The Last-Place Cubs Are Injured, but All Is Nowhere Near Lost Yet

Patrick Gorski and Kamil Krzaczynski-Imagn Images

This isn’t how they drew it up on the North Side this winter. The Cubs won 92 games in 2025, and then they made some additions in the winter. The Brewers, meanwhile, subtracted. Chicago had the best playoff odds of any team in the NL Central, whether you’re talking about our odds, PECOTA’s odds, or pretty much any projection system you can name. The Cubs had exciting rookies, battle-tested veterans, and fun vibes. Surely, they’d sail through 2026.

Nearly two weeks into the season, it’s fair to say that things haven’t gone according to plan. There’s the standings, for one thing: They’re in last place in the NL Central. But this early in the year, only four games separate first and last in the division, so that’s not the biggest problem in Wrigleyville. A bigger concern is that Cade Horton and Matthew Boyd, two of Chicago’s top starting pitchers, hit the IL on consecutive days. Seiya Suzuki hasn’t appeared yet this year, though he’s expected back on Friday.

Horton’s injury looks to be the worst of the two. He left last Friday’s start after feeling forearm discomfort, and after getting some scans over the weekend, he’s seeking a second opinion from Dr. Keith Meister. That ominous turn of phrase doesn’t guarantee a long-term injury, of course, but it’s definitely not a good sign. Pitchers don’t generally seek second opinions from famous surgeons unless there’s a decent chance of surgery.

Boyd was supposed to be the safe option in the Cubs rotation. We had him down for the most innings and the most WAR, the staff ace. His bicep strain might not be all that bad; he noted that he could have pitched through the injury if it weren’t so early in the year. But that’s not really the nature of pitcher injuries, in my experience. Sure, sometimes they’re short. But a guaranteed minimum stay doesn’t exist. I think it’s reasonable to be worried about Boyd’s prognosis until he’s back on a major league mound, even though he seems likely to return far sooner than Horton.

The Cubs, to their credit, accumulated plenty of pitching depth this winter. Justin Steele isn’t due back until around midseason, so they made sure to stock their roster with more quality options than there were turns in the rotation. Javier Assad, who has made 36 starts for the Cubs over the last two years, was recalled from Triple-A to fill one rotation spot. He’s not a frontline option – as you might imagine, what with his starting the season in the minors and all – but he’s solidly above replacement level. He’s been much better out of the bullpen in the majors, but if you need a few weeks of competent starting pitching, he more than fits the bill.

Colin Rea, who slid over from long relief to claim the other spot in the rotation, is a different verse of the same song. Like Assad, I wouldn’t want to go into a season with him as one of my top five options. His best season as a major leaguer was 2025, and even then, he performed pretty much like a fifth starter. He struggles greatly with left-handed hitters, a weakness that’s minimized out of the bullpen, and he doesn’t miss enough bats to make up for the loud contact he allows. But, also like Assad, I’d be pleased if my break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option was as accomplished as Rea. At the point where we’re asking who should be the eighth starter on the depth chart (counting Steele), beggars can’t be choosers.

However, don’t take my appreciation of Chicago’s pitching depth as a statement that everything is fine. Our Depth Charts projects this team to have the ninth-worst rotation in baseball the rest of the year, and that counts the production from guys who are expected to return from injury. Losing two of your top starters two weeks into the year hurts. Doing that while your best guy still isn’t back from elbow surgery is even worse. But this is mostly expected. The Cubs came into the year projected to have baseball’s 11th-worst rotation in our Positional Power Rankings, and they were still the favorite to win the division.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Luckily for the Cubs, two of their three healthy starters have been on point to begin the year. Edward Cabrera, their big trade acquisition this winter, hasn’t allowed a run yet. The peripherals aren’t quite as pretty – a 14.6% walk rate means he probably won’t remain unscathed for long – but the Cubs brought him in to add length to their rotation, and he hasn’t been scored on. It’s hard to argue with those early returns. Shota Imanaga, who briefly flirted with free agency before returning to the Cubs on a qualifying offer, looks like he’s going to be solid, too. It’s only been two starts, but he’s looked good to my eyes, and both of our pitching models think that this is the best he’s been as a Cub.

Jameson Taillon, the last member of the rotation, is off to a bumpy start. He avoided damage in his first start, against the woeful Angels, but only barely – he walked four and only struck out three. In his second start, the Rays tagged him for two homers. His velocity is down. His stuff, never a strength, grades out worse than ever. If it weren’t for the injuries, it’s reasonable to think that the Cubs would be considering swapping Rea into the rotation in the short term anyway – only for an ineffective Taillon instead of for an injured Horton.

Amid the pitching woes, Suzuki’s absence hasn’t slowed the Cubs down on offense. Matt Shaw has played nearly every day in his place; it’s nice to have a top prospect as a utility player. Alex Bregman’s slow start has been offset by strong production from stalwarts Nico Hoerner and Ian Happ. I feel roughly as good about the Cubbie offense as I did before the year began. I’m a little worried about Bregman’s fit in Wrigley, and I’m eagerly watching Pete Crow-Armstrong to see how he adjusts to a steady diet of offspeed junk, but everything else looks in good order to me.

Give the Chicago front office its due: President of baseball operations Jed Hoyer has built this team with a lot of injury replacements. Most clubs would look more diminished than the Cubs do while missing three of their chosen starting rotation members and one of their best hitters. But still, they’re missing three of their starting rotation members and one of their best hitters. That’s pretty clearly bad. And besides, this team’s slow start began before the injuries to Horton and Boyd. Neither Rea, nor Assad has had a turn in the rotation yet, and each of them will be making at least three starts apiece before reinforcements arrive. Things might not get better right away.

Even so, it’s hardly time to panic. But it is a reminder of how thin the margins in the playoff chase are with few true doormats to count out. The only NL team who has seen its playoff chances decline by as much as Chicago’s in the early going? That’d be the Giants, who are allowing nearly twice as many runs as they score. The Cubs now have the seventh-best odds of making the playoffs in the NL. Only six teams make the playoffs. You can do the math.

I think that’s a good encapsulation of what’s gone down so far. The Cubs haven’t played particularly poorly, but they’ve spotted their division rivals, all of whom started hot, some games in the standings. At the same time, a series of injuries has impeded their ability to get those games back – or at least our forecast of their ability to get those games back, as represented by their true talent level. We had them as a .523 team before the season; now, we have them at .512 for the rest of the season. When you put it that way, their decline in odds makes sense.

That said, the Cubs aren’t in dire straits yet. We’re 10 games into the season. Fortunes have a ton of time to rise and fall. A miserable April can cost you a playoff spot, but the Cubs are 4-6, not staring down a 2-8 record or anything. And even more impressively, they aren’t out of rotation options. Ben Brown, who made 15 starts last year, is currently working in long relief. Like Assad and Rea, he’s probably best-suited as a reliever, with iffy command holding back a nice fastball/curveball combo. I wouldn’t be excited to put Brown in my rotation, but he’s the ninth option on Chicago’s depth chart. In that context, he’s hilariously far above average.

Even the hitters have some injury insulation. Suzuki has already played the field in rehab games, and the Cubs announced that they expect him to rejoin the major league roster this Friday and play the outfield right away. That frees Shaw up to float around the diamond in a superutility role. Between Hoerner’s ability to slide over to short and Shaw’s versatility, the Cubs can weather an injury to any starter and still be able to field a reasonable lineup. It’s not like hitters get injured all that often relative to pitchers, anyway.

So, are the Cubs battered early? Most definitely. They’re one of the most injured teams in baseball at the moment, with four good players already on the shelf. But they’re not fried yet. They’re not that far behind in the standings. They had a metric ton of replacements available, and they still have a few options even now. The solution to their injury problems right now is essentially “their 2025 rotation” – Assad, Rea, and Brown combined for 49 starts last year – and that team won 92 games and made the playoffs. I think this is a happy situation, even though it looks sad on its face. Every team deals with injury at one point or another. The Cubs are strikingly well set up to get through theirs. Now, if they could only get Crow-Armstrong and Bregman going.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

27 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David Klein
6 months ago

That sucks no question. I can’t say I’m shocked or even surprised that the Brewers are still a top team they keep on keeping on and are the greater sum of their parts. The nl central is also much improved and I expect three teams in the division to make the playoffs. If the Marlins are out of the race by the deadline I’d put the Cubs as one of the favorites to acquire Alcantara.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  David Klein

If I had gone around 15 years ago telling people that everyone in the NL Central looks great except the Cardinals my employer would have started drug testing me. This is not the natural order of things at all.

warpath
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Cardinals don’t even look quite as bad as some feared! The pitching is still suspect at best but some of the young guys in the lineup look good!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  warpath

Jordan Walker looks completely different. I don’t think he’s hitting 50 homers this year but his hard hit / barrel rate has exploded. He’s going to surpass the number of homers he had last year in less than a quarter of the PAs.

AdvantageSchneiderMember since 2018
6 months ago

The Brewers subtracted? Did anyone tell the Brewers this?

airforce21oneMember since 2026
6 months ago

Lol. Exactly. The Brewers have beaten the projections like eight year running now, and still no one gets it.

Also, two of the best Brewers hitters are on the DL right now…they seem to be doing fine and not making excuses.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago

They absolutely subtracted. Their best pitcher from last year is Met now!

Of course the other good players they traded are now bad, and the bad players they traded for are now good. Just another sunny day in Milwaukee.

warpath
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Still very early on some of these deals but selling high on Durbin is looking mighty good right now.

We will probably have to wait some time to say too much about the Peralta deal. Made them worse this year for sure.

The Isaac Collins + Nick Mears for Angel Zerpa trade was always the most puzzling. You can’t even call it really “selling high” on Collins because Mears was arguably better than Zerpa last year? Weird trade. Decent chance this trade made Milwaukee marginally worse both in the short and long term.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  warpath

Zerpa has had good results but something is wrong with him. His stuff is way down.

Kyle Harrison looks awesome though. And they now have a ton of left handed relievers to throw at the Pirates, Dodgers, Mets, and Phillies.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I wrote this before I learned from scanning the starting lineups yesterday that the Brewers decided to start Luis freaking Matos at DH.

Admittedly he is *not* one of the guys they got in a trade but I am more than a little surprised that Matos is even still in the league. I thought he had thoroughly played his way out of an active roster spot.

The Brewers must really not think highly of Tyler Black.

MichaelMember since 2017
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It’s a right/left thing I think.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  Michael

One of the things that drives me crazy is when teams decide they need a certain handedness and go with a much worse hitter than if they had just stuck with a same handed hitter. Luis Matos has a career wRC+ under 80. He should not be DHing.

Although maybe teams have also decided not to give away guys the Brewers anymore even if they look totally busted.

Last edited 6 months ago by sadtrombone
airforce21oneMember since 2026
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Matos is 24, was a 55FV, and has like 600 PAs total in his career. I’m not saying he’s going to be a superstar, or even a hallways decent player, bit the Brewers gave up nothing for him.

mattMember since 2023
6 months ago

Idk based on the title/headline it made it seem like you were trying to convince me the Cubs are deep pitching wise. But then I read said article and you pointed out lot of flaws for the “depth” (now needed) pieces and I am thinking the opposite. Now do not get me wrong, this isn’t the Padres rotation who have only 4 close to mlb quality starters (Pivetta/King/Musgrove (currently on IL/Vasquez) but there are tons of questions for the so called depth in Cubs rotation.

steubyMember since 2018
6 months ago
Reply to  matt

Sure, but what team’s depth pitching options don’t have serious question marks? That’s kind of why they’re depth options, right?

berseliusMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  matt

You could do a lot worse than (the underrated) Javy Assad as your nominal 8th or 9th starter. The Cubs staff/depth doesn’t have any great pitchers, but they’ve got a ton of cromulent ones. It beats past years where they’ve started guys like Sampson, Wesneski, and other minor league cannon fodder

Last edited 6 months ago by berselius
mike sixelMember since 2016
6 months ago

Joe Ryan…..

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 months ago

It’s not great to be last in your division but even with the injuries it’s not like the talent level they have on hand is that different than the teams ahead of them.

And they’re only four games back. It’s too soon to hit the panic button.

Of course the Red Sox are only 5.5 games back and hitting the panic button seems absolutely appropriate, but that’s a more extreme case.

airforce21oneMember since 2026
6 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I don’t think the Red Sox should panic. The Yankees are talented but brittle. The Orioles still seem like they are missing something. The Blue Jays are overrated, and the Rays aren’t the same team as they were even a few years ago.

warpath
6 months ago

Cubs bats have been dormant so far, they were 6th in team wRC+ last year but are currently languishing in 25th this year. Kyle Tucker out, Alex Bregman in was the big swap on offense, but as the bats come around and Suzuki is back, this should be a pretty good lineup that can help carry a sketchy pitching staff, at least in the regular season.

They also might have the best infield defense in the league, which certainly doesn’t hurt. Suzuki should be the only definitively below-average fielding regular in the lineup, so that should help out a beleaguered pitching staff.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 months ago
Reply to  warpath

I’m having trouble seeing them win a playoff series. Even the bullpen looks pretty bad. Of course Texas won a WS with Jordan Montgomery as the ace so who knows..

JimmyMember since 2019
6 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Well, they did win a playoff series last year with a bullpen that had the 4th worst xFIP, 5th worst ERA, 3rd worst K-BB%, and 2nd most blown saves through April. I think you’re coming to conclusions way too early.

OnWI1933Member since 2016
6 months ago

As a Brewer fan, I fully endorse Cubs management panic. Panicked leadership typically makes bad decisions.

So, hit that panic button Chicago!

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
6 months ago

Of the current last-place clubs, the Red Sox are the most troubling. They are failing at the two primary things that CBO Craig Breslow focused the offseason on improving: pitching and defense

Last edited 6 months ago by JimmieFoxxalorian
databountyMember since 2025
6 months ago

Yeah, I am a Cubs fan being from the Chicago suburbs, but have found myself cheering for the Red Sox as well due to my love for the city of Boston. Really not loving how the 2026 season has started.

ThomasMember since 2017🏆 MVP
6 months ago

If you’re trying to make me feel better, it’s working. So thanks for that.

  • sent from the ledge
Matthew
6 months ago

It’s hard to believe there are 19 better projected rotations than the Cubs. Maybe 12 or 13.