The Highly Unlikely Dangerous Diamondback
The Diamondbacks are way out in first place in the National League West, and while the biggest story might arguably be the early struggles of the Dodgers, Arizona has issued an immediate reminder that last year this club just won 93 games. J.D. Martinez is gone, playing now in Boston. Steven Souza Jr. is on the disabled list. Jake Lamb is also on the disabled list. But the Diamondbacks have still thrived, not even needing that many surprises. Patrick Corbin is one — his development has been an encouraging turn. And then there’s the matter of the shortstop. The no-hit glove guy who had to fight for a job.
Before the year, for the Effectively Wild podcast, Ben Lindbergh and I ran our annual season-preview series. When it came time to talk about the Diamondbacks, we chatted with guest Nick Piecoro. Piecoro expressed what I found to be a surprising amount of optimism about Nick Ahmed. Ahmed had never before hit well in the majors, and his peripheral skills didn’t suggest a strong offensive foundation. How many no-hit shortstops figure it out at 28? Ahmed was never a threat. Suffice to say Piecoro caught me off guard.
And now here we are, and as early as it is, Ahmed owns a three-digit wRC+. By itself, that’s not much. Roughly half of all batters will have a three-digit wRC+. But you have to remember where Ahmed is coming from. You have to remember his record.
Ahmed debuted in the majors in 2014. Through last season, he’d come to the plate 1,020 times. To show for all those opportunities, he had a career wRC+ of 58. Over the four seasons, there were 444 different players who batted at least 500 times, and Ahmed was the sixth-worst hitter. He shares a dugout with one of the only worse hitters, in Jeff Mathis. At this writing, Ahmed’s wRC+ stands at 116, which happens to be exactly double his previous mark. Don’t know much about Nick Ahmed? Imagine Jeff Mathis with a wRC+ of 116. It’s basically the same idea.
Ahmed doesn’t have some brand new, exaggerated leg kick. He’s not a huge exit-velocity guy — his peak contact is fairly ordinary. It’s true that, this season, Ahmed has hit for more power than usual. It’s also true that, this season, Ahmed has hit more batted balls in the air than usual. Like anyone, Ahmed has put in some work to further polish his swing. But the way I see it, there’s one big adjustment here. And it’s something Ahmed has already advertised.
Following are two heat maps from Baseball Savant. These simply reflect pitches Ahmed has swung at.
The most important takeaway is that, in 2018, Ahmed is hardly swinging at pitches down. Pitches down in the zone, and pitches down out of the zone. Ahmed talked about this, for a Piecoro article in early April. An excerpt:
When it comes to the former, he is trying to reign in his approach, trying not to offer at the specific pitches β sinkers down and in, breaking balls down and away β that lead to weak ground balls. Instead, heβs focusing the pitches on which he can do damage.
βI think thatβs what the best hitters do in our game,β Ahmed said. βThey know what pitch theyβre looking to hit and hit hard and they swing at that pitch and try not to swing at the other ones. I think in the past Iβve probably not locked in a specific zone as much as I should and chased more of the pitchersβ pitches, either on the corners or down and out of the zone.β
Using the tools at Baseball Savant, I narrowed down to what I’ll refer to as low pitches. Facing those low pitches, here are Ahmed’s year-to-year major-league swing rates:
- 2014: 37%
- 2015: 36%
- 2016: 36%
- 2017: 40%
- 2018: 15%
There’s truly no mistaking that. From last year to this one, Ahmed has dropped his low-pitch swing rate by nearly 26 percentage points. Just how dramatic a change is that? Here are the ten biggest such drops:
| Player | 2017 Rate | 2018 Rate | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Ahmed | 40% | 15% | -26% |
| Evan Gattis | 32% | 18% | -15% |
| Dexter Fowler | 29% | 14% | -14% |
| Jay Bruce | 32% | 18% | -14% |
| Francisco Cervelli | 30% | 16% | -14% |
| Bryce Harper | 33% | 20% | -14% |
| Justin Bour | 34% | 21% | -13% |
| Lorenzo Cain | 31% | 18% | -13% |
| Alex Bregman | 25% | 12% | -13% |
| Didi Gregorius | 38% | 26% | -12% |
Last season, Ahmed’s low-pitch swing rate ranked in the highest 12% of all hitters. So far this season, it ranks in the lowest 5% of all hitters. This is something Ahmed has implemented almost instantly, which seems to reflect a discerning batter’s eye. Ahmed is seeing the pitches he doesn’t like out of the hand, and now, for the most part, he’s spitting on them. This is reminiscent of one of Aaron Hicks‘ big 2017 adjustments, and it’s also an interesting change in an era in which more pitchers are trying to avoid throwing low sinkers to begin with. Ahmed wants to swing at pitches up. That’s where he finds his pop and line drives. For one month, at least, he has clearly been successful.
Against the Nationals on Sunday, Ahmed finished 3-for-4. None of the hits were super exciting, but you could see Ahmed’s approach in action. In the third, he worked a 2-and-1 count and singled against an elevated changeup. In the sixth, he worked the count full and doubled against an elevated fastball. In the eighth, he took a low sinker for a strike, then hit a higher sinker for a single. The best version of Nick Ahmed doesn’t have Troutian-level skills, but he can hit the ball hard enough to be fine. The key is always limiting the bad contact. If Ahmed keeps laying off pitches he can’t hit hard, then only the better contact should remain.
The Diamondbacks certainly aren’t asking for much. Ahmed is still a defense-first player, and as a shortstop with plus range, the offensive bar isn’t very high. If Ahmed can finish with even a league-average batting line, he would end up being a quality regular. There’s no doubt that Ahmed’s approach has worked so far. What remains to be seen is the extent to which this is exploitable, since Ahmed has publicly shared what he’s doing. It’s easy to imagine opponents coming after him with sinker after sinker, and changeup after changeup. Ahmed might then get himself into problems. But if he stays within himself and waits pitchers out for something a little higher — mistakes do get made, and they’re made all the time. If nothing else, in 2018, Nick Ahmed has succeeded in making himself a hitter you have to think about facing.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

in the advanced metrics for baseball writer productivity jeff is at a 320 wRC+
Maybe higher.
Volume and value.
Do you think he is due some regression due to small sample size so far or do you think he has made some sustainable adjustments and this is him now reaching his ceiling?
heβs had a long run of 250 wrc+ seasons. this latest bump might just be a bit of short term burst of energy. a full season of above 300 wrc+ productiok would be asking too much, even for the troutian jeff.
Speaking of Arizona shortstops: If the Diamondbacks could go back in time, knowing what they know now, would they still do the Didi Gregorious / Robbie Ray trade? Since that trade, Ray has been worth 8.7 WAR. Didi has been worth 12.1.
Well, no, they wouldn’t. But management at the time (Stewart/Larussa, since deposed) didn’t know Gregrious wold turn into an actual hitter. At the time he looked like for all the world like a glove-first, bat 2nd kind of guy who might hit enough to be OK, but never like he hit last year, forget about this year.
At the time, the Dbacks looked like they had a surplus of SS with Gregorious, Ahmed and Chris Owings, so they traded from a a position of strength. They just traded the wrong guy π
I think it’s worth pointing out their WAR/$ over the time the two have played for their respective clubs. Mainly, the last 3 completed years because so far this year Didi has been hot and Ray has been hurt, in addition to a more salary in play (8.25m for Didi, and 3.9m for Ray).
From 2015-2017, Ray’s play has been worth 8.5 fWAR while being paid $~1.5m, or roughly $175k/fWAR. Didi’s play for the same time has been worth 9.4 fWAR for $13.6m, roughly $1.4m/fWAR.
In 2014, they must have seen something in Ray because they let their starting shortstop who had been worth ~1.7 WAR/600 for a prospect entering his rookie year. Service time could be the key to this with the Yankees letting Didi play into being a Super 2 and being just fine with him being paid through Arb, when I’m confident that the Dbacks would have tried to flip him sometime during 2017’s Y2Arb breakout.
It could be easy to point out that since the trade, Didi has looked vastly better than any other Dbacks 2B/SS, minus Segura’s 5.1 fWAR breakout. But I’m sure they’re very happy with Ray’s development going forward.
That Segura trade, where the Dbacks immediately flipped him for Walker and Marte is an even more interesting trade for future examination, especially because Haniger turned out to be more than a throw-in.
No, but, the Tigers would certainly try to get more than mediocre “closer” Shane Greene..& they would not include Domingo Leyba to AZ, either.
That trade had 2 winners & 1 big loser.
I think it’s also worth pointing out that Didi may not have developed into the hitter he is staying in the Dbacks’ organization. And Yankee Stadium appears to be doing him some favors as well. Last year he proved his offense was real by hitting on the road, but his HR numbers were still propped up at home. This year his HRs are coming almost all at home and so far his road numbers aren’t great. That’s not to take anything away from his approach, he’s certainly become a very good SS and I’m sure the Yankees are thrilled with his development and approach. But given that the context would’ve been entirely different in AZ, I don’t think it’s safe to assume he would’ve become a monster away from NY. The same could be said for Ray. He’d essentially been given up on as a real prospect only to find success in AZ. It really was a win-win for both teams.
Sheesh, timely. Ahmed just took one 438 ft to dead center over the 20 ft high fence onto the home run porch for a dinger.
Other notes from this game (if anyone is interested):
– Alex Verdugo has made a couple questionable defensive plays, just looked really, really bad on a flyball
– Jerry Lane has a MONSTROUS strike zone tonight. Eric Gregg/Livan Hernandez big. Poor Joc Pederson just got rung up on 3 called strikes, none of which were within 3 inches of the plate.
I thought this was going to be about Daniel Descalso, but when I checked his page it turns out he’s creating runs at an only slightly better rate than his career average despite running an ISO almost 100 points higher.
A few extra base hits later, he’s up to a 113 wRC+ and a .230 ISO! Where’s my Descalso article??
133 wRC+ after last night.
FG’s defensive metric doesn’t like his work yet this season (which is strange to me; in watching every game nothing has suggested to me that he has diminished range or anything). But assuming he is still a plus defender, what is Ahmed worth with even just a league-average bat? Gotta be 3-4 WAR, right?
Babip is exactly where you think it should be and walk percentage highest since rookie ball….
This article talks about whether the league will react to what Ahmed said what he was doing differently. If I were a player, I might try deliberate disinformation in case they do.
Does anyone know of anyone who has admitted to doing trying to trick the opposition with false statements, or of a significant change in how people pitched to a player after a player revealed how he was doing something differently?
Ahmed actually felt like he was turning the corner on his offense LAST season before getting hurt. Looking at his numbers seems to show the same thing.
Ozzie Smith was in his late 20s when he became a reasonably productive hitter. Maybe the same thing is happening here.
In the week since this post was published, Nick Ahmed has gone 1 for 22 with a single and six strikeouts, good for a -89 wRC+, bringing his season line down to 91 wRC+ (still a career high). Baseball!
And Descalso is up to 127 wRC+. I demand justice for Daniel Descalso, the rightful subject of this post!