The Mets Have a Mismatched Outfield Once Again
It’s only March 2, but between Yoenis Céspedes‘ media blackout, J.D. Davis‘ shoulder scare, and Brandon Nimmo’s irregular heartbeat, the Mets’ outfield has already enlivened the spring with a fair bit of drama and a few eye-catching headlines. Thankfully none those events has turned into a worst-case scenario, and as Opening Day approaches, the unit looks to be a potential source of strength on a contending team — though as ever, it could be a challenge to fit all of the parts together.
Indeed, assembling the pieces into a coherent whole has been a perennial shortcoming for the Mets, even before Brodie Van Wagenen took the reins as general manager; this team hasn’t had a true two-way center fielder — as opposed to a misplaced corner who could outhit his mistakes in the middle pasture — since the heyday of Ángel Pagán, if not Carlos Beltrán. Last year’s roster, the first one assembled by Van Wagenen, had such a surplus of infielders that its six most common outfield configurations (from among 27 different permutations in all) involved at least one infielder who had little major league experience as a flychaser:
| LF | CF | RF | Games Started |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff McNeil | Brandon Nimmo | Michael Conforto | 27 |
| J.D. Davis | Juan Lagares | Michael Conforto | 26 |
| J.D. Davis | Michael Conforto | Jeff McNeil | 17 |
| Dominic Smith | Michael Conforto | Jeff McNeil | 16 |
| J.D. Davis | Brandon Nimmo | Michael Conforto | 10 |
| Jeff McNeil | Juan Lagares | Michael Conforto | 8 |
| Brandon Nimmo | Juan Lagares | Michael Conforto | 7 |
Coming into 2019, McNeil had never played the outfield in the majors and had just eight games of minor league experience there, while Davis’ outfield resumé amounted to five major league games plus 31 in the minors, with Smith notching 13 in the majors and 26 in the minors. One had to scroll down to the team’s seventh most commonly-used configuration to find a trio of seasoned outfielders playing in the same unit. The mismatches contributed to ongoing defensive woes, as the team ranked 13th in the NL in defensive efficiency (.677), 14th in UZR (-12.8), and last in DRS (-86).
Among the outfielders the results were a mixed bag. The left fielders (led by Davis with 302 PA, then McNeil with 197, Smith with 112, and Nimmo with 82 PA) hit for a 130 wRC+ (fifth in the majors) but were a league-worst 10 runs below average in the field; still, their collective 3.0 WAR ranked 10th. Their center fielders (primarily Lagares with 272 PA, then Nimmo with 148, and Conforto with 142) hit for just an 88 wRC+ and were 6.5 runs below average afield (fifth-worst in the majors); their collective 0.8 WAR ranked 21st. Their right fielders (primarily Conforto for 501 PA and McNeil with 159 PA) hit for a 123 wRC+ (seventh-best), were 1.5 runs above average defensively, and ranked sixth at the position with 3.9 WAR. Add it up and the unit as a whole was sixth in wRC+ (114), but 24th in UZR (-15) and just 15th overall at 7.7 WAR. Of the 10 playoff teams, only the Cardinals got less value from their outfield (7.0 WAR) than the Mets.
To be fair, injuries played some part in their strange outfield picture, and this being the Mets, things only got stranger as the season continued. Céspedes played just 38 games in 2018 before undergoing surgeries to remove bone spurs and calcifications around the Achilles tendons in both heels. The team hoped to get him back at some point last summer but in mid-May, he fractured his right ankle in a violent fall at his Port St. Lucie Ranch, one that — wait for it — involved his stepping in a hole while dodging a wild boar. The injury not only wiped out his season but led to a restructuring of his contract, with his base salary of $29.5 million cut to $6 million but rising to $11 million if he doesn’t start the season on the injured list for a right foot or ankle injury related to the fracture. If he misses the Opening Day roster for an unrelated injury, his salary will be prorated to $11 million once he makes the roster. He could make another $9 million via plate appearance bonuses, with $3.5 million available in awards bonuses, and an assignment bonus whose value depends on whether he’s traded to an AL team ($2 million) or an NL one ($500,000).
Meanwhile, Nimmo missed 89 games from late May to September due to a bulging disc in his neck and a case of whiplash, caused by an April 14 collision with an outfield wall. After a breakout 4.5-WAR season in which he hit .263/.404/.483 (148 wRC+) in 2018, his production sank to 1.3 WAR, though he was still above-average offensively despite a plummeting batting average (.221/.375/.407, 114 wRC+). Conforto suffered a collision-induced concussion in May, but his stay on the injured list was minimal; he topped the 150-game mark for the second straight season while batting .257/.363/.494 (126 wRC+) with a career-high 33 homers and 3.7 WAR.
For new manager Luis Rojas, the infield picture offers a bit more clarity than last year. With third baseman Todd Frazier having departed for the Rangers in free agency, McNeil — who tied Pete Alonso for the team’s top wRC+ (143) while batting a sizzling .318/.384/.531 en route to 4.6 WAR in just 133 games spread out over four positions — is ticketed to be the starter at the hot corner, particularly given the concerns about Davis’ defense there (-11 DRS and -2.7 UZR in just 500.2 career innings). That’s not to say that Davis took to left field by any stretch of the imagination, given his -11 DRS and -4.7 UZR in 585.1 innings in 2019, but when given the chance, he simply kept hitting. Aided by improved plate discipline and more consistent contact, he flat-out scalded the ball at a .307/.369/.527 (136 wRC+) clip with 22 homers. Per Statcast, his average exit velocity (91.4 mph), hard hit rate (47.4%) and xwOBA (.383) all ranked in the 90th percentile or better.
The 26-year-old Davis was actually playing third base when he injured his left (non-throwing) shoulder last Tuesday, jamming it while diving for a grounder against the Tigers. He remained on the ground for several minutes following the play before being assisted off the field. An MRI revealed no new damage, just inflammation, though a previous labrum tear that the Mets were aware of, but that was asymptomatic, came to light. He’s expected to resume baseball activities soon.
It remains to be seen how things will play out in left field if both Davis and Céspedes are available. The latter, now 34, has played just 135 games over the past three seasons due to hamstring and hip flexor woes as well as the heel problems. He’s been taking batting practice and running in a straight line and is hoping to play in spring training games by mid-month. And he’s apparently talking to the media again; on February 16, as camp opened, he declared his intention not to speak to the reporters “because I don’t want to,” presumably due to the roasting he received for his ranch misadventure. “Not today, not tomorrow, not at all year this year,” he said at the time. Yet within a week, he spoke to reporters through a translator, conceding, “I committed an error and paid the price for it,” before turning the focus to his availability and grading his motivation level to return at “12” on a scale of 1 to 10:
“I think the money is important, but regardless I was going to come in with the same motivation whether the money was the same or any different,” Céspedes told reporters. “A big part of the motivation is the people who have been out there and have been saying that I can’t do it. So I am going out there to prove that I can.”
Potentially crowding the left field picture even further is the continued presence of the 24-year-old Smith, who has lingered on the roster despite losing out to Alonso, the NL Rookie of the Year, as the first baseman of the present and future. With his sleep apnea issues solved, and his body in better shape (though he did miss two months with a stress reaction in his left foot) got 197 plate appearances last year between left field, first base, and pinch-hitting, and he made the most of that thin slice of playing time, hitting .282/.355/.525 for a 133 wRC+. Left field has proven to be a mismatch for him, as both the metrics (-6.8 UZR, -7 DRS in 309 innings over the past two seasons) and the eye test suggest, though Rojas, who worked with him previously as the team’s outfield coach, has seen positive signs this spring. “Dom’s got great defensive ability and I think he did a good job in the offseason,” Rojas said on February 12. “We talked about him working, movement and agility, and I saw him taking good steps off the bat and being efficient in some routes there. I would like him to keep that versatility and keep throwing more in the outfield like he’s been doing.”
Nimmo, who turns 27 on March 27, was scratched from a Grapefruit League appearance on Wednesday and underwent a series of tests related to an irregular heartbeat that only manifests itself when he’s resting. The condition was first discovered in 2016; doctors wanted to retest him to check that the walls of his heart weren’t thickening, and fortunately, he got a clean bill of health. Still, the crowd in left field consigns him to center field, where his work has been shaky (-5.5 UZR and -9 DRS in 718.1 career innings), but with Conforto no better there (-4.3 UZR and -16 DRS in 1,137.1 career innings), somebody has to take one for the team. Ex-Astro Jake Marisnick, who signed a one-year, $3.313 million deal with the team in January, has the glove (18.7 UZR and 53 DRS in 3,757.2 career innings) but not the bat (a career 79 wRC+) to be more than a backup, occasional option against lefties (90 wRC+ for his career) or late-inning replacement.
Via our Depth Charts, the Mets forecast to rank 11th in cumulative outfield WAR despite the fourth-worst defensive rating:
| Team | Bat | BsR | Fld | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 77.1 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 14.3 |
| Angels | 56.2 | 4.6 | -1.8 | 11.7 |
| Yankees | 34.3 | 2.3 | 11.5 | 10.7 |
| Nationals | 38.5 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 10.3 |
| Astros | 37.7 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 10.2 |
| Brewers | 36.6 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 9.9 |
| Twins | 14.5 | 6.2 | 14.8 | 9.5 |
| Braves | 28.5 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 9.2 |
| Athletics | 19.7 | 1.1 | -0.5 | 8.0 |
| Rays | 1.0 | 3.4 | 15.9 | 7.9 |
| Mets | 27.9 | 1.4 | -6.2 | 7.6 |
| Red Sox | 0.3 | 3.6 | 10.1 | 7.4 |
| Phillies | 20.3 | 0.6 | -3.9 | 7.0 |
| White Sox | 9.5 | 1.4 | -3.3 | 6.8 |
| Cubs | 10.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 6.8 |
| Diamondbacks | 4.6 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 6.3 |
| Padres | -1.8 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 5.9 |
| Rangers | 1.0 | 2.0 | -8.1 | 5.5 |
| Reds | 7.0 | -1.9 | -11.1 | 4.9 |
| Blue Jays | -14.1 | 0.3 | -2.9 | 4.4 |
| Cardinals | -15.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 4.4 |
| Royals | -28.2 | 1.9 | 7.8 | 4.1 |
| Orioles | -16.1 | -0.6 | -4.6 | 3.9 |
| Indians | -32.8 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| Pirates | -20.0 | 3.1 | -2.5 | 3.5 |
| Marlins | -25.9 | 1.5 | -2.2 | 2.8 |
| Giants | -29.8 | 0.9 | -0.1 | 2.5 |
| Rockies | -22.0 | 0.3 | -8.5 | 2.5 |
| Mariners | -41.7 | 4.9 | -0.3 | 2.4 |
| Tigers | -37.1 | 0.9 | -1.9 | 2.3 |
As you can see, the team’s outfield projection still ranks behind those of the other NL East contenders, though the Mets are strong enough in other areas that their 59.5% playoff odds are a close second behind those of the Nationals (63.4%), and ahead of the Braves (54.4%). But as with every other area of the three teams’ rosters, any significant advantage or disadvantage there could be a difference-maker.
Ideally, a trade that converts the surplus of corner bats into a useful center fielder would go a long way for the Mets, but neither Van Wagenen nor his predecessors have found one to their liking. The GM is understandably less than willing to sell low on Smith or Davis, each of whom has five years of club control — and two minor league options — remaining, and while moving Céspedes makes sense, he’ll not only have to show he’s healthy in order for that to happen, but the team will likely need to eat some of the remaining salary, an utter rarity in Wilponland. In the meantime, rostering everyone might be easier with the addition of the 26th man and the maximum of 13 pitchers, but right now, the Mets are a long way from sorting out their current logjam.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
I doubt Ces is ready to start the season, I’m hopeful that Davis is ready and with outs above average having Davis as a competent third baseman I’d go with him at third and McNeil in LF. Conforto is a very good defender in RF according to outs above average and think if the Mets better position Nimmo I think he’ll be fine and outs above average had him as a good defender in 2029. I like Dom but his statcast numbers are meh and Davis has elite statcast numbers and if play him over Smith.
I also think Nimmo is a good defender in 2029. He’ll be about the same age I was when I started having my best years.
Me and my stubby fingers
2029 is still ahead of Tebow’s ETA.
Just neighing.
They ought to be trying to trade for someone like Inciarte, who is not likely to start for the Braves. I know that intradivisional trades are rare, but still.
The problem isn’t just in finding a good partner to send them a capable CF, defensively (which they have in Marisnick already). Conforto, Nimmo, Davis and Cespedes are all impact bats in various ways (OBP from Nimmo, power from the others), and the idea of benching 2 of them to play Inciarte is as laughable as doing so for Marisnick. Depth is a good problem to have, and it tends to sort itself out. Adding another light-hitting, defense first CF isn’t the answer.
Inciarte has a 94 wRC+ in his career and is light years ahead of Marisnick.
He’s also projected for an 83-90 wRC+ this year and saw an extremely significant defensive decline last year. So he’s either a lateral move or a downgrade from Marisnick. Either way, he’s not the kind of player that helps the Mets
Right, Inciarte from 3 years ago and there would be an interesting idea here. Inciarte now is more expensive than Marisnick and not better.
The Braves should trade Inciarte to clear space for the logjam they have in the minors… but I dunno if the Mets can afford that sacrifice offensively. Braves need “obvious” MLB pitching, but Inciarte is in no way worth anyone the Mets would trade, at least glancing at the Mets roster.
Not sure it makes sense to talk about Nimmo’s offense being down in 2019 without highlighting that the team ill-advisedly having him play through the neck injury from April 15 to May 28th, where he only hit for a 75 wRC+. He was red hot when he came back from the injury in September (159 wRC+), and if you ignore the time he played while injured, he averaged a 139 wRC+ in 2019. *If* his neck remains asymptomatic, there’s plenty of reason to be optimistic about Nimmo’s 2020.
For whatever it’s worth, I looked up the OAA metrics for JD Davis at third base and in the outfield, which I’ve now been totally converted to over UZR and DRS. OAA actually had him as adequate at third base, although in a smaller sample, and completely unplayable in the outfield. If they want him to play the outfield, they probably need to go all-in on it and play him there full-time so he can work on his reads, because playing multiple position is not working for his outfield defense.
Meanwhile, Nimmo was okay in CF, Conforto was okay in a corner, and Smith was terrible in the outfield (McNeil was good in right field and bad in left, so I don’t know what to make of that, especially in smaller samples). It’s not impossible to assemble a working setup with Davis at 3B, Cano at 2B, McNeil at 2B/3B/OF, and Nimmo and Conforto in the outfield, but If I were the Mets I’d feel better about that if it didn’t involve McNeil playing every day in the outfield/relying on Cespedes to do much of anything/relying on Smith to play anything other than 1B…I actually think Puig would be a surprisingly good fit in this scenario.
In fairness, there really aren’t a lot of CF options out there that are any better. Marte would have been a good get, but how often is trading controllable young talent for a 31 year old projected for 2.5ish WAR a good move? Even with these flaws, the Mets are still 15th in the depth charts for CF production and I just don’t see a team above them giving up Bellinger, Robert, Robles, Laureano or Buxton in a trade. Kiermaier, Gardner, and Bader all have question marks of their own on offense. The Braves are only ranked higher because Acuna will fill in for Inciarte, and Acuna’s not available and Inciarte isn’t better than the talent they would give up (or keep). I suppose they could have went after one of the millions of Padres traded this winter, but they were mostly platoon or corner types that wouldn’t be any worse than Marisnick, and trading for Jackie Bradley Jr. doesn’t seem like the answer either.
It’s just hard to find a CF right now. The haves aren’t giving theirs up and the have nots are left with scraps. Maybe they could approach Seattle to trade someone like Edwin Diaz and Robinson Cano for Jarred Kelenic. I’m sure they could add a piece or two and some cash to even it out. That seems fair, right?
maybe could have paid down some of Matt Moore, but the Mets at least act like they have financial constraints so I don’t see that happening. Shit, if they wanted to pay money, say, for David Price, they would have been in on Betts I imagine.
This is why Jackie Bradley Jr. is going to get paid next year. He’s still a bit above average in the field and he can right handers. There are a handful of teams for whom that’s a real improvement. You could say the same thing about Kike Herndandez, and to a lesser extent, Michael Taylor (and if he can actually field the position, Jonathan Villar).
Maybe the Braves will trade Inciarte or one of Waters/Pache but there aren’t a lot of prospects coming up soon who are going to stick in CF (except Robert), Betts and Springer are good enough FAs that teams will bid on them even if they don’t have a strict need in CF, and there are only 8 “true” center fielders who Depth Charts projects to have more than 2 wins next year (9 if you count Robert, 10 if you count Betts, 11 if you count Akiyama). Ian Happ and Brandon Nimmo and Trent Grisham are not ideal in that slot long-term, but amazingly, there are 11 teams below any of the Cubs/Padres/Mets in terms of total projected WAR from CF.
I wonder if LAD offers Pederson to NYM at some point as a low risk fill-in/starter in exchange for bullpen help…
If there’s one thing the Mets don’t need is another left handed hitting OFer and giving up assets for a rental would be bad
They might not have a better shot at winning the NL East than they do this season; why not go all in? They wouldn’t have to give up much for a platoon power hitter on an expiring contract
Years ago I would be hard pressed to think that trading for Robinson Cano and the world’s greatest relief pitcher would make a team significantly worse, but yet here we are. Cano’s continued presence on the team is making the positional logjams worse – McNeil really should be playing second base which would put Davis at third – plus he is a serious headache. Yet he still shows flashes of being really good and he is getting paid an obscene amount of money, so he has to stay.
I sometimes wonder if the Cano trade never happened would the Mets have made the playoffs in 2019.
I doubt they would’ve made the playoffs unless they found some other way to dump Bruce and Swarzak’s salaries. That trade always seems to be remembered as the Mets only getting Diaz and Cano for Kelenic and Dunn, but I think a huge motivating factor behind the trade in the first place was it was an opportunity to dump those bad contracts. Who knows if they trade for JD Davis or if Alonso makes the team out of spring training. My point is, their ‘18-‘19 off-season could’ve gone in so many different directions if the Kelenic trade never happened that it’s impossible to say whether they would have been better off last year.
Point taken. These are the Mets were are talking about.
The thing is Swarzak was better than Diaz last year – if Diaz had not have a track record, the only real question is when they sent him down if he went to AAA or AA – and Bruce arguably had a better year than Cano. So in order to unload one bad year of Swarzak and two bad years of Bruce, they got five bad years of Cano and and several years of control of a reliever that may be great or may be an utter disaster. And to sweeten that they gave up three prospects. I’m pretty sure that’s not how they planned that, but golly what a fiasco.
So they only real issue here is Bruce. It is conceivably that the Mets would have felt obliged to play him at first and block both Alonso and Smith, which would be a very Mets thing to do. So you probably have a point. By the time they gave up on Bruce, it probably would have been too late. But in theory if they had not done this trade and acted like a sane actor, that’s probably enough to get them into the playoffs.
Jay, you’ve been moderately patient in responding to some of my feedback in your chat and on Twitter, and I appreciate that. I have 2 more questions for you:
• You list Jeff McNeil as one of the guys who had no MLB OF experience and was part of the most common OF configurations (including the most frequent one); but you don’t mention that he was actually a positive defender in the OF. I know that doesn’t fit the narrative, but it’s worth mentioning. If you’re dinging the team for playing guys with no experience in the OF, why not mention that the guy who did it the most frequently was a success?
• You suggest trading guys from the surplus of corner OF for a “useful center fielder”; but there aren’t a lot of good CF available, though. Would it maybbe make more sense to trade some of the corner OF depth for a better left fielder? Isn’t it more likely that you could find a LF with better range who can also hit some?
Mets look strong this year for sure. Its going to be a good race.