The Home-Run Record Could Be Broken Twice Over

The 1997 Seattle Mariners hit 264 home runs. No team has ever hit more than that. That season, the next-closest team hit 239 home runs, and that particular team played half its baseball on the moon. The next-closest team hit 220. The Mariners hit more than their share of dingers. Didn’t win them a World Series, and, didn’t even win them an ALDS, but those Mariners still hold the single-season team record. It’s something to cling to, which is all anyone wants.

Last year’s Yankees led baseball with 241 home runs. Their lead was narrow, but they still had sole possession of first, and then those Yankees went and traded for Giancarlo Stanton. Stanton was last year’s player who hit the most homers. And that’s not the only factor here, because the Yankees might also get to enjoy a full season from a healthy Greg Bird. It doesn’t take much wonky analysis to figure the Yankees could give that single-season homer record a push. Might even knock it down! The Yankees are as set up as anyone, and, as you’ve probably heard, we’ve entered into an era of high home-run totals, anyway. Seems like it’s all lined up.

Indeed, I can verify this: The 2018 Yankees are positioned to break the home-run record. What’s a little more surprising is they’re not alone. In 1998, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa both eclipsed the home-run record set by Roger Maris. We could very well see something similar on the team scale.

Don’t be led to believe I’ve done anything complicated. The work that went into this post was incredibly easy, because the hardest work was done by other people. Just a few days ago, our projections shown on the site folded in ZiPS. Just before and during the season, our projections are a 50/50 blend of the ZiPS and the Steamer projection systems. Now that our full projections are up and running, and now that rosters are mostly figured out, I just dipped into the stats. Based on current rosters and estimates of expected playing time, I calculated every team’s projected home-run total. You could do the same in a matter of minutes.

As you know, the projections aren’t perfect. Maybe they’re missing someone’s obvious decline, or maybe they’re missing someone’s obvious breakout. Also, the playing-time estimates aren’t perfect. Far from it, actually. One can know only so much in the last week of February. That being said, the signal here should be strong. Most players will play about as much as we think they will, and most players will end up in the vicinity of their preseason projections. So, with no further delay, here is the landscape of 2018 team home runs. Pitchers aren’t included, because we don’t project pitcher offense, and also, they’re terrible.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

If you’re a Pirates fan, don’t fret. Or, fret, but fret less. These projections don’t include Corey Dickerson, who the team just picked up. He should improve this projection a little bit. But, for this post, I don’t care about the right side of things. I care about the left side of things. And, would you look at that: The Yankees are projected to lead all of baseball, with 269 dingers. That would break the Mariners’ record. But the Orioles are *also* projected to break the Mariners’ record, with 267 dingers. There is then a pretty healthy drop between second and third place.

There are two important things to understand. One, this is less impressive than it seems, because in 1997 the average team hit 166 home runs, and now the average team is projected to hit 198. Last year’s average team hit 204. You’d almost expect someone to set a new record at some point soon. But then, on the other hand, two, this is more impressive than it seems, because these aren’t actual totals. These are projected totals, and projections are conservative by their nature. Typically, record-setting performances are extraordinary, anomalous. These numbers suggest the Yankees and Orioles could both break the record just by playing as they’re expected to play.

The Yankees, last year, ranked first in homers. The Orioles ranked fifth. Now, the Orioles didn’t do anything to compete with the Yankees’ Stanton addition. Stanton leads all players in projected home runs, by an incredible 16. Aaron Judge is in third. Both Bird and Gary Sanchez are projected to go deep 31 times. That’s the heart of the Yankees’ order, right there. Four players are projected to hit at least 30 homers, and five players are projected to hit at least 20.

On the Orioles’ side, there’s no one extreme, but they have their own four players projected to hit at least 30 homers, and they have eight players projected to hit at least 20. Chris Davis is projected to hit nine more homers than he just did. Mark Trumbo, too. Colby Rasmus is a new addition who could hit for plenty of power. Of course, Rasmus isn’t actually a great player, at this point. And that leads into the real difference here. The Yankees and Orioles could both hit for plenty of power. But in terms of overall offense, the Yankees are simply superior. Here’s another plot, showing projected batting runs above or below average.

The Yankees are there in third place, at +65. Their lineup is more than just powerful. The Orioles are all the way over in 15th, at -6. It’s not as if that’s a bad ranking — it’s perfectly average. But the Orioles’ run production will be driven by homers. The Yankees’ run production, meanwhile, won’t be so homer-dependent. Oh, they’ll take the homers, and they’ll wish for even more homers, but there’s just more all-around batting skill. It’s what makes the Yankees extra frightening.

If you want to get very much carried away, you might wonder about the Yankees’ chances of getting to 300 homers. The average team in 2018 is projected to hit fewer home runs than in 2017, and if anything, we might expect the opposite. Judge is projected to lose 11 homers, because his rookie performance was just too good for the projections to believe, but for all we know he might come back even better. Maybe Brandon Drury taps into buried power reserves. Maybe Gleyber Torres or Miguel Andujar are about to break out. The thing about projections is they’re midpoints, and you can reasonably wonder about upside beyond them. It also works just the same in the other direction, but this is spring, and spring is a time to think the impossible possible.

Here’s what we can say for now: The Yankees and the Orioles are positioned to break the existing home-run record. It’s not something that would even require all that much luck. The projections try to strip away the luck, and still, they point to a pair of record-breaking team performances. I know that, in this era, that’s less amazing than it could be. There exists some measure of widespread dinger fatigue. But those home runs aren’t going away, and the AL East is about to experience an incredible number of them. The 1997 Mariners could be looking at their next and final loss.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
careaganMember since 2017
8 years ago

I saw Drury destroy a Morrow pitch in the NLDS, I like his chances to unearth those power reserves

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  careagan

And a bunch of hype on him working w Jd Martinez’s hitting coach….

jetzzfanMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  careagan

I caught a Drury opposite field dinger last season. It was the fastest* incoming of the four homers I’ve caught.

https://www.mlb.com/video/drurys-opposite-field-home-run/c-1846933183?tid=6479266

*Based on my anecdotal evidence of having caught the homers

Mike NMN
8 years ago

I liked the breathless tone of this. I expect to be awed this year…majestic shots into the clear night air, rising to ever greater heights, while slow trots are taken around the bases. If only I didn’t have to listen to John Sterling.

option240Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

Mmmmm it is HIGH, mmmmm it is FAR, it is……. CAUGHT at the warning track for the final out of the inning.

Deacon DrakeMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  option240

Maybe he was pointing at the left fielder

awy
8 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

sterling is awesome tho.

Captain Tenneal
8 years ago

I’d just like to take a moment to point that that Steamer is projecting Giancarlo to hit 53 HR this year (already more than I would ever expect from a projection system outside of Big Mac and Sosa) in only 135 games! That is absurd.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

Stanton’s gonna hit 80 homers in playing half his games at Yankee Stadium if he can stay healthy, and it’s gonna be crazy.

Here’s the fun question: How many teams will the Stanton/Judge team top in dingers? One? Two? Five?

carterMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree it is a good league change, but I saw a stat showing he would of hit 0 extra HR’s in Yankee stadium. I guess he doesn’t hit cheapies.

beasterMember since 2018
8 years ago
Reply to  carter

He gets 9 trips to Fenway, instead of Citi field and 9 to Skydome instead of suntrust

Meir-w
8 years ago
Reply to  beaster

Lets see some singles off the monster!

James
8 years ago
Reply to  Meir-w

What happens when Stanton hits the ball *through* the Monster?

rockbardMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  James

Boringly, ground rule double. =/

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
8 years ago
Reply to  beaster

Are you saying he is advantages by going to Skydome instead of Suntrust? That’s a dubious statement. Stanton hit 4 homers in 44 PAs at Suntrust last year. He also hit 4 in 42 PAs at Nats Park and 4 in 41 PAs at Citi. He only hit 2 homers at Philly. That is 14 homers in 38 road games in the division. I’d take the under on 14 road homers in the division this year for Stanton.

Edit: On the other hand, Stanton hit 1 home run in 63 combined PAs at Chase, Coors, Miller, and GAB, perhaps the 4 best home run parks in the NL.

calebwMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

This is not how projections work.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Trust me, I don’t want to be that guy… but Stanton has never been healthy for two consecutive years.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
8 years ago

I wonder if home runs can become more of a separator again next year. Last year 5 teams were within 10 hr and 11 within 20 so the power was more a negative selector than a positive one. 200+ bombs is now more staying with the pack rather than a plus.

But if the yankees hit 270 and the second and third team (or at least competing team because with the Os rotation 250 bombs won’t do much) hit only 240 than it becomes a separator.

It is not easy to build a power super team in a league when anyone and their mother hits 25 bombs but maybe the yanks achieve that.

Slappy McSlapperson
8 years ago

Lot of HRs coming from the AL east + west

Paul22
8 years ago

Manfred should require the Yankees to use a humidor at that park or maybe he even dejuices the ball. The sanctity of stats must be protected.

Otherwise , both Stanton and Judge have a chance to break the 61 record and Judge, Stanton, Bird and Sanchez could combine for 200 HR

Mean Mr. Mustard
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

Statistics are tabulating and calculating the record of what happened. There’s no sanctity involved in that. The only thing about stats that need to be protected is the true record of what happened. Sure, put an asterisk on ’em if you feel like records need to be preserved. But while you’re at it, include the 61 season in that list.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

Context is important. Stats without context are worthless. 61 HR 5 years ago would be much more impressive than in 2017.

dl80Member since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul22

What’s a 61 record? Oh, you are assuming no one in baseball is juicing anymore, including Stanton and Judge?

Huh. That’s cute.

Baron Samedi
8 years ago

What if they fixed the ball

Baron Samedi
8 years ago

ZiPS also has Bo Bichette, Vlad Jr., and Randal GRICHUK hitting a combined 60 hr

cheekfullofchew
8 years ago

lol@these BlueJays coming anywhere close to that.

WerthlessMember since 2020
8 years ago

It was probably a deliberate decision, but it was a bit disorienting to have 1 graph showing a counting stat, and the other showing counts above/below average. The latter graph will often look more extreme. I was trying to compare/contrast NYY and HOU, and having trouble seeing how “extreme” the top values were.

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

MLB did what they could to discount the HR records of the steroid era. I wonder what the historical context of the juiced ball era will be? It is a totally different thing, but I think it is something that will be dealt with after MLB is finished marketing the HRs in its many forms. The steroid era was all about “cheaters” and these guys aren’t cheaters, but they are also not playing the game that their peers played… so its weird. The record of which you speak is a steroid-fueled record and the new record will be powered by something more influential than steroids…

I would think that the point where HR start to decline will be when this era gets torn down. I think it has to be torn down, otherwise the future will be living in these shadows. At one point Mark McGwire was an American Hero, which is crazy to even imagine today. The end of the juiced ball era will probably be marketed as a defensive revolution, which is how the era right before juiced balls was being sold. It could be sold as a pitching revolution – we haven’t had one of those yet. Funny to think that we went from crediting the shifts and defensive metrics when players weren’t hitting and right into to launch angles and StatCast after the outcomes changed… which seem to be more related to physics than evolution of player development. Sorry, I got off my original point which was all I was trying to say, as I stumbled into a conspiracy theory.

calebwMember since 2016
8 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

No one is ever playing the game that their peers of another era played. That’s just the way the game and history work. The dead ball era, the wars, spitballers, segregation, the height of the mound, the length of the season, free agency and the CBA, not to mention changes in equipment, nutrition, etc. All of these have had immense effects on competition and outcomes. The future is always living in the shadows of the past.

But what you say at the end actually does pinpoint player development…do you think it is a coincidence that the flyball revolution followed on the heels of the increased effectiveness of defensive shifts? That’s a strategic adjustment. Players swinging for a higher launch angle is a response to the fact that a grounder or low liner is losing its value.

deanlwwhite
8 years ago

Jeff you come off like a girl with a high school crush…and a major homer for the NYY.

Stanton has been healthy exactly once, and prior to last season had a career high of 37 hrs…a significant drop from the 53 that supports your premise. Judge is widely expected to regress due to his exorbitant K rate. Bird hit .190 last year, and has less than 350 total at-bats in the Majors…and you’ve already banked his 30+ bombs.

…All of which is also predicated on the idea of a continuation of the juiced ball phenomenon.

The Bombers and Stanton/Judge look very good, there’s no doubt about it, but to break the team and individual records would involve a combination of events that an objective analyst would consider unlikely.

MAYBE Network
8 years ago
Reply to  deanlwwhite

Judge is “expected to regress” because he’s a Yankee and people hate the Yankees. Judge was one of the most consistent hitters in the past 16 years before he was injured. He had 13 straight weeks where his wRC+ for that week was 150 or above. I’m pretty sure no other active player has done that. Strikeouts don’t matter if you walk a ton and have a 50% hard-hit%.

Jason BMember since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  MAYBE Network

Expected to regress because people hate the Yankees?! lolwut

I don’t think you understand how projections work…

London Yank
8 years ago

This is a clear situation where the distribution of projection outcomes would be useful. What proportion of the Yankees’ projected outcomes result in them breaking the HR record? You can put an estimated probability on it by considering the distributions.