The First Half’s Most Improved Pitch

Want to be a better pitcher? Pick one of your pitches and work on it all offseason. Change the grip. Alter the release. It can change your career.

At best, you might find a new pitch that changes everything for you, like the time Clayton Kershaw picked up the ball and tried to throw a slider for the first time. Or you’ll improve an old standard that has faded, as Cole Hamels has done with his curveball this year.

While this sort of improvement happens so often in spring, or in the offseason, the most improved pitch of the first half is actually improving in front of our eyes.

When the Rays traded for 27-year-old starter Nate Karns this past offseason, it was probably for his power curveball, which sat among the curves thrown by Craig Kimbrel, David Robertson, and Kevin Jepsen as the only ones that topped 83 mph while also having six inches of drop.

That sort of velocity, paired with that sort of drop, should make Karns’ curve one of the best in the game. And while it has, even at a slightly reduced velocity this year — his 11% whiff rate is top-20 among curveballs thrown at least 300 times — the real story here is the right-hander’s changeup.

No pitch — thrown at least 150 times by a starter — has improved as much by whiff rate since last year as Nate Karns‘ changeup. He’s added 14.6% points to his whiff rate for that pitch this year when compared to last year.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The Rays must have continued to like Karns’ changeup — even if he only threw 11 of them last year and didn’t record a whiff — because they turned to him first when injuries began to decimate their rotation, and he’s rewarded them with a top-ten strikeout rate for a rookie and what looks like a starter’s profile.

Karns spent spring training trying to improve the pitch, apparently. When you look at his overall numbers, the change still doesn’t have as much drop as your average changeup (about an inch less), but it’s still improving as he throws it more.

Karns has added three inches of fade this year over last year, and as the season has gone on (and he’s used it more), he’s added another inch of drop. Courtesy BrooksBaseball, watch the movement on the changeup improve over the course of this year. See how the line moves closer to four as the season has gone on? That’s important, because it represents average drop for a right-handed changeup.

Brooksbaseball-Chart-17
Average vertical movement on Nate Karns‘ changeup over the course of 2015.

Drop and fade are great for changeups. Over the past month, Karns has shown average drop for the first time, to pair with above-average horizontal movement and below-average velocity gap. It’s impressive given where he started, and it makes sense given what pitchers say about changeups being “feel” pitches that you have to throw for a while to master.

  Vertical Move Horizontal Move Velocity Gap
Karns April 5.4 -7.9 6.9
Karns July 4.3 -7.4 7.4
MLB Ave RHP 4.3 -6.5 8.4

Paired with a plus curveball and average velocity — too bad Karns dropped from the 93 mph he used to average, but he’s still average for a righty — an average change and average command could produce a lasting above-average starter. And when you look at Karn’s change from the beginning of the season (left) to now (right), it’s fair to dream a little further.

KarnsOldChangeKarnsNewChange

It may look like incremental change, but it’s important. If he can improve the change in one half-season, what more could the Rays’ righty do going forward?





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cory Settoon
10 years ago

Do you think his control will improve as his stuff continues to develop?

Sandy Kazmir
10 years ago

Real nice look, Eno. Thanks for taking the time. While the Rays have been hesitant to let him go deep in winnable games the addition of a useful change up could help the decision makers let him go deeper into games. Pretty excited to see Karns turn himself into a solid mid-rotation option.

Who is Zorbist?
10 years ago
Reply to  Sandy Kazmir

They might be willing to let him pitch deeper in to games now that it’s a bullpen day everytime Matt Moore toes the rubber.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago

Is this the first half’s most improved pitch, or just an example of a pitch that improved over the first half? The latter is a fine topic, but I didn’t get the sense this was the former.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

ok I see where that came from, must have glossed over that. But, given the relatively small change in movement and velocity, I’m thinking that this is more due to fluctuation in results, than genuine change.

Eno Sarris
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

yeah and it was compared to 11 thrown last year. But improving the drop 1.5 inches is not just a little bit. I’m going to work on context, but I’ve only seen a few that have changed their pitches more.

Eno Sarris
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

1.5 inches, if the improvement had come from last year to this year, would represent the fifth-biggest change among regularly-thrown changeups.

Question
10 years ago

So if drops are great for changeups, why is it a good thing that he used to have 5.5″ of drop and now has closer to 4″?

Or are you saying that because he has increased the horizontal movement and the velocity gap, at the expense of vertical drop, that the 4″ vertical is still sufficient?

Eno Sarris
10 years ago
Reply to  Question

4″ is 1.5″ more drop than 5.5″. The closer to negative you are, the more drop you’re showing.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Question

Speaking technically, the pitch doesn’t drop it all. It changed from rising 5.5 to rising 4. Even though it is rising, it can make sense to refer to this as “drop”, because it rises less that the pitcher’s fastball, which for most pitchers can be thought of as the “default” pitch.

The same is true of a sinker. Virtually no sinkers actually “drop”, but they do rise much less than other fastballs.

Brad
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

Speaking technically, no pitches actually rise.

SpinDoctor
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Speaking technically, all pitches rise, depending on your baseline. The measurements referenced refer to how much higher the pitch is compare to one with no spin.

Bobby Ayala
10 years ago

This is great Eno, thanks for the analysis. I’m curious about other vastly improved pitches (#’s 2-5 perhaps?) Or was Karns the only surprise at the top?