The Lightning Hands of Mookie Betts

We’ve spoken about Mookie Betts a few times recently in these digital pages, highlighting what we might expect out of him given his age and tools, and looking at the validity of some of the comparisons to a young Andrew McCutchen. And why not: despite a batting line in the opening week that might not wow us at first glance, he’s been a walking highlight reel since spring training with his sneaky power, base running, and defense in centerfield.

Monday only added to the hype, as he did this in the top of the first inning on a Bryce Harper would-be home run:

Mookie_Betts_Catch

Followed by this base running gem in the bottom of the same inning:

Mookie_Betts_Double_Steal

Quickly followed by this line drive shot in the bottom of the second:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Mookie_Betts_Homerun

Those plays are a great full day at the park for an established superstar; they were a great 40 minutes for Mookie Betts during the opening week of his first full year as a major leaguer. We’ve only played six or seven games this season, so it’s hard for us to cut through the noise and hype — however, there’s the sense that it this is the continued beginning of something special for the guy playing centerfield in Boston.

Yesterday, following the home run, there was a common theme to the reactions from the press and social media: Mookie Betts has incredibly quick hands. It’s not hard to see why people are saying that: the pitch was inside, Betts kept his arms in, and the swing was short and explosive. Adding to that, Jordan Zimmerman hit his target. He and Jose Lobaton were trying to get Betts inside with something hard (PITCHf/x classified it as a slider, but it would be an abnormally fast slider for Zimmerman, and it didn’t break much); the pitch was going where it was supposed to, Betts just hit it out. From the Red Sox broadcast:

How many times have we seen this so far this season, where they try to sneak a fastball inside to Mookie Betts, and he just cleans it out?

There’s a bit of hyperbole there, as the Red Sox have played seven games, but we get the gist. To that point, the pitch location of his home run yesterday was similar to the one he hit on Opening Day; it turns out it’s similar to most of the home runs he’s hit at the big league level. There have been 195 home runs hit so far this season: Betts’ second-inning shot yesterday was the 30th-most inside pitch hit for a home run, and his dinger on Opening Day was the 18th-most. This next one, on a 1-2 count from September of last year off Miguel Gonzalez, is illustrative of that tendency:

Mookie_Betts_HomeRun_Sept

The angle of the camera shot makes the ball look a bit closer to the plate than it was, as it was over a foot inside from the center of the plate when Betts hit it. That was good for the 34th-most inside pitch hit for a home run in 2014 (out of 4,188 total home runs). We’re starting to get an idea of what’s going on with Betts’ power. Jeff wrote a great article last week about where Ryan Zimmerman is like Miguel Cabrera, and how both are able to hit pitches way off the plate inside for home runs. We’re not seeing that extreme level of off-plate power with Mookie Betts (and we may never), but we are starting to get an idea where his happy zone is, and it’s a little different from most hitters. Take a look at where his career home runs have been in the strike zone (the zone is not exact, but it’s good enough to get the point):

Mookie_Betts_HRs_2014-15

Don’t get my wrong, most hitters like pitches middle-in. Those two closer to the center of the plate are pitches that hitters often do damage to. The difference between other hitters and Betts is that most of them like it a little more middle than the other five pitches above, and most of them don’t have the in-zone contact skills that Betts possesses. That highlights the trickiness inherent to pitching to Betts: he doesn’t have many glaring holes in his swing and doesn’t chase a lot of bad pitches. Try to bust him inside, and he can drive the ball, even when it’s on the black; try to get him to chase outside, and he’ll take his walks. Let’s take a look at his zone profile for swing rates to get an idea of how often he chases:

Mookie_Betts_Swing_Rate

Not a lot, is the answer. The place to get him, it seems, is well-located on the outside corner, where he doesn’t swing much and isn’t as able to drive the ball (.182 slugging for the 38% purple box). Again, you could say the same about most hitters. Zimmerman and Lobaton made the mistake of trying to beat Betts in the place where he swings the most, and the result was a three-run home run that effectively ended the contest. They weren’t the first battery to try that, and it’s a safe bet they won’t be the last.

There’s one thing for certain: pitchers will adjust to Betts’ strengths. As is the case with all young players, how Betts adjusts back to the pitching change will tell us a lot. Based on his contact skills and eye at the plate, he might be better suited to weathering those adjustment periods than most. With hands as quick as his on inside pitches, everything becomes a lot easier.





Owen Watson writes for FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. Follow him on Twitter @ohwatson.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tz
11 years ago

That last GIF shows a very strong back leg once he’s turned his core to be in a position to turn on the inside pitch with authority.

Which looks a lot like Miguel Cabrera’s form. Holy re-justifying the hype!!

wildcard09
11 years ago

Yeah what a day the kid had. I know like you mentioned his line so far is a little underwhelming, but he’s had a pretty good approach in most of his at bats this year, and he’s had more than a few well hit balls right at fielders so he’s probably been a little unlucky so far.

jfree
11 years ago

Didn’t see that stolen base play before. Looks to me like hit-and-run can obliterate the infield shift.

bdresch7
11 years ago
Reply to  jfree

It wasn’t a hit and run, it was just a heads up play. Betts knows Papi is shifted on most in the MLB and saw the opening. I love aggressive baserunning.

jfree
11 years ago
Reply to  bdresch7

I know it wasn’t a hit and run. It was a stolen base.

you're anonymous. just say "I was wrong"
11 years ago
Reply to  jfree

So, then, what exactly was the point of your first comment.
How does hit-and-run “obliterate” the shift?
How did the gif of a stolen base make you come up with that idea?

When what you’ve written something that makes no sense at all, there is no need to get snotty when someone points that out.

K
11 years ago
Reply to  jfree

Probably that a hit and run leaves the entire left side of the field open by a pulling the shortstop to cover second.

Yirmiyahu
11 years ago
Reply to  bdresch7

I remember seeing this once before (Ellsbury?) when 3B was abandoned due to a shift. I love the fact that a 22-year-old had the awareness and intelligence to see the opportunity.

Par016
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

I believe it was actually done by Pedroia before and Damon on the Yankees (maybe in the playoffs IIRC?).

pft
11 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

Its not that rare with all the shifting now

John C.
11 years ago
Reply to  bdresch7

The “double steal” was a heads up play by Betts and a napping play by Jordan Zimmermann (the pitcher is supposed to cover third when the runner from first attempts to steal second and the infield is shifted).

Famously, Johnny Damon did exactly the same thing in the World Series in 2009, stealing two bases on one pitch when the Phillies overshifted on Texeira. The difference is that yesterday Zimmermann at least made it a close play at third, where in the WS there was no throw at all.

bdresch7
11 years ago

I’ve listened to a few Red Sox broadcasts, this being one of them. The other he took a pitch off the left field wall. Both times I knew he had exploded the pitch based on the sound of the bat. Not many guys can square it up like that and have the discipline to be a smart lead-off hitter. Can’t wait to see more out of this kid. I truly think he’s the next Jacoby Ellsbury.

Jonathan Sher
11 years ago
Reply to  bdresch7

He’s a better hitter than Ellsbury, Consider:

(1) Betts reached the majors 3 years earlier (age 21 v 24)

(2) Betts posted an ISO last year that Ellsbury didn’t come close to until the season he turned 28. In fact, except fpr that one monster year by Ellsbury, his ISO has been lower than what Betts posted last year.

(3) It take Ellsbury four season in the bigs before he posted a wRC+ that was average or better. His lifetime wRC+ of 109 is significantly less than Mookie posted as a rookie (130). And Ellsbury’s offensive production largely came in one monster year.

(4) Ellsbury contact skills are strong but still a little behind that of Betts.

I expect Betts will be a much more consistent source of power and a better hitter overall. I also think its clear Betts will post a higher OBP too — his rookie mark was better than Ellsbury’s lifetime average and Betts consistently drew more walks in the minors too.

holymoly
11 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan Sher

weird post.

1) ellsbury reached mlb at 23, not 24.

2) ellsbury posted a .155iso in his first callup (and .160 in those playoffs), better than betts’ .153.

3) ellsbury posted a 136wrc+ in his first callup (and 145 in those playoffs), better than betts’ 130.

4) ells career .315avg in milb, betts .313. ells .353 in his first callup (and .360 in those playoffs), betts .291.

besides, you’re setting yourself up for disappointment by using a “mookie will be better than anyone who wasn’t as good as him at age 21” argument. you could use the same logic to argue mookie is not as good a hitter as brett lawrie.

nerf
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

His first callup was 127 PAs, and the playoffs even less. I know Mookie doesn’t have a wicked long track record, but let’s not use too little information for the both of them.

everdiso
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

Your objection seems more applicable to his post then mine, imo.

Jonathan Sher
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

(1) Ellsbury turned 24 the season he was called up; just over half of his plate appearances that season came after he turned 24.That said, the age difference is closer to two years than to three. At the same age that Betts raked in the majors, Ellsbury was playing college ball for Oregeon State.

(2) Most players progress rather than regress from age 21 to 26 and an exception (Brett Lawrie) doesn’t disprove that tendency.

(3) There is no basis for using Ellsbury’s first 127 plate appearances as a barometer for his power when he has had 3,747 plate appearances since.His lifetime ISO is .141 and he has topped .150 only twice, his one monster year in 2011 and his cup of coffee his first year. The same holds true when looking at wRC+

(4) It is true that Betts has only 252 plate appearances and it takes significantly longer for some statistic tendencies to become evident. In the interim, I tend to rely on scouting reports whose consensus seems to support Betts a player with more upside at the plate than Ellsbury.

holymoly
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

Hey say that he’s younger than Ellsbury if you want. That’s fine.

But completely ignoring Ellsbury’s 155pa first late season callup when using Betts 213pa first late season callup seems like bizarre statistical analysis.

And Lawrie isn’t some rare exception. Sox fans should be familar with guys like Middlebrooks, for example.

In general, saying that “this kid is better in a small sample at age 21 so he will be better than this veteran who broke out in a massive way later in his career” is not the greatest argument.

Jonathan Sher
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

I am relying on the best available evidence for each player.

In Ellsbury’s case, that means evaluating the nearly 3,900 plate appearances he has had and not cherry-picking 3% of those at-bats. I am not ignoring that 3% — it is included with the remaining 97%.

In Betts’s case, that means considering his 252 plate appearances, his minor league record and scouting reports.

Your mentioning of Middlebrooks says much about how you structure your argument — it is devoid of analysis or scientific rigor. When there is a universe of more than 15,000 people who have played in MLB, naming a second exception is as unconvincing as only naming one. There have been many studies that examined how different aspects of performance are affected by age. Here are a few:

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9933

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/how-do-star-hitters-age/

Pure
11 years ago

Fengraphs

everdiso
11 years ago

legendary opening day for the kid. fit for a storybook. hard not to love him for that.

he’s scaring pitchers away from pitching inside on him already. not bad.

Only Glove, No Love
11 years ago

Looks more like Pedroia’s swing to me.

Damaso's Burnt Shirt
11 years ago

Not as impressive as Emperor Palpatine’s though. Over time, they could be.

Joe
11 years ago

I swear its like nonstop mookie betts coverage on FG.
Im starting to think its just a product of the boston hype machine. Lords knows how many RS prospects get hailed as the next big thing.

Wake me up when he actually makes the AS team or something. Sheez

David O
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe

I’m sorry the Yankees aren’t doing well. But they have a lot of guys who have made the All Star game, so they’ll probably be OK.

Garys of OldeMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe

I’m not a Red Sox fan, but I appreciate the Betts coverage. He’s just fun. What’s not to like?

stretchfest
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe

I’ll wake you up to give you your money back.

bdhudson
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe

Because Steamer and ZIPS definitely take ‘hype machine’ into account when projecting a 22 year old for over 3 WAR in his first full season.

OLIVER
11 years ago
Reply to  bdhudson

That ain’t nothing. Sixteen months ago I said Mookie would be a 5.5 WAR player in 2015. And I’ll stand by that.

Better forget about hype and start scouting the stat line, everybody!

MARCEL
11 years ago
Reply to  OLIVER

That’s right. I also remember you said Joey Gallo would become a 6.0 WAR player while striking out 40% of the time.

Gfuzz
11 years ago
Reply to  Joe

I forget exactly when the teams are selected, but you’ve got roughly 10 weeks to nap.

southie
11 years ago

I think a lot of is his name, team and crazed baseball market. If his name was Dave Johnson and he played on San Diego I don’t think much ink would be spilled. I have read a lot about market (stock) psychology and the name of a stock (and even ticker symbol) can really help or hurt a stock’s performance in the eyes/minds of prospective investors.

Not saying he isn’t a great player. A 130 wRC+ last season in 213 PAs is definitely nothing to sneeze at but to have 10x the amount of coverage tells me there has to be something more to his ‘legend’ than just his skills.

TB
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

A few years ago, it seemed like every other article was about Mike Trout. Writing about young players is more interesting than talking about veterans.

BenRevereDoesSteroids
11 years ago
Reply to  TB

Well, you could also so the same thing about Dustin Ackley. He came up in 2011, was hyped to hell, had a great 400 or so PAs, and then has never been the same. Same thing with Wil Meyers. Its stories like those that make some of us want Fangraphs to tap the breaks a little on the Mookie Train.

Paul
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

Billy Hamilton had the same treatment in 2013 after he was called up, and it’s certainly wasn’t because of his boring name.

Gfuzz
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

A few factors that make Mookie extra intriguing: (1) He basically came out of nowhere. No one predicted this 2 years ago, and right now he looks like he could end up a true superstar in the sport. (2) His peripherals foretold a tantalizing hit tool, and that seems to be playing out. So it’s a confirmation of all that this website is about. (3) Fangraphs is also all about defensive metrics, and Mookie’s D is legit at multiple positions.

holymoly
11 years ago
Reply to  southie

well to be fair to the complainers, despite this one great game, mookie hasn’t exactly been off to a great start this year.

Jay Stevens
11 years ago
Reply to  holymoly

The numbers don’t match the performance yet. The kid has been mashing the ball — just a lot of screeching liners at defenders. That is, .231 BABIP. With his speed and bat-on-ball profile, expect to see the numbers align with ability.

Chowjuch
11 years ago

Mookie is a stud. That said, he absolutely has holes. He does not take pitches the other way very effectively, and teams are picking up on that. The Nationals almost exclusively pitched him low and away tonight. Other teams have done the same. Mookie needs to adjust.

Representing Dan Szymborski
11 years ago
Reply to  Chowjuch

April.

Arc
11 years ago
Reply to  Chowjuch

That a 22 year old with 300 ABs under his belt has holes in his game is a devastating indictment. True MLB talent is perfect in every way.

pft
11 years ago

Do the Nats skimp on their advanced scouting budget? Everyone in Boston knows Betts loves the ball inside. Why Zimmerman would want to throw a slider inside to Betts at Fenway is puzzling. Maybe knock him off the plate to set up a pitch outside, but thats it until he shows he can hit the ball outside

tz
11 years ago
Reply to  pft

It looked like Lobaton was setting up for a pitch up and in, and the ball stayed belt-high on the inside corner. Can’t put all the pitches on the outer half, since that would give him some chance to adjust.

Jonas
11 years ago

While his hands are quick and strong, like most professional hitters, what is really impressive is the lightning fast turn that he gets through the baseball. On that inside pitch, look how his chest is already square to the pitcher. The core turning the shoulders and chest are what squares the bat up. After his swings, his chest gets all the way turned to foul territory.

Charles Pogacar
11 years ago

Gonna shoot you straight here, Watson: there seems to be more of an emphasis on the “fan” than the “graphs” in this post. Was this a calculated maneuver?

Francis C.
11 years ago

I have noticed pitchers are already throwing him a lot of pitches on the outside half of the plate, inducing 3 ground ball outs to shortstop yesterday. Let’s hope Mookie adjusts.

james wilson
11 years ago
Reply to  Francis C.

Cookie Best will adjust.