The Free-Agency Analysis FanGraphs Doesn’t Want You to Read

I ended up writing a much longer introduction than Carson Cistulli would permit for the free-agent post made available earlier today. Instead of abandoning all that content, however, I’ve badgered him — against his better judgment — into letting me publish all the ideas too hot to be included in the most read article on the site for months. Do not operate heavy machinery while reading these takes.

First, some bullet-point thoughts on various player markets:

  • This class was projected years ago to be a bonanza, yet only four players (Patrick Corbin, Bryce Harper, Dallas Keuchel, and Manny Machado) are locks to clear $50 million guaranteed.
  • Former Dodgers Yasmani Grandal and Hyun-Jin Ryu are both threats to accept the qualifying offer (one year, $17.9 million), as they both have a market for multi-year deals but at a lower AAV and likely well under $50 million guaranteed.
  • The changing face of pitching could be most evident in the markets of Nathan Eovaldi and Garrett Richards. Both have high-octane stuff, relative youth, Tommy John surgery in the past, and flexibility to fit in relief or starting roles. Both may end up getting more than you’d expect, as over half the league is aggressively looking for this type of pitcher.
  • There’s a number of infielders on the market — and specifically second basemen. Jed Lowrie is 35 but turned into a new player two years ago, a near clone of Ben Zobrist. Marwin Gonzalez is the multi-positional fit for which nearly every contending team is looking. Mike Moustakas is looking for the payday he thought he would get last winter, and a collection of others are either getting long in the tooth (Adrian Beltre, Asdrubal Cabrera, Ian Kinsler) or coming off down seasons (Brian Dozier, Josh Harrison, DJ LeMahieu, Daniel Murphy, Neil Walker). At least one of those players will get way less than we’re expecting, and I think it’ll be more a matter of timing the market poorly than being the clear worst bet of this group.
  • The durable, young-ish, high-end pitching may be the first big-dollar players off the board first, with Corbin, Eovaldi and Keuchel representing the top of that group. The 29-year-old Eovaldi specifically should have wide appeal. He shined in both starting and relief roles this fall, fits where league trends in pitching are going, and his lack of track record and recent Tommy John surgery will keep his price down to about half that of Corbin or Keuchel.
  • I found it interesting that Machado and Harper have played 926 and 927 games in their careers, respectively, and both have a career WAR of 30. I have them essentially tied atop the rankings but lean Machado due to the positional advantage that will be relevant in the eight- to 12-year horizon into which these free-agent deals are likely to run. It also sounds like he’ll be a bit cheaper and sign a bit earlier.
  • On Harper, specifically, I think he’ll sign after Machado, as Harper’s agent Scott Boras is always (even in the draft) focused on setting precedents and getting the highest top-line dollar amounts. He’ll need to know Machado’s price to ensure he’s done that, and sources indicate the Nationals will act as a backstop if the irrational/retail bidders don’t materialize and Harper needs a soft place to land in February. I would expect Machado’s market to heat up post-Thanksgiving and for him hammer out a deal in December, with Harper going in the second half of December or January.
  • One last point on the contract estimates for Harper and Machado: we don’t know exactly what they want. There will be lots of interest and relatively similar options on which they’ll be deciding, along with all kinds of benefits/value that won’t be in the top-line year/salary figures that we’re guessing. If there’s five comparable offers for both players and each has a different selling point (guaranteed money, years, city/team, opt-outs/flexibility, no state income tax), we don’t know where either will lean or how they’ll value these factors.

Now some chatter, buzz, and innuendo from around the game regarding teams that may be more aggressive than you’re expecting…

We aren’t projecting teams for these players since it’s hard enough to project the contracts themselves, but there are some notable clubs to monitor. The Phillies have been rumored for what seems like years to be poised to spend big this offseason, with an executive group that was in charge of the Orioles when Machado was drafted. The club has indicated they won’t go nuts, but they’d say that no matter the situation. Rival clubs and agents think they’re poised to make a splash due to ownership that’s become impatient.

A little further beneath the radar, the Padres, Reds, White Sox, Twins and Braves are all expected to be aggressive, in order from most to least. The Padres are expected to kick the tires on every top player and the Ron Fowler/A.J. Preller combination is still one of the most aggressive in the league. San Diego arguably acted prematurely with the addition of Eric Hosmer last offseason, and with Jacob deGrom and Noah Syndergaard apparently off the table, that makes Corbin, Eovaldi, and Keuchel possible targets.

Industry chatter has the Reds ready to participate in the $50-plus million guaranteed market in which they spent little time recently, with informed speculation suggesting that they’re focused on pitching. Matt Harvey is mentioned as a cheaper option of which Cincinnati seems to be fond. The Twins and White Sox haven’t landed a big fish in the trade or free-agent markets recently, but both have been close in some major transaction over the last year and may be swimming in deeper waters than some expect. Lastly, Atlanta is in a position to really push their chips to the middle this winter, but the perception is they’ll pursue more of a moderate strategy, filling holes to supplement the core for vets on shorter deals rather than shooting for the stars.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Kiley McDaniel has worked as an executive and scout, most recently for the Atlanta Braves, also for the New York Yankees, Baltimore Orioles and Pittsburgh Pirates. He's written for ESPN, Fox Sports and Baseball Prospectus. Follow him on twitter.

59 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sam Yost
7 years ago

This title smells of Cistulli

Sam Yost
7 years ago
Reply to  Sam Yost

and I like it

sooperspoon
7 years ago
Reply to  Sam Yost

And no Dave to filter it.

JoserMember since 2021
7 years ago
Reply to  Sam Yost

Cistulli-scented candles, clove cigarettes, and infrequently-washed sheets. Ah, college.

Baller McCheeseMember since 2016
7 years ago

The White Sox were trying to trade for Machado last winter. Which, while huh?, lends some credence that they might be all in on him.

Dooduh
7 years ago

They seem a better fit for Harper.

OtterMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

But every Cub fan has told me he’s going to the Cubs.

Dooduh
7 years ago
Reply to  Otter

I know… cuz Bryant!

MikeSMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

They have more outfield prospects than third base. Both positions have had health issues, but Burger is the best 3B prospect in a system with few other options. He just blew out his Achilles twice and even before that there were concerns about whether he was athletic enough to stick at 3B instead of moving to first. It is the weakest position in their system and is only slightly stronger if you entertain the option of moving Moncada there and have Madrigal play 2B.

In the outfield they have Jimenez, Robert, Rutherford, Basabe, Adolfo, Walker, and Gonzalez all getting grades of 50 or better at MLB.com. I’m not saying all of those are good, they are just less likely to have holes in the OF in a few years than they are at 3B.

Baller McCheeseMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Dooduh

“Why not both? ” he replies jokingly, masking his misplaced hopes and dreams.

dudleyMember since 2026
7 years ago

Phils should save some of that cheddar for Mike Trout.

carterMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  dudley

Harper+Machado+ Trout?

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  carter

I’d watch that with earnest

Shalesh
7 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

Who’s Earnest? Friend of yours?

FrodoBeck
7 years ago

Kershaw’s early contract renegotiation kinda put a damper on the star power of the class, even though I think it was more or less expected to happen.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

Unforunately the biggest thing to put a damper on the class was a few years ago with Jose Fernandez.

Six Ten
7 years ago
Reply to  FrodoBeck

Donaldson, Dozier, and Murphy all having lost years didn’t help. If we were leaving the 2016 or 2017 seasons they’d be coming off 19.5 or 14.5 WAR, respectively. Leaving 2018 they’re coming off 2.9. They’re going to get like $200 million less than we might have guessed a couple years ago. Dozier’s underlying numbers don’t look bad, but Murphy stopped hitting the ball hard and Donaldson’s strikeouts (and injuries) are increasing rapidly.

jgawelMember since 2020
7 years ago

Thoughts on the widespread reports that the Cubs won’t be in on top guys unless they move significant payroll? Do you take that at face-value (it’s obviously very plausible due to what they already have committed), or is this a case of the team wanting that message to be out there to dictate more favorable terms for itself on the market?

OtterMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  jgawel

They’re already around $180m committed to the 2019 team (if my math is right), so there isn’t a ton of room to make a big signing. Maybe they could get off Chatwood by moving Schwarber (if they sign Harper)? But that might not clear enough money unless they move on from, probably, Zobrist. And if that were to happen, you’d be nearing the point where you might not be making the team better.

jgawelMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  Otter

For luxury tax purposes, I think they’re looking at $225M if you include arb projections and minimum guys. Reports make it sound like they’re using the tier three threshold of the tax ($246M) as a cap. Thing is, they’re only really beholden to that if ownership wants to be, which is true of any team, but we’re talking about a big market team with expanding revenue streams. It’s more about willingness to blow through that threshold than ability.

OtterMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  jgawel

I haven’t seen anything recently but the Cubs are probably more constrained by however leveraged ownership is with all the development around Wrigley than the luxury tax. And the answer might be zero, but how much will starting their own network cost?

Opening Day payroll was $180 million last year, even if that’s bumped up to $210 million this year, I’d expect they’d have to move off of around $20 million if they signed Harper.

OtterMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Otter

BTW, my math was way off, I was looking at 2018 Cots and not the updated 2019 worksheet which has them at $209m. Looks like the Cubs are probably already in the tax for 2019, though just barely.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  jgawel

I strongly suspect the plan was that the Cubs would sign Heyward and he’d opt out during this FA market so they’d be in on Harper. It would have been brilliant if it worked, but it didn’t. I just can’t imagine that they’d go after Harper knowing that Heyward would become the world’s most expensive platoon bat.

jgawelMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, that sounds pretty plausible. Heyward falling off a cliff really threw a wrench in this window.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  jgawel

Have to give it to Heyward. He’s made Matt Kemp’s deal look good in comparison…

Kemp 1st 3 years .288/.349/.493 with a .842 OPS 135 OPS+. 7.3 fWAR
Heyward 1st 3 years .252/.322/.367 with a .688 OPS 81 OPS+ 4.0 fWAR

Heyward been paid 58 million so far to 53 for Kemp 1st 3 years. Heyward has left 106 million (Kemp had 107 million left after 3 years). (plus Cubs have 20 million signing bonus due 5 mil each Apr 1 from 24-27).

jgawelMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

sadtrombone was the right person to bring him up

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago
Reply to  jgawel

Every time I open my mouth, all that comes out is waahm, waahm, waaahm, waaaaaaahm…

Jason BMember since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Are you Charlie Brown’s teacher?

NATS FanMember since 2018
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

In Fairness, Kemp is an awful defensive player and Heyward is a plus defender.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  NATS Fan

enough to make the offensive gap meaningless?

Also-
Kemp 134 wRC+
Heyward 85 wRC+

sadtromboneMember since 2020
7 years ago

As much as it is good to have teams try and put a winning product out there, I also think that it is a little ridiculous for the Padres, White Sox, or the Reds to start spending tons of money. Buying someone’s decline years is risky enough, but buying decline years when a team isn’t ready to compete is tying up your payroll later. Maybe for a guy like Machado or Harper or Kikuchi it would be okay because they’re younger, but signing AJ Pollock or Dallas Keuchel or Craig Kimbrel for your team that will start to win in 2021 sounds like a waste.

Shalesh
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Padres, WSox, and Reds want the younger FA’s such as Harper, Machado, Corbin, Eovaldi, and Grandal. It’s certainly premature for them to sign these guys, but 26-year-old superstars and 29-year-old-All-Stars aren’t on the market often. As SteveR20 said in the other thread, the rest of the FA class beyond those 5 looks as unimpressive as last year’s, unless a team needs a closer like Kimbrel or Miller. (Age seems to matter less for elite closers, anecdotally speaking.)

Tanned Tom
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Padres have already started, what with the Hosmer signing last year and the Myers extension the year before that. At this point they are probably closer than any other team to just saying freak it, and spending like crazy. Because their goal for 2018 was a .500 club (as if) and they missed, now some frustration will set in. Wouldn’t be surprising to see them make big offers to Machado and Harper (getting neither) and trading Myers.

Shalesh
7 years ago
Reply to  Tanned Tom

Their goal was .500 with Tyson Ross as their #1 starter? At least they’ll get the #6 pick in the draft as consolation.

The Duke
7 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I think the reds should go get two of eovaldi, Sanchez, or Harvey and sign Corbin to give that lineup a chance to win. I’d like to see Joey Votto in a pennant race

Shalesh
7 years ago
Reply to  The Duke

Is that enough to compete with the Cubs, Brewers, Cardinals, and wanna-be Pirates? Tough division there.

Johnston
7 years ago

Carson was wrong. This is great stuff.

Thank you, Kiley.

West Coast WreckMember since 2016
7 years ago

Will Machado or Harper’s overall length of deal be hampered by various State’s labor laws which define allowed maximum length of contract?

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
7 years ago

Seems unlikely. Those tend to hold the employer responsible to uphold the agreement, but allow the employee to walk away after 7 years or so.

The only way that would happen is if the player thinks that, at age 33+, they stand to gain more on the free market than the $30M or so they’re already making … not even counting the possibility for a deal that back loads the money or defers payments that might evaporate if the player opts out.

But yeah. If one of them turns into SF-era Barry Bonds I suppose that it could happen.

Roger21
7 years ago

“Nathan Eovaldi and Garrett Richards . . . have . . . Tommy John surgery in the past, and . . . over half the league is aggressively looking for this type of pitcher.”

This seems to imply that teams view a past TJ surgery as a positive. Is that actually the case, perhaps because teams figure that they won’t end up paying for a year+ of rehab when a hard-throwing pitcher like Eovaldi or Richards inevitably has the surgery at some point in his career? Or are teams really just “aggressively looking” for the other characteristics mentioned in the passage (i.e., flexibility, youth, and velocity)?

Johnny Coconuts
7 years ago
Reply to  Roger21

I don’t think it seems to imply a positive connotation to having the surgery. It seems to be more indicative of a risk profile that shortens the expected contract length the market would grant them, despite being young and having plus stuff.

Shalesh
7 years ago

I’m not sure. I haven’t read Jeff Passan’s book “The Arm”, but it seems that once pitchers have a TJ-surgery and have their UCL repaired & strengthened, they don’t need a second one. I thought I heard that High School pitchers were pre-emptively getting TJ surgeries for this reason.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  Roger21

I also think that they’ll have different markets for the simple reason that Richards’ (second) TJ surgery is only in the past by 3-4 months, so whoever signs him isn’t getting him until 2020.

I think Richards might get a contract similar to what Eovaldi signed in TB prior to 2016, but at a higher AAV.

Eminor3rdMember since 2019
7 years ago

I lived long enough to see Nathan Eovaldi described as “durable”

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  Eminor3rd

One season of 160+ IP! ERA over 4.00 this year prior to going to BOS. K% still only at 22% despite the noted improvements.

Recency bias all over. Ceiling is a 3-4 starter with a floor much, much lower.

tung_twista
7 years ago

I don’t think it makes sense for Grandal to accept QO.
He had a career high year (postseason troubles aside) and is going to be 30.
The chances of him getting significantly better offers next year is pretty low.

mike sixelMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

He’s going to get $17.5MM for next year. Unless he falls off a cliff, he’ll be a FA next year, and can make 10-15MM per year in his next deal. It’s pretty hard to pass up that one big number, imo.

Dave TMember since 2025
7 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

Grandal is a player for whom I think that a change in the current CBA – limiting a player to only one QO over his career – could make a difference.

Under the old CBA, a good 2019 season by Grandal would just mean that he would have almost certainly received another QO.

Under the current CBA, he has the possibility that he could make his $17.5 million in 2019, put up another good season, and enter the market free from the draft pick/IFA signing pool overhang of having a QO attached to him.

It’s still a decision for 2019 that has risk to it, because he’d be taking a much lower total guarantee with the QO, albeit at a higher AAV. Kiley and crowdsourcing project Grandal to get 3 years / $39 to $45 million as a free agent this offseason. That seems like the range of AAV and total guaranteed dollars, however, where taking the QO could meaningfully improve the total money that Grandal makes over the next 3-4 seasons if he takes the $17.9 million QO for 2019, puts up a good season, and then enters free agency next year without any overhang from the QO for a team that signs him.

stever20Member since 2017
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Yeah. Lets say he gets 3 years/39 million next year after taking the QO this year….

He’d be 4 years/56 million for these 4 years. Not too bad.

As long as he got 2/21 he’d be the same as what he’d get this offseason.

oozyalbies1
7 years ago
Reply to  stever20

It’s not like he’s been a model of consistency though. He had a negative oWAR as recently as 2017. That may have been somewhat of an outlier driven by a career low OBP (.308 versus .341 career), but he wouldn’t be crazy to take the guaranteed years and $$$ now.

The Duke
7 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

Agree. He should re-sign with a team that once again may go to World Series, make $18 million, hope for a SSS good post-season and cash in. Even if he just repeats this year, he will get a good contract a year from now

Billsaints
7 years ago

I’d be surprised if Donaldson didn’t get $50+.

The Duke
7 years ago
Reply to  Billsaints

He will – too much upside. But a lot of injury risk

websoulsurfer
7 years ago

The Mets new GM has said that no one is off the table. What makes you think that Thor and deGrom are off the table?

Matty 2 Seams
7 years ago

For me, it would be great and ideal if the Braves could sign one of Eovaldi, Corbin, and Keuchel. While possibly/hopefully trading for another top arm like a Kluber, Carrasco, Bumgardner, etc. Plus who knows what other pitching could be available through the trade market. If this is accomplished we could enter 2019 with a very solid starting 3(paired with Folty)for the rotation. Of course, adding a few quality bullpen pieces would be ideal as well.

This year’s market is very interesting and the opportunity is absolutely out there for all clubs to strengthen their team/move in the desired direction. Really looking forward to it.

TKDCMember since 2016
7 years ago
Reply to  Matty 2 Seams

This is pretty unreasonable. The Braves should hang back and strike if there is a pitcher who has his market fall apart, and maybe trade if there is good value, without giving up the farm.

The easiest and best way to improve the club would be to improve on the third outfield spot (by moving on from Markakis). I saw MLBTR put us on Brantley, but I’d much rather look at McCutchen if Kiley’s 2/$26 million is even close to within range (I’d definitely even add a third year at that AAV). He’s right handed, which makes more sense, to me, for a middle of the order hitter. He also seems to come with a better chance of staying healthy, though that is more of a gut call.

Matty 2 Seams
7 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

That would definitely be ideal. I never said we should give up “the farm” in a trade, as I am one of the guys who thinks we should hang on to most of our great farm pieces, and only trade some if it is a great value deal. So I actually agree with you a bit. Too many people want us to trade a bunch of our pieces, and while holding on to absolutely all of them would be unreasonable, we shouldn’t get too aggressive. There is nothing wrong at taking a shot at 1 or 2 of those starting pitchers available.

BobbyJohn69
7 years ago

It sure is good that Jeff Bridich didn’t sink a hundred million dollars into the bullpen for the Rockies will all those position player needs.

difflja
7 years ago

Nice synopsis of FA market……not that I read it, of course!