The Most Important Players of 2016

Mike Trout is the best player in baseball, and losing Trout would cost the Angels more wins than the loss of any other player would cost any other franchise. But even with Mike Trout, we’re only projecting the Angels for 80 wins this year, and unless some of his teammates step up, the Angels might not be a factor in the postseason race this year. So, while no one is as singularly valuable as Trout is, there are some players whose performances might end up swinging a division race one way or another, especially because we don’t really know what they’re going to be.Today, let’s look at a few players with a wide range of potential outcomes who could play a critical role in determining whether their team ends up in the postseason this year.

Anthony Rendon, 3B, Washington Nationals

Two years ago, Rendon put up a +6.5 win season and finished 5th in the MVP voting; last year, he played 80 games, put up a 97 wRC+, and was worth less than +1 win. There are plenty of reasons that the Nationals season went off the rails a year ago, but the loss of Rendon — and his relatively weak performance when he was on the field — was one of the primary reasons the team underperformed. This year, he’ll be shifting back to third base full time, his best defensive position, and the team is hopeful that a healthy Rendon will be able to drive the ball with authority once again. If he can rediscover his power, he could be among the game’s best third baseman.

If he can’t, or gets injured again, the drop-off could be pretty extreme. Stephen Drew looks like the first man up to fill the void, but Drew has been pretty terrible the last two years, and has actually only ever started one game at third base in his big league career, so it’s not even a certainty that he would be a defensive asset over there. The Nationals could slide Daniel Murphy over to third and promote Trea Turner to play the middle infield if Rendon was going to miss significant time, but while Turner looks like a quality shortstop in the making, he’s not going to be able to make up for Rendon’s offense.

The Nationals line-up needs a healthy Rendon to set the table for Bryce Harper, and if they can get him back to where he was two years ago, they can take the division title back from the Mets. If he struggles or is hurt yet again, the team doesn’t really have a great alternative, and it’s not clear where they’ll get non-Harper offensive production if not from Rendon.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Hanley Ramirez, 1B, Boston Red Sox

One of the primary reasons our forecasts think the Red Sox are the best team in the AL East again is that Hanley Ramirez is projected as a reasonable performer at first base, forecasting +2 WAR from him in just 120 games played. The idea that he should bounce back offensively isn’t that tough a sell — a .257 BABIP for a guy with a .327 career mark isn’t going to last — but the projections are also assuming he’ll be fine defensively at first base, and that’s obviously something that’s difficult to know in advance. There were lots of assumptions that Ramirez would be fine in left field last year too, and instead, he turned out to be the worst defensive outfielder anyone has ever seen.

It’s entirely possible that Ramirez is again a defensive disaster, and that he simply doesn’t have the aptitude for playing quality defense in the major leagues, no matter where a team sticks him. If he ends up as a defensive liability at 1B, there probably won’t be enough offensive production to justify leaving him in the line-up on a daily basis, except the team doesn’t really have much in the way of first base depth. The presumed alternative, Travis Shaw, was just named the team’s starting third baseman, so now if the team wanted to replace Ramirez, they’d essentially be putting Pablo Sandoval back in the line-up, which isn’t exactly a huge upgrade.

If Ramirez lives up to our projections, he’ll be worth four wins more than he was a year ago, which is larger than the upgrade the team should expect from replacing Wade Miley with David Price. But there’s no question that projecting Ramirez’s value at first base is an exercise in dart-throwing, and this could all go sideways once again. If Ramirez doesn’t bounce back, the Red Sox may not either.

Rougned Odor, 2B, Texas Rangers

Many expect the Rangers to be the primary challengers to the Astros in the AL West this year, though our projections aren’t as excited about Texas’ chances. One of the primary reasons for the difference? The forecasts moderate expectations for Odor, the team’s young second baseman. ZIPS and Steamer see him as a little better than league average but nothing special, expecting +2.6 WAR over a full season worth of playing time, producing less value on a per game basis than he did in 2015.

But while the algorithms are taking the broad view, it’s not hard to think that Odor has the potential to be one of 2016’s breakout stars. His early-season struggles last year led to a demotion back to the minor leagues for a month, but after he returned to Texas on June 15th, he hit .292/.334/.527, with a .237 ISO and a 15% strikeout rate, the kinds of core skills that could make any player a big asset, much less a 22 year old middle infielder. While human beings have a tendency to overweight recent performance, the last three months of Odor’s performances were terrific, and given his age, it’s easy to connect it to real growth and improvement.

Given Odor’s power and contact skills, he certainly seems capable of crushing these projections, and ending the season as something more like a +4 or +5 win player, which would significantly boost the Rangers chances in the AL West. If the Rangers are going to compete with the Astros this season, they’ll very likely need Odor to hit more like he did in the second half of last season, rather than the average hitter that the forecasts expect in 2016.

Socrates Brito, OF, Arizona Diamondbacks

Like with Texas, there’s a pretty significant disconnect between what our data says and the public expectations for the Diamondbacks. After a headline-generating offseason and a spring training where they’ve rolled over the Cactus League, the Diamondbacks see themselves as legitimate contenders for years to come. The team’s left field situation is one of the main reasons our forecasts don’t agree, as the calculations don’t expect Yasmany Tomas to develop into a useful player, and thinks the team will miss Ender Inciarte’s production more than they expect.

While we could easily list Tomas as the important player here, I think Brito might actually be the more likely solution, if the team is going to solve their left field situation internally anyway. Jeff recently did a nice job writing up Brito’s development, but the short version is that Brito is one of the fastest players in baseball, could be a significant defensive asset, and might have developed into an improved hitter in the second half last year. It’s not that hard to see him becoming something like Inciarte-lite.

That development could be even more important because of A.J. Pollock’s balky elbow. Not only is Brito perhaps the team’s best left field option, but he’s also going to be pressed into everyday duty if Pollock needs some DL time at any point during the season, and would need to make sure the team didn’t fall apart without one of their core stars. If Brito doesn’t develop, the team will be awfully thin behind Pollock, and could be in a world of trouble if Pollock gets hurt and Tomas continues to stink. Brito turning into a guy who hits enough to make his speed-and-defense package a valuable asset would go a long way to solving one of the team’s main weaknesses, and would give the D’Backs a much stronger chance to live up to their expectations.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

62 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
drewsylvaniaMember since 2019🏆 MVP
10 years ago

The way Hanley played left field, I don’t know if aptitude is the concern. He looks like he just doesn’t give a damn. Guaranteed contract, whee!

snoop god
10 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

Fangraphs has really been missing this type of well-reasoned, well-researched, analytical perspective.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019🏆 MVP
10 years ago
Reply to  snoop god

Neither has it been missing the tired, dry sarcasm you’re proffering. There’s no EFFORT statistic that tells us which players aren’t trying hard enough. We have to go with eyeballs.

Did you watch Hanley play the field last year? Or are you just spitballing?

filthyrichardMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

On (rival podcast) one of the Red Sox beat writers was speculating that Hanley’s foibles in LF might have been more of an attentiveness/engagement issue than an outright lack of emotional investment. I guess those are related, but it makes sense that 1B forces you to be more engaged with the game action on a pitch-by-pitch basis, while LF can let you lapse into a bit more of a space cadet. From what I’ve seen so far in ST, Hanley looks endearingly pleased with himself every time he makes a play at 1B, and he obviously gets a lot more chances to be involved. I could see a return to IF helping him get back to a better mental space. But again, this is based on the eyeball test. Also while I was writing this comment he homered.

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

Too bad there isn’t a statistic for f***s given.

Spartacus
10 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

I mean Hawk did invent #TWTW, so there’s that…

Hurtlocker
10 years ago
Reply to  snoop god

Did you forget that humans play this game, not statistics??

wily moMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  drewsylvania

hanley’s inclusion in this article makes sense, but the whole idea that hanley may somehow be -unplayable anywhere on the field- due to what happened in LF last year is silly, and has been silly all offseason.

here is why: up through 2014, one year ago, he was -a shortstop-. he was not a -good- shortstop, but, he was one, and he was nowhere near as big of a disaster there as he was in left field.

if you want numbers for this: from 2012-14, in ~2000 innings at SS for the dodgers, his DRS was -13, which is better (less bad) than his -19 in only ~750 innings in LF last year. UZR, different math, same result.

if you can stomach a little subjectivity: as someone who follows the dodgers, when he was a shortstop, no one was really talking about him. he was there, he made most of the plays. the dodgers made the playoffs in some of those seasons playing him at shortstop. it wasn’t a thing. he wasn’t fantastic, but he was dependable enough, and when you add in the hitting, he was fine. (this reflects what the numbers say.)

that was ONE year before this LF experiment, which as we all can see did not work.

but this idea drifting around that this somehow translates to him not being able to play the field at all? it’s press-narrative-driven nonsense. what the LF failure means is that he’s an infielder. if you put him back at shorstop now, he’d probably still be better than he was in left field. first base has some particular footwork tricks to it but so does shortstop, presumably; on the whole first is a lot easier to play. there’s absolutely no sensible reason to believe that hanley can’t handle it.

i’ve been saying all of this since the comment section of this poorly conceived article from back in november,

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/finding-a-new-home-for-hanley-ramirez/

and i’ll keep saying it until everyone stops talking like this, which ought to be not long after the season starts.

even the herald columnists are already starting to grudgingly come around to the idea that hanley-at-1B will work, just based on the spring returns.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/2016/03/silverman_time_to_accept_that_hanley_ramirez_fits_at_1b

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
10 years ago

No love?

The Ghost of Stephen Drews BatMember since 2026
10 years ago

Let’s say the Angels are guaranteed to miss the playoffs by the trade deadline. Trade Trout to replenish the farm? Is it even possible?

j6takish
10 years ago

No. They should never trade him. Having a 9-10 WAR player helps you out that much. The Angels could have been a contender this year, they just chose to sit on their hands all winter. The team is disastrous but mostly of their own doing. They didn’t even have to break the bank, Howie Kendrick or Dexter fowler or even any number of cheap free agents could have solved a lot of their woes. They just chose to do nothing

jtmorgan
10 years ago
Reply to  j6takish

I mean anything is possible when you start with Trout, but they would have had to spend a lot of money to fix their roster. They don’t have the prospects to bring in anybody that could be of use without it being mostly about the money.

The Ghost of Stephen Drews BatMember since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  j6takish

I understand and agree.

But I do not see how it will change in the next 4-5 years. No young talent available, no pieces to trade for said young talent (except for Trout).

I guess it is dependent on the Angels brass making wise deals with free agents, but I do not think that exists within the Moreno universe.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Idk about no talent. Calhoun, Richards, Skaggs, Heaney, and now Simmons are all young enough with enough control to have good trade value. Skaggs and Heaney have to prove themselves a bit more but were both highly rated prospects and the others are proven above average big leaguers. Certainly if they did decide to rebuild they could acquire an above average farm from just those guys and then throw money at free agents after 2017. I think if they did rebuild they could have the shortest rebuild time of all teams, basically just punt 2 years.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

I mean just running thru team needs, Richards could bring back a McKinney,happ, Johnson package from the cubs, Calhoun can bring back a Spencer Adams, Tyler danish, alfaro package from the white Sox. And then I think they can get back more than they gave up for Simmons. That’s a good start to a rebuild, you still have the 2 young pitchers trying to build there value before you deal them, then trout. If you take trout, Simmons, Richards, Wilson, weaver, and Hamilton off the books next year that’s like 120 mil off the books. Or 5 top free agents.

Los
10 years ago

What would you trade to get Trout? There isn’t a package of minor league players worth Trout. If you trade for MLB players then you have the same problem of the 4-5 year window. The only Trout trade that makes sense is Trout+Pujols and getting assets in return and teams can’t absorb that payroll.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Los

There is certainly a package of minor leaguers. Espinoza, moncada, devers, owens from the red Sox is a damn sexy start, then include a Bradley to raise floor value of the package and help field a team.

Greg
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

There is absolutely no chance that package lands Trout.

Greg
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

I think the guy who said there is no package of minor leaguers is correct.

I think of Trout as worth two other MVP candidates. If Trout gives you 9 wins and you pair him with a league average player, that’s equal to two Kris Bryants by prijections. So a package has to start with a player like that, imo.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

That’s numbers 3,18,19 on baseball America’s top 100 list. Maybe include benitendi who is number 15. So 4 top 20 overall prospects. I think people forget trout is due 34 mil each year starting next year. If this was last year and you get 15 and 16 at 25 mil total then sure you can demand the world. But getting those prospects back and 34 mil can buy you 5 war in free agency.

Antonio BananasMember since 2016
10 years ago

In 2 off seasons, one of the greatest (at this point in time’s perspective) free agent classes in history will happen. On top of that, they have solid talent as stated (Simmons, Calhoun, Skaggs). Draft a couple good college bats that can develop quickly, find your Lirano/Arrieta/Keuchal and they are dangerous for 2018-2022. They also probably won’t suck in 2016 or 2017 because of Trout.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Trout is only signed thru 2020 though… And if they don’t suck its kind of hard to just draft sure fire bats. If they go all out in 2018 they can’t afford to resign trout 1, and 2 they might end up in the same position as now with bad contracts. Why not just flip everything now and sign Harper in 2018. You give the prospects time to develop and basically get another trout in free agency.

Famous Mortimer
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Anaheim’s stadium would burn down if they traded Trout.

jpgMember since 2020
10 years ago

I feel like this could be a great miniseries. I’d add:

Tyler Glasnow – Pretty meh past Cole and Liriano, he might have to be the guy who stabilizes the middle of the Pirates rotation if guys like Niese and Locke falter.

David Wright – If he can play 135 games and avoid the DL, he can probably still put 3+ WAR. And sure Wilmer Flores is a quality back up but past him, the next men up are replacement level fodder like Eric Campbell and Matt Reynolds.

Yadier Molina – He’s aging and coming off a catastrphic thumb injury but a fully healthy Yadi really improves the Cards chances of hanging with the Cubs.

Clayton Kershaw – Same as how DC described Trout except that the Dodgers are a strong favorite in the NL West. That rotation is screwed if he goes down.

soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  jpg

Kluber – The Indians are division contenders with him, but if he goes down they’re in real trouble.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Corrasco is basically the same pitcher so wouldn’t it be him too? I would also argue it’s Lindor for them.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  jpg

I don’t agree with regard to Kershaw. If the Dodgers win the West, it will likely be largely because Kershaw had another Kershaw season, but he’s about as safe a bet as a pitcher can be. “Will Kershaw continue to be Kershaw?” is not the question people have on their mind with regard to the Dodgers’ season. If anything, Puig might be a pretty good candidate from this list, as simply returning to 2013-2014 levels would be a big upgrade from last year, and there’s still a chance he could be even better than that.

MooserMember since 2020
10 years ago

Heres another one: Aaron Sanchez

Im with Busey
10 years ago
Reply to  Mooser

This one is a joke, right?

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Mooser

Sanchez is an x factor for sure but Stroman being awesome is probably the most important player on the jays.

Im with Busey
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Yep.

Chavez would likely be better than Sanchez if forced into the role.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Im with Busey

well if sanchez’ command improvement is legit, imo he could be better than any jays sp other than stro – so i get where mooser is coming from.

MooserMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Your missing the point of the article. Its not the best player, its the player who has the ability to outperform their projection and put their team in a better position to win their division or make the playoffs. Fangraphs has Stroman as a 3.4 Win pitcher, while they have Sanchez at 1.1. Which one has the best ability to beat their projection?

jrubyMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Mooser

Hello, Pot, may I introduce you to Kettle?

What I mean to say is: No, it’s *you* who missed the point of the article, which was to highlight not players who “have the ability to outperform their projection” but to “look at a few players with a wide range of potential outcomes who could play a critical role” in affecting their teams’ chances.

Is it more likely that Sanchez outperforms his projection than Stroman? I am certainly not saying so, but even if it’s true, what’s Sanchez’s ceiling? 2.0? Where Stroman, coming back from an injury could be anywhere from 0 if he gets hurt again to, say, 5ish if he hits the potential everyone was so excited about last year? I think it’s clear that the *variability* of Stroman’s possible outcomes is far more influential to the Jays’ chances of making the post-season than is Sanchez’s.

Spudchukar
10 years ago

Randall Grichuk, anyone?

rbemont
10 years ago
Reply to  Spudchukar

I was thinking Grichuk/Piscotty might be on this list, or even Carlos Martinez. If the Cards make the playoffs, or even pass the Cubs it’ll likely be because Randall and Piscotty got all Ryan Ludwick or that Carlos Martinez is healthy. Given the Cubs difficulties with high velocity pitchers, Martinez likely changes the playoff series from last year. You could even add Wainwright to this list. All four are likely to be more valuable than Yadi at this point.

Spudchukar
10 years ago
Reply to  rbemont

Agree. Only because I don’t think it is likely that Molina gets hurt. It isn’t like he hasn’t caught more innings in his career than just about anybody. Waino isn’t “injury prone” either, the guy has logged plenty of innings except for the TJ year, and the Achilles injury. But the questions remain for Grichuk and Piscotty. If they put up similar numbers like their 1/2 seasons of 2015 then the Cards should have all the pop they need. It is only health with Martinez, cause the dude is filthy. Wong needs to play up to his potential too, and Adams needs to contribute also. Yeah there are a number of “ifs” but they aren’t of the wishful thinking type, cause all of them have the talent to excel.

Los
10 years ago

Regarding Socrates Brito, I’ve never seen him play so I don’t know for sure but this line stood out to me: :Brito is one of the fastest players in baseball”. Kiley gave him 55 speed and Dan gave him 60 speed. Was the line an exaggeration by Dave (which I am fine with) or did he “develop” more speed?

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Los

Depends if the prospect projection includes base stealing. I think he matched Dee Gordon’s time on a triple or something and Gordon is one of the fastest.

redsox1Member since 2016
10 years ago

I would vote Puig as perhaps the most obvious for this category of “players with a wide range of potential outcomes who could play a critical role in determining whether their team ends up in the postseason this year”

Damaso
10 years ago

“One of the primary reasons our forecasts think the Red Sox are the best team in the AL East again is that Hanley Ramirez is projected as a reasonable performer at first base, forecasting +2 WAR from him in just 120 games played.”

this sentence. wat.

Ozzie Albies
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

“Waah waah waah waah waah waah waah waah waah Red Sox waah waah waah waah waah waah AL East waah waah waah Hanley Ramirez waah waah waah waah waah waah waah waah waah, waahwaahwaah waah WAAH waah waah waah waah waah waah waah.”

waah waah. waaaaah.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Ozzie Albies

+5

Brians Sticky Sock
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

God only knows what Damaso has going on up in there… and furthermore, Serb, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to learn that he habitually smoked marijuana cigarettes…

Beel418Member since 2017
10 years ago

I feel like Latos is very important. If he’s not healthy or sucks again then the options behind him are pretty scary for the Sox. However, if Herm and Cooper can unlock something there and he manages ~25 starts with an ERA around 4 or lower that would be a huge difference maker.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Beel418

I mean, are the White Sox in any significant way relying on Mat Latos this season?

Could he make a difference for them? Yes. Is he important? No.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

This. If he fails its probably Johnson, then fulmer. Latos was a 3 mil dolla lottery ticket.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Beel418

From the white Sox its probably Todd Frazier. Is he the first half guy last year or the second half.

witesoxfan
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

This was the one that came to mind right away. Jose Abreu is a pretty strong player for consideration too. Is he the 5 WAR player he was as a rookie (or better), or is he closer to the 3 WAR player he was last year?

Carlos Rodon is one of those guys too.

jaykaydeeMember since 2018
10 years ago

“it’s not clear where they’ll get non-Harper offensive production if not from Rendon.”

Rendon is the most-important, but just after him and for similar reasons are Ryan Zimmerman and Jayson Werth. Both were hurt last year, and took a while to get going once they got on the field, managing just 0.6 and -0.3 WAR, and wRC+ of 107 and 87, respectively. But when Zimmerman *was* healthy last year, he put up his best numbers in years – from coming back in July to going downin September, he hit .311/.372/.652, good for a .422 wOBA and 171 wRC+. That’s good. Even if he only gets back to the production of 2012-14, that’s a .279/.345/.468 line, with a .352 wOBA and 122 wRC+, which is plenty fine.

Werth, in addition to being hurt, also took some time to get going when he got back – but when he did, was also well above-average. From the middle of August through the end of the year, he hit .253/.342/.488 with a .359 wOBA and 127 wRC+. And over the course of 2013-14, he hit .304/.396/.491 with a .389 wOBA and 149 wRC+. When healthy, he can still hit *very* well.

Of course, that’s the catch, and they’ve both been injured recently and are older now than ever, and neither is superlative in the field any longer. But at least as much as Rendon, their health and production will buoy or drag the Nats. If Zimmerman and Werth play 120+ games each, the Nats have a terrifying lineup, probably as good as any in the NL.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
10 years ago

When it started with Trout I thought this was going to be a list that was about players who account for the most percentage of their team’s WAR. That would be cool. Which players are the only lifeline that their team has, basically?

johansantana17Member since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  phoenix2042

Not as dramatic, but Kershaw, Sale, and Goldschmidt all account for a large percentage of their respective teams’ total WARs.

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago

Carlos Correa – I think the Astros lineup would be a lot closer to mediocre without him.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  KCDaveInLA

It seems like Dave focused on players who have more variability in their outcomes. Correa is being widely projected to be a star this year, so in that sense his ability to reach that level is not the difference in the Astros’ season, even if he is their best player and leads them to the division.

KCDaveInLA
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

Good point. Maybe a ‘whose out-for-the-season injury would most likely cause a collapse’ would be a good subject for Dave’s next article.

The Dude of NY
10 years ago
Reply to  KCDaveInLA

With maybe a few exceptions, wouldn’t that end up just being the best player on each contending team?

Joe Joe
10 years ago

I don’t see Odor being the difference. I’d think Trout being a 11-12 win player is more likely than Odor being an 8 win player. Even then, both teams need other players to perform above their projections. More likely, Astros are going to have to falter than some player breaking out and making the difference.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

I think the relative competitiveness of the two teams is more significant than how likely a player is to outperform his projections.

Ozzie Albies
10 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

I do not get the smell is different. I think Guy Salmon 11-12 victory is likely that the smell of the 8 players win. In this case, two other players in the toy and carry on your projector. It is more likely that the Tigers have some players break and hesitated to make a difference.

{Couldn’t pass up an opportunity to put a comment with Trout and Odor into the old translator 😉 – Serb }

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Should have done 1 guy for every team I think.

The Dude of NY
10 years ago

Spin off article: which players on rebuilding teams are the most important in making sure that that the team loses as many games as possible.

johansantana17Member since 2026
10 years ago
Reply to  The Dude of NY

Freeman and Teheran for the Braves. Santana for the Brewers. Hamilton and Peraza for the Reds. Carlos Gonzalez for the Rockies.