The Kumar Rocker Velocity Roller Coaster
The best word to describe how teams are approaching the 2021 draft might be “uneasy.” Teams lean hard on things like the Cape Cod League and summer high school showcases, which the industry lost in 2020 due to the pandemic. Track records of performance are hard to come by because of it (as well as other factors), and teams are desperate for anything resembling a sure thing.
Entering the season, Vanderbilt right-hander Kumar Rocker looked like one of these few sure things. A highly regarded prep arm out of Georgia in 2018, he might have slipped into the first round that year had he not made it abundantly clear that without an elite bonus offer, he had every intention of honoring his college commitment. He’s succeeded since arriving in Nashville, stepping right into the weekend rotation and throwing a no-hitter in Super Regional Play as a freshman. With athletic bloodlines and the much-desired combination of above-average stuff and command, Rocker entered the season as a strong candidate to be selected by the Pirates with the No. 1 pick come July.
He’s certainly held up his end on a performance level. Through 13 starts for the Commodores, he’s struck out 118 over 81 innings and allowed just 47 hits and 25 walks. But on a stuff level, it’s been a different story, as the average firmness of Rocker’s fastball has ranged by as much as six miles per hour on average from one start to the next. He is still expected to be a top-five pick at minimum, and that 1–1 slot is in play for him as well, but for teams looking for consistency, the varying fastball is a bit troubling. For teams looking for answer as to his ability to handle a pro workload, it’s even more so.
Rocker came out with the best velocity of his career in his first start of the season, averaging 96 mph with his fastball and touching 99. He averaged 94–96 over his next two starts and touched 98, but the first big drop occurred following a 116-pitch outing on March 19 against South Carolina. Seven days after that, I got a text message from a scout: “Are you watching Rocker?” I switched his start on and saw him sitting at 90–91 all of a sudden. And these were not the 87–91 cutters he’s added to his repertoire; these were four-seam fastballs.
Rocker topped out at 92 mph in that game and slowly got the velo back from there, as this chart of his game-by-game velocities shows. The P51+ column shows his velocity after 50 pitches, which has encouragingly been at the rate one would expect as opposed to significant drop-offs.
| Date | Opponent | Line | Pitches | FB Avg | FB Peak | P51+ FB Avg | P51+ FB Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 22 | Wright State | 4 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 3 BB, 8 K | 67 | 96 | 99 | 95 | 97 |
| February 28 | Georgia State | 5 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 3 BB, 6 K | 84 | 94 | 98 | 94 | 97 |
| March 6 | Illinois-Chicago | 6 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 BB, 11 K | 86 | 96 | 98 | 95 | 97 |
| March 13 | Oklahoma State | 8 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 9 K | 103 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| March 19 | South Carolina | 8 IP, 3 H, 2 R, 2 BB, 14 K | 116 | 94 | 96 | 94 | 96 |
| March 25 | Missouri | 6 IP, 5 H, 2 R, 2 BB, 5 K | 92 | 90 | 92 | 90 | 92 |
| April 1 | Louisiana State | 6 IP, 4 H, 1 R, 0 BB, 8 K | 89 | 91 | 94 | 90 | 93 |
| April 8 | Georgia | 5 IP, 7 H, 6 R, 2 BB, 12 K | 100 | 92 | 96 | 91 | 95 |
| April 16 | Tennessee | 7 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 8 K | 97 | 95 | 98 | 94 | 97 |
| April 23 | Mississippi State | 9 IP, 3 H, 2 R, 0 BB, 8 K | 109 | 94 | 98 | 93 | 96 |
| April 30 | Florida | 5 IP, 4 H, 2 R, 4 BB, 8 K | 95 | 92 | 96 | 92 | 96 |
| May 7 | Alabama | 5 IP, 6 H, 6 R, 5 BB, 13 K | 110 | 92 | 96 | 91 | 96 |
| May 14 | Mississippi | 7 IP, 5 H, 3 R, 1 BB, 8 K | 99 | 93 | 95 | 93 | 95 |
As you can see, the oomph on his fastball took a dip again after throwing 109 pitches, his second-highest total of the season at the time on April 23, and it’s now settled in at a consistent low-90s, touching 95–96. Evaluators would be somewhat comforted if this recent three-start run represented the real normal, as while he’s below his early-season velocity spike, he’s at least recovered from the disturbing mid-season dip and returned to his historical norms.
We didn’t see these kind of wild velocity swings out of Rocker as a freshman, when he averaged 93 mph with a best bolt of 98. In only three 2020 starts, Rocker was regularly 94–96, so he’s throwing as hard as expected in aggregate, but the up-and-down nature of his fastball has created some questions as teams start to organize for their initial draft meetings.
It’s important to note that velocity isn’t everything. With an altered arm slot from previous years, Rocker’s fastball shape is better than ever, and he continues to command the pitch well. The fastball also is far from his best pitch, as over 70% of his strikeouts in 2021 have come on breaking balls. But a Kumar Rocker who sits 90–92 versus one who sits 92–94 and one who sits 94–96 are three very different players. The first one is a late first-round talent; the last one stays in the corner of the Pirates’ board among the special magnets being considered for the first pick in the draft. And thanks to Rocker’s inconsistency and some recent sub-par (for him) showings by Jack Leiter (along with a skipped start two weekends ago), that first pick remains wide open, with high school shortstops Jordan Lawlar and Marcelo Mayer entering into the pool for Pittsburgh’s consideration along with Louisville catcher Henry Davis.
Rocker has just one regular-season start left in his college career, coming this Friday against Kentucky, but as one of the best teams in college baseball, Vanderbilt is expected to have a long postseason run. That should provide teams with a handful of additional looks to get more comfortable with what is currently an uncomfortable evaluation of one of the top pitchers in the draft … depending on what day you see him.
Kevin Goldstein is a National Writer at FanGraphs.
Not that it’s ever a bad thing, but is this the worse year to have the 1-1 pick in recent memory?
This year reminds me a bit of 2017. There are five players who would be Top 5 picks in most years but not any generational talents.
Then again, I’m not sure that it’s that obvious there is an elite, #1, slam-dunk, generation-changing prospect in most drafts. Adley Rutschman, obviously; Gerrit Cole, too. Maybe Casey Mize and Dansby Swanson…maybe. I know lots of people thought that Torkelson was in that category but I’m not exactly buying it. Some people were saying that about Byron Buxton but he didn’t go #1 (and in hindsight, it was obvious the opinions of who the top pick was in that draft varied a lot).
You know the ’17 draft was brutal when not even the Dodgers can play any of their guys selected from that year
I don’t think this draft is anywhere near as bad as 2017; the 2017 draft’s talent level dropped over dramatically at Pick #6. But the Top 5 is reminiscent of the Top 5 that year.
Zach Pop was drafted by the Dodgers (he’s in the majors with the Marlins now)
There’s several of them at AAA this year, but most of them aren’t with the Dodgers, and the ones who is wasn’t for a while (Reks). It seems like they were very aggressive using this class in trades (Betts deal, Machado deal, Reks going away for Dozier and back for Maeda, Pop, etc)
It’s sure not the 2016 Dodgers draft, but few drafts are.
I’m a biased Phillies fan but the Moniak draft (2016) has been brutal.
On the other side of the coin something like 12 or 13 players from the Dodgers’ 2016 draft have appeared in MLB.
Gavin Lux
Will Smith
Jordan Sheffield (Rockies)
Mitch White
Dustin May
DJ Peters
Devin Smeltzer (Twins)
Luke Raley
Andre Scrubb (Astros)
Tony Gonsolin
Dean Kremer (Orioles)
Zach McKinstry
8 of their top 10 picks are currently on MLB rosters: the last two are Errol Robinson (AAA-Reds) and their 10th rounder, a senior-sign for $2500 (they spent all their bonus pool on the other guys). Of course, 9th round pick Gonsolin was also a $2500 senior sign (they went $500k above slot for May)
Really got to be a contender for one of the best drafts in modern history.
I was just thinking about him the other day. With Henry Davis probably joining the Leiter-Rocker-Lawlar-Mayer quartet in the top tier of prospects, at what point do signability concerns start to come in for the prep shortstops / Vanderbilt arms if they fall unexpectedly out of the Top 4/5 picks? For Lawlar and Mayer they have the option of going to school, Leiter is (I think) a sophomore. And while it would seem like it’s crazy for Rocker to return to school if he gets a $5M or #6M bonus he has an extra year of eligibility and as a guy who was largely expected to go 1-1 probably was expecting an even higher bonus.
For example, if the Red Sox take Davis at #4 (a totally plausible scenario) and Rocker falls to the Orioles, it would seem logical that he’d sign for the $6M+ slot bonus. But maybe not? Maybe he’d demand overslot money? What about the Royals at #7 and their $5.5M or so bonus? What about the Angels and their $5M or so slot bonus? It seems crazy that any of those 5 guys would fall past the Top 5 picks and it seems crazy that a junior would ever return to school or that a team would pass on a top talent falling to them like that given that if it doesn’t work out they’d get another pick next year.
I guess maybe what I’m asking about–and I think Kevin would be uniquely qualified to write a whole article on this–is how do teams assess “signability” and how does it affect their draft? I know that partly idiosyncratic because a lot of it is “high school players have a number and if they get it they sign and they don’t they go to school” much like Rocker in his previous draft year. But last year we had guys like Tommy Mace go undrafted because of signability concerns. But we’ve heard that it’s harder to sign players away from some schools than others, like Virginia and Vanderbilt, and you sometimes see college players who are sophomores do the same, I think.
I personally have Davis ranked 1 and he also might be cheapest. Current rumors seem to be loudest on Lawlar for them tho
I was thinking about this last night. If you have a guy who is walking more than he’s striking out, posting in the 90th percentile of exit velocities, hitting double digit home runs in ~200 PAs, getting on base literally one half of the time he comes to the plate, and very likely to stick at by far the most difficult defensive position in major league baseball, one where you can barely find any offense at all…where would you have taken that player in 2020? In 2019? In 2018? I think he would have been #2 for me in any of those years. Although he’s probably 50/50 for me vs Mize and Leiter in 2018 and 2021.
FWIW, Keith Law also has Davis #1
If I were drafting this year, Davis would be the guy I take at 1. He’s got the most complete resume in the class, is more or less a sure starting catcher, and thanks to marketing will be nice and cheap if he were to go 1
THAT said, I don’t think he’s the best prospect in this class. Give me Harry Ford if I could take one player from this class
Leiter is a sophomore with three more years of eligibility because of the pandemic. He has a lot of leverage for holding for a huge bonus/team he likes.
So much risk with any pitcher. Pirates should choose Lawlar. But Pirates always manage to make silly decisions:
Trade Cole while his value is low. Then trade for Archer when his value is at its peak. Then refuse to trade Felipe Vasquez when his value is at its mega-peak. Draft a Boston College catcher with the #4 pick when nobody else had him in the 1st round. Draft VanBenschoten and Allie and mess them up. Bryan Burlington anybody?
The Bucs will waste their draft pick somehow.
You do know there is an entirely different FO running the Pirate than there was during every example of stupidity you mention ? Try catching up on the news, it would benefit you before making a fool of yourself in public. And who the hell was “Brian Burlington “ ?
Yeah the FO matters now like it has for the last 15 years with nutting.
his velocity drops after throwing a bunch of pitches. Wow, crazy hot take guys.
Am I the only one scared out of his mind by Rocker’s mechanics? He looks like he’s constantly late with his arm at foot contact.
I like his mechanics today much more than 2019, BUT think he needs to get stronger to really nail it. He stumbles sometime with this one
the scrapped 2020 college season and lack of summer leagues was a real blow to the development of pitchers around the game
Maybe it’s all part of a strategy to not get drafted by the Pirates. The Pirates would probably be the number one team I’d want to avoid being drafted by if I was a pitcher, especially one with a good 4 seamer that they will try to convince me to ditch for a 2 seamer.
You do know there was an entirely different FO philosophy running the Pirates before 2020 ? Looks like a few of the people commenting here stopped paying attention to FG before the virus hit.
∆∆∆Butt hurt pirates fan ∆∆∆
These arent even MLB average FB numbers. Also, Vandy Players are more often than not fools gold. Same with LSU. Think how many 1st rounders those schools have had and think how many have been all stars. 1 or 2? Rocker is a reliever. and Lieter has a much better chance of being the next Carson Fulmer than he does a #1. Its well known that a friday night pitcher in the SEC is 90% chance hes just a bullpen piece in the MLB.
That’s because almost everyone picked in the MLB draft is likely to be a bust. Here are all the picks in the first round I could find from either Vanderbilt or LSU in MLB from 2011 forward: Sonny Gray, Aaron Nola, Tyler Beede, Carson Fulmer, Walker Buehler, Kyle Wright. That’s something like a 50% hit rate. Good luck finding schools with better than 50% hit rates.
lol yeah Vanderbilt is the most ridiculous baseball factory in the NCAA and it is true today (and has been true at times in the past) that the Vanderbilt roster has more future MLB WAR on it than some teams entire farm systems.
A collegiate pitcher who has a 90% chance to be a MLB reliever is like a top 20 MLB draft pick. Basically no player has MLB odds that high, even for non-star roles.
It’s wild looking at “re-drafts” that analysts will do 7 or 8 years after a draft. In good drafts, the analyst starts really grasping at straws around 25-28; in bad ones it starts around 12-15. I think sometimes people underestimate how much talent comes through the J2 market, as well as how many players on most MLB rosters are role players.
I haven’t looked at the draft at all…..but this data is staring everyone right in the face. He doesn’t even throw mlb avg fastballs for an entire game. Why is he even being discussed?
Pirates’ fan: Rocker and Leiter appear too risky for a 1-1 selection. I would rather the Pirates select one of the three position players in the top five. Only the Edmonton Oilers and Astros get multi-year 1-1 picks, although the Tigers are making a strong effort to win the 2021 pick.
Honestly gang, the solution may be to let him fall all the way to 21 and scream at him about leveragez until he signs for even fewer pennies on the dollar
I am here for draft discussion. Someone sell me on Marcelo Mayer. So I get he’s a LHH MIF with a shot to stick at SS, has an interesting frame size, but he also missed a ton of last summer and didn’t really separate himself when he did play I thought. What am I missing?
I don’t know if I’m the right person to sell you on him since I’m not that sold on him myself. Part of this is straight up that he’s been scouted for years, thanks to playing next to Keoni Cavaco. With so little information a lot of teams are probably feeling pretty anxious about who they want to pick. That said, pretty much everyone thinks he’s got good feel for contact and power projection, and it’s hard to argue with that when he’s got a good shot at sticking at shortstop. I’m not totally sold on him but I also don’t see a ton of room for skepticism.
Have to disagree with the end, sooooo much room for skepticism. Last summer just does not strike me as an elite among elite prospect. I see comparisons to Seager out there but I was in on Seager from the go whereas Mayer just does not strike me as that kind of hitter. I should be going gaga for a 6’3” LHH MIFer with a shot at SS too, prefer Watson btw the two. Not really a Lawlar fan either.
I do appreciate the response tho, this draft is rough. I usually have some shinnin’ but have more trouble with this one than last year’s tbh
I’m not sure there’s a lot separating Lawlar, House, Mayer, and Watson. But as Kevin mentioned in his article today evaluators are missing a lot of information.
I almost feel like you have to lean House in that group? He’s the biggest, youngest, has the most present and future power, still has a shot at SS anyway, is probably the most decorated amateur in the group. Mostly because my team doesn’t have to get it right do I feel confident saying this, but it maybe even feels like an easy call?
Lawlar strikes me as Royce Lewis-lite rather than someone who compares to Jeter (that’s Ed Howard btw, wait for it!). I could see how people get to Crawford for Mayer, but also Crawford’s such an underrated player that I don’t love comping anyone to him (and if I did it might be Stott with the Phillies right now?). OTOH I just say things…Watson’s a real wild card depending on what you think of his ability to make contact, also got knocked for makeup