The First Half’s Most Improved Pitch
Want to be a better pitcher? Pick one of your pitches and work on it all offseason. Change the grip. Alter the release. It can change your career.
At best, you might find a new pitch that changes everything for you, like the time Clayton Kershaw picked up the ball and tried to throw a slider for the first time. Or you’ll improve an old standard that has faded, as Cole Hamels has done with his curveball this year.
While this sort of improvement happens so often in spring, or in the offseason, the most improved pitch of the first half is actually improving in front of our eyes.
When the Rays traded for 27-year-old starter Nate Karns this past offseason, it was probably for his power curveball, which sat among the curves thrown by Craig Kimbrel, David Robertson, and Kevin Jepsen as the only ones that topped 83 mph while also having six inches of drop.
That sort of velocity, paired with that sort of drop, should make Karns’ curve one of the best in the game. And while it has, even at a slightly reduced velocity this year — his 11% whiff rate is top-20 among curveballs thrown at least 300 times — the real story here is the right-hander’s changeup.
No pitch — thrown at least 150 times by a starter — has improved as much by whiff rate since last year as Nate Karns‘ changeup. He’s added 14.6% points to his whiff rate for that pitch this year when compared to last year.
The Rays must have continued to like Karns’ changeup — even if he only threw 11 of them last year and didn’t record a whiff — because they turned to him first when injuries began to decimate their rotation, and he’s rewarded them with a top-ten strikeout rate for a rookie and what looks like a starter’s profile.
Karns spent spring training trying to improve the pitch, apparently. When you look at his overall numbers, the change still doesn’t have as much drop as your average changeup (about an inch less), but it’s still improving as he throws it more.
Karns has added three inches of fade this year over last year, and as the season has gone on (and he’s used it more), he’s added another inch of drop. Courtesy BrooksBaseball, watch the movement on the changeup improve over the course of this year. See how the line moves closer to four as the season has gone on? That’s important, because it represents average drop for a right-handed changeup.

Average vertical movement on Nate Karns‘ changeup over the course of 2015.
Drop and fade are great for changeups. Over the past month, Karns has shown average drop for the first time, to pair with above-average horizontal movement and below-average velocity gap. It’s impressive given where he started, and it makes sense given what pitchers say about changeups being “feel” pitches that you have to throw for a while to master.
| Vertical Move | Horizontal Move | Velocity Gap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karns April | 5.4 | -7.9 | 6.9 |
| Karns July | 4.3 | -7.4 | 7.4 |
| MLB Ave RHP | 4.3 | -6.5 | 8.4 |
Paired with a plus curveball and average velocity — too bad Karns dropped from the 93 mph he used to average, but he’s still average for a righty — an average change and average command could produce a lasting above-average starter. And when you look at Karn’s change from the beginning of the season (left) to now (right), it’s fair to dream a little further.
It may look like incremental change, but it’s important. If he can improve the change in one half-season, what more could the Rays’ righty do going forward?
With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.


Do you think his control will improve as his stuff continues to develop?
Real nice look, Eno. Thanks for taking the time. While the Rays have been hesitant to let him go deep in winnable games the addition of a useful change up could help the decision makers let him go deeper into games. Pretty excited to see Karns turn himself into a solid mid-rotation option.
They might be willing to let him pitch deeper in to games now that it’s a bullpen day everytime Matt Moore toes the rubber.
Is this the first half’s most improved pitch, or just an example of a pitch that improved over the first half? The latter is a fine topic, but I didn’t get the sense this was the former.
ok I see where that came from, must have glossed over that. But, given the relatively small change in movement and velocity, I’m thinking that this is more due to fluctuation in results, than genuine change.
yeah and it was compared to 11 thrown last year. But improving the drop 1.5 inches is not just a little bit. I’m going to work on context, but I’ve only seen a few that have changed their pitches more.
1.5 inches, if the improvement had come from last year to this year, would represent the fifth-biggest change among regularly-thrown changeups.
So if drops are great for changeups, why is it a good thing that he used to have 5.5″ of drop and now has closer to 4″?
Or are you saying that because he has increased the horizontal movement and the velocity gap, at the expense of vertical drop, that the 4″ vertical is still sufficient?
4″ is 1.5″ more drop than 5.5″. The closer to negative you are, the more drop you’re showing.
Speaking technically, the pitch doesn’t drop it all. It changed from rising 5.5 to rising 4. Even though it is rising, it can make sense to refer to this as “drop”, because it rises less that the pitcher’s fastball, which for most pitchers can be thought of as the “default” pitch.
The same is true of a sinker. Virtually no sinkers actually “drop”, but they do rise much less than other fastballs.
Speaking technically, no pitches actually rise.
Speaking technically, all pitches rise, depending on your baseline. The measurements referenced refer to how much higher the pitch is compare to one with no spin.
This is great Eno, thanks for the analysis. I’m curious about other vastly improved pitches (#’s 2-5 perhaps?) Or was Karns the only surprise at the top?