The Nationals Already Have Another Playoff Letdown

The Nationals are far from the only team to have experienced recent playoff disappointment. Some teams don’t even make the playoffs at all! So you can’t really say the Nationals are necessarily unique. Teams run up against obstacles. A lot of those teams can’t get past. That being said, over the past number of seasons, few teams have looked better than the Nationals, and few teams have wound up more disappointing. A Nationals fan might get the sense that a championship will simply never be in the cards, and that familiar feeling is coming back with gusto, with Wilson Ramos having been diagnosed with a torn ACL.

The truest pain here belongs to Ramos. Most immediately, he is the one literally hurting. But he’s also the one who can’t play anymore, and he’s the one who was looking ahead to free agency after having a big bounceback season. Ramos’ short-term future has been blown up in the blink of an eye, and he might wonder whether he’ll even be able to catch anymore down the line. This is somebody’s life, somebody’s career. That is, and is always, the most important thing.

Secondarily, but of fan interest, is the effect on the team. And that’s the only thing we’re really equipped to write about. So, acknowledging that the real story is Ramos himself, I’d like to set that aside for a moment and talk about the postseason. The Nationals find themselves in trouble at the worst possible time.

The postseason concludes with a World Series, and the World Series is a series, after which one team gets to celebrate. It’s the celebration every fan of every team yearns for, but if you allow yourself to overthink it, you do get to wonder what’s being celebrated. In theory, the winner is the best team. In practice, that can be argued.

Perhaps it’s the best team at the time. What about the preceding six and a half months? The postseason devalues the regular season, and as we all understand, the baseball itself is different between the two tournaments. The postseason is built upon small-sample series. It rewards the team that gets suddenly hottest. And the rosters are just different, with the usage patterns being different. Depth is less of a necessity in the playoffs. And there’s the matter of health. Leaving aside everything else, the playoffs might select for the hottest team, and they might select for the healthiest team.

The Nationals are going to make the playoffs. In the first round, they’re going to face the Dodgers. The Dodgers are good — every team in the playoffs is good. The Nationals, now, won’t have Wilson Ramos, who’s been one of their best players. They’re unlikely to have Stephen Strasburg, who’s been one of their best pitchers. They haven’t been able to play Daniel Murphy in a while, and he’s been one of their best players. Bryce Harper right now seems like one giant Band-Aid, and he’s been one of their best players. There’s still plenty of talent left, of course, but there’s no replacing a star player.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

It’s almost an amusing contrast. The Dodgers might’ve been the most banged-up team in baseball all summer. And they will be without some of their players. But, critically, Clayton Kershaw recently became playably healthy. The same could be said of Rich Hill. Now the Dodgers will get to go into the postseason with two of the most effective starters in the game, and they’re going to combine for the easy majority of starts. The Dodgers got their critical health at the right time. The Nationals are experiencing critical injuries at the wrong time.

Very obviously, it should be said the Nationals don’t have a monopoly on inconvenient injuries. Any Mets fan would tell you they’ve had it worse, and they might even be right. That pitching staff is in tatters. So is Cleveland’s — Carlos Carrasco is out, and Danny Salazar is seemingly out, and now even Corey Kluber is having an MRI on his lower body. To say nothing of Michael Brantley, a team MVP who was barely ever able to play. Other teams have injuries of their own, albeit not quite of the same collective magnitude. There are playoff and potential-playoff teams who’ve been suffering.

The Nationals are getting my attention here because Ramos’ injury just happened. It is a massive blow to the roster, with the playoffs beginning in a week. Every team knows every offseason that it needs to assemble sufficient depth. Some teams do end up deeper than others, and that’s a credit to how the rosters are built. But I don’t think you can shrug off an injury like this. A team can’t really prepare for losing a Wilson Ramos, not realistically. You just can’t convince many starting-caliber players to hang out on the bench just in case. Depth is handy, even necessary, but reserves aren’t stars.

None of this is anything new. At least, not the generalities. All that’s new are the specific names of the injured, but players have been getting injured forever. The playoffs have always proceeded anyway, and a championship has never once felt less satisfying because an opponent was missing some player or two. Every team has to overcome some kind of adversity, and I don’t think the average fan wants to overthink a title. It just is; it’s the whole goal. You don’t stare a gift trophy in the mouth.

It’s just, every so often, it is worth wondering about the significance of October. No one wants it to go away. The drama is unmatched. I’ve just become decreasingly clear on the meaning. The rosters are different. The baseball is different. The sample sizes are different. And some teams are healthier than others, even if they weren’t for the months leading up. Looking ahead, the Nationals are going to be somewhat penalized in the playoffs for having lost Wilson Ramos in the season’s last week. From the perspective that the World Series doesn’t crown the best team in baseball, it doesn’t matter. Even though I can’t help but love it, I’m just having trouble identifying what the World Series does.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
9 years ago

“the significance of October.[…] From the perspective that the World Series doesn’t crown the best team in baseball, it doesn’t matter. Even though I can’t help but love it, I’m just having trouble identifying what the World Series does”

Is this really a complicated or meaningful question, somehow? If so it’s escaping me, and I say that as someone who’s really trying to give it a charitable reading. Okay, we all agree because this is FanGraphs, the World Series doesn’t identify the “best team in baseball.” Why would it need to? The World Series identifies who won the World Series, i.e. who won into, and then won, the final round of an exciting tournament played by a group of the better teams in baseball. It’s not a leading indicator of some other phenomenon, with some other deep meaning remaining to be uncovered. We are all, as fans, perfectly well allowed to treat it with either disdain or deep investment — and myself I go back and forth regularly, it’s certainly pretty fun when my team’s involved even though I have gone so far as to think of myself as just a “regular-season baseball fan” the rest of the time — but there’s no other deep question here that I can see. Just a matter of a personal decision how much to get into it, on whatever personal hedonic, aesthetic, etc. grounds one wants.

minisidd
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

This discussion seems less about the significance of the WS Championship, and more about the relative Insignificance of the divisional titles. Wild cards assist in making these titles less of an accomplishment in my opinion. But, essentially each division winner is the “best team.” October baseball is not necessarily about “best,” but rather a clash of the titans. An event to see which team can rise to the new challenge put forth by short rest, tough competition, and a slim margin for error. The team that wins is the team that can adapt to the new game, and still take on all comers. It’s a Battle of Champions for supreme bragging rights. The teams in the tournament are (or would ideally be in my mind,) all champions already.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
9 years ago
Reply to  minisidd

It seems like if anything maybe the closest to a consensus position here is that we ought to accord a little more significance — not in the sense of deep meaning, but rather cultural prominence and respect — to the regular-season league champions. You could think of it as returning a little closer to the way things were before the LCS era, when the World Series was a title bout between the truly “best” (or at least the largest-sample-size best) team from one league and the best team from the other.

I think in that sense a team like this year’s Cubs probably deserves some kind of title that comes with a sense of accomplishment and respect, which doesn’t really happen now unless they succeed in the playoffs. Even if the playoffs don’t break their way, say they get knocked out before the NLCS and the NL “champion” is a team with 87 wins instead of them, the team that wins the league in regular-season play should maybe be thought of as a winner too, rather than (as currently) almost treated as an asterisk-like also-ran that gets dragged out on trivia nights.

SoxWatcher
9 years ago
Reply to  Jeff Sullivan

Yup, you’re WAY over-thinking it 🙂 I think of it like chess — to beat a *good* player, you have to be able to beat (or at least stay even) with him in the opening, the middle game and then the end game. To win the WS, your team has to have enough talent AND depth to survive the long grind, and then be able to match up well enough with their opponents in the short-sprint of the post-season.

And, several GOOD teams will fall short; but they were still good – and not winning the WS doesn’t mean the season was a waste for them – it means someone else found a way to win when they didn’t at the end – or “outrageous fortune” stepped in and caused something unexpected to happen – which is fun in its own way. Enjoy it 🙂

sheeks9
9 years ago

The whole “the playoffs dont matter” argument is weak, in my opinion.

First off all, regular season records are hardly a perfect way of measuring team success. Schedules are not consistent and some teams face more difficulty than others. How is that fair?

And on top of that, why are we disregarding the team that earns a playoff bid, then adds 11 more wins while playing only the best teams in the league? Maybe we should add playoff victories to regular season win totals. I would imagine that the extra 11 wins will more often than not give the World Series champion one of the best, if not the best, records in the league.

The World Series (and the playoffs in general) are fine. There is no perfect way to determine which team is the best. Not even a 162 game regular can do that. Just enjoy the post season. It is exciting as hell and more often than not crowns a worthy champion.

Harold Reynolds
9 years ago

What the world series does is make more money for the already rich.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
9 years ago

What I want to know is, why, having already clinched, Baker is not resting his best players? Obviously his use of Melancon in relatively low leverage situations on multiple consecutive days has been questionable. We can add onto that, with six games to play, Ramos, 29, setting a new career plate appearance record and a new career season games record. The injury is not Baker’s fault, but I really wish that at this time of year he treated his players to as much rest as possible.

JCCfromDCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

Because the players have to stay sharp, and more importantly, because they’d rather deal with road Kershaw in Game 1 (and possibly Game 5) than home Kershaw.

Doorknob11
9 years ago
Reply to  Easyenough

You try to convince a giant he’s not playing so he doesn’t get injured, I’m sure you wouldn’t have great luck doing that.

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago

Your analysis assumes that injuries and their effects are caused by random sources and are randomly distributed across teams. Injuries and their effects are not completely random. I think any Dodgers executive who was being honest with himself would have told you 6 months ago they expected a higher-than-average injury rate in 2016 given the composition of the roster. There are/were many injury-prone players (Wood, Ryu, Maeda, Puig, etc.) and many players with concerning histories of injury (McCarthy, Anderson, Kazmir, Crawford, etc.) on the 2016 Dodgers and there are indications the front office was conscious of this aspect of their roster building. One factor in player evaluation is proneness to injury/history of injury. One factor in personnel management is the training staff’s injury prevention/recovery procedures. One factor in general management is taking these previous factors into proper account when crafting a roster. To my knowledge, none of these attributes change from regular season to postseason. I cannot think of any legitimate reason why a team front office’s skill in judging injury considerations as they develop a roster should not be taken to be a part of what makes the World Series winner the best team in baseball.

swingofthings
9 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

Injuries aren’t all random but that doesn’t mean all injuries aren’t random. Strasburg, for one, was always going to be a high injury risk. Or Salazar, or all the Mets’ previously injured starters. But Ramos? Or Carrasco getting hit by a liner? (He was an injury but that’s not why he ended up out.)

hebrewMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  swingofthings

it seems like you’re implying here that Ramos’ injury is surprising. Have you seen the guys history?

He didn’t play in only 78 games in 2013 and 88 games in 2014 because he was so healthy.

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  swingofthings

My point is that randomness factors into injuries at some rate between 1% and 99%. This article assumes randomness factors into injuries at a 100% rate.

output gap
9 years ago

Hell continues to freeze over during the Year of the Cubs.

scotman144Member since 2016
9 years ago

The 2001 Mariners couldn’t agree with your conclusion more 😉

showerdeer
9 years ago

Even though the World Series champ is not necessarily the best regular season team teams still build and strategize for the post season. If the world series champ was determined some other way teams would build and strategize differently

Johnston
9 years ago

The playoffs are pretty meaningless – just a crapshoot to see who can get hot and who can get lucky at the right time. The real champions are crowned during the regular season, over 162 games. The best team in baseball in 2016 is the Cubs. Period. End of story.

If the Cubs lose out to a lesser team in a short series – and remember that the worst team in baseball can beat the best team in baseball in a seven-game series some 25% of the time, and that of the eight teams that ever won 100 games or more in a regulars season and were clearly the best team in baseball that year, only five won the World Series – the Cubs are still the best baseball team of the 2016 season.

The playoffs are fun to watch, but they mean nothing and change nothing.

dl80Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

I pretty much agree with you. The playoffs are fun, but they have little to nothing to do with which team is the best.

rosen380
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

“and remember that the worst team in baseball can beat the best team in baseball in a seven-game series some 25% of the time”

I guess it depends on how good and bad those teams are 🙂

In 2003 the best and worst were the 101 win Yankees and 43 win Tigers; Log5 says the Tigers would have a 3.6% chance of taking a best-of-seven.

1996 11%
1997 24%
1998 3%
1999 18%
2000 32%
2001 5%
2002 9%
2003 4%
2004 6%
2005 13%
2006 24%
2007 37%
2008 17%
2009 13%
2010 18%
2011 11%
2012 14%
2013 11%
2014 28%
2015 22%

With some games left to play this year, the range would be 8-18%. The median since the strike, through 2015, is 13.5%.

…and that assumes that the best team didn’t get better at the trade deadline and the worst team got worse, so probably a bit lower.

noseeumMember since 2020
9 years ago

Regarding injuries, the same could be said for the regular season. Some teams suffer major injuries and struggle to make the playoffs, only to recover in time for the playoffs and clearly look like the best team as we head into the post season, despite perhaps not having the best record.

There’s issues with everything. Let’s watch some playoff baseball anyway!

I do think a regular season title should be more celebrated. Is there even a name for it?

phoenix2042Member since 2016
9 years ago

For me, the most exciting thing about the postseason is watching teams I never get to see on tv but keep reading about on here (because they’re good). I live in CT, so I can watch the Yankees, Red Sox, and Mets. Watching the Dodgers play the Nationals or the Cubs play the Giants (even year, guys) is a rare treat that I look forward to. For me, that is what the postseason is all about.

chrisjacoby
9 years ago

Very few sports crown the very best selection of talent as their annual world champion, that is the beauty of competition. On any given day, the underdog may come out on top. Our culture has celebrated underdogs since the epic battles between David and Goliath, Jack and the beanstalk giant, or Cinderella and her evil step mother. The unique joy in baseball is that it takes 162 games before you can punch your ticket to the playoffs. Its one of the penultimate marathon battles in sports. Society is always skeptical and dissatisfied with crowning a champion when a selection of the best teams is unable to compete with one another. Look to any competition when the outcome is dictated by a selection of judges such as boxing, college football durimg the BCS rating days, or any judged olympic sport.

I think the current format is near perfect. The drama is unbelievable and the team crowned world champion is more often than not very deserving.

Noah BaronMember since 2016
9 years ago

This Mets fan has no sympathy.

SteveM
9 years ago

The actual purpose of playing baseball games, or any games for that matter, is not to determine who is the best team. The purpose is to entertain people who pay to watch said games. Creating a tournament and giving it importance makes it more interesting and, in theory, more entertaining.

SteveM
9 years ago
Reply to  SteveM

Having said that, if the Mets somehow win the World Series, it will prove that there is, after all, hope and meaning to life. Cosmically, I mean.

bennythemet
9 years ago

Nothing to discuss, but your initial comments regarding the true focus of the story inspired me to emphasize a level of appreciation for an honest and properly focused form of journalism rarely seen by this particular reader.

Graves
9 years ago

The Postseason in a Nutshell

Win 11 games (12 if you are WC)

before you lose 9

*any record > or = 11 – 8 = World Series Champs

*note proper sequencing required

TommyLasordid
9 years ago

If your goal is to find the best team in baseball, eliminate the divisions, eliminate the leagues and have the 30 teams play each other an equal number of time, split evenly between home and away, for the longest period of time feasible — 8 months? Team with the best record is crowned king. Now wouldn’t that be boring?

Dr. DaveMember since 2016
9 years ago

As noted above, the purpose of the playoffs and World Series is to crown a champion. That being the case, it’s reasonable to wonder how different the postseason game could be from the regular-season version before the championship would feel unsatisfying. I think we’re all agreed that if the playoffs consisted of ping-pong matches between members of the various teams, we would not care nearly as much about who won.

In the playoffs, there are a lot of things that were valuable during the regular season that are no longer (as) valuable:
— inning-eating mediocre starting pitching
— better than average fourth and fifth starters
— durable players
— relievers who can spot start
— players who can fill in credibly at multiple positions
— backup catchers who don’t completely suck
— consistently above-average defense
— hitters who force pitchers to throw a lot of pitches
— etc.

Personally, I would be happier if the postseason could somehow reward being good at the same things that got you to the postseason. I don’t quite see how to get there, though.