathan Schoop | 85.6 | 96.4 | 85.7% |
| Paul Goldschmidt | 92.3 | 96.4 | 76.0% |
| Rougned Odor | 90.4 | 96.2 | 91.2% |
| Gerardo Parra | 86.0 | 96.0 | 92.1% |
| Mitch Moreland | 93.7 | 96.0 | 89.2% |
| Tyler Collins | 93.3 | 96.0 | 82.2% |
| Evan Longoria | 91.1 | 96.0 | 76.1% |
I’ve highlighted the four guys on the list who are in this EV range and have a Z-Contact% over 90%. Any time you’re in a group with Bryce Harper, you’re probably doing okay, and while Rougned Odor and Gerardo Parra aren’t elite hitters, both are known for having pretty decent contact skills, and thus far this year, they’re hitting the ball pretty hard.
The average Z-Contact% for this group of 34 hitters? 82.6%, well below the league average of 85.8%. This is a group that trades contact for batted-ball authority, and these are Thames’ peers in terms of driving the ball in the first few weeks of 2017.
So, yeah, we were pretty Thames had power, and that’s been obviously true the first few weeks. But he might also have pretty decent bat-on-ball skills, or at least, it doesn’t seem like contact is going to be a huge, Joey Gallo-style problem for him. Certainly, we’re dealing with just a couple of weeks of data, and a lot of his success came against a bad Cincinnati pitching staff, so perhaps he’ll make less contact as he faces better pitchers and the scouting report on him gets around the league.
But the big question coming into the year was whether Thames would be able to hit big league pitching enough to make the power play at this level. So far, the answer is a resounding yes, and if his early contact abilities hold, Thames might make even the lofty projections look conservative.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Michael Conforto also has a Z-Contact score above 90%. He really should be getting everyday playing time
Surely one of the great tragedies of our time.
Hasn’t seen any breaking pitches yet.
Yo aint coming out of the lineup
Bruce aint coming out of the lineup
Duda is still slugging and healthy
Conforto cannot play CF
I dont see any way he gets reg AB without an injury or trade
Granderson can’t play CF either. Might as well go for the better bat if you’re going to put a statue out there.
Why not put him in CF and see what happens? I know Granderson has actually played CF before but heck, if the Mets were okay with Cespedes in center they owe it to Conforto to see what he can do there.
My instinct is to sell high on Bruce before he implodes again and put Conforto back on the field, but I think Alderson would be tarred and feathered if he did that given how Bruce has been hitting.
Also, someone pointed out that Bruce is terrible against lefties. Could have him play instead of Bruce against them, plus when he’s already playing against righties.
Bruce should, in fact, come out of the lineup. It’s nice that he had a hot week to begin the season and all but there’s no particular reason to think that will continue. Honestly if they could flip him for a decent reliever (i.e., might slide in at #3 on the bullpen depth chart behind Familia and Reed) right now that would be great.
Because the way Conforto looks right now, and the skills he’s displaying (as seen in this article), I’m pretty sure he would out-produce Bruce even in Bruce’s, like, 95th percentile outcome or whatever.
He has also faced a total of 0 left handed pitchers. He needs the chance, but his Z-Contact will fall when he does.
Can a Mets fan tell me why they are dicking around Conforto so much?
No, no they cannot. It defies explanation, except that they made a mistake on Bruce and are committed to it now (and it happens to have worked out okay-ish for the first week of the season but who knows if that will keep up).
I am also not a Mets fan. When I have asked them, the explanation is that I have been given is that “Terry Collins likes veterans.” I don’t know if that is true or not, but this organization has done some weird things to get extra pop in the lineup (like playing corner guys in center) so I don’t understand why they don’t try it with Conforto too.
Any reason conforto isn’t highlighted, with 91.7 % z-contact?
Because I hate the Mets.
(Or I just missed him with the highlighting tool.)
“The River” is looking good, so far
Yeah, I don’t really appreciate the fact that he goes by Thames with a soft “Th” as opposed to the hard “Th” like the river.
“A lot of his success came against a bad Cincinnati pitching staff”
As a Pirates fan, this made me sad given what the Reds did to them last week.
As a Cubs fan, this made me sad given what the Pirates did to them last series.
And yet, this article is missing arguably the biggest part of his plate discipline evolution–a mere 16% o-swing rate, per pitch fx.
His high z-contact%, minuscule o-swing%, high hard contact% and low soft contact%…this is awesome.
I was ragging on him and any pundit who touted him as a potential beast with the stick. Damn I was wrong.
Zips pegged Thames for a 114 wRC+ in the offseason, and now pegs him at a 121 wRC+ moving forward. His projection has improved by 7 percentage points of the MLB average in just 12 games.
That’s ridiculous.
I know, I know, this isn’t a Rotographs entry, but Thames had an ADP of like 200 which shows that both the “computers” and humans were doubting him. It’s awesome to see him come back to the MLB and dominate.
Thames is halfway to the record for most home runs in a player’s first 20 games of a season. He’s at 7 HR and 27 PA. The record is A-Rod at 14 HR at 54 PA (he’s literally halfway like I said).
http://i.imgur.com/5ys2tUu.png
*Note that I had to finagle play index a bit to get this record but it SEEMS right
Excellent analysis. Bonus points if you can tell me who the heck Ken Keltner is/was.
Your results are showing only data from the games in which those players homered. It took A-Rod 86 PA (which is still amazingly low) to hit those 14 HR. In 11 games he had with a HR (3 multi-homer games), he totaled 54 PA.
Also super low O swing rate. If he maintained that it would be awesome.
However I’m not sure I buy the contact numbers. His o con is below average. Now it might be almost good to have a low o con because you avoid bad contact but in practice almost all high z con guys have high on con numbers.
It still looks encouraging but a 30 point difference between o and z con does not look sustainably (most guys up there have around a 15 to 20% difference). One of the numbers must be wrong.
But if he can be a 25/10% guy with a 250 iso that would be awesome.
Could playing in the KBO be the equivalent of Thames getting more time in the minors? Could this mean players with contact issues would benefit from more time in AAA than previously thought?
From everything I heard KBO doesn’t have the high velocity FBs of the MLB but make up for it with a lot more quality breaking balls.
As young bad contact guys usually suck at making contact with breaking balls, I guess it could help some failed minor leaguers in a wat
This article goes over some of it. Looks like it could be good for some players.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nightengale/2017/04/18/eric-thames-brewers-korea-god-home-runs/100592868/
Anyone think we’ll soon see a bunch of failed major leaguers go to Korea and build a ton of muscle very quickly?
Because building a ton of muscle is clearly going to help you make contact right?
Yes because the article clearly doesn’t state that his problem before he went there wasn’t power, but contact. Come on, read the damn article before you post something so arrogant.
There’s some speculation that some steroids help with hand-eye coordination and reaction time, but it’s just speculation so far (studies of this stuff are pretty lacking). Of course, the guy was jacked before he left too, and he’s been back in the states for a few months and the effects would start to wear off by now–not completely, but after 8 weeks or so you start to lose it.
Unless he’s using a special designer steroid that MLB can’t detect (possible, they do exist) I don’t think this is a steroid-fueled binge. He has attributed a lot of his current physique to tips he got from Jose Bautista. Given that Bautista was a similar late bloomer, I’m willing to take this as the reason or else I’m just going to assume they’re all roided up (which might be the smart move, but it’s no way to watch baseball and have fun).
The only reason I’m taking this at all seriously is that 3% of the American male population has used steroids at some point in their lives. You see a guy at the gym who has muscles rippling everywhere? He’s probably using a steroid of some kind. So yeah, it’s theoretically possible that Thames is using/has used some steroids but then we’d probably have the same suspicions of Yasiel Puig, Bryce Harper, Yoenis Cespedes, Giancarlo Stanton…but I’m willing to accept that there are just a handful of truly freakishly ripped people in this world.
Hey, whaddyaknow, Joey Gallo has just about caught Miguel Sano in the Z-Contact% department.
When did Jose Bautista become Jose Bautista? The season he turned 30.
When did Edwin Encarcion become Edwin Encarcion? When he was 29.
Eric Thames is 30 this year, and he’s definitely figuring out MLB pitching in similar manner to Joey Bats in 2010 and E5 in 2012.
I was looking at his batted-ball profile the other day. His hard-hit % is over HALF of his batted balls. His soft-hit is under 10%. That’s an insane couple of numbers, alongside guys like Judge and Sano. One of these days we’re going to see one of these guys actually destroy a baseball or completely disintegrate his bat.
Also, Thames now has a slugging % of 1.000. I know it’s only 50 PAs in or so but this just can’t be real. By that I mean, it’s not real in that it can’t continue, but it’s also not real in that I can’t believe this is actually happening. It’s beyond Ruthian. Not real.